Compositional nutrient diagnosis in sugar beet with sodium supplementation

References

• Allison MF, Jaggard KW, Armstrong MJ. 1994. Time of application and chemical form of potassium, phosphorus, magnesium and sodium fertilizers and effects on the growth, yield and quality of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). J Agr Sci. 123:61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barłóg P. 2013a. The soil Na concentration as a background of fertilizer Na recommendation: a case of sugar beet. Acta Agr Scand B-SP. 63:206–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barłóg P. 2013b. Sodium as element increasing nitrogen productivity – a case study on sugar beet. J Elem. 18:7–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barłóg P. 2016. Diagnosis of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) nutrient imbalance by DRIS and CND-clr method at two stages during early growth. J Plant Nutr. 39:1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaufils ER, Sumner ME. 1976. Application of DRIS approach for calibrating soil, plant yield and plant quality factors of sugarcane. Proc South Afr Sugar Technol Assoc. 50:118–124.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann W. 1992. Nutritional disorders of plants: visual and analytical diagnosis. Jena (Germany): Gustav Fischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz K, Märländer B, Puke H, Glattkowski H, Thielecke K. 1995. Neubewertung des technischen Wertes von Zuckerrüben. Zuckerindustrie. 120:113–121.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson DR, Draycott AP. 2006. Nutrition – phosphorus, sulphur, potassium, sodium, calcium, magnesium and micronutrients – liming and nutrient deficiencies. In: Draycott, AP, editor. Sugar beet. Bury St Edmunds (UK): Blackwell; p. 185–219.
   Google Scholar
• Draycott AP, Durrant MJ. 1976. Response by sugar beet to potassium and sodium fertilizers, particularly in relation to soils containing little exchangeable potassium. J Agr Sci. 87:105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durrant MJ, Draycott AP, Milford GFJ. 1978. Effect of sodium fertiliser on water status and yield of sugar beet. Ann Appl Biol. 88:321–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fageria VD. 2001. Nutrient interaction in crop plants. J Plant Nutr. 24:1269–1290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2016. Crop water information: sugarbeet [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Land and Water division; [cited 2016 Aug 30]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/nr/water/cropinfo_sugarbeet.html.
   Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT. 2016. Sugar beet [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division; [cited 2016 Apr 11]. Available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.
   Google Scholar
• García-Hernández JL, Valdez-Cepeda RD, Murillo-Amador B, Beltrán-Morales FA, Ruiz-Espinoza FH, Orona-Castillo I, Flores-Hernández A, Troyo-Diéguez E. 2006. Preliminary compositional nutrient diagnosis norms in Aloe vera L. grown on calcareous soil in an arid environment. Environ Exp Bot. 58:244–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grzebisz W, Gransee A, Szczepaniak W, Diatta J. 2013. The effects of potassium fertilization on water-use efficiency in crop plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 176:355–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajiboland R, Joudmand A, Fotouhi K. 2009. Mild salinity improves sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) quality. Acta Agr Scand B-SP. 59:295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hampe T, Marschner H. 1982. Effect of sodium on morphology, water relations, and net photosynthesis in sugar beet leaves. Z Pflanzenphysiol. 108:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haneklaus S, Knudsen L, Schnug E. 1998. Relationship between potassium and sodium in sugar beet. Commun Soil Sci Plant. 29:1793–1798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinsinger P. 2001. Bioavailability of soil inorganic p in the rhizosphere as affected by root-induced chemical changes: a review. Plant Soil. 237:173–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones Jr JB, Case VW. 1990. Sampling, handling, and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Westerman, RL, editor. Soil testing and plant analysis. Madison (WI): SSSA; p. 389–427.
   Google Scholar
• Kenter C, Hoffmann CM, Märländer B. 2006. Effects of weather variables on sugar beet yield development (Beta vulgaris L.). Eur J Agron. 24:62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari L, Parent L-É, Tremblay N. 2001a. Selecting the high-yield subbpopulation for diagnosing nutrient imbalance in crops. Agron J. 93:802–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khiari L, Parent L-É, Tremblay N. 2001b. The phosphorus compositional nutrient diagnosis range for potato. Agron J. 93:815–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronzucker HJ, Coskun D, Schulze LM, Wong JR, Britto DT. 2013. Sodium as nutrient and toxicant. Plant Soil. 369:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar PSS, Geetha SA, Savithri P, Mahendran PP, Ragunath KP. 2003. Evaluation of DRIS and CND indexes for effective nutrient management in Muscat grapevines (Vitis vinefera). J Appl Hortic. 5:76–80.
   Google Scholar
• Mäck G, Hoffmann CM. 2006. Organ-specific adaptation to low precipitation in solute concentration of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Eur J Agron. 25:270:– 279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malnou CS, Jaggard KW, Sparkes DL. 2006. A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop. Eur J Agron. 25:254–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier U. 2001. Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants [Internet]. BBCH Monograph. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Germany; [cited 2016 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.jki.bund.de/fileadmin/dam_uploads/_veroeff/bbch/BBCH-Skala_englisch.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Milford GFJ, Armstrong MJ, Jarvis PJ, Houghton BJ, Bellett-Travers DM, Jones J, Leigh RA. 2000. Effect of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium offtake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status. J Agr Sci. 135:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent L-É. 2011. Diagnosis of the nutrient compositional space of fruit crops. Rev Bras Frutic. 33:321–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parent L-É, Dafir M. 1992. A theoretical concept of compositional nutrient diagnosis. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 117:239–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schachtman DP, Liu WH. 1999. Molecular pieces to the puzzle of the interaction between potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 4:281–287.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva EC, Nogueira RJMC, Silva MA, Albuquerque MB. 2010. Drought stress and plant nutrition. Plant Stress. 5:32–41.
   Google Scholar
• StatSoft, Inc. (2013). Electronic statistics textbook [Internet]. Tulsa (OK): StatSoft. WEB; [cited 2016 Sep 19]. Available from: http://www.statsoft.com/textbook.
   Google Scholar
• Subbarao GV, Ito O, Berry WL, Wheeler RM. 2003. Sodium – a functional plant nutrient. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 22:391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbarao GV, Wheeler RM, Levine LH, Stutte GW. 2001. Glycine betaine accumulation, ionic and water relations of red-beet at contrasting levels of sodium supply. J Plant Physiol. 158:767–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supit I, van Diepen C, de Wit A. 2010. Recent changes in the climatic yield potential of various crops in Europe. Agric Syst. 103:683–694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulrich A, Hills FJ. 1990. Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing sugarbeet. In: Westerman, RL, editor. Soil testing and plant analysis. Madison (WI): SSSA; p. 249–447.
   Google Scholar
• Wakeel A, Abd-El-Motagally F, Steffens D, Schubert S. 2009. Sodium-induced calcium deficiency in sugar beet during substitution of potassium by sodium. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 172:254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeel A, Farooq M, Qadir M, Schubert S. 2011. Potassium substitution by sodium in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 30:401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakeel A, Steffens D, Schubert S. 2010. Potassium substitution by sodium in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) nutrition on K-fixing soils. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 173:127–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner M, Kryza M, Dore AJ, Hallsworth S, Błaś M. 2011. Modelling emission, concentration and deposition of sodium for Poland. In: Proceedings of 14th Conference on Harmonisation within Atmospheric Dispersion Modelling for Regulatory Purposes; 2011 Oct 2–6; Kos, Greece; p. 139–143.
   Google Scholar
• White PJ, Broadley MR. 2001. Chloride in soils and its uptake and movement within the plant: A review. Ann Bot. 88:967–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J-L, Flowers TJ, Wang S-M. 2010. Mechanisms of sodium uptake by roots of higher plants. Plant Soil. 326:45–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar