Development of purified cashew gum mucoadhesive buccal tablets containing nystatin for treatment of oral candidiasis

References

• Akpan A, Morgan R. Oral candidiasis. Postgrad Med J. 2002;78(922):455–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coronado-Castellote L, Jiménez-Soriano Y. Clinical and microbiological diagnosis of oral candidiasis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2013;5:e279–286.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patil S, Rao RS, Majumdar B, et al. Clinical appearance of oral Candida infection and therapeutic strategies. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyu X, Zhao C, Yan Z, et al. Efficacy of nystatin for the treatment of oral candidiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:1161–1171.
   Google Scholar
• Ellepola ANB, Samaranayake LP. Oral candidal infections and antimycotics. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2000;11(2):172–198.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arastehfar A, Daneshnia F, Farahyar S, et al. Incidence and spectrum of yeast species isolated from the oral cavity of Iranian patients suffering from hematological malignancies. J Oral Microbiol. 2019;11(1):1601061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhtiari S, Jafari S, Taheri JB, et al. The effects of cinnamaldehyde (Cinnamon derivatives) and nystatin on candida albicans and candida glabrata. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(7):1067–1070.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamza OJM, Matee MIN, Brüggemann RJM, et al. Single-dose fluconazole versus standard 2-week therapy for oropharyngeal candidiasis in HIV-infected patients: A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47(10):1270–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González GM, Tijerina R, Sutton DA, et al. In vitro activities of free and lipid formulations of amphotericin B and nystatin against clinical isolates of Coccidioides immitis at various saprobic stages. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(5):1583–1585.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman J, Krysan DJ. Drug resistance and tolerance in fungi. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18(6):319–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaranayake LP, Keung Leung W, Jin L. Oral mucosal fungal infections. Periodontol 2000. 2009;49:39–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cuesta C, Sarrion-Pérez MG, Bagán JV. Current treatment of oral candidiasis: A literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2014;6(5):e576–e582.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Llabot JM, Manzo RH, Allemandi DA. Double-layered mucoadhesive tablets containing nystatin. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2002;3(3):E22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunton LL, Hilal-Dandan R, Knollmann BC. As Bases Farmacológicas da Terapêutica de Goodman e Gilman. 13th ed. Rio de Janeiro: McGraw-Hill education, Artmed; 2018. p. 1116–1117.
   Google Scholar
• Sakeer K, Al-Zein H, Hassan I, et al. Enhancement of dissolution of nystatin from buccoadhesive tablets containing various surfactants and a solid dispersion formulation. Arch Pharm Res. 2010;33(11):1771–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khutoryanskiy VV. Mucoadhesive materials and drug delivery systems. Mucoadhesive Mater. Drug Deliv. Syst. 1st ed. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2014. p. 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Khutoryanskiy VV. Advances in mucoadhesion and mucoadhesive polymers. Macromol Biosci. 2011;11(6):748–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jug M, Hafner A, Lovrić J, et al. An overview of in vitro dissolution/release methods for novel mucosal drug delivery systems. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018;147:350–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook MT, Khutoryanskiy VV. Mucoadhesion and mucosa-mimetic materials-A mini-review. Int J Pharm. 2015;495(2):991–998.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andrews GP, Laverty TP, Jones DS. Mucoadhesive polymeric platforms for controlled drug delivery. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2009;71(3):505–518.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddupalli BM, Mohammed ZNK, Nath AR, et al. Mucoadhesive drug delivery system: An overview. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2010;1(4):381–387.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hearnden V, Sankar V, Hull K, et al. New developments and opportunities in oral mucosal drug delivery for local and systemic disease. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(1):16–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri S, Kesharwani P, Jain K, et al. Mucoadhesion: a promising approach in drug delivery system. React Funct Polym. 2016;100:151–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sudhakar Y, Kuotsu K, Bandyopadhyay AK. Buccal bioadhesive drug delivery-a promising option for orally less efficient drugs. J Control Release. 2006;114(1):15–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar MMGB. Obtenção de gel mucoadesivo de nistatina para o tratamento da candidíase oral. Desenvolvimento e caracterização de dispersões sólidas de nistatina. Clim Chang 2013 – Phys Sci Basis. 2016;1:231.
   Google Scholar
• de Sá LLF, Nogueira NC, Filho ECDS, et al. Design of buccal mucoadhesive tablets: Understanding and development. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2018;8:150–163.
   Google Scholar
• Salamat-Miller N, Chittchang M, Johnston TP. The use of mucoadhesive polymers in buccal drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005;57(11):1666–1691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowthamarajan K, Jawahar N, Wake P, et al. Development of buccal tablets for curcumin using Anacardium occidentale gum. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;88(4):1177–1183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cordeiro MSF. Aplicação de novo sistema polimérico mucoadesivo para Liberação prolongada de pilocarpina. [Internet]. Federal University of Pernambuco, BR; 2015. Available from: https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/16572.
   Google Scholar
• Paula RCM, De Heatley F, Budd PM. Characterization of anacardium occidentale exudate polysaccharide. Polym Int. 1998;45(1):27–35.
   Google Scholar
• Silva D, Feitosa J, Maciel J, et al. Characterization of crosslinked cashew gum derivatives. Carbohydr Polym. 2006;66(1):16–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha PLR, Maciel JS, Sierakowski MR, et al. Oxidation of cashew tree gum exudate polysaccharide with TEMPO reagent. J Braz Chem Soc. 2007;18(1):85–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okoye EI, Onyekweli AO, Ohwoavworhua FO, et al. Comparative study of some mechanical and release properties of paracetamol tablets formulated with cashew tree gum, povidone and gelatin as binders. African J Biotechnol. 2009;8:3970–3973.
   Google Scholar
• Kwakye KO, Asantewaa YAA, Kipo SL. Physicochemical and binding properties of cashew tree gum in metronidazole tablet formulations. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2010;2: 105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Gowthamarajan K, Kumar GKP, Gaikwad NB, et al. Preliminary study of Anacardium occidentale gum as binder in formulation of paracetamol tablets. Carbohydr Polym. 2011;83(2):506–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Kwakye K, Amekyeh H, El-Duah M, et al. Occidentale l) gum-based films. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2012;5:1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto A. P d S, Holanda e Silva K. G d, Mansur CRE. Evaluation of the application of cashew gum as an excipient to produce tablets. Polimeros. 2018;28(4):302–308.
   Google Scholar
• Ap de Spa M, do Carmo FA, Mansur CRE. Pre-formulation Study for Preparation of Mucoadhesive Buccal Tablets Containing Nystatin and Cashew Gum by Direct Compression. J Phys Sci Appl. 2019;9:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Brasil. Farmacopeia Brasileira. 5th ed. Brasília: Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária; 2010. p. 59–76.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi S, Bonferoni MC, Ferrari F, et al. Drug release and washability of mucoadhesive gels based on sodium carboxymethylcellulose and polyacrylic acid. Pharm Dev Technol. 1999;4(1):55–63.,.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, Ferrari F, et al. A modified franz diffusion cell for simultaneous assessment of drug release and washability of mucoadhesive gels. Pharm Dev Technol. 1999;4(1):45–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri G, Bonferoni MC, Rossi S, et al. Nanoparticles based on N-trimethylchitosan: Evaluation of absorption properties using in vitro (Caco-2 cells) and ex vivo (excised rat jejunum) models. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2007;65(1):68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sattar M, Sayed OM, Lane ME. Oral transmucosal drug delivery – Current status and future prospects. Int J Pharm. 2014;471(1-2):498–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akbari J, Saeedi M, Enayatifard R, et al. Development and evaluation of mucoadhesive chlorhexidine tablet formulations. Trop J Pharm Res. 2010;9:321–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy AK, Sm V, Kumar Basha SJ, et al. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive buccal tablets of PGZ hydrochloride. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2013;5:145–155.
   Google Scholar
• El Sayeh A, Abou El Ela F, Ibrahim EH, et al. Bucco-adhesive tablets containing metoprolol tartarate: Formulation, in vitro and in vivo characterization. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 2013;23(2):171–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Pendekal M, K. Tegginamat P. Formulation and evaluation of a bioadhesive patch for buccal delivery of tizanidine. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2012;2(3):318–324.
   Google Scholar
• Llabot JM, Palma SD, Manzo RH, et al. Design of novel antifungal mucoadhesive films. Part II. Formulation and in vitro biopharmaceutical evaluation. Int J Pharm. 2007;336(2):263–268.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Llabot JM, Manzo RH, Allemandi DA. Drug release from carbomer:carbomer sodium salt matrices with potential use as mucoadhesive drug delivery system. Int J Pharm. 2004;276(1-2):59–66.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potu AR, Pujari N, Burra S, et al. Formulation and evaluation of buccoadhesive quetiapine fumarate tablets. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2012;48(2):335–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishna VR, Rao YM, Reddy PC, et al. Formulation and Invitro evaluation of Buccoadhesive tablets of Furosemide. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2011;3:351–361.
   Google Scholar
• Champaneri AM, Soniwala MM. CJ. Formulation and Evaluation of Unidirection Bucco- Adhesive Tablet of Sumatriptan Succinate for Migraine Disorder. Austin J Anal Pharm Chem. 2016;3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lopes CM, Manuel J, Lobo S, et al. Formas farmacêuticas de liberação modificada: polímeros hidrifílicos. Brazilian J Pharm Sci. 2005;41:144–154.
   Google Scholar
• Mangilal T, Anusha M, Sadana N, et al. Formulation and evaluation of glipizide buccal adhesive tablets using natural edible mucoadhesives. Int J Pharm Res Allied Sci. 2015;4:58–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Kwakye K, Mfoafo KA, Kipo SL, et al. Development and evaluation of natural gum-based extended release matrix tablets of two model drugs of different water solubilities by direct compression. Saudi Pharm J. 2016;24(1):82–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Aguiar MMGB, De Albuquerque RP, Marinho DS, et al. Oral sustained release nystatin tablets for the treatment of oral candidiasis: Formulation development and validation of UV spectrophotometric analytical methodology for content determination. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010;36(5):594–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofori-Kwakye K, Asantewaa Y, Kipo SL. Physicochemical and binding properties of cashew tree gum in metronidazole tablet formulations. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2010;2:105–109.
   Google Scholar
• Morin G, Briens L. The effect of lubricants on powder flowability for pharmaceutical application. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2013;14(3):1158–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanmugam S. Granulation techniques and technologies: recent progresses. Bioimpacts. 2015;5(1):55–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg C, Sun CC, Rantanen J. Analytical method development for powder characterization: Visualization of the critical drug loading affecting the processability of a formulation for direct compression. J Pharm Biomed Anal. [Internet]. 2016;128:462–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VF, Liu F, Brown MB. Modeling the oral cavity: In vitro and in vivo evaluations of buccal drug delivery systems. J Control Release. 2012;161(3):746–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borges AF, Silva C, Coelho JFJ, et al. Oral films: current status and future perspectives II – Intellectual property, technologies and market needs. J Control Release. [Internet]. 2015;206:108–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva BMA, Borges AF, Silva C, et al. Mucoadhesive oral films: the potential for unmet needs. Int J Pharm. 2015;494(1):537–551.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng-Lund E, Jacobsen J, Müllertz A, et al. Buccal absorption of diazepam is improved when administered in bioadhesive tablets-an in vivo study in conscious Göttingen mini-pigs. Int J Pharm. 2016;515(1-2):125–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura P, Cirri M, Mennini N, et al. Polymeric mucoadhesive tablets for topical or systemic buccal delivery of clonazepam: Effect of cyclodextrin complexation. Carbohydr Polym. 2016;152:755–763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumtaz AM, Ch'ng H-S. Design of a dissolution apparatus suitable for in situ release study of triamcinolone acetonide from bioadhesive buccal tablets. Int J Pharm. 1995;121(2):129–139.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Quinn ME. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 6th ed. APhA/Pharmaceutical Press: London; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Khalid I, Ahmad M, Minhas MU, et al. Formulation and in vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive controlled release matrix tablets of flurbiprofen using response surface methodology. Braz J Pharm Sci. 2014;50(3):493–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Nabarawi MA, Ali AA, Aboud HM, et al. Transbuccal delivery of betahistine dihydrochloride from mucoadhesive tablets with a unidirectional drug flow: In vitro, ex vivo and in vivo evaluation. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016;10:4031–4045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikeuchi-Takahashi Y, Ishihara C, Onishi H. Evaluation of polyvinyl alcohols as mucoadhesive polymers for mucoadhesive buccal tablets prepared by direct compression. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2017;43(9):1489–1500.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos D. a, Ribeiro AC, Costa EM, et al. Study of antimicrobial activity and atomic force microscopy imaging of the action mechanism of cashew tree gum. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(1):270–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar