1,007
Views
72
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Miscellany

Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates

&
Pages 341-357 | Published online: 02 Jun 2009

References

  • Ansolabehere , S. and Iyengar , S. 1995 . Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. , New York : Free Press. .
  • Ansolabehere , S. , Iyengar , S. , Simon , A. and Valentino , N. 1994 . Does attack advertising demobilize the electorate? . American Political Science Review , 87 : 829 – 838 .
  • Auer , J.J. 1962 . “ The counterfeit debates ” . In The great debates: Background, perspective, effects , Edited by: Kraus , S. 142 – 150 . Bloomington : Indiana University Press .
  • Benoit , P.J. 1997 . Telling the success story: Acclaiming and disclaiming discourse. , Albany : State University of New York Press. .
  • Benoit , W.L. 1995 . Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration discourse. , Albany : State University of New York Press. .
  • Benoit , W.L. 1999 . Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television spots, 1952–1996. , New York : Praeger. .
  • Benoit , W.L. , Blaney , J.R. and Pier , P.M. in press . Acclaiming, attacking, and defending: A functional analysis of nominating convention keynote speeches . Political Communication. ,
  • Benoit , W.L. , Blaney , J.R. and Pier , P.M. 1998 . Campaign ‘96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending discourse. , New York : Praeger. .
  • Benoit , W.L. , Pier , P.M. and Blaney , J.R. 1997 . A functional approach to televised political spots: Attacking, defending, acclaiming . Communication Quarterly , 45 : 1 – 20 .
  • Benoit , W.L. and Wells , W.T. 1996 . Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. , Tuscaloosa : University of Alabama Press. .
  • Benoit , W.L. , Wells , W.T. , Pier , P.M. and Blaney , J.R. 1999 . Acclaiming, attacking, and defending in nominating convention acceptance addresses . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 85 : 247 – 267 .
  • Bitzer , L. and Rueter , T. 1980 . Carter versus Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976. , Madison : University of Wisconsin Press. .
  • Carlin , D.P. 1989 . A Defense of the “debate” in presidential debates . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 25 : 208 – 213 .
  • Clines , F.X. 1996 . Experience has colored his lessons with regret . New York Times , June 3 : A12
  • Cohen , J. 1960 . A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales . Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20 : 37 – 46 .
  • Ellsworth , J.W. 1965 . Rationality and campaigning: A content analysis of the 1960 presidential campaign debates . Western Political Quarterly , 18 : 794 – 802 .
  • Finkel , S.E. and Geer , J.G. 1998 . A spot check: Casting doubt on the demobilizing effect of attack advertising . American Journal of Political Science , 42 : 573 – 595 .
  • Fiorina , M.P. 1981 . Retrospective voting in American national elections. , New Haven, CT : Yale University Press. .
  • Fleiss , J.L. 1981 . Statistical methods for ratios and proportions. , New York, NY : Wiley. .
  • Friedenberg , R.V. 1994 . “ Patterns and trends in national political debates: 1960–1992 ” . In Rhetorical studies of national political debates, 1960–1992 , Edited by: Friedenberg , R.F. 235 – 259 . Westport, CT : Praeger . 2/e.
  • Hellweg , S.A. , Pfau , M. and Brydon , S.R. 1992 . Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. , New York : Praeger. .
  • Hinck , E.A. 1993 . Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. , Westport, CT : Praeger. .
  • Jackson‐Beeck , M. and Meadow , R.G. 1979 . Content analysis of televised communication events: The presidential debates . Communication Research , 6 : 321 – 344 .
  • Jamieson , K.H. 1987 . “ Television, presidential campaigns, and debates ” . In Presidential debates 1988 and beyond , Edited by: Swerdlow , J.L. 27 – 33 . Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly Inc .
  • Jamieson , K.H. and Birdsell , D.S. 1988 . Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. , New York : Oxford University Press. .
  • Jamieson , K.H. and Campbell , K.K. 1982 . Rhetorical hybrids: Fusions of generic elements . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 68 : 146 – 157 .
  • Kraus , S. 1962 . The great debates: Kennedy vs. Nixon, 1960. , Bloomington, IN : Indiana University Press. .
  • Kraus , S. 1996 . Winners of the first 1960 televised debate between Kennedy and Nixon . Journal of Communication , 46 : 78 – 96 .
  • Lamoureaux , E.R. , Entrekin , H.S. and McKinney , M.S. 1994 . “ Debating the debates ” . In The 1992 presidential debates in focus , Edited by: Carlin , D.B. and McKinney , M.S. 55 – 67 . Westport, CT : Praeger .
  • Leff , M.C. and Mohrmann , G.P. 1974 . Lincoln at Cooper Union: A rhetorical analysis of the text . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 60 : 346 – 358 .
  • Meadow , R.G. and Jackson‐Beeck , M. 1978 . “ A comparative perspective on presidential debates: Issue evolution in 1960 and 1976 ” . In The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives , Edited by: Bishop , G.F. , Meadow , R.G. and Jackson‐Beeck , M. 33 – 58 . New York : Praeger .
  • Merritt , S. 1984 . Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings . Journal of Advertising , 13 : 27 – 38 .
  • Popkin , S.L. 1994 . The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. , Chicago : University of Chicago Press. .
  • Riley , P. and Hollihan , T.A. 1981 . The 1980 presidential debates: A content analysis of the issues and arguments . Speaker & Gavel , 18 : 47 – 59 .
  • Roper , E. 1960 . Polling post‐mortem . Saturday Review , November : 10 – 13 .
  • Rosenthal , P.I. 1966 . The concept of ethos and the structure of persuasion . Speech Monographs , 33 : 11 – 26 .
  • Samovar , L.A. 1962 . Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy‐Nixon television debates . Quarterly Journal of Speech , 48 : 277 – 279 .
  • Samovar , L.A. 1965 . Ambiguity and unequivocation in the Kennedy‐Nixon debates: A rhetorical analysis . Western Speech , 29 : 211 – 218 .
  • Stewart , C.J. 1975 . Voter perception of mud‐slinging in political communication . Central States Speech Journal , 26 : 279 – 286 .
  • Stuckey , M.E. and Antczak , F.J. 1995 . “ The battle of issues and images: Establishing interpretive dominance ” . In Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problems , Edited by: Kendall , K.E. 117 – 134 . Albany : State University of New York Press .
  • Swerdlow , J.L. 1984 . Beyond debate: A paper on televised presidential debates. , New York : Twentieth Century Fund. .
  • Swerdlow , J.L. 1987 . “ The strange‐and sometimes surprising‐history of presidential debates in America ” . In Presidential debates 1988 and beyond , Edited by: Swerdlow , J.L. 3 – 16 . Washington, DC : Congressional Quarterly Inc .
  • Vancil , D.L. and Pendell , S.D. 1987 . The myth of viewer‐listener disagreement in the first Kennedy‐Nixon debate . Central States Speech Journal , 38 : 16 – 27 .
  • Weiler , M. 1989 . The 1988 electoral debates and debate theory . Journal of the American Forensic Association , 25 : 214 – 219 .
  • Weisberg , H.F. and Kimball , D.C. 1993 . The 1992 presidential election: Party identification and beyond . Paper presented at the American Political Science Association . 1993 , Washington, DC.
  • Levine , M.A. 1995 . Presidential campaigns and elections: Issues and images in the media age. , Itasea, IL : Peacock Publishers .
  • Windt , T. 1994 . “ The 1960 Kennedy‐Nixon presidential debates ” . In Rhetorical studies of national political debates, 1960–1992 , Edited by: Friedenberg , R.F. 1 – 27 . Westport, CT : Praeger . 2/e.
  • Zakahi , W.R. and Hacker , K.L. 1995 . “ Televised presidential debates and candidate images ” . In Candidate images in presidential elections , Edited by: Hacker , K.L. 99 – 122 . Westport, CT : Praeger .
  • Zarefsky , D. 1992 . Spectator politics and the revival of public argument . Communication Monographs , 59 : 411 – 414 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.