Lubricant sensitivity in function of paddle movement in the forced feeder of a high-speed tablet press

References

• Bolhuis GK, Lerk CF, Zijlstra HT, de Boer AH. Film formation by magnesium stearate during mixing and its effect on tabletting. Pharm Weekbl 1975;110:517–60.
   Google Scholar
• Doelker E. Comparative compaction properties of various microcrystalline cellulose types and generic products. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1993;19:2399–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doelker E, Massuell D, Vueillez F, Humbert-Droz P. Morphological, packing, flow and tableting properties of new avicel types. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1995;21:643–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz PJ, Parrott EL. Effect of lubricants on tensile strengths of tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1984;10:259–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakio S, Vajna B, Farkas I, et al. Challenges in detecting magnesium stearate distribution in tablets. AAPS PharmSciTech 2013;14:435–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuurman K, van der Voort Maarschalk K, Bolhuis GK. Effect of magnesium stearate on bonding and porosity expansion of tablets produced from materials with different consolidation properties. Int J Pharm 1999;179:107–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haware RV, Bauer-Brandl A, Tho I. Comparative evaluation of the powder and compression properties of various grades and brands of microcrystalline cellulose by multivariate methods. Pharm Dev Technol 2010;15:394–404.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz PJ, Parrott EL. Effect of lubricants on axial and radial work of failure. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1982;8:445–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Watt JG. The effect of the particle size of microcrystalline cellulose on tablet properties in mixtures with magnesium stearate. Int J Pharm 1987;36:51–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner J, Moore F. Scale-up model describing the impact of lubrication on tablet tensile strength. Int J Pharm 2010;399:19–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushner J. Incorporating Turbula mixers into a blending scale-up model for evaluating the effect of magnesium stearate on tablet tensile strength and bulk specific volume. Int J Pharm 2012;429:1–11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingali K, Mendez R, Lewis D, et al. Mixing order of glidant and lubricant-influence on powder and tablet properties. Int J Pharm 2011;409:269–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Watt JG, de Villiers MM. The effect of V-mixer scale-up on the mixing of magnesium stearate with direct compression microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm Biopharm 1997;43:91–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendez R, Muzzio F, Velazquez C. Study of the effects of feed frames on powder blend properties during the filling of tablet press dies. Powder Technol 2010;200:105–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narang AS, Rao VM, Guo H, et al. Effect of force feeder on tablet strength during compression. Int J Pharm 2010;401:7–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pingali K, Mendez R, Lewis D, et al. Evaluation of strain-induced hydrophobicity of pharmaceutical blends and its effect on drug release rate under multiple compression conditions. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2011;37:428–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Wen H, Desai D. Lubrication in tablet formulations. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2010;75:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem Eng 1965;72:163–8.
   Google Scholar
• Sinka IC, Motazedian F, Cocks ACF, Pitt KG. The effect of processing parameters on pharmaceutical tablet properties. Powder Technol 2009;189:276–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akande OF, Ford JL, Rowe PH, Rubinstein MH. The effects of lag-time and dwell-time on the comaction properties of 1:1 paracetamol/microcrystalline cellulose tablets prepared by pre-compression and main compression. J Pharm Pharmacol 1998;50:19–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogda MJ. Tablet compression: machine theory, design, and process troubleshooting. In: Swarbrick J, ed. Encyclopedia of pharmaceutical technology. New York: Informa Healthcare USA Inc.; 2007:3611–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ruegger CE, Celik M. The influence of varying precompaction and main compaction profile parameters on the mechanical strength of compacts. Pharm Dev Technol 2000;5:495–505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Evelghem J. Improving tablet quality with compression to equal force technology. Pharm Technol: Tableting and Granulation 2008;32:26–9.
   Google Scholar
• Vogeleer J. Rotary tablet press. Eur Pharm Manuf 2008;1:18
   Google Scholar
• Sun CC, Grant DJW. Influence of crystal structure on the tableting properties of sulfamerazine polymorphs. Pharm Res 2001;18:274–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joiris E, Di Martino P, Berneron C, et al. Compression behavior of orthorhombic paracetamol. Pharm Res 1998;15:1122–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tye CK, Sun C, Amidon GE. Evaluation of the effects of tableting speed on the relationships between compaction pressure, tablet tensile strength, and tablet solid fraction. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:465–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor SL, Hoag SW, Augsburger LL. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of extrusion-spheronized beads and multiparticulate systems. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2009;35:683–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegger CE, Celik M. The effect of compression and decompression speed on the mechanical strength of compacts. Pharm Dev Technol 2000;5:485–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters E, De Beer T, Vervaet C, Remon JP. Reduction of tablet weight variability by optimizing paddle speed in the forced feeder of a high-speed rotary tablet press. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2015;41:530–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. Determination of tablet strength by the diametral-compression test. J Pharm Sci 1970;59:688–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porion P, Sommier N, Faugere A, Evesqu P. Dynamics of size segregation and mixing of granular materials in a 3D-blender by NMR imaging investigation. Powder Technol 2004;141:55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommier N, Porion P, Evesque P, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging investigation of the mixing-segregation process in a pharmaceutical blender. Int J Pharm 2001;222:243–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twitchell A. Mixing. In: Aulton ME, ed. Pharmaceutics: the science of dosage form design. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:181–96.
   Google Scholar
• Cavinato M, Artoni R, Bresciani M, et al. Scale-up effects on flow patterns in the high shear mixing of cohesive powders. Chem Eng Sci 2013;102:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds GK, Le PK, Nilpawar AM. High shear granulation. In: Salman AD, Hounslow MJ, Sevile JPK, eds. Granulation. Oxford: Elsevier; 2007:3–19.
   Google Scholar
• Crouter A, Briens L. The effect of moisture on the flowability of pharmaceutical excipients. AAPS PharmSciTech 2014;15:65–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun CC. Mechanism of moisture induced variations in true density and compaction properties of microcrystalline cellulose. Int J Pharm 2008;346:93–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun CC. True density of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci 2005;94:2132–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iijima H, Takeo K. Microcrystalline cellulose: an overview. In: Phillips GO, Williams PA, eds. Handbook of hydrocolloids. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Ltd.; 2000:331–46.
   Google Scholar
• Abdullah EC, Geldart D. The use of bulk density measurements as flowability indicators. Powder Technol 1999;102:151–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podczeck F, Miah Y. The influence of particle size and shape on the angle of internal friction and the flow factor of unlubricated and lubricated powders. Int J Pharm 1996;144:187–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velasco MV, Munoz-Ruiz A, Monedero MC, Jimenez-Castellanos MR. Study of flowability of powders. Effect of the addition of lubricants. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1995;21:2385–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Q, Rudolph C, Weigl B, Earl A. Interparticle van der Waals force in powder flowability and compactibility. Int J Pharm 2004;280:77–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie X, Puri VM. Uniformity of powder die filling using a feed shoe: a review. Part Sci Technol 2006;24:411–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaginuma Y, Ozeki Y, Kakizawa M, et al. Effects of powder flowability on die-fill properties in rotary compression. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol 2007;17:205–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang RC, Parrott EL. Effect of lubricant on wear rate of tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1993;19:1379–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebba F, Piccerelle P, Prinderre P, et al. Stress relaxation studies of granules as a function of different lubricants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2001;52:211–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurster DE, Likitlersuang S, Chen Y. The influence of magnesium stearate on the Hiestand tableting indices and other related mechanical properties of maltodextrines. Pharm Dev Technol 2005;10:461–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Veen B, Bolhuis GK, Xu YS, et al. Compaction mechanism and tablet strength of unlubricated and lubricated (silicified) microcrystalline cellulose. Eur J Pharm Biopharm 2005;59:133–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel S, Kaushal AM, Bansal AK. Lubrication potential of magnesium stearate studied on instrumented rotary tablet press. AAPS PharmSciTech 2007;8:E1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kikuta J, Kitamori N. Effect of mixing time on the lubricating properties of magnesium stearate and the final charactersitics of the compressed tablets. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1994;20:343–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethola VM, Heinamaki JT, Nikupaavo P, Yliruusi JK. Effect of some excipients and compression pressure on the adhesion of aqueous-based hydroxypropyl methylcellulose film coatings to tablet sufraces. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1995;21:1365–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheskey PJ, Robb RT, Moore RD, Boyce BM. Effect of lubricant level, method of mixing, and duration of mixing on a controlled-release matrix tablet containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 1995;21:2151–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn T, Steffens KJ. Press chamber coating as external lubrication for high speed rotary presses: lubricant spray rate optimization. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 2005;31:951–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka M, Sato M, Matsuda M. Comparative evaluation of tableting compression behaviors by methods of internal and external lubricant addition: inhibition of enzymic activity of trypsin reparation by using external lubricant addition during the tableting compression process. AAPS PharmSci 2001;3:1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamamura T, Ohta T, Taira T, et al. Effects of automated external lubrication on tablet properties and the stability of eprazinone hydrochloride. Int J Pharm 2009;370:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar