A Novel image processing technique for weighted particle size distribution assessment

References

• ICH. Analytical procedure development Q14. ICH Harmonised Guideline. 2023. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_Q14_Guideline_2023_1116.pdf
   Google Scholar
• ICH. Validation of analytical procedures Q2(R2). ICH Harmonised Guideline. 2022. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/ICH_Q2-R2_Document_Step2_Guideline_2022_0324.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Tobyn M, Hamey R. Application of image-based particle size and shape characterization systems in the development of small molecule pharmaceuticals. J Pharm Sci. 2015;104(5):1563–1574. doi: 10.1002/jps.24382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen T. 3 – Particle size analysis by image analysis. In: Allen T, editor. Powder sampling and particle size determination. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2003. p. 142–207.
   Google Scholar
• Sims EE, Withington R. Description and evaluation of a semi-automatic system for particle size analysis by microscopy. Int J Pharm. 1983;17(2-3):167–181. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(83)90030-3.
   Google Scholar
• Etzler FM, Sanderson MS. Particle size analysis: a comparative study of various methods. Part Part Syst Charact. 1995;12(5):217–224. doi: 10.1002/ppsc.19950120503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer E, Ramsland A. Particle size determination by automated microscopical imaging analysis with comparison to laser diffraction. J Pharm Sci. 1995;84(4):499–501. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600840421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble JF, Chiu W-S, Tobyn M. Investigation into the impact of Sub-populations of agglomerates on the particle size distribution and flow properties of conventional microcrystalline cellulose grades. Pharm Dev Technol. 2011;16(5):542–548. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2010.495395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farkas D, Madarász L, Nagy ZK, et al. Image analysis: a versatile tool in the manufacturing and quality control of pharmaceutical dosage forms. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(5):685. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartig SM. Basic image analysis and manipulation in ImageJ. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2013;Chapter 14(1):Unit14.15. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1415s102.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papadopulos F, Spinelli M, Valente S, et al. Common tasks in microscopic and ultrastructural image analysis using ImageJ. Ultrastruct Pathol. 2007;31(6):401–407. doi: 10.1080/01913120701719189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumari RR. Particle size and shape analysis using imagej with customized tools for segmentation of particles. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2015;4:211. doi: 10.17577/ijertv4is110211.
   Google Scholar
• Igathinathane C, Pordesimo LO, Columbus EP, et al. Shape identification and particles size distribution from basic shape parameters using ImageJ. Comput Electron Agric. 2008;63(2):168–182. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2008.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grishagin IV. Automatic cell counting with ImageJ. Anal Biochem. 2015;473:63–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.12.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaialy W, Alhalaweh A, Velaga SP, et al. Influence of lactose carrier particle size on the aerosol performance of budesonide from a dry powder inhaler. Powder Technol. 2012;227:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice SB, Chan C, Brown SC, et al. Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: an interlaboratory comparison case study. Metro. 2013;50(6):663–678. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/663.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoli A, Favoni O. Particle size, size distribution and morphological evaluation of airborne dust particles of diverse woods by scanning electron microscopy and image processing program. Powder Technol. 2012;225:65–71. doi: 10.1016/j.powtec.2012.03.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Linde S. Single-molecule localization microscopy analysis with ImageJ. J Phys D. 2019;52(20):203002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/ab092f.
   Google Scholar
• Lafargue D, Lourdin D, Doublier J-L. Film-forming properties of a modified starch/κ-carrageenan mixture in relation to its rheological behaviour. Carbohydr Polym. 2007;70(1):101–111. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Copeland L. Phase transitions of pea starch over a wide range of water content. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(25):6439–6446. doi: 10.1021/jf3011992.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tako M, Tamaki Y, Teruya T, et al. The principles of starch gelatinization and retrogradation. Food Nutri Sci. 2014;05(03):280–291. doi: 10.4236/fns.2014.53035.
   Google Scholar
• Liu H, Li M, Chen P, et al. Morphologies and thermal properties of hydroxypropylated high-Amylose corn starch. Cereal Chem. 2010;87(2):144–149. doi: 10.1094/CCHEM-87-2-0144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tester RF, Morrison WR. Swelling and gelatinization of cereal starches. I. Effects of amylopectin, amylose, and lipids. Cereal Chem. 1990;67(6):551–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Li C, Yu J, et al. Phase transition and swelling behaviour of different starch granules over a wide range of water content. Food Sci Technol. 2014;59(2):597–604. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2014.06.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydroxypropyl Pea Starch Monograph. 2022; [cited 2022 Oct 03]. Available from: https://online.uspnf.com/uspnf/document/1_GUID-FA2661C5-ECD8-42F4-8A3B-A42B5B500821_1_en-US.
   Google Scholar
• Carson JW. Overcoming particle segregation in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industries. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 1988;14(18):2749–2758. doi: 10.3109/03639048809152046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakubowska E, Ciepluch N. Blend segregation in tablets manufacturing and its effect on drug content uniformity – a review. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(11):1909. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13111909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner KE, G JJ, Burnett S, et al. Film-forming compositions comprising modified starches and iota-carrageenan and methods for manufacturing soft capsules using same. Canada 2006. https://patentimagesstoragegoogleapiscom/cb/9a/f4/2be51f9d43756f/CA2375652Cpdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nokhodchi A, Homayouni A, Araya R, et al. Crystal engineering of ibuprofen using starch derivatives in crystallization medium to produce promising ibuprofen with improved pharmaceutical performance. RSC Adv. 2015;5(57):46119–46131. doi: 10.1039/C5RA06183K.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad Alnaief RO, Mashaqbeh H. Loading and evaluation of meloxicam and atorvastatin in carrageenan microspherical aerogels particles. J Appl Pharma Sci. 2019;9:083–088. doi: 10.7324/JAPS.2019.90112.
   Google Scholar
• Corn Starch Monograph. 2014; [cited 2022 Dec 01]. Available from: https://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp/document/harmonization/excipients/corn_starch.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Phillies GDJ. Elementary lectures in statistical mechanics. New York, NY: Springer; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Blott SJ, Croft DJ, Pye K, et al. Particle size analysis by laser diffraction. SP. 2004;232(1):63–73. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.2004.232.01.08.
   Google Scholar
• Roberson S, Weltje GJ. Inter-instrument comparison of particle-size analysers. Sedim. 2014;61(4):1157–1174. doi: 10.1111/sed.12093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sciortino F, Belloni A, Tartaglia P. Irreversible diffusion-limited cluster aggregation: the behavior of the scattered intensity. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Topics. 1995;52(4):4068–4079. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.4068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferri F, D’Angelo A, Lee M, et al. Kinetics of colloidal fractal aggregation by differential dynamic microscopy. Eur Phys J Spec Top. 2011;199(1):139–148. doi: 10.1140/epjst/e2011-01509-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin MY, Lindsay HM, Weitz DA, et al. Universality in colloid aggregation. Nature. 1989;339(6223):360–362. doi: 10.1038/339360a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haw MD, Poon WCK, Pusey PN. Structure and arrangement of clusters in cluster aggregation. Phys Rev E. 1997;56(2):1918–1933. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.56.1918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latreille P-L, Rabanel J-M, Le Goas M, et al. In situ characterization of the protein corona of nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. Adv Mater. 2022;34(38):e2203354. doi: 10.1002/adma.202203354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun C. True density of microcrystalline cellulose. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94(10):2132–2134. doi: 10.1002/jps.20459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HGT, Horn JC, Bleakney M, et al. Understanding material characteristics through signature traits from helium pycnometry. Langmuir. 2019;35(6):2115–2122. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sympatec. 2024) The universal shapefinder for particle characterisation ranging from below 1 µm to 34,000 µm. https://www.sympatec.com/en/particle-measurement/sensors/dynamic-image-analysis/qicpic/.
   Google Scholar