Characterization of new functionalized calcium carbonate-polycaprolactone composite material for application in geometry-constrained drug release formulation development

References

• Taylor R, Raffa RB, Pergolizzi JV. Controlled release formulation of oxycodone in patients with moderate to severe chronic osteoarthritis: a critical review of the literature. J Pain Res. 2012;5:77–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nokhodchi A, Raja S, Patel P, et al. The role of oral controlled release matrix tablets in drug delivery systems. Bioimpacts. 2012;2:175–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Qazi F, Shoaib MH, Yousuf RI, et al. Formulation development and evaluation of Diltiazem HCl sustained release matrix tablets using HPMC K4M and K100M. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2013;26:653–663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarode A, Wang P, Cote C, et al. Low-Viscosity Hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC) Grades SL and SSL: versatile pharmaceutical polymers for dissolution enhancement, controlled release, and pharmaceutical processing. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2012;14:151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swanson JM. Long-acting stimulants: development and dosing. Can Child Adolesc Psychiatr Rev. 2005;14:4–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Conley R, Gupta SK, Sathyan G. Clinical spectrum of the osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS), an advanced oral delivery form. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006;22:1879–1892.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conte U, Maggi L. Modulation of the dissolution profiles from Geomatrix® multi-layer matrix tablets containing drugs of different solubility. Biomaterials. 1996;17:889–896.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathbone MJ, Hadgraft J, Roberts MS. Modified-release drug delivery technology. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2002; p. 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Kim C. Compressed donut-shaped tablets with zero-order release kinetics. Pharm Res. 1995;12:1045–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozeki Y, Watanabe Y, Inoue S, et al. Comparison of the compression characteristics between new one-step dry-coated tablets (OSDRC) and dry-coated tablets (DC). Int J Pharm. 2003;259:69–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casas M, Strusi OL, Jiménez-Castellanos MR, et al. Tapioca starch graft copolymers and Dome Matrix® modules assembling technology. I. Effect of module shape on drug release. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2010;75:42–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuenberger H, Rohera BD. Fundamentals of powder compression. I. The compactibility and compressibility of pharmaceutical powders. Pharm Res. 1986;3:12–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzzio FJ. Engineering approaches for pharmaceutical process scale-up, validation, optimization, and control in the PAT era. In: Levin M, editor. Pharm. Process Scale-up. 3rd ed. New York (NY), London (UK): Informa Healthcare; 2011; p. 58–69.
   Google Scholar
• Krajacic A, Tucker IG. Matrix formation in sustained release tablets: possible mechanism of dose dumping. Int J Pharm. 2003;251:67–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle VA, Schoelkopf J, Gane PAC, et al. Floating gastroretentive drug delivery systems: Comparison of experimental and simulated dissolution profiles and floatation behavior. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2014;58:34–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirnimann T, Atria S, Schoelkopf J, et al. Compaction of functionalized calcium carbonate, a porous and crystalline microparticulate material with a lamellar surface. Int J Pharm. 2014;466:266–275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirnimann T, Maiuta ND, Gerard DE, et al. Functionalized calcium carbonate as a novel pharmaceutical excipient for the preparation of orally dispersible tablets. Pharm Res. 2013;30:1915–1925.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Controlled release device with an impermeable coating having an orifice for release of drug [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.google.com/patents/US5004614
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME, editors. Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients. 6th ed. London (UK), Grayslake (IL), Washington (DC): Pharmaceutical Press and American Pharmacists Association; 2009; p. 86–89, 99?101.
   Google Scholar
• Bose S, Mahanwar PA. Effect of particle size of filler on properties of nylon-6. J Miner Mater Charact Eng. 2004;03:23.
   Google Scholar
• Lou J, Harinath V. Effects of mineral fillers on polystyrene melt processing. J Mater Process Technol. 2004;152:185–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Järvelä PA, Järvelä PK. Multicomponent compounding of polypropylene. J Mater Sci. 1996;31:3853–3860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Melkebeke B, Vervaet C, Remon JP. Validation of a continuous granulation process using a twin-screw extruder. Int J Pharm. 2008;356:224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervaet C, Remon JP. Continuous granulation in the pharmaceutical industry. Chem Eng Sci. 2005;60:3949–3957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Shalom D, Bukh N, Larsen TK. Egalet®, a novel controlled-release system. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1991;618:578–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin S-Y, Kawashima Y. Current status and approaches to developing press-coated chronodelivery drug systems. J Control Release. 2012;157:331–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckel R. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans Metall Soc AIME. 1961;221:671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Ilkka J, Paronen P. Prediction of the compression behaviour of powder mixtures by the Heckel equation. Int J Pharm. 1993;94:181–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuentz M, Leuenberger H. Pressure susceptibility of polymer tablets as a critical property: A modified heckel equation. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillip WA, Rzayev J, Hillmyer MA, et al. Gas and water liquid transport through nanoporous block copolymer membranes. J Memb Sci. 2006;286:144–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charalambides MN, Goh SM, Lim SL, et al. The analysis of the frictional effect on stress - strain data from uniaxial compression of cheese. J Mater Sci. 2001;36:2313–2321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER). Guidance for Industry, Dissolution Testing of Immediate Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt KG, Heasley MG. Determination of the tensile strength of elongated tablets. Powder Technol. 2013;238:169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain S. Mechanical properties of powders for compaction and tableting: an overview. Pharm Sci Technol Today. 1999;2:20–31.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen B, Sun K. Poly (ɛ-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite composites: effects of particle size, molecular weight distribution and irradiation on interfacial interaction and properties. Polym Test. 2005;24:64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soenen B, De AK, Vandeputte S, et al. Competition between grain boundary segregation and Cottrell atmosphere formation during static strain aging in ultra low carbon bake hardening steels. Acta Mater. 2004;52:3483–3492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shabat S, Abuganima E, Raziel A, et al. Biodegradable polycaprolactone–polyanhydrides blends. J Polym Sci Part Polym Chem. 2003;41:3781–3787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalium Hausmann® – compendium.ch [Internet]. [cited 2016 Nov 22]. Available from: http://compendium.ch/mpro/mnr/1688/html/de#7250
   Google Scholar
• Eberle VA, Donzelli M, Alles R, et al. Vivo evaluation of a gastroretentive drug delivery system based on enteric-coated floating tablets. Clin Res. 2015;1.
   Google Scholar