A model to predict the dry matter and yield of rapeseed under salinity and deficit irrigation

References

• Ahmadi SH, Niazi-Ardekani J. 2006. The effect of water salinity on growth and physiological stages of eight canola (Brassica napus) cultivars. Irrig Sci. 25:11–20. doi:10.1007/s00271-006-0030-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Borg H, Grimes DW. 1986. Depth development of roots with time: an empirical description. Trans ASAE. 29:194–197. doi:10.13031/2013.30125
   Google Scholar
• Deligios PA, Farci R, Sulas L, Hoogenboom G, Ledda L. 2013. Predicting growth and yield of winter rapeseed in a mediterranean environment: model adaptation at a field scale. Field Crops Res. 144:100–112. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirksen C, Kool JB, Koorevaar P, Van Genuchten MT. 1993. Hyswasor-simulation model of hysteretic water and solute transport in the root zone. In: Russo D, Dagan G, editors. Water flow and solute transport in soils. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 99–122.
   Google Scholar
• Farshi AA, Feyen J, Belmans C, Wijngaert KD. 1987. Modelling of yield of winter wheat as a function of soil water availability. Agric Water Manag. 12:323–339. doi:10.1016/0378-3774(87)90007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Font R, Río-Celestinoa M, Carteab E, De Haro-Bailón A. 2005. Quantification of glucosinolates in leaves of leaf rape (Brassica napus ssp. pabularia) by near-infrared spectroscopy. Phytochemistry. 66:175–185. doi:10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.11.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielle B, Denoroy P, Gosse G, Justes E, Andersen M. 1998. Development and evaluation of a CERES-type model for winter oilseed rape. Field Crops Res. 57:95–111. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00120-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habekotte B. 1997. A model of the phenological development of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Field Crops Res. 54:127–136. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00043-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homaee M, Feddes RA. 1999. Water uptake under nonuniform transient salinity and water stress. In: Feyen J, Wiyo K, editors. Modeling of transport processes in soil at various scales in time and space. Wageningen: Wageningen Press; p. 416–427.
   Google Scholar
• Homaee M, Feddes RA, Dirksen C. 2002. A macroscopic water extraction model for nonuniform transient salinity and water stress. Soil Sci Soc America J. 66:1764–1772. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homaee M, Schmidhalter U. 2008. Water integration by plants root under non-uniform soil salinity. Irrig Sci. 27:83–95. doi:10.1007/s00271-008-0123-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honar T, Sabet-Sarvestani A, Sepaskhah AR, Kamgar-Haghighi AA, Shams S. 2012. Simulation of soil water content and yield of canola using CRPSM. J Sci Tech Agric Nat Resour. 16:45–57. (In Persian with English abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD, Porter JR, Wilson DR. 1991. A test of the computer simulation model ARCWHEAT1 on wheat crops grown in New Zealand. Field Crops Res. 27:337–350. doi:10.1016/0378-4290(91)90040-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis NJ. 1989. A simple empirical model of root water uptake. J Hydrology. 107:57–72. doi:10.1016/0022-1694(89)90050-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katerji N, Mastrorilli M, Lahmar F. 2011. FAO-56 methodology for the stress coefficient evaluation under saline environment conditions: validation on potato and broad bean crops. Agric Water Manag. 98:588–596. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2010.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkegaard J, Sprague S, Dove H, Kelman W, Marcroft S. 2006. Dual-purpose canola – a new opportunity in mixed-farming systems? In: Turner NC, Acuna T, Johnson RC, editors. Proceedings of the 13th Australian Agronomy Conference. Sep 10–14. Perth: Australian Society of Agronomy.
   Google Scholar
• Kramer PJ, Boyer JS. 1995. Water relations of plants and soils. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lizaso JI, Batchelor WD, Westgate ME. 2003. A leaf area model to simulate cultivar-specific expansion and senescence of maize leaves. Field Crops Res. 80:1–17. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00151-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majnooni-Heris A, Sadraddini AA, Nazemi AH, Shakiba MR, Neyshaburi MR, Tuzel IH. 2012. Determination of single and dual crop coefficients and ratio of transpiration to evapotranspiration for canola. An Biol Res. 3:1885–1894.
   Google Scholar
• Mass EV, Hoffman GJ. 1977. Crop salt tolerance-current assessment. J Irrig Drain Div, Am Soc Civil Eng. 103:115–134.
   Google Scholar
• Noory H, Van Der Zee VDZ, Liaghat AM, Parsinejad M, Van Dam JC. 2011. Distributed agro-hydrological modeling with SWAP to improve water and salt management of the Voshmgir irrigation and drainage network in northern Iran. Agric Water Manag. 98:1062–1070. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirmoradian N, Sepaskhah AR. 2006. A very simple model for yield prediction of rice under different water and nitrogen applications. Biosystems Eng. 93:25–34. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razzaghi F, Sepaskhah AR. 2012. Calibration and validation of four common ET0 estimation equations by lysimeter data in a semi-arid environment. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 58:303–319. doi:10.1080/03650340.2010.518957
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards LA, editor. 1931. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. Physics. 1:318–333. doi:10.1063/1.1745010
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1954. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agricultural Handbook, No. 60. Washington (DC): US Dept. of Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Amini-Nejad M, Kamgar-Haghighi AA. 2013. Developing a dynamic yield and growth model for saffron under different irrigation regimes. Int J Plant Prod. 7:473–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Beirouti Z. 2009. Effect of irrigation interval and water salinity on growth of madder (Rubina tinctorum L.). Int J Plant Prod. 3:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Fahandezh-Saadi S, Zand-Parsa S. 2011. Logistic model application for prediction of maize yield under water and nitrogen management. Agric Water Manag. 99:51–57. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Ilampour S. 1996. Relationships between yield, crop water stress index (CWSI) and transpiration of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L). Agronomie. 16:269–279. doi:10.1051/agro:19960501
   Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Rezaee-Pour S, Kamgar-Haghighi AA. 2006. Water budget approach to quantify cowpea yield using crop characteristic equations. Biosystems Eng. 95:583–596. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2006.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sepaskhah AR, Yarami N. 2010. Evaluation of macroscopic water extraction model for salinity and water stress in saffron yield production. Int J Plant Prod. 4:175–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani A, Sepaskhah AR, Kamkar-Haghighi AA. 2013a. Responses of agronomic components of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) as influenced by deficit irrigation, water salinity and planting method. Int J Plant Prod. 7:313–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani A, Sepaskhah AR, Kamkar-Haghighi AA. 2013b. Growth and physiologic response of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) to deficit irrigation, water salinity and planting method. Int J Plant Prod. 7:569–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabani A, Sepaskhah AR, Kamkar-Haghighi AA. 2013c. Estimation of yield and dry matter of rapeseed using logistic model under water salinity and deficit irrigation. Arch Agron Soil Sci. doi:10.1080/03650340.2013.858807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva LL, Ragab R, Duarte I, Lourenço E, Simões N, Chaves MM. 2013. Calibration and validation of SALTMED model under dry and wet year conditions using chickpea field data from southern Portugal. Irrig Sci. 31:651–659. doi:10.1007/s00271-012-0341-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stöckle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R. 2003. Cropsyst, a cropping systems simulation model. Eur J Agron. 18:289–307. doi:10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00109-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner CB, Sinclair TR. 1983. Efficient water use in crop production; research or re-search. In: Taylor HM, Jordan WR, Sinclair TR, editors. Limitations to efficient water use in crop production. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy-Crop Society of America-Soil Science Society of America; p. 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten M. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc America J. 44:892–898. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten MT 1987. A numerical model for water and solute movement in and below the root zone. Research Project Report. Riverside (CA): US Salinity Lab.
   Google Scholar
• Willmott CJ, Rowe CM, Mintz Y. 1985. Climatology of the terrestrial seasonal water cycle. J Climatol. 5:589–606. doi:10.1002/joc.3370050602
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu Q, Liu JD, Zhang YQ, Li J. 2002. Simulation of rice biomass accumulation by an extended logistic model including influence of meteorological factors. Int J Biometeorol. 46:185–191. doi:10.1007/s00484-002-0141-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeleke KT, Luckett D, Cowley R. 2011. Calibration and testing of the FAO aquacrop model for canola. Agron J. 103:1610–1618. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar