Hydroxyapatite as a biomaterial – a gift that keeps on giving

References

• Uskoković V. The role of hydroxyl channel in defining selected physicochemical peculiarities exhibited by hydroxyapatite. RSC Adv. 2015;5(46):36614–36633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Uskoković DP. Nanosized hydroxyapatite and other calcium phosphates: chemistry of formation and application as drug and gene delivery agents. J Biomed Mater Res. 2011;96B(1):152–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto T, Kojima T, Iijima T, et al. Resorption of synthetic porous hydroxyapatite and replacement by newly formed bone. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6(5):444–447.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Valencia G, et al. Histologic evaluation of a hydroxyapatite onlay bone graft retrieved after 9 years: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87(5):481–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V. When 1 + 1>2: nanostructured composites for hard tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;57:434–451.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi B, Sefidbakht Y, Rezaei M. Hydroxyapatite for biomedicine and drug delivery. In: Rahmandoust M, Ayatollahi MR, editors. Nanomaterials for advanced biological applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p 85–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ohta K, Tada M, Ninomiya Y, et al. Application of interconnected porous hydroxyapatite ceramic block for onlay block bone grafting in implant treatment: a case report. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(6):5564–5568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Desai TA. Phase composition control of calcium phosphate nanoparticles for tunable drug delivery kinetics and treatment of osteomyelitis. I. Preparation and drug release. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2013;101(5):1416–1426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lelli M, Roveri N, Marzano C, et al. Hydroxyapatite nanocrystals as a smart, pH sensitive, delivery system for kiteplatin. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(33):13187–13195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V. Ion-doped hydroxyapatite: an impasse or the road to follow? Ceram Int. 2020;46(8):11443–11465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng S, Zhou R, Zheng X, et al. Mono-dispersed Ba2+-doped Nano-hydroxyapatite conjugated with near-infrared Cu-doped CdS quantum dots for CT/fluorescence bimodal targeting cell imaging. Microchem J. 2017;134:41–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Mei L, Liu H, et al. Growth mechanism of surfactant-free size-controlled luminescent hydroxyapatite nanocrystallites. Crystal Growth Design. 2017;17(5):2809–2815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian D, Sun J, Zhang L, et al. Selective turn-on detection of low levels of cysteine and homocysteine based on fluorescent hydroxyapatite nanoparticles. Anal Methods. 2018;10(38):4644–4647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado TR, Sczancoski JC, Beltrán-Mir H, et al. Structural properties and self-activated photoluminescence emissions in hydroxyapatite with distinct particle shapes. Ceram Int. 2018;44(1):236–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović NL, Mančić L, Vuković M, et al. Rare-earth (Gd3+,Yb3+/Tm3+, Eu3+) co-doped hydroxyapatite as magnetic, up-conversion and down-conversion materials for multimodal imaging. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):16305
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhao X, Ng S, Heng BC, et al. Cytotoxicity of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles is shape and cell dependent. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87(6):1037–1052.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Zhao M, Lu J, et al. Cell responses to two kinds of nanohydroxyapatite with different sizes and crystallinities. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:1239–1250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan Y, Liu C, Qian J, et al. Size-mediated cytotoxicity and apoptosis of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Biomaterials. 2010;31(4):730–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović N, Ajduković Z, Savić V, et al. Nanoparticles of cobalt-substituted hydroxyapatite in regeneration of mandibular osteoporotic bones. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013;24(2):343–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović N, Uskoković V, Ajduković Z, et al. Multifunctional hydroxyapatite and poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) nanoparticles for the local delivery of cholecalciferol . Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33(2):943–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molino G, Palmieri MC, Montalbano G, et al. Biomimetic and mesoporous nano-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue application: a short review. Biomed Mater. 2020;15(2):022001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe B, Hardy JG, Walsh LJ. Optimizing nanohydroxyapatite nanocomposites for bone tissue engineering. ACS Omega. 2020;5(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levingstone TJ, Herbaj S, Dunne NJ. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles for therapeutic applications in bone regeneration. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(11):1570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Singh RP, Jolly SS. Customized hydroxyapatites for bone-tissue engineering and drug delivery applications: a review. J Sol-Gel Sci Technol. 2020;94(3):505–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levingstone TJ, Herbaj S, Redmond J, et al. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles-based systems for RNAi delivery: applications in bone tissue regeneration. Nanomaterials. 2020;10(1):146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albulescu R, Popa A-C, Enciu A-M, et al. Comprehensive in vitro testing of calcium phosphate-based bioceramics with orthopedic and dentistry applications. Materials. 2019;12(22):3704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcos D, Vallet-Regí M. Substituted hydroxyapatite coatings of bone implants. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(9):1781–1800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y, Cockerill I, Zheng Y, et al. Biofunctionalization of metallic implants by calcium phosphate coatings. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:196–206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyadarshini B, Rama M, Vijayalakshmi C, et al. Bioactive coating as a surface modification technique for biocompatible metallic implants: a review. J Asian Ceram Soc. 2019;7(4):397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi G, Choi AH, Evans LA, et al. A review: recent advances in sol-gel-derived hydroxyapatite nanocoatings for clinical applications. J Amer Ceram Soc. 2020;0:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Li T-T, Ling L, Lin M-C, et al. Recent advances in multifunctional hydroxyapatite coating by electrochemical deposition. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(15):6352–6374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ain Q, Zeeshan M, Khan S, et al. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite as potential polymeric nanocarrier for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107(12):2595–2600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajor K, Pajchel L, Kolmas J. Hydroxyapatite and fluorapatite in conservative dentistry and oral implantology—a review. Materials. 2019;12(17):2683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal S, Dubey A, Lahiri D. In Vitro biodegradation and biocompatibility of Mg–HA-based composites for orthopaedic applications: a review. J Indian Inst Sci. 2019;99(3):303–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorozhkin SV. Functionalized calcium orthophosphates (CaPO4) and their biomedical applications. J Mater Chem B. 2019;7(47):7471–7489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei G, Gong C, Hu K, et al. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite on graphene supports for biomedical applications: a review. Nanomaterials. 2019;9(10):1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y-J, Lu B-Q. Deformable biomaterials based on ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(10):4951–4961.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Kargozar S, Baino F, et al. Additive manufacturing methods for producing hydroxyapatite and hydroxyapatite-based composite scaffolds: a review. Front Mater. 2019;6(313)
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Pal U. 3D hydroxyapatite scaffold for bone regeneration and local drug delivery applications. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2019;53:101131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoi T. The development of novel calcium phosphate–polymer composite biomaterials with macro- to nano-level controlled hierarchical structures. J Ceram Soc Japan. 2019;127(10):715–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christy PN, Basha SK, Kumari VS, et al. Biopolymeric nanocomposite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications–A review. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2020;55:101452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonoyama T. Robust hydrogel–bioceramics composite and its osteoconductive properties. Polym J. 2020;86:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Xu X, Chen X, Li J. Natural protein bioinspired materials for regeneration of hard tissues. J Mater Chem B. 2020;8(11):2199–2215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasheed T, Nabeel F, Raza A, et al. Biomimetic nanostructures/cues as drug delivery systems: a review. Mater Today Chem. 2019;13:147–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahirwar H, Zhou Y, Mahapatra C, et al. Materials for orthopedic bioimplants: modulating degradation and surface modification using integrated nanomaterials. Coatings. 2020;10(3):264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šupová M. The significance and utilisation of biomimetic and bioinspired strategies in the field of biomedical material engineering: the case of calcium phosphat—protein template constructs. Materials. 2020;13(2):327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velu R, Calais T, Jayakumar A, et al. A comprehensive review on bio-nanomaterials for medical implants and feasibility studies on fabrication of such implants by additive manufacturing technique. Materials. 2019;13(1):92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beheshtizadeh N, Lotfibakhshaiesh N, Pazhouhnia Z, et al. A review of 3D bio-printing for bone and skin tissue engineering: a commercial approach. J Mater Sci. 2020;55(9):3729–3749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar MJ, Zhu D, Zhang Z. 3D printing of bioceramics for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2019;12(20):3361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masaeli R, Zandsalimi K, Rasoulianboroujeni M, et al. Challenges in three-dimensional printing of bone substitutes. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2019;25(5):387–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S-Y, Hu H-Z, Qing X-C, et al. Recent advances of drug delivery nanocarriers in osteosarcoma treatment. J Cancer. 2020;11(1):69–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Souza M, Macdonald NA, Gendreau JL, et al. Graft materials and biologics for spinal interbody fusion. Biomedicines. 2019;7(4):75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manatunga DC, Godakanda VU, de Silva RM, et al. Recent developments in the use of organic-inorganic nanohybrids for drug delivery. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2020;12(3):e1605.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz-Herrera JA, Reina-Romo E. Continuum modeling and simulation in bone tissue engineering. Appl Sci. 2019;9(18):3674.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly DC, Raftery RM, Curtin CM, et al. Scaffold-based delivery of nucleic acid therapeutics for enhanced bone and cartilage repair. J Orthop Res. 2019;37(8):1671–1680.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNOS. Data.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Thantrakul C, Kan S, et al. Feasibility of using high-contrast grating as a point-of-care sensor for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants. IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2020;8:1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandez de Grado G, Keller L, Idoux-Gillet Y, et al. Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management. J Tissue Eng. 2018;9:2041731418776819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler T, Sass FA, Duda GN, et al. A review of biomaterials in bone defect healing, remaining shortcomings and future opportunities for bone tissue engineering: the unsolved challenge. Bone Joint Res. 2018;7(3):232–243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattuso J-P, Frankignoulle M, Bourge I, et al. Effect of calcium carbonate saturation of seawater on coral calcification. Global Planet Change. 1998;18(1–2):37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozin GA. Nanochemistry: synthesis in diminishing dimensions. Adv Mater. 1992;4(10):612–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorozhkin SV. Nanodimensional and nanocrystalline apatites and other calcium orthophosphates in biomedical engineering, biology and medicine. Materials. 2009;2(4):1975–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorozhkin SV. A detailed history of calcium orthophosphates from 1770s till 1950. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2013;33(6):3085–3110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu V, Uskoković V. Waiting for Aπαταω: 250 years later. Found Sci. 2019;24(4):617–640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kattimani VS, Kondaka S, Lingamaneni KP. Hydroxyapatite–past, present, and future in bone regeneration. Bone Tissue Regen Insights. 2016;7:BTRI.S36138.
   Google Scholar
• Sultan M. Hydroxyapatite/polyurethane composites as promising biomaterials. Chem Pap. 2018;72(10):2375–2395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piskin E. Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 1995;6(9):775–795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji Y, Ghosh K, Shu XZ, et al. Electrospun three-dimensional hyaluronic acid nanofibrous scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2006;27(20):3782–3792.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farokhi M, Mottaghitalab F, Samani S, et al. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Biotechnol Adv. 2018;36(1):68–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park J-Y, Yang C, Jung I-H, et al. Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using cells-implanted nano-hydroxyapatite coated silk scaffolds. Biomater Res. 2015;19(1):7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu P, Bao R-Y, Shi X-J, et al. Self-assembled high-strength hydroxyapatite/graphene oxide/chitosan composite hydrogel for bone tissue engineering. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;155:507–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma C, Dinda AK, Potdar PD, et al. Fabrication and characterization of novel nano-biocomposite scaffold of chitosan-gelatin-alginate-hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;64:416–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari F, Bahrololoom ME, Vashaee D, et al. In situ preparation of iron oxide nanoparticles in natural hydroxyapatite/chitosan matrix for bone tissue engineering application. Ceram Int. 2015;41(2):3094–3100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulanthaivel S, Roy B, Agarwal T, et al. Cobalt doped proangiogenic hydroxyapatite for bone tissue engineering application. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;58:648–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng S, Feng P, Wu P, et al. Graphene oxide as an interface phase between polyetheretherketone and hydroxyapatite for tissue engineering scaffolds. Sci Rep. 2017;7:46604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim MH, Kim BS, Lee J, et al. Silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite composite hydrogel induced by gamma-ray irradiation for bone tissue engineering. Biomater Res. 2017;21(1):12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin L, Hao R, Xiong W, et al. Quantitative analyses of the effect of silk fibroin/nano-hydroxyapatite composites on osteogenic differentiation of MG-63 human osteosarcoma cells. J Biosci Bioeng. 2015;119(5):591–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed MK, Mansour SF, Al-Wafi R, et al. Tuning the mechanical, microstructural, and cell adhesion properties of electrospun ε-polycaprolactone microfibers by doping selenium-containing carbonated hydroxyapatite as a reinforcing agent with magnesium ions. J Mater Sci. 2019;54(23):14524–14544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie W, Peng C, Zhou X, et al. Three-dimensional porous scaffold by self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide and nano-hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering. Carbon. 2017;116:325–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey DJ, Ercan B, Sun L, et al. Adding MgO nanoparticles to hydroxyapatite-PLLA nanocomposites for improved bone tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomater. 2015;14:175–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid J, Schwarz S, Fischer M, et al. A laser-cutting-based manufacturing process for the generation of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering using Polycaprolactone/Hydroxyapatite composite polymer. J Tissue Eng. 2019;10:2041731419859157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akindoyo JO, Beg MDH, Ghazali S, et al. Impact modified PLA-hydroxyapatite composites—Thermo-mechanical properties. Compos Pt A Appl Sci Manuf. 2018;107:326–333.
   Google Scholar
• Lee WD, Gawri R, Pilliar RM, et al. Sol gel-derived hydroxyapatite films over porous calcium polyphosphate substrates for improved tissue engineering of osteochondral-like constructs. Acta Biomater. 2017;62:352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Kim J, Bae M, et al. Development of poly(ɛ-caprolactone) scaffold loaded with simvastatin and beta-cyclodextrin modified hydroxyapatite inclusion complex for bone tissue engineering. Polymers. 2016;8(2):49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan E, López-Noriega A, Thompson E, et al. Development of collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds incorporating PLGA and alginate microparticles for the controlled delivery of rhBMP-2 for bone tissue engineering. J Control Release. 2015;198:71–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei Y, Xu Z, Ke Q, et al. Strontium hydroxyapatite/chitosan nanohybrid scaffolds with enhanced osteoinductivity for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;72:134–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barneo-Caragol C, Martínez-Morillo E, Rodríguez-González S, et al. Strontium and its role in preeclampsia. J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2018;47:37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strontium ranelate discontinued. Drug Ther Bull. 2017. 55(8):93–94.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid S, Calderon-Larrañaga S, Hawley S, et al. Comparative anti-fracture effectiveness of different oral anti-osteoporosis therapies based on "real-world" data: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched cohort findings from the UK Clinical Practice Research Database and the Catalan SIDIAP Database. Clin Epidemiol. 2018;10:1417–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessens FCM, De Maeyer EAP, Fernández E, et al. Amorphous calcium phosphate cements and their transformation into calcium deficient hydroxyapatite. Bioceramics. 1996;9:231–234.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh S, Wu V, Pernal S, et al. Self-setting calcium phosphate cements with tunable antibiotic release rates for advanced antimicrobial applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(12):7691–7708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow LC, Eanes ED. Octacalcium phosphate. Basel (Switzerland): Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rau JV, Fadeeva IV, Fomin AS, et al. Sic parvis magna: manganese-substituted tricalcium phosphate and its biophysical properties. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2019;5(12):6632–6644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Graziani V, Wu VM, et al. Gold is for the mistress, silver for the maid: enhanced mechanical properties, osteoinduction and antibacterial activity due to iron doping of tricalcium phosphate bone cements. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2019;94:798–810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rau JV, Wu VM, Graziani V, et al. The bone building blues: self-hardening copper-doped calcium phosphate cement and its in vitro assessment against mammalian cells and bacteria. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;79:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorozhkin SV. Calcium orthophosphate cements and concretes. Materials. 2009;2(1):221–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Ghosh S, Wu VM. Antimicrobial hydroxyapatite-gelatin-silica composite pastes with tunable setting properties. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5(30):6065–6080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatta SP, Okeke IU, Jayasuriya AC. Injectable porous nano-hydroxyapatite/chitosan/tripolyphosphate scaffolds with improved compressive strength for bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C. 2016;69:505–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox SC, Thornby JA, Gibbons GJ, et al. 3D printing of porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds intended for use in bone tissue engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2015;47:237–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinlapabodin S, Amornsudthiwat P, Damrongsakkul S, et al. An axial distribution of seeding, proliferation, and osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 cells and rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells across a 3D Thai silk fibroin/gelatin/hydroxyapatite scaffold in a perfusion bioreactor. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;58:960–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qi XN, Mou ZL, Zhang J, et al. Preparation of chitosan/silk fibroin/hydroxyapatite porous scaffold and its characteristics in comparison to bi-component scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2014;102(2):366–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W, Both SK, Zuo Y, et al. Biological evaluation of porous aliphatic polyurethane/hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2015;103(7):2251–2259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed MK, Mansour SF, Al-Wafi R, et al. Gold as a dopant in selenium-containing carbonated hydroxyapatite fillers of nanofibrous ε-polycaprolactone scaffolds for tissue engineering. Int J Pharm. 2020;577:118950.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ong JL, Chan DC. Hydroxyapatite and their use as coatings in dental implants: a review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;28(5-6): 667–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szcześ A, Hołysz L, Chibowski E. Synthesis of hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;249:321–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider A, Haider S, Han SS, et al. Recent advances in the synthesis, functionalization and biomedical applications of hydroxyapatite: a review. RSC Adv. 2017;7(13):7442–7458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alagarsamy K, Vishwakarma V, Kaliaraj GS, et al. Implant application of bioactive nano-hydroxyapatite powders—a comparative study. Mater Res Express. 2018;5(1):015405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senthil R, Vedakumari SW, Sastry TP. Hydroxyapatite and demineralized bone matrix from marine food waste–a possible bone implant. AJMSP. 2018;3(1):1.
   Google Scholar
• Mazaheri M, Haghighatzadeh M, Zahedi A, et al. Effect of a novel sintering process on mechanical properties of hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Alloys Compd. 2009;471(1-2):180–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaria L, Tharakan SJ, Altermatt S. Hydroxyapatite ceramic implants for cranioplasty in children: a single-center experience. Childs Nerv Syst. 2017;33(2):343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim H-P, Park S-W, Yun K-D, et al. Hydroxyapatite Coating on TiO2 Nanotube by Sol–Gel Method for Implant Applications. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2018;18(2):1403–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar RM, Kuntal KK, Singh S, et al. Electrophoretic deposition of hydroxyapatite coating on Mg–3Zn alloy for orthopaedic application. Surf Coat Technol. 2016;287:82–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu G, Harja M. Cerium-doped hydroxyapatite/collagen coatings on titanium for bone implants. Ceram Int. 2019;45(2):2852–2857.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Xu Z, Zhang X, et al. Nanotube-formed Ti substrates coated with silicate/silver co-doped hydroxyapatite as prospective materials for bone implants. J Alloys Compd. 2017;697:182–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Z-S, Zhou W-S, He X-W, et al. A comparative study of zinc, magnesium, strontium-incorporated hydroxyapatite-coated titanium implants for osseointegration of osteopenic rats. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;62:226–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijesinghe W, Mantilaka M, Senarathna KC, et al. Preparation of bone-implants by coating hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on self-formed titanium dioxide thin-layers on titanium metal surfaces. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;63:172–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Yang W, Li X, et al. Improving osteointegration and osteogenesis of three-dimensional porous Ti6Al4V scaffolds by polydopamine-assisted biomimetic hydroxyapatite coating. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(10):5715–5724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gryshkov O, Klyui NI, Temchenko VP, et al. Porous biomorphic silicon carbide ceramics coated with hydroxyapatite as prospective materials for bone implants. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;68:143–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimond-Lischer S, Ren Q, Braissant O, et al. Vacuum plasma sprayed coatings using ionic silver doped hydroxyapatite powder to prevent bacterial infection of bone implants. Biointerphases. 2016;11(2):011012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Xie C-M, Lu X, Wang K-F, et al. Silver nanoparticles and growth factors incorporated hydroxyapatite coatings on metallic implant surfaces for enhancement of osteoinductivity and antibacterial properties. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(11):8580–8589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu W-Z, Zhang Y, Liu X, et al. Synergistic antibacterial activity of multi components in lysozyme/chitosan/silver/hydroxyapatite hybrid coating. Mater Des. 2018;139:351–362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Liu X, Li Z, et al. Nano Ag/ZnO-incorporated hydroxyapatite composite coatings: highly effective infection prevention and excellent osteointegration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(1):1266–1277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao Z-S, Zhou W-S, Qiang Z, et al. Intermittent administration of human parathyroid hormone (1-34) increases fixation of strontium-doped hydroxyapatite coating titanium implants via electrochemical deposition in ovariectomized rat femur . J Biomater Appl. 2016;30(7):952–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laonapakul T, Rakngarm Nimkerdphol A, Otsuka Y, et al. Failure behavior of plasma-sprayed HAp coating on commercially pure titanium substrate in simulated body fluid (SBF) under bending load. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2012;15:153–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He G, Guo B, Wang H, et al. Surface characterization and osteoblast response to a functionally graded hydroxyapatite/fluoro-hydroxyapatite/titanium oxide coating on titanium surface by sol-gel method. Cell Prolif. 2014;47(3):258–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh S, Kumar RM, Kuntal KK, et al. Sol–gel derived hydroxyapatite coating on Mg-3Zn alloy for orthopedic application. JOM. 2015;67(4):702–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelea V, Ristoscu C, Chiritescu C, et al. Pulsed laser deposition of hydroxyapatite thin films on Ti-5Al-2.5 Fe substrates with and without buffer layers. Appl Surf Sci. 2000;168(1-4):127–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levingstone TJ, Ardhaoui M, Benyounis K, et al. Plasma sprayed hydroxyapatite coatings: understanding process relationships using design of experiment analysis. Surf Coat Technol. 2015;283:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao J, Kuroda S, Ohya K, et al. Enhanced osteoblast and osteoclast responses to a thin film sputtered hydroxyapatite coating. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2011;22(6):1489–1499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammelt S, Schulze E, Bernhardt R, et al. Coating of titanium implants with type-I collagen. J Orthop Res. 2004;22(5):1025–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham MH, Haugen HJ, Rinna A, et al. Hydrofluoric acid treatment of titanium surfaces enhances the proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts. J Tissue Eng. 2019;10:2041731419828950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugan N, Murugan C, Sundramoorthy AK. In vitro and in vivo characterization of mineralized hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone-graphene oxide based bioactive multifunctional coating on Ti alloy for bone implant applications. Arab J Chem. 11(6):959–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murugan N, Murugan C, Sundramoorthy AK. In vitro and in vivo characterization of mineralized hydroxyapatite/polycaprolactone-graphene oxide based bioactive multifunctional coating on Ti alloy for bone implant applications. Arab J Chem. 2018;11(6):959–969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alghamdi HS, Bosco R, Both SK, et al. Synergistic effects of bisphosphonate and calcium phosphate nanoparticles on peri-implant bone responses in osteoporotic rats. Biomaterials. 2014;35(21):5482–5490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosco R, Iafisco M, Tampieri A, et al. Hydroxyapatite nanocrystals functionalized with alendronate as bioactive components for bone implant coatings to decrease osteoclastic activity. Appl Surf Sci. 2015;328:516–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prosolov KA, Belyavskaya OA, Rau JV, et al. Deposition of polycrystalline zinc substituted hydroxyapatite coatings with a columnar structure by RF magnetron sputtering: role of in-situ substrate heating. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1115:032077.
   Google Scholar
• Prosolov KA, Belyavskaya OA, Muehle U, et al. Thin bioactive Zn substituted hydroxyapatite coating deposited on ultrafine-grained titanium substrate: structure analysis. Front Mater. 2018;5(3). DOI:10.3389/fmats.2018.00003
   Google Scholar
• Prosolov KA, Belyavskaya OA, Linders J, et al. Glancing angle deposition of Zn-doped calcium phosphate coatings by RF magnetron sputtering. Coatings. 2019;9(4):220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedelnikova MB, Komarova EG, Sharkeev YP, et al. Modification of titanium surface via Ag-, Sr- and Si-containing micro-arc calcium phosphate coating. Bioact Mater. 2019;4:224–235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otsuka Y, Kawaguchi H, Mutoh Y. Cyclic delamination behavior of plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating on Ti-6Al-4V substrates in simulated body fluid. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;67:533–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskokovic V. Nanostructured platforms for the sustained and local delivery of antibiotics in the treatment of osteomyelitis. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst. 2015;32(1):1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciocilteu M-V, Mocanu AG, Mocanu A, et al. Hydroxyapatite-ciprofloxacin delivery system: synthesis, characterisation and antibacterial activity. Acta Pharm. 2018;68(2):129–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munir MU, Ihsan A, Sarwar Y, et al. Hollow mesoporous hydroxyapatite nanostructures; smart nanocarriers with high drug loading and controlled releasing features. Int J Pharm. 2018;544(1):112–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar GS, Govindan R, Girija E. In situ synthesis, characterization and in vitro studies of ciprofloxacin loaded hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for the treatment of osteomyelitis. J Mater Chem B. 2014;2(31):5052–5060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaro Martins VC, Goissis G. Nonstoichiometric hydroxyapatite-anionic collagen composite as support for the double sustained release of gentamicin and norfloxacin/ciprofloxacin . Artif Organs. 2000;24(3):224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Z-C, Yang Z-Y, Zhu Y-J, et al. Ultralong hydroxyapatite nanowires-based paper co-loaded with silver nanoparticles and antibiotic for long-term antibacterial benefit. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(27):22212–22222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangeetha K, Ashok M, Girija EK, et al. Strontium and ciprofloxacin modified hydroxyapatites as functional grafts for bone prostheses. Ceram Int. 2018;44(12):13782–13789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butini ME, Cabric S, Trampuz A, et al. In vitro anti-biofilm activity of a biphasic gentamicin-loaded calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite bone graft substitute. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2018;161:252–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhumathi K, Kumar TS. Regenerative potential and anti-bacterial activity of tetracycline loaded apatitic nanocarriers for the treatment of periodontitis. Biomed Mater. 2014;9(3):035002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano-Souza CA, Rossi AL, Mavropoulos E, et al. Chlorhexidine-loaded hydroxyapatite microspheres as an antimicrobial delivery system and its effect on in vivo osteo-conductive properties. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2015;26(4):166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai S-W, Huang S-S, Yu W-X, et al. Fabrication and characteristics of porous hydroxyapatite-CaO composite nanofibers for biomedical applications. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(8):570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai S-W, Yu W-X, Hwang P-A, et al. Fabrication and characterization of strontium-substituted hydroxyapatite-CaO-CaCO3 nanofibers with a mesoporous structure as drug delivery carriers. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(4):179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren B, Chen X, Du S, et al. Injectable polysaccharide hydrogel embedded with hydroxyapatite and calcium carbonate for drug delivery and bone tissue engineering. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;118(Pt A):1257–1266.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramírez-Agudelo R, Scheuermann K, Gala-García A, et al. Hybrid nanofibers based on poly-caprolactone/gelatin/hydroxyapatite nanoparticles-loaded Doxycycline: effective anti-tumoral and antibacterial activity. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2018;83:25–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding L, Zhang P, Wang X, et al. Effect of doxycycline-treated hydroxyapatite surface on bone apposition: a histomophometric study in murine maxillae. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(1):130–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörensen JH, Lilja M, Sörensen TC, et al. Biomechanical and antibacterial properties of Tobramycin loaded hydroxyapatite coated fixation pins. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater. 2014;102(7):1381–1392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ionita D, Bajenaru-Georgescu D, Totea G, et al. Activity of vancomycin release from bioinspired coatings of hydroxyapatite or TiO2 nanotubes. Int J Pharm. 2017;517(1-2):296–302.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zihayat B, Khodadadi A, Torabi M, et al. Wound healing activity of sheep’s bladder extracellular matrix in diabetic rats. Biomed Eng Appl Basis Commun. 2018;30(02):1850015.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Z, Jiang D, Yan L, et al. In vitro and in vivo drug release and antibacterial properties of the novel vancomycin-loaded bone-like hydroxyapatite/poly amino acid scaffold. Int J Nanomedicine. 2017;12:1841–1851.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr JC. Lower-extremity osteomyelitis treatment using calcium sulfate/hydroxyapatite bone void filler with antibiotics seven-year retrospective study . J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2018;108(3):210–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RP, Singh G, Singh H. Sub-micrometric mesoporous strontium substituted hydroxyapatite particles for sustained delivery of vancomycin drug. J Aust Ceram Soc. 2019;55(2):405–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giacomini D, Torricelli P, Gentilomi GA, et al. Monocyclic β-lactams loaded on hydroxyapatite: new biomaterials with enhanced antibacterial activity against resistant strains. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2712
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zomorodian A, Santos C, Carmezim M, et al. In-vitro” corrosion behaviour of the magnesium alloy with Al and Zn (AZ31) protected with a biodegradable polycaprolactone coating loaded with hydroxyapatite and cephalexin. Electrochim Acta. 2015;179:431–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan T, Stylios GK, Giannoudi M, et al. Investigating a new drug delivery nano composite membrane system based on PVA/PCL and PVA/HA (PEG) for the controlled release of biopharmaceuticals for bone infections. Injury. 2015;46:S39–S43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rădulescu D, Grumezescu V, Andronescu E, et al. Biocompatible cephalosporin-hydroxyapatite-poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)-coatings fabricated by MAPLE technique for the prevention of bone implant associated infections. Appl Surf Sci. 2016;374:387–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz A, Santos J, Monteiro F, et al. Adsorption and release studies of sodium ampicillin from hydroxyapatite and glass-reinforced hydroxyapatite composites. Biomaterials. 2001;22(11):1393–1400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pradid J, Keawwatana W, Boonyang U, et al. Biological properties and enzymatic degradation studies of clindamycin-loaded PLA/HAp microspheres prepared from crocodile bones. Polym Bull. 2017;74(12):5181–5194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez G, Sagarzazu A, Cordova A, et al. Comparative study of two silica mesoporous materials (SBA-16 and SBA-15) modified with a hydroxyapatite layer for clindamycin controlled delivery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018;256:251–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamoume O, Thibault S, Regnié G, et al. Macroporous calcium phosphate ceramic implants for sustained drug delivery. Mater Sci Eng C. 2011;31(7):1352–1356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deepak A, Goyal AK, Rath G. Development and characterization of novel medicated nanofiber for the treatment of periodontitis. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2018;19(8):3687–3697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardhani R, Setyaningsih , Hafiyyah OA, Ana ID. Preparation of carbonated apatite membrane as metronidazole delivery system for periodontal application. Key Eng Mater. 2016;696:250–258.
   Google Scholar
• Deshmukh K, Shaik MM, Ramanan SR, et al. Self-activated fluorescent hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: a promising agent for bioimaging and biolabeling. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2016;2(8):1257–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Predoi D, Iconaru SL, Buton N, et al. Antimicrobial activity of new materials based on lavender and basil essential oils and hydroxyapatite. Nanomaterials. 2018;8(5):291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller B, Treccani L, Rezwan K. Antibacterial active open-porous hydroxyapatite/lysozyme scaffolds suitable as bone graft and depot for localised drug delivery. J Biomater Appl. 2017;31(8):1123–1134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Deng C, Tang S, et al. Mitochondria-dependent apoptosis induced by nanoscale hydroxyapatite in human gastric cancer SGC-7901 cells. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007;30(1):128–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu J, Xu P, Li Z, et al. Oxidative stress and apoptosis induced by hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in C6 cells. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2012;100(3):738–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li B, Guo B, Fan H, et al. Preparation of nano-hydroxyapatite particles with different morphology and their response to highly malignant melanoma cells in vitro. Appl Surf Sci. 2008;255(2):357–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Iyer MA, Wu VM. One ion to rule them all: combined antibacterial, osteoinductive and anticancer properties of selenite-incorporated hydroxyapatite. J Mater Chem B. 2017;5(7):1430–1445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović NL, Sakač M, Kuzminac I, et al. Chitosan oligosaccharide lactate coated hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a vehicle for the delivery of steroid drugs and the targeting of breast cancer cells. J Mater Chem B. 2018;6(43):6957–6968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović NL, Penov-Gaši KM, Wu VM, et al. Selective anticancer activity of hydroxyapatite/chitosan-poly(d,l)-lactide-co-glycolide particles loaded with an androstane-based cancer inhibitor. Colloid Surf B. 2016;148:629–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamiano A, Wu VM, Carella F, et al. Magnetic calcium phosphates nanocomposites for the intracellular hyperthermia of cancers of bone and brain. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2019;14(10):1267–1289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han Y, Li S, Cao X, et al. Different inhibitory effect and mechanism of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on normal cells and cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun Y, Chen Y, Ma X, et al. Mitochondria-targeted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for selective growth inhibition of lung cancer in vitro and in vivo. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8(39):25680–25690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang W, Yuan Y, Liu C, et al. Differential cytotoxicity and particle action of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in human cancer cells. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2014;9(3):397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Mccrate JM, Lee JC, et al. The role of surface charge on the uptake and biocompatibility of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with osteoblast cells. Nanotechnology. 2011;22(10):105708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao X, Heng BC, Xiong S, et al. In vitro assessment of cellular responses to rod-shaped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles of varying lengths and surface areas. Nanotoxicology. 2011;5(2):182–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Ye L, Pan J, et al. Antitumoural hydroxyapatite nanoparticles‐mediated hepatoma‐targeted trans‐arterial embolization gene therapy: in vitro and in vivo studies. Liver Int. 2012;32(6):998–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer IW, Li S-P, Han Y-C, et al. Internalization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in liver cancer cells. J Mater Sci: Mater Med. 2008;19(3):1091–1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Kim BY, Rutka JT, et al. Nanoparticle-mediated cellular response is size-dependent. Nat Nanotechnol. 2008;3(3):145–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhou G, Liu H, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite particles induce apoptosis on MC3T3-E1 cells and tissue cells in SD rats. Nanoscale. 2012;4(9):2894–2899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tay CY, Fang W, Setyawati MI, et al. Nano-hydroxyapatite and nano-titanium dioxide exhibit different subcellular distribution and apoptotic profile in human oral epithelium. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2014;6(9):6248–6256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Morales J, Iafisco M, Delgado-López JM, et al. Progress on the preparation of nanocrystalline apatites and surface characterization: overview of fundamental and applied aspects. Prog Cryst Growth Charact Mater. 2013;59(1):1–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu VM, Tang S, Uskoković V. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as intrinsic inorganic antimicrobials: the antibacterial effect. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(40):34013–34028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanhua W, Hao H, Li Y, et al. Selenium-substituted hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and their in vivo antitumor effect on hepatocellular carcinoma. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;140:297–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong H, Du S, Ni J, et al. Mitochondria and nuclei dual-targeted heterogeneous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for enhancing therapeutic efficacy of doxorubicin. Biomaterials. 2016;94:70–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu B, Ghosh D, Sinha MK, et al. Doxorubicin-intercalated nano-hydroxyapatite drug-delivery system for liver cancer: an animal model. Ceram Int. 2013;39(8):9557–9566.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerweck LE. Tumor pH: implications for treatment and novel drug design. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1998;8(3):176–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Fan J, Wang S, et al. Biodegradable drug-loaded hydroxyapatite nanotherapeutic agent for targeted drug release in tumors. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018;10(9):7832–7840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li D, Huang X, Wu Y, et al. Preparation of pH-responsive mesoporous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for intracellular controlled release of an anticancer drug. Biomater Sci. 2016;4(2):272–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeda H, Tsukigawa K, Fang J. A Retrospective 30 years after discovery of the enhanced permeability and retention effect of solid tumors: next-generation chemotherapeutics and photodynamic therapy-problems, solutions, and prospects. Microcirculation. 2016;23(3):173–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastegar R, Akbari Javar H, Khoobi M, et al. and others. Evaluation of a novel biocompatible magnetic nanomedicine based on beta-cyclodextrin, loaded doxorubicin-curcumin for overcoming chemoresistance in breast cancer. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup2):207–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham FL, van der Eb AJ. A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology. 1973;52(2):456–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolova V, Epple M. Inorganic nanoparticles as carriers of nucleic acids into cells. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2008;47(8):1382–1395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorth M, Narvekar A. Non viral vectors in gene therapy- an overview. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(1):GE01–GE06.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisht S, Bhakta G, Mitra S, et al. pDNA loaded calcium phosphate nanoparticles: highly efficient non-viral vector for gene delivery. Int J Pharm. 2005;288(1):157–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee D, Upadhye K, Kumta PN. Nano-sized calcium phosphate (CaP) carriers for non-viral gene deilvery. Mater Sci Eng B. 2012;177(3):289–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu H, Wei D, Gai X, et al. Amine functionalised hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for anti-angiogenesis gene therapy of breast cancer. Micro Nano Lett. 2016;11(8):416–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welzel T, Radtke I, Meyer-Zaika W, et al. Transfection of cells with custom-made calcium phosphate nanoparticles coated with DNA. J Mater Chem. 2004;14(14):2213–2217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G-J, Zhou L-Z, Wang K-W, et al. Hydroxylapatite nanorods: an efficient and promising carrier for gene transfection. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2010;345(2):427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu S, Huang B, Zhou K, et al. Hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as a novel gene carrier. J Nanopart Res. 2004;6(2/3):307–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olton D, Li J, Wilson ME, et al. Nanostructured calcium phosphates (NanoCaPs) for non-viral gene delivery: influence of the synthesis parameters on transfection efficiency. Biomaterials. 2007;28(6):1267–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MA, Wu VM, Ghosh S, et al. Gene delivery using calcium phosphate nanoparticles: optimization of the transfection process and the effects of citrate and poly(l-lysine) as additives. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;471:48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheang T-Y, Lei Y-Y, Zhang Z-Q, et al. Graphene oxide-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites effectively deliver HSV-TK suicide gene to inhibit human breast cancer growth . J Biomater Appl. 2018;33(2):216–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanifi A, Fathi MH, Mir Mohammad Sadeghi H, et al. Mg2+ substituted calcium phosphate nano particles synthesis for non viral gene delivery application. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2010;21(8):2393–2401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klesing J, Chernousova S, Epple M. Freeze-dried cationic calcium phosphate nanorods as versatile carriers of nucleic acids (DNA, siRNA). J Mater Chem. 2012;22(1):199–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang G-h, Zhao Y-z, Tan J, et al. Arginine functionalized hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and its bioactivity for gene delivery. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China. 2015;25(2):490–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komuro H, Sasano T, Horiuchi N, et al. The effect of glucose modification of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on gene delivery. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019;107(1):61–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee SY, Jeon SI, Jung S, et al. Targeted multimodal imaging modalities. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2014;76:60–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norek M, Peters JA. MRI contrast agents based on dysprosium or holmium. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2011;59(1):64–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi D, Dong S, Meng X, et al. Gold nanoparticles as computerized tomography (CT) contrast agents. RSC Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2012;2:12515–12524.
   Google Scholar
• Lusic H, Grinstaff MW. X-ray-computed tomography contrast agents. Chem Rev. 2013;113(3):1641–1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ametamey SM, Honer M, Schubiger PA. Molecular imaging with PET. Chem Rev. 2008;108(5):1501–1516.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Conti PS. Radiopharmaceutical chemistry for positron emission tomography. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(11):1031–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wades TW, Weisman GR, Anderson CJ. Coordinating radiometals of copper, gallium, indium, yttrium and zirconium for PET and SPECT imaging of disease. Chem Rev. 2010;110:2858–2902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobin AL, Halas NJ, James WD, et al. Near-infrared resonant nanoshells for combined optical imaging and photothermal cancer therapy. Nano Lett. 2007;7(7):1929–1934. 1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AF F. Optical coherence tomography-development, principles, applications. Z Med Phys. 2009;20:251–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansare VJ, Hejazi S, Faenza WJ, et al. Review of long-wavelength optical and NIR imaging materials: ontrast agents, fluorophores, and multifunctional nano carriers. Chem Mater. 2012;24(5):812–827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey CJ, Blomley MJ, Eckersley RJ, et al. Developments in ultrasound contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(4):675–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo C, Jin Y, Dai Z. Multifunctional ultrasound contrast agents for imaging guided photothermal therapy. Bioconjug Chem. 2014;25(5):840–854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu WHQ, Ku G, Wen X, et al. Photoacoustic imaging of living mouse brain vasculature using hollow gold nanospheres. Biomaterials. 2010;31(9):2617–2626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kherlopian AR, Song T, Duan Q, et al. 4. A review of imaging techniques for systems biology. BMC Syst Biol. 2008;2:74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma P, Brown S, Walter G, et al. Nanoparticles for bioimaging. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2006;123-126:471–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soo Choi1 H, Frangioni1 JV. Nanoparticles for biomedical imaging: fundamentals of clinical translation. Mol Imaging. 2010;9(6):291–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ntziachristos V. Fluorescence molecular imaging. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2006;8(1):1–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu H, Chen F, Xi P, et al. Biocompatible fluorescent hydroxyapatite: synthesis and live cell imaging applications. J Phys Chem C. 2011;115(38):18538–18544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syamchand SS, Sony G. Multifunctional hydroxyapatite nanoparticles for drug delivery and multimodal molecular imaging. Microchim Acta. 2015;182(9-10):1567–1589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uskoković V, Tang S, Nikolić MG, et al. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles as intrinsic inorganic antimicrobials: in search of the key particle property. Biointerphases. 2019;14(3):031001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erhan I, Altınoǧlu † TJR, Kaiser JM §, et al., Near-infrared emitting fluorophore-doped calcium phosphate nanoparticles for in vivo imaging of human breast cancer. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;419:188–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kester M, Fox T, Sharma A, et al. Calcium phosphate nanocomposite particles for in vitro imaging and encapsulated chemotherapeutic drug delivery to cancer cells. Nano Lett. 2008;8(12):4116–4121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondéjar SP, Kovtun A, Epple M. Lanthanide-doped calcium phosphate nanoparticles with high internal crystallinity and with a shell of DNA as fluorescent probes in cell experiments. J Mater Chem. 2007;17(39):4153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Oh J, Xie X, et al. Simultaneous molecular and hypoxia imaging of brain tumors in vivo using spectroscopic photoacoustic tomography. Proc Ieee. 2008;96(3):481–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Araujo TS, Macedo ZS, de Oliveira PASC, et al. Production and characterization of pure and Cr3+-doped hydroxyapatite for biomedical applications as fluorescent probes. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(7):2236–2243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagannathan RK. Eu3+ luminescence: a spectral probe in M5(PO4)3X apatites (M = Ca or Sr; X = F-, Cl-, Br- or OH). J Phys Condens Matter. 1995;7(44).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graeve OA, Kanakala R, Madadi A, et al. Luminescence variations in hydroxyapatites doped with Eu2+ and Eu3+ ions. Biomaterials. 2010;31(15):4259–4267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakovan J, Reeder RJ. ntracrystalline rare earth element distributions in apatite: surface structural influences on zoning during growth. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1996;60(22):4435–4445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisfeld R, Gaft M, Boulon G, et al. Laser-induced luminescence of rare-earth elements in natural fluor-apatites. J Lumin. 1996;69(5-6):343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer I, Layani JD, Givan A, et al. La ions in precipitated hydroxyapatites. J Inorg Biochem. 1999;73(4):221–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin P, Carlot G, Chevarier A, et al. Mechanisms involved in thermal diffusion of rare earth elements in apatite. J Nucl Mater. 1999;275(3):268–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doat A, Fanjul M, Pellé F, et al. Europium-doped bioapatite: a new photostable biological probe, internalizable by human cells. Biomaterials. 2003;24(19):3365–3371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doat A, Pellé F, Gardant N, et al. Synthesis of luminescent bioapatite nanoparticles for utilization as a biological probe. J Solid State Chem. 2004;177(4-5):1179–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doat A, Pellé F, Lebugle A. Europium-doped calcium pyrophosphates : allotropic forms and photoluminescent properties. J Solid State Chem. 2005;178(7):2354–2362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciobanu CS, Iconaru SL, Le Coustumer P, et al. Antibacterial activity of silver-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2012;7(1):324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciobanu CM, Andronescu E, Stan MS, et al. Biocompatibility study of europium doped crystalline hydroxyapatite bioceramics. Dig J Nanomater Bios. 2011;6(4):1639–1647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capobianco JA, Proulx PP, Raspa N. Laser-excited fluorescence spectroscopy and crystal field analysis of europium (III)-doped cordierite glass. Chem Phys Lett. 1989;160(5-6):591–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavin VB, Jayasankar CK, Martin IR, et al. On the local structure of Eu3+ ions in oxifluoride glasses. Comparison with fluoride and oxide glasses. J Chem Phys. 2001;23:10935–10944.
   Google Scholar
• Zambelli M, Abril M, Lavín V, et al. Fluorescence line narrowing spectroscopy of Eu3+ in a niobium tellurite glass. Phys Non-Crystalline Solids. 2004;345-346(15):386–390.
   Google Scholar
• Kushida T. Site-selective fluorescence spectroscopy of Eu3+ and Sm2+ ions in glass. J Lumin. 2002;100(1–4):73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doweidar H. Density–structure correlations in Na2O–CaO–P2O5–SiO2 bioactive glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2009;355(9):577–580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iconaru S-L, Motelica-Heino M, Predoi D. Study on europium-doped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles by fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and their antimicrobial properties. J Spectro. 2013;2013:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weerasuriya DRK, Wijesinghe W, Rajapakse R. Encapsulation of anticancer drug copper bis(8-hydroxyquinoline) in hydroxyapatite for pH-sensitive targeted delivery and slow release. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2017;71:206–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuya T, Otsuka Y, Tagaya M, et al. Formation of stacked luminescent complex of 8-hydroxyquinoline molecules on hydroxyapatite coating by using cold isostatic pressing. Mater Sci Eng. 2016;58:127–132. (1873-0191 (Electronic)).
   Google Scholar
• Neacsu IA, Stoica AE, Vasile BS, et al. Luminescent hydroxyapatite doped with rare earth elements for biomedical applications. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland). 2019;9(2):239.
   Google Scholar
• Matsuya T, Otsuka Y, Tagaya M, et al. Formation of stacked luminescent complex of 8-hydroxyquinoline molecules on hydroxyapatite coating by using cold isostatic pressing. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2016;58:127–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li ZLZ, Yin M, Yang X, et al. Aptamer-capped multifunctional mesoporous strontium hydroxyapatite nanovehicle for cancer-cell-responsive drug delivery and imaging. Biomacromolecules. 2012;13(12):4257–4263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanic V, Dimitrijević S, Antonovic DG, et al. Synthesis of fluorine substituted hydroxyapatite nanopowders and application of the central composite design for determination of its antimicrobial effects. Appl Surf Sci. 2014;290:346–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y-H, Liu C-H, Liang Y-H, et al. Hollow mesoporous hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (hmHANPs) with enhanced drug loading and pH-responsive release properties for intracellular drug delivery. J Mater Chem B. 2013;1(19):2447–2450.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao L, Liu X, Liu M, et al. Surface grafting of zwitterionic polymers onto dye doped AIE-active luminescent silica nanoparticles through surface-initiated ATRP for biological imaging applications. Appl Surf Sci. 2017;419:188–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne JD, Betancourt T, Brannon-Peppas L, 60Active targeting schemes for nanoparticle system in cancer therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2008;60(15):1615–1626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu MK, Park J, Jon S. Targeting strategies for multifunctional nanoparticles in cancer imaging and therapy. Theranostics. 2012;2(1):3–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhöfer B, Meckel M, Delgado-López JM, et al. Synthesis and preliminary in vivo evaluation of well-dispersed biomimetic nanocrystalline apatites labeled with positron emission tomographic imaging agents. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2015;7(19):10623–10633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamiano A, Iafisco M, Sandri M, et al. On the use of superparamagnetic hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as an agent for magnetic and nuclear in vivo imaging. Acta Biomater. 2018;73:458–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao H, Wu C, Gao D, et al. Antitumor effect by hydroxyapatite nanospheres: activation of mitochondria-dependent apoptosis and negative regulation of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway. ACS Nano. 2018;12(8):7838–7854.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li X, Ito A, et al. Rod-shaped and fluorine-substituted hydroxyapatite free of molecular immunopotentiators stimulates anti-cancer immunity in vivo. Chem Commun (Camb). 2016;52(44):7078–7081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomoaia G, Pop L-B, Petean I, et al. Significance of surface structure on orthopedic materials. Mater. Plast. 2012;49(1):48–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung F, Braune S. Thrombogenicity and hemocompatibility of biomaterials. Biointerphases. 2015;11(2):029601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman M, Monroe DM. IIIA cell-based model of hemostasis. Thromb Haemost. 2001;85(6):958–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuigan AP, Sefton MV. The influence of biomaterials on endothelial cell thrombogenicity. Biomaterials. 2007;28(16):2547–2571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Gause KT, Kamphuis MM, et al. Differential roles of the protein corona in the cellular uptake of nanoporous polymer particles by monocyte and macrophage cell lines. ACS Nano. 2013;7(12):10960–10970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Wang Q, Shen J, et al. Adsorption of Leucine-Rich Amelogenin Protein on Hydroxyapatite (001) Surface through − COO-Claws. J Phys Chem C. 2007;111(3):1284–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong X, Wang Q, Wu T, et al. Understanding adsorption-desorption dynamics of BMP-2 on hydroxyapatite (001) surface. Biophys J. 2007;93(3):750–759.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J-W, Wu T, Wang Q, et al. Molecular simulation of protein adsorption and desorption on hydroxyapatite surfaces. Biomaterials. 2008;29(5):513–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docter D, Strieth S, Westmeier D, et al. No king without a crown-impact of the nanomaterial-protein corona on nanobiomedicine. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2015;10(3):503–519.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer A, Vadon M, Rinner B, et al. The role of nanoparticle size in hemocompatibility. Toxicology. 2009;258(2-3):139–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Z, Haixia L, Wei Y, et al. Hydroxyapatite/silk fibroin composite biomimetic scaffold for dental pulp repair. Bioinspir Biomim Nan. 2019;8(4):231–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee A, Gupta A, Verma M, et al. Site-specific antibacterial efficacy and cyto/hemo-compatibility of zinc substituted hydroxyapatite. Ceram Int. 2019;45(9):12225–12233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ooi C-H, Ling YP, Abdullah WZ, et al. evaluation and in vitro hemocompatibility study on nanoporous hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019;30(4):44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Feng L, Peng R, et al. Studies on nano-particle sols of hydroxyaptite and titanium dioxide for haemo-compatibility. Wei sheng yan jiu=. J hygiene res.. 2002;31(3):197–199.
   Google Scholar
• Han Y, Wang X, Dai H, et al. Nanosize and surface charge effects of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on red blood cell suspensions. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2012;4(9):4616–4622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Sun J. Potential proinflammatory effects of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on endothelial cells in a monocyte–endothelial cell coculture model. Int J Nanomed. 2014;9:1261–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katanasaka Y, Ida T, Asai T, et al. Antiangiogenic cancer therapy using tumor vasculature-targeted liposomes encapsulating 3-(3,5-dimethyl-1H-pyrrol-2-ylmethylene)-1,3-dihydro-indol-2-one, SU5416. Cancer Lett. 2008;270(2):260–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puvvada N, Panigrahi PK, Pathak A. Room temperature synthesis of highly hemocompatible hydroxyapatite, study of their physical properties and spectroscopic correlation of particle size. Nanoscale. 2010;2(12):2631–2638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos C, Turiel S, Sousa Gomes P, et al. Vascular biosafety of commercial hydroxyapatite particles: discrepancy between blood compatibility assays and endothelial cell behavior. J Nanobiotechnology. 2018;16(1):27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turkez H, Yousef MI, Sönmez E, et al. Evaluation of cytotoxic, oxidative stress and genotoxic responses of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on human blood cells. J Appl Toxicol. 2014;34(4):373–379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Xie G. Tissue distribution of intravenously administrated hydroxyapatite nanoparticles labeled with 125I. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2011;11(12):10996–11000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ignjatović N, Vranješ Djurić S, Mitić Ž, et al. Investigating an organ-targeting platform based on hydroxyapatite nanoparticles using a novel in situ method of radioactive 125Iodine labeling. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014;43:439–446.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding T, Xue Y, Lu H, et al. Effect of particle size of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles on its biocompatibility. IEEE Trans Nanobioscience. 2012;11(4):336–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remya NS, Syama S, Gayathri V, et al. An in vitro study on the interaction of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for assessing the toxicological behaviour. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2014;117:389–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramis J, Coelho C, Córdoba A, et al. Safety assessment of nano-hydroxyapatite as an oral care ingredient according to the EU cosmetics regulation. Cosmetics. 2018;5(3):53.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J, Ginebra MP, Engel E, et al. Ion reactivity of calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite in standard cell culture media. Acta Biomater. 2011;7(12):4242–4252.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson J, Ginebra MP, Planell J, et al. Osteoblast-like cellular response to dynamic changes in the ionic extracellular environment produced by calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2012;23(10):2509–2520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entering the era of nanoscience: time to be so small Vuk Uskokovíc. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013;9(9):1441–1470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CF, Grainger DW. In vitro assessments of nanomaterial toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2009;61(6):438–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang K-S, Trosko JE. Stem cells in toxicology: fundamental biology and practical considerations. Toxicol Sci. 2011;120(Supplement 1):S269–S289.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uskoković V. Nanotechnologies: what we do not know. Technol Soc. 2007;29(1):43–61.
   Google Scholar