Spatial variability of water retention parameters and saturated hydraulic conductivity in a calcareous Inceptisols (Khuzestan province of Iran) under sugarcane cropping

References

• Anderson S, Cassel D. 1986. Statistical and autoregressive analysis of soil physical properties of Portsmouth sandy loam. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 50:1096–1104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghdadi N, Boyer N, Todoroff P, El Hajj M, Bégué A. 2009. Potential of SAR sensors TerraSAR-X, ASAR/ENVISAT and PALSAR/ALOS for monitoring sugarcane crops on Reunion Island. Remote Sens Environ. 113:1724–1738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter MR, Gregorich EG. 2008. Soil sampling and handling. In: Patterson GT Carter MR, editors. Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science. Boca Raton (FL): Lewis Publishers; p. 1–69.
   Google Scholar
• Decken SCF, Siqueira GM. 2011. Characterizing the spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties of a poorly drained soil. World Appl Sci J. 12:732–741.
   Google Scholar
• Emery X, Lantuéjoul C. 2006. TBSIM: a computer program for conditional simulation of three-dimensional Gaussian random fields via the turning bands method. Comput Geosci. 32:1615–1628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliam FS, Dick DA. 2010. Spatial heterogeneity of soil nutrients and plant species in herb-dominated communities of contrasting land use. Plant Ecol. 209:83–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goovaerts P. 1998. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol Fertil Soil. 27:315–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greminger P, Sud Y, Nielsen D. 1985. Spatial variability of field-measured soil-water characteristics. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 49:1075–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal J, Thomasson JA, Jenkins JN, Owens PR, Whisler FD. 2005. Spatial variability analysis of soil physical properties of alluvial soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 69:1338–1350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleners T, Beekma J, Chaudhry M. 1999. Spatially variable soil hydraulic properties for simulation of field-scale solute transport in the unsaturated zone. Geoderma. 92:199–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klute A, Dirksen C. 1986. Hydraulic conductivity and diffusivity: laboratory methods. In: Klute, A, editor. Methods of soil analysis: part 1- physical and mineralogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9. Madison (WI): American Society of Agronomy; p. 687–734.
   Google Scholar
• Lauren JG, Wagnet R, Bouma J, Wosten J. 1988. Variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a Glossaquic Hapludalf with macropores. Soil Sci. 145:20–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallants D, Mohanty BP, Jacques D, Feyen J. 1996. Spatial variability of hydraulic properties in a multi-layered soil profile. Soil Sci. 161:167–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallants D, Vanclooster M, Meddahi M, Feyen J. 1994. Estimating solute transport in undisturbed soil columns using time-domain reflectometry. J Contam Hydrol. 17:91–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani V, Mohanty K. 1999. Effect of pore-space spatial correlations on two-phase flow in porous media. J Petrol Sci Eng. 23:173–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mantoglou A, Gelhar LW. 1987. Effective hydraulic conductivities of transient unsaturated flow in stratified soils. Water Resour Res. 23:57–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty B, Horton R, Ankeny M. 1996. Infiltration and macroporosity under a row crop agricultural field in a glacial till soil 1. Soil Sci. 161:205–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty B, Kanwar R, Horton R. 1991. A robust‐resistant approach to interpret spatial behavior of saturated hydraulic conductivity of a glacial till soil under no‐tillage system. Water Resour Res. 27:2979–2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty B, Kanwar RS, Everts C. 1994. Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measurement methods for a glacial-till soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 58:672–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi AA, Sepaskhah AR. 2012a. Artificial neural networks for predicting unsaturated soil hydraulic characteristics at different applied tensions. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 58:125–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moosavi AA, Sepaskhah AR. 2012b. Spatial variability of physico-chemical properties and hydraulic characteristics of a gravelly calcareous soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 58:631–656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mubarak I, Angulo-Jaramillo R, Mailhol JC, Ruelle P, Khaledian M, Vauclin M. 2010. Spatial analysis of soil surface hydraulic properties: is infiltration method dependent? Agric Water Manage. 97:1517–1526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naseri AA, Mohsenimowahed A, Hawasipoor E, Veysi S. 2012. Sugarcane plantation effects on the soil hydraulic conductivity in South-West of Iran. Afr J Agric Res. 7:1098–1103.
   Google Scholar
• Russo D, Bresler E. 1981. Effect of field variability in soil hydraulic properties on solutions of unsaturated water and salt flows. Soil Sci Soc Ama J. 45:675–681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwen A, Zimmermann M, Bodner G. 2014. Vertical variations of soil hydraulic properties within two soil profiles and its relevance for soil water simulations. J Hydrol. 516:169–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika. 52:591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith KA. 2000. Soil and environmental analysis: physical methods. Revised, and Expanded. New York (NY): CRC Press; p. 65–95.
   Google Scholar
• Sobieraj J, Elsenbeer H, Cameron G. 2004. Scale dependency in spatial patterns of saturated hydraulic conductivity. Catena. 55:49–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th ed. Washington (DC): USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Springer EP, Cundy TW. 1987. Field‐scale evaluation of infiltration parameters from soil texture for hydrologic analysis. Water Resour Res. 23:325–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng PH, Jury WA. 1993. Simulation of field measurement of hydraulic conductivity in unsaturated heterogeneous soil. Water Resour Res. 29:2087–2099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten MT. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 44:892–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Genuchten MT, Leij F, Yates S. 1991. The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. Robert Riverside (CA): U.S. Salinity Laboratory, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service.
   Google Scholar
• Vieira SR, Carvalho JRPd, González AP. 2010. Jack knifing for semivariogram validation. Bragantia. 69:97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Shao M, Han X, Liu Z. 2015. Spatial variability of soil parameters of the van Genuchten model at a regional scale. Clean Soil Air Water. 43:271–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrick AW, Nielsen DR. 1980. Spatial variability of soil physical properties in the field. In: Hillel, D, editor. Application of soil physics. New York (NY): Academic Press; p. 319–344.
   Google Scholar
• Wilding LP. 1985. Spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil surveys. In: Nielsen DR, Bouma J, editors. Proceedings of the soil spatial variability workshop. Wageningen: Pudoc; p. 166–194.
   Google Scholar
• Wuest SB. 2005. Bias in ponded infiltration estimates due to sample volume and shape. Vadose Zone J. 4:1183–1190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates S, Warrick A. 1987. Estimating soil water content using cokriging. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 51:23–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young M, Caldwell T, Meadows D, Fenstermaker L. 2009. Variability of soil physical and hydraulic properties at the Mojave Global Change Facility, Nevada: implications for water budget and evapotranspiration. J Arid Environ. 73:733–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar