Topcross hybrids in papaya (Carica papaya L.): evaluation of the potential for increasing fruit quality in new cultivars

References

• Alin A. 2010. Multicollinearity. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat. 2(3):370–374. doi:10.1002/wics.84.
   Google Scholar
• Barros Gb De A, Aredes FAS, Ramos HCC, Santa-Catarina R, Pereira MG. 2017. Combining ability of recombinant lines of papaya from backcrossing for sexual conversion. Rev Cienc Agron. 48(1):166–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho EML, Reis RC, Borges VP, Ledo CAS, Araújo ES, Dantas JLL. 2020. Physicochemical and sensory properties of papaya fruits of elite lines and hybrids. Semin Agrar. 41(1):121–129. doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2020v41n1p121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes DFM, Santa-catarina R, Oliveira A, Azevedo N, Pastana T, Poltronieri DS. 2018. Papaya recombinant inbred lines selection by image-based phenotyping. Sci Agr. 75:208–215. doi:10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes DFM, Santa-Catarina R, Vettorazzi JCF, Ramos HCCR, Viana AP, Pereira MG. 2019. Development of superior lines of papaya from the Formosa group using the pedigree method and REML/Blup procedure. Bragantia 78(3):350–360. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.20180253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz CD. 2013. GENES - a software package for analysis in experimental statistics and quantitative genetics. Acta Sci Agro. 35:271–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PC. 2012. Biometric methods criteria for genetic improvement. Viçosa: UFV Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Cruz CD, Regazzi AJ, Carneiro PC. 2014. Biometric methods criteria for genetic improvement. Viçosa: UFV Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Dantas JLL, Lucena RS, Boas SAV. 2015. Agronomic evaluation of papaya lines and hybrids. Rev Bras Frutic. 37(1):138–148. doi:10.1590/0100-2945-022/14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis RL. 1927. Report of the plant breeder. Rep of the Puerto Rico Agri Exp. 14–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dias NLP, Oliveira EJD, Dantas JLL. 2011. Evaluation of papaya genotypes using agronomic descriptors and estimation of genetic parameters. Pesq Agropec Bras. 46(11):1471–1479. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2011001100008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAOSTAT: statistical database. 2018. Rome (IT): Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; [acessed 2020 Jul 20]. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#home.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira A, Cecon PR, Cruz CD, Ferrão RG, Da Silva MF, Da Fonseca AFA, Ferrão EMAG. 2005. Simultaneous selection of Coffea canephoraby means of combination of factor analysis and selection indexes. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 40(12):1189–1195. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2005001200005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas SP, Do Amaral AT, Rangel RME, Viana AP. 2009. Genetic gain prediction on UNB-2U popcorn population under recurrent selection by using different selection indexes. Semin Agrar. 30(4): 803–814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan FH, Tajidin NE, Ahmad SH, Mohamed MTM, Shukor NIA. 2018. Ripening characteristics of vapour heat treated ‘frangi’ papaya (Carica papaya L. cv. frangi) as affected by maturity stages and ethylene treatment. Bragantia. 77(2):372–384. doi:10.1590/1678-4499.105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazel HN. 1943. The genetic basis for constructing selection indexes. Genetics 28(6):476–490.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• IBGE: produção agrícola municipal. 2018. Brazil: instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; [acessed 2020 July 20]. https://www.ibge.gov.br/.
   Google Scholar
• Ide CD, Pereira MG, Viana AP, Pereira TNS. 2009. Use of testers for combining ability and selection of papapya hybrids. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 9(1):59–65. doi:10.12702/1984-7033.v09n01a09.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INMET: banco de dados meteorológicos. 2018. Brazil: instituto Nacional de Meteorologia; [acessed 25 December 20]. https://bdmep.inmet.gov.br/.
   Google Scholar
• Koc AB. 2007. Determination of watermelon volume using ellipsoid approximation and image processing. Postharvest Biol Technol. 45(3):366–371. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laviola BG, Rosado TB, Bhering LL, Kobayashi AK, Resende MDV. 2010. Genetic parameters and variability in physic nut accessions during early developmental stages. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras. 45(10):1117–1123. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2010001000010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luz LN, Pereira MG, Barros FR, Barros GDB, Ferreguetti GA. 2015. New hybrids of papaya evaluated in the traditional region for crop and in the brazilian semiarid. Rev Bras Frutic. 37(1):159–171. doi:10.1590/0100-2945-069/14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo CAF, Souza MM, Viana AP, Santos EA, Souza VO, Corrêa RX. 2016. Morphological characterization and genetic parameter estimation in backcrossed progenies of Passiflora L. For Ornamental Use Sci Hortic. 212:91–103. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore PH. 2014. Phenotypic and Genetic Diversity of Papaya. In: Moore PH, Ming R, editors. Genetics and Genomics of Papaya. New York: Springer; p. 35–45.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira SO, Kuhlcamp KT, Barros FLDS, Zucoloto M, Godinho TDO. 2019. Selection index based on phenotypic and genotypic values predicted by REML/BLUP in papaya. Rev Bras Frutic. 41(1):1–7. doi:10.1590/0100-29452019079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira SO, Kuhlcamp KT, Barros FLS, De Oliveira SB, Trindade RS. 2018b. Path analysis under multicollinearity for papaya production of the solo and formosa groups. Rev Bras Frutic. 40(3):3. doi:10.1590/0100-29452018110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira SO, Kuhlcamp KT, Barros FLS, Zucoloto M, Moitinho ACR. 2018a. Intrapopulation recurrent selection by mixed models in papaya of the formosa group. Rev Bras Frutic. 40(3):1–8. doi:10.1590/0100-29452018870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulamba NN, Mock JJ. 1978. Improvement of yield potential of the Eto Blanco maize (Zea mays L.) population by breeding for plant traits. Egy J of Gen and Cytl. 7:40–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves LG, Bruckner CH, Cruz CD, Viana AP, Barelli MAA. 2011. Gain prediction with different selection index for yellow passion fruit characterization. Rev Bras Frutic. 33(4):1322–1330. doi:10.1590/S0100-29452011000400033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurmberg PL, Souza JC, Ribeiro PHE. 2000. Performance of single cross hybrids as testers of maize lines in top crosses. Rev Ceres. 47(274):683–696.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira RL, Von Pinho RG, Ferreira DF, Pires LPM, Melo WMC. 2014. Selection index in the study of adaptability and stability in maize. Sci World J. 2014:1–6
   Google Scholar
• Pereira MG, Ferreguetti GA, Pereira TNS, Ramos HCC, Cortes DFM, Santa-Catarina R, Luz LN, Barros GBA, Arêdes FAS, Boechat MSB, et al. 2018. Genetic improvement of papaya: uenf/Caliman program. In: Martins DS, editor. VII Simpósio do papaya brasileiro: produção e sustentabilidade hídrica. Incaper: Vitória; p. 1–59.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira MG, Luz LN, Santa-Catarina R, Ramos HCC, Pereira TNS, Barros GB, Ferregueti GA, Cortes DFM, Vettorazzi JCF, Azevedo AON, Silveira, SF, Oliveira, JG, Viana, AP. 2019a. “UC14”: a new papaya cultivar with intermediate fruit size CULTIVAR RELEASE. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol [Internet]. 19(2):226–229. doi:10.1590/1984-70332019v19n2c31
   Google Scholar
• Pesek J, Baker RJ. 1969. Desired improvement in relation to selected indices. Canadian J of Plant Sci. 49(6):803–804. doi:10.4141/cjps69-137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira MG, Luz LN, Santa-Catarina R, Ramos HCC, Pereira TNS, Barros GB, Ferregueti GA, Vivas M, Cortes DFM, Vettorazzi JCF, Azevedo AON, Silveira SF, Oliveira JG, Viana AP. 2019b. UC10: a new early Formosa papaya cultivar. Crop Breed Appl Biotechnol. 19(1):131–134. doi:10.1590/1984-70332019v19n1c18
   Google Scholar
• Ramos DP, Silva AC, Leonel S, Costa SM, Damatto Júnior, ER. 2010. Production and fruit quality of 'Paluma' guava, submitted to different pruning seasons in a subtropical climate. Rev Ceres. 57(5): 659–664.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos HCC, Pereira MG, Gonçalves LSA, Berilli APCG, Pinto FO, Ribeiro EH. 2012. Multivariate analysis to determine the genetic distance among backcross papaya (Carica papaya) progenies. Genet Mol Res. 11(2):1280–1295. doi:10.4238/2012.May.14.2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos HCC, Pereira MG, Viana AP, Luz LN, Cardoso DL, Ferreguetti GA. 2014. Combined Selection in Backcross Population of Papaya (Carica papaya L.) by the Mixed Model Methodology. Am J Plant Sci. 05(20):2973–2983. doi:10.4236/ajps.2014.520314.
   Google Scholar
• Reis RC, Viana ES, De Jesus JL, Dantas JLL, Lucena RS. 2015. Physicochemical characterization of new hybrids and inbred lines of papaya. Pesqui Agropecu Bras. 50(3):210–217. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2015000300004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resende MDV. 2002. Biometric and Statistics Genetics in the Improvement of Perennial Plants. Embrapa Publisher: Brasília.
   Google Scholar
• Resende MDV, Duarte JB. 2007. Precision and quality control in cultivar evaluation experiments. Pesqui Agropecuária Trop. 37:182–194.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues EV, Damasceno-Silva KJ, Rocha MDM, Bastos EA, Teodoro PE. 2017. Selection of cowpea populations tolerant to water deficit by selection index. Rev Cienc Agron. 48(5):889–896. doi:10.5935/1806-6690.20170105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santa-Catarina R, Cortes DFM, Vettorazzi JCF, Ramos HCC, Ferreguetti GA, Pereira MG. 2018. Image-based phenotyping of morpho-agronomic traits in papaya fruits (Carica papaya L. THB var.). Aust J Crop Sci. 12(11):1750–1756. doi:10.21475/ajcs.18.12.11.p1437.
   Google Scholar
• Santa-Catarina R, Vettorazzi JCF, Cortes DFM, Santana JGS, Poltronieri TPS, Miranda DP, Pirovani AAV, Moreira NF, Vivas M, Pereira MG. 2020. Phenotypic characterization of recurrent selection S 1 Papaya (Carica papaya L. Families by Multivariate Approach. 1:1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Silva MGM, Viana AP. 2012. Alternatives of selection in a yellow passion fruit population under intrapopulation recurrent selection. Rev Bras Frutic. 34(2): 525–531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva MS, Leonel S, Souza JMA, Modesto JH, Ferreira RB, Bolfarini ACB. 2018. Evaluation of papaya genotypes using agronomic descriptors and estimation of genetic parameters. Biosci J. 34(4):943–951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith HF. 1936. A discriminant function for plant selection. Annals of Eug. 7(3):240–250. doi:10.1111/j.1469-1809.1936.tb02143.x.
   Google Scholar
• Terres LR, Lenz E, Castro CM, Pereira AS. 2015. Genetic gain estimates using different selection index methods in three potato hybrid populations. Hortic Bras. 33(3):305–310. doi:10.1590/S0102-053620150000300005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos UAA, Dias LAS, Corrêa TR, Rosmaninho LBC, Silva DRM, Zaidan IR. 2020. Estimates of genetic parameters and path analysis of crambe: an important oil plant for biofuel production. Acta Sci Agron. 42:e42490. doi:10.4025/actasciagron.v42i1.42490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vettorazzi JCF, Santa-Catarina R, Poltronieri TPDS, Cortes DFM, Azevedo AON, Miranda DP, Santana JGS, Ramos HCC, Pereira MG. 2021. Combining ability of recombined F4 papaya lines: a strategy to select hybrid combination. Sci Agric. 78(2):e20190191. doi:10.1590/1678-992x-2019-0191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivas M, Silveira SF, Pereira MG. 2012. Prediction of genetic gain from selection indices for disease resistance in papaya hybrids. Rev Ceres. 59(6):781–786. doi:10.1590/S0034-737X2012000600007.
   Google Scholar
• Williams JS. 1962. The evolution of a selection index. Biometr 18(3):375–393. doi:10.2307/2527479.
   Google Scholar