The combined application of controlled-release urea and fulvic acid improved the soil nutrient supply and maize yield

References

• Barkunan SR, Bhanumathi V, Sethuram J. 2019. Smart sensor for automatic drip irrigation system for paddy cultivation. Comput Electr Eng. 73:180–193. doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2018.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Koopal LK, Xiong J, Avena M, Tan W. 2017. Mechanisms of soil humic acid adsorption onto montmorillonite and kaolinite. J Colloid Interface Sci. 504:457–467. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrads H, Ingwersen J, Xiaotang JU, Streck T. 2018. Direct measurement of co2 retention in arable soils with pH above 6.5 during barometric process separation incubation. Pedosphere. 28:726–738. doi:10.1016/S1002-0160(18)60042-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa AS, Rom~ao LPC, Araújo BR, Lucas SCO, Maciel STA, Wisniewski A Jr, Alexandre MR. 2012. Environmental strategies to remove volatile aromatic fractions (BTEX) from petroleum industry wastewater using biomass. Bioresour Technol. 105:31–39. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas LA, Riazi A, Smith CJ. 1980. A semi-micro method for determining total N in soils and plant material containing nitrite and nitrate. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 44:431–433. doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400020047x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PL, González-Villalba HA, Sermarini RA, Trivelin PCO. 2018. Nitrogen use efficiency and nutrient partitioning in maize as affected by blends of controlled-release and conventional urea. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 64:1944–1962. doi:10.1080/03650340.2018.1469746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia PL, Sermarini RA, Trivelin PCO. 2019a. Effect of nitrogen rates applying controlled-release and conventional urea blend in maize. J Plant Nutr. 4:2199–2208. doi:10.1080/01904167.2019.1658778.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia PL, Sermarini RA, Trivelin PCO. 2019b. Placement effect of controlled-release and conventional urea blend in maize. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 50:2321–2329. doi:10.1080/00103624.2019.1659300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golbashy M, Sabahi H, Allahdadi I, Nazokdast H, Hosseini M. 2017. Synthesis of highly intercalated urea-clay nanocomposite via domestic montmorillonite as eco-friendly slow-release fertilizer. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 63:84–95. doi:10.1080/03650340.2016.1177175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant CA, Wu R, Selles F, Harker KN, Clayton GW, Bittman S, Lupwayi NZ. 2012. Crop yield and nitrogen concentration with controlled release urea and split applications of nitrogen as compared to non-coated urea applied at seeding. Field Crops Res. 127:170–180. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo J, Wang Y, Blaylock AD, Chen X. 2017a. Mixture of controlled release and normal urea to optimize nitrogen management for high-yielding (>15Mg ha−1) maize. Field Crop Res. 204:23–30. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo JM, Xue JQ, Blaylock AD, Cui ZL, Chen XP. 2017b. Film-mulched maize production: response to controlled-release urea fertilization. J Agric Sci. 155:1299–1310. doi:10.1017/S002185961700048X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo L, Ning T, Nie L, Li Z, Lal R. 2016. Interaction of deep placed controlled-release urea and water retention agent on nitrogen and water use and maize yield. Eur J Agron. 75:118–129. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2016.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha N, Feike T, Back H, Xiao H, Bahrs E. 2015. The effect of simple nitrogen fertilizer recommendation strategies on product carbon footprint and gross margin of wheat and maize production in the North China plain. J Environ Manage. 163:146–154. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.08.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G, Zhao B, Dong S, Zhang J, Liu P, Vyn TJ. 2017. Interactive effects of water and controlled release urea on nitrogen metabolism, accumulation, translocation, and yield in summer maize. Sci Nat. 104:72. doi:10.1007/s00114-017-1491-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morosini JS, Mendon ALDF, Lyra DH, Galli G, Vidotti MS, Fritsche-Neto R. 2017. Association mapping for traits related to nitrogen use efficiency in tropical maize lines under field conditions. Plant Soil. 421:453–463. doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3479-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin S, Hu C, Dong W. 2010. Nitrification results in underestimation of soil urease activity as determined by ammonium production rate. Pedobiologia. 53:401–404. doi:10.1016/j.pedobi.2010.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabahi H, Jamian SS, Ghashghaee F. 2016. Assessment of urea coated with pomegranate fruit powder as N slow-release fertilizer in maize. J Plant Nutr. 39:2092–2099. doi:10.1080/01904167.2016.1193607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2012. SAS® system for windows, version 9.2. Cary (NC, USA): SAS Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Sabahi H, Rabiei M, Jafari Y, Asilan KS. 2017. Evaluation of pomegranate fruit powder coated on urea as urea-N immobilizer and soil-P mobilizer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal. 48:285–293. doi:10.1080/00103624.2016.1269794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slobodníková L, Fialová S, Rendeková K, Kováč J, Mučaji P. 2016. Antibiofilm activity of plant polyphenols. Molecules. 21:1717. doi:10.3390/molecules21121717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suman S, Spehia RS, Sharma V. 2016. Productivity of capsicum as influenced by fertigation with chemical fertilizers and humic acid. J Plant Nutr. 39:410–416. doi:10.1080/01904167.2015.1069338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USDA, N. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. Washington: Soil Survey Staff.
   Google Scholar
• Vásquez-Murrieta MS, Govaerts B, Dendooven L. 2007. Microbial biomass c measurements in soil of the central highlands of mexico. Appl Soil Ecol. 35:432–440. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2006.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodley AL, Drury CF, Reynolds WD, Calder W, Yang XM, Oloya TO. 2018. Improved acid trap methodology for determining ammonia volatilization in wind tunnel experiments. Can J Soil Sci. 98:193–199. doi:10.1139/cjss-2017-0081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap SD, Astals S, Lu Y, Peces M, Jensen PD, Batstone DJ, Tait S. 2018. Humic acid inhibition of hydrolysis and methanogenesis with different anaerobic inocula. Waste Manage. 80:130–136. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2018.09.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Yin H, Chen L, Liu F, Chen H. 2018. The role of different functional groups in a novel adsorption-complexation-reduction multi-step kinetic model for hexavalent chromium retention by undissolved humic acid. Environ Pollut. 237:740–746. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W, Liang Z, He X, Wang X, Shi X, Zou C, Chen X. 2019. The effects of controlled release urea on maize productivity and reactive nitrogen losses: A meta-analysis. Environ Pollut. 246:559–565. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Ni T, Li J, Lu Q, Fang Z, Huang Q, Shen Q. 2016. Effects of organic–inorganic compound fertilizer with reduced chemical fertilizer application on crop yields, soil biological activity and bacterial community structure in a rice–wheat cropping system. Appl Soil Ecol. 99:1–12. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Liu Z, Zhang M, Shi Y, Zhu Q, Sun Y. 2017. Improving crop yields, nitrogen use efficiencies, and profits by using mixtures of coated controlled-released and uncoated urea in a wheat-maize system. Field Crops Res. 205:106–115. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2017.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Sui C, Liu Z, Geng J, Tian X, Yang X, Zhang M. 2016b. Long-term effects of controlled-release urea on crop yields and soil fertility under wheat–corn double cropping systems. Agron J. 108:1703–1716. doi:10.2134/agronj2015.0581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng W, Zhang M, Liu Z, Zhou H, Lu H, Zhang W, Chen B. 2016a. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system. Field Crops Res. 197:52–62. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Z, Shen Y, Du C, Zhou J, Qin Y, Wu Y. 2017. Economic and soil environmental benefits of using controlled‐release bulk blending urea in the North China plain. Land Degrad Dev. 28:2370–2379. doi:10.1002/ldr.2767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar