Biogas digestates based on lignin-rich feedstock – potential as fertilizer and soil amendment

References

• Abubaker J, Risberg K, Pell M. 2012. Biogas residues as fertilisers – effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Appl Energ. 99:126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Bernal MP. 2012a. Chemical properties of anaerobic digestates affecting C and N dynamics in amended soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 160:15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferrer-Costa A, Carrasco L, Cegarra J, Abad M, Bernal MP. 2012b. Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues. Biomass Bioenerg. 40:181–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthurson V. 2009. Closing the global energy and nutrient cycles through application of biogas residue to agricultural land - potential benefits and drawbacks. Energies. 2:226–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beni C, Servadio P, Marconi S, Neri U, Aromolo R, Diana G. 2012. Anaerobic digestate administration: effect on soil physical and mechanical behavior. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 43:821–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bougnom BP, Niederkofler C, Knapp BA, Stimpfl E, Insam H. 2012. Residues from renewable energy production: their value for fertilizing pastures. Biomass Bioenerg. 39:290–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bremner JM, Mulvaney CS. 1982. Nitrogen-total. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis part 2. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA; p. 595–624.
   Google Scholar
• Bungay S, Humphries M, Stephenson T. 2007. Operating strategies for variable-flow sequencing batch reactors. Water Environ J. 21:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra R, Takeuchi H, Hasegawa T. 2012. Hydrothermal pretreatment of rice straw biomass: A potential and promising method for enhanced methane production. Appl Energ. 94:129–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Fuente C, Alburquerque JA, Clemente R, Bernal MP. 2013. Soil C and N mineralisation and agricultural value of the products of an anaerobic digestion system. Biol Fert Soils. 49:313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egnér H, Riehm H, Domingo WR. 1960. Untersuchungen über die chemische Boden-Analyse als Grundlage für die Beurteilung des Nährstoffzustandes der Böden. [Studies on chemical soil analysis as a basis for evaluating the nutrient status of soils]. Kung Lantbrukshögskolans Annaler. 26:199–215. German.
   Google Scholar
• Elonen P. 1971. Particle-size analysis of soil. Acta Agral Fenn. 112:1–122.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez MM. 2013. Improving the anaerobic digestion of lignocelluloses and organic wastes: effects of steam explosion, co-digestion and digestate recirculation [ PhD thesis]. Norway: Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Estevez MM, Linjordet R, Morken J. 2012. Effects of steam explosion and co-digestion in the methane production from Salix by mesophilic batch assays. Bioresour Technol. 104:749–756.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvez A, Sinicco T, Cayuela ML, Mingorance MD, Fornasier F, Mondini C. 2012. Short term effects of bioenergy by-products on soil C and N dynamics, nutrient availability and biochemical properties. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 160:3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks ATWM, Zeeman G. 2009. Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 100:10–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn SJ, Estevez MM, Nielsen HK, Linjordet R, Eijsink VGH. 2011. Biogas production and saccharification of Salix pretreated at different steam explosion conditions. Bioresour Technol. 102:7932–7936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J. 2015. Manure-based biogas fermentation residues – Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochem. 84:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinari S, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B, Grego S. 2000. Influence of organic and mineral fertilisers on soil biological and physical properties. Bioresour Technol. 72:9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K. 2015. Effects of anaerobic digestion on soil carbon and nitrogen turnover, N emissions, and soil biological activity. A review. Agron Sustainable Dev. 35:1021–1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möller K, Müller T. 2012. Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review. Eng Life Sci. 12:242–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller-Stöver DS, Sun G, Kroff P, Thomsen ST, Hauggaard-Nielsen H. 2016. Anaerobic co-digestion of perennials: methane potential and digestate nitrogen fertilizer value. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 179:696–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2. 2nd ed. Madison (WI): ASA and SSSA; p. 539–579.
   Google Scholar
• Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K. 2008. Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Manage. 28:1246–1253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øgaard AF, Krogstad T, Løes A-K. 2001. Potassium uptake by grass from a clay and a silt soil in relation to soil tests. Acta Agric Scand, Sect B, Soil and Plant Sci. 51:97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1947. Pressure-membrane apparatus, construction and use. Agr Eng. 28:451–454.
   Google Scholar
• Richards LA. 1948. Porous plate apparatus for measuring moisture retention and transmission by soils. Soil Sci. 66:105–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risberg K, Sun L, Levén L, Horn SJ, Schnürer A. 2013. Biogas production from wheat straw and manure – impact of pretreatment and process operating parameters. Bioresour Technol. 149:232–237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawatdeenarunat C, Surendra KC, Takara D, Oechsner H, Khanal SK. 2015. Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol. 178:178–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiralipour A, McConnell DB, Smith WH. 1992. Physical and chemical properties of soils as affected by municipal solid waste compost application. Biomass Bioenerg. 3:261–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieling K, Herrmann A, Wienforth B, Taube F, Ohl S, Hartung E, Kage H. 2013. Biogas cropping systems: short term response of yield performance and N use efficiency to biogas residue application. Eur J Agron. 47:44–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith SR, Woods V, Evans TD. 1998. Nitrate dynamics in biosolids-treated soils. I. Influence of biosolids type and soil type. Bioresour Technol. 66:139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sogn TA, Haugen LE. 2011. Predicting mineral N release during decomposition of organic wastes in soil by use of the SOILN_NO model. Appl Environ Soil Sci.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson K, Odlare M, Pell M. 2005. The fertilizing effect of compost and biogas residues from source separated household waste. J Agric Sci. 142:461–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tambone F, Scaglia B, D’Imporzano G, Schievano A, Orzi V, Salati S, Adani F. 2010. Assessing amendment and fertilizing properties of digestates from anaerobic digestion through a comparative study with digested sludge and compost. Chemosphere. 81:577–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tampio E, Salo T, Rintala J. 2016. Agronomic characteristics of five different urban waste digestates. J Environ Manage. 169:293–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torstensson G, Eriksson S. 1936. A new method for determining the porosity of the soil. Soil Sci. 42:405–417.
   Google Scholar
• Vivekanand V, Olsen EF, Eijsink VGH, Horn SJ. 2013. Effect of different steam explosion conditions on methane potential and enzymatic saccharification of birch. Bioresour Technol. 127:343–349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar