Effect of drought pretreatment before anthesis and post-anthesis waterlogging on water relation, photosynthesis, and growth of tomatoes

References

• Ahmed F, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Juraimi AS, Rahim HA, Asfaliza R, Latif MA. 2013. Waterlogging tolerance of crops: breeding, mechanism of tolerance, molecular approaches, and future prospects. Biomed Res Int. 2013:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Aloni B, Rosenshtein G. 1982. Effect of flooding on tomato cultivars: the relationship between proline accumulation and other morphological and physiological changes. Physiol Plantarum. 56:513–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AOAC. 1990. Official methods of analysis, 15th. Washington (DC): Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce TJA, Matthes MC, Napier JA, Pickett JA. 2007. Stressful “memories” of plants: evidence and possible mechanisms. Plant Sci. 173:603–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel JR, Fereres E. 1982. Responses of young almond stress to two drought periods in the field. J Hortic Sci. 57:175–187.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Qualls RG, Blank RR. 2005. Effect of soil flooding on photosynthesis, carbohydrate partitioning and nutrient uptake in the invasive exotic Lepidium latifolium. Aquat Bot. 82:250–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Qualls RG, Miller GC. 2002. Adaptive responses of Lepidium latifolium to soil flooding: biomass allocation, adventitious rooting, aerenchyma formation and ethylene production. Environ Exp Bot. 48:119–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorais M, Papadopoulos A, Gosselin A. 2001. Greenhouse tomato fruit quality. Hortic Rev. 26:239–319.
   Google Scholar
• Drew MC. 1997. Oxygen deficiency and root metabolism: injury and acclimation under hypoxia and anoxia. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 48:223–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar GD, Sharkey TD. 1982. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. 33:317–345.
   Google Scholar
• Giorio P, Sorrentino G, d’Andria R. 1999. Stomatal behaviour, leaf water status and photosynthetic response in field-grown olive trees under water deficit. Environ Exp Bot. 42:95–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grassini P, Indaco GV, Pereira ML, Hall AJ, Trápani N. 2007. Responses to short-term waterlogging during grain filling in sunflower. Field Crops Res. 101:352–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo XP, Zhen B, Lu HF. 2013. Research advances in pile-up effects of drought and waterlogging alternative stress on rice. Adv Sci Technol Water Res. 33:83–85.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison RD, Daniell JW, Chesire JM. 1989. Net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of peach seedlings and cuttings in response to changes in soil water potential. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 114:986–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho LC, White PJ. 2005. A cellular hypothesis for the induction of blossom-end rot in tomato fruit. Ann Bot. 95:571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang B. 2000. Waterlogging responses and interaction with temperature, salinity, and nutrients. In: Wilkinson, RE, editor. Plant–Environmental Interaction. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker Inc. Academic Press; p. 263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Irving LJ, Sheng Y-B, Woolley D, Matthew C. 2007. Physiological effects of waterlogging on two lucerne varieties grown under glasshouse conditions. J Agron Crop Sci. 193:345–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishikawa M, Robertson AJ, Gusta LV. 1995. Comparison of viability tests for assessing cross-adaptation to freezing, heat and salt stresses induced by abscisic acid in brome grass (Bromus inermis Leyss) suspension cultured cells. Plant Sci. 107:83–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreps JA, Wu Y, Chang HS, Zhu T, Wang X, Harper JF. 2002. Transcriptome changes for Arabidopsis in response to salt, osmotic, and cold stress. Plant Physiol. 130:2129–2141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar P, Pal M, Joshi R, Sairam RK. 2013. Yield, growth and physiological responses of mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes to waterlogging at vegetative stage. Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 19:209–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CY, Jiang D, Wollenweber B, Li Y, Dai T, Cao, W. 2011. Waterlogging pretreatment during vegetative growth improves tolerance to waterlogging after anthesis in wheat. Plant Sci. 180:672–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin KHR, Weng -C-C, Lo H-F, Chen J-T. 2004. Study of the root antioxidative system of tomatoes and eggplants under waterlogged conditions. Plant Sci. 167:355–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marouelli WA, Silva WLC. 2007. Water tension thresholds for processing tomatoes under drip irrigation in Central Brazil. Irrigation Sci. 25:411–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael B, Jackson D, Campbell J. 2006. Waterlogging and petiole epinasty in tomato. The role of ethylene and low oxygen. New Phytologist. 76:21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Molinier J, Ries G, Zipfel C, Hohn B. 2006. Transgeneration memory of stress in plants. Nature. 442:1046–1049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra M, Albacetea A, Martínez-Andújara C, Pérez-Alfocea F. 2007. Increasing plant vigour and tomato fruit yield under salinity by inducing plant adaptation at the earliest seedling stage. Environ Exp Bot. 60:77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peet M. 1992. Fruit cracking in tomato. Hort Technology. 2:216–223.
   Google Scholar
• Pezeshki SR. 1994. Plant response to flooding. In: Wilinson, RE, editor. Plant–environment interactions. New York (NY): Marcel Dekker Inc., Academic Press; p. 289–321.
   Google Scholar
• Pociecha E, Kościelniak J, Filek W. 2008. Effects of root flooding and stage of development on the growth and photosynthesis of field bean (Vicia faba L. minor). Acta Physiol Plant. 30:529–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Promkhambut A, Younger A, Polthanee A, Akkasaeng C. 2010. Morphological and physiological responses of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to waterlogging. Asian J Plant Sci. 9:183–193.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Domingo R, Savé R, Biel C, Torrecillas A. 1997. Effects of water deficit and rewatering on leaf water relations of lemon plants. Biol Plant. 39:623–631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Domingo R, Torrecillas A, Pérez-Pastor A. 2000. Water stress preconditioning to improve drought resistance in young apricot plants. Plant Sci. 156:245–251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabehat A, Weiss D, Lurie S. 1998. Heat-shock proteins and cross tolerance in plants. Physiol Plantarum. 103:437–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Blanco MJ, Alarcón JJ, Planes J. 1994. Differential flood stress resistance of two almond cultivars based on survival, growth and water relations as stress indicators. J Hortic Sci. 69:947–953.
   Google Scholar
• Shao GC, Deng S, Liu N, Wang MH, She DL. 2015. Fruit quality and yield of tomato as influenced by rain shelters and deficit irrigation. J Agric Sci Tech. 17:691–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao GC, Lan JJ, Yu SE, Liu N, Guo RQ, She DL. 2013. Photosynthesis and growth of winter wheat in response to waterlogging at different growth stages. Photosynthetica. 51:429–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao GC, Wang MH, Liu N, Yuan M, Kumar P, She DL. 2014. Growth and comprehensive quality index of tomato under rain shelters in response to different irrigation and drainage treatments. Sci World J. 2014:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Shao HB, Chu LY, Zhao CX, Guo QJ, Liu XA, Ribaut JM. 2006. Plant gene regulatory network system under abiotic stress. Acta Biol Szegediensis. 50:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma D, Swarup A. 1988. Effects of short-term flooding on growth, yield and mineral composition of wheat on sodic soil under field conditions. Plant Soil. 107:137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro RG. 1966. Analysis of sugars found in glycoproteins. In: Neufeld, ES, Ginsburg, V, editors. Methods in enzymology. Vol. VIII, complex carbohydrates. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Tallón C, Quiles MJ. 2007. Acclimation to heat and high light intensity during the development of oat leaves increases the NADH DH complex and PTOX levels in chloroplasts. Plant Sci. 173:438–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tardif G, Kane NA, Adam H, Labrie L, Major G, Gulick P, Sarhan F, Laliberté J-F. 2007. Interaction network of proteins associated with abiotic stress response and development in wheat. Plant Mol Biol. 63:703–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner NC. 1988. Measurement of plant water status by the pressure chamber technique. Irrig Sci. 9:289–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Kang SZ, Du TS, Li FS, Qiu RJ. 2011. Determination of comprehensive quality index for tomato and its response to different irrigation treatments. Agric Water Manage. 98:1228–1238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu G, Shao H-B, Chu L-Y, Cai J-W. 2007. Insights into molecular mechanisms of mutual effect between plants and the environment. Agron Sustain Dev. 27:69–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi PH, Rafique S, Singh NN. 2003. Response of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes to excess soil moisture stress: morpho-physiological effects and basis of tolerance. Eur J Agron. 19:383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar