Effects of biochar and TUAT-1 bio-inoculant on grain yield and nitrogen efficiency of forage rice ‘Monster rice 1’ under different N application modes

References

• Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW. 2009. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol. 58(4):921–929. doi:10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ao H, Wang S, Zou Y, Peng S, Tang Q, Fang Y, Chen Y, Xiong C, Xiao A. 2008. Study on yield stability and dry matter characteristics of super hybrid rice. Scientia Agricultura Sinica. 41:1927–1936.
   Google Scholar
• Asai H, Samso BK, Stephan HM, Songyikhangsuthor K, Homma K, Kiyono Y, Inoue Y, Shiraiwa T, Horie T. 2009. Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res. 111(1–2):81–84. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buresh RJ, Reddy KR, Van Kessel C. 2008. Nitrogen transformations in submerged soils. In: Schepers JS, Raun WR, editors. Nitrogen in agricultural systems, Agronomy monograph 49. Madison: American Society of Agronomy; p. 401–436.
   Google Scholar
• Butnan S, Deenik JL, Toomsan B, Antal MJ, Vityakon P. 2015. Biochar characteristics and application rates affecting corn growth and properties of soils contrasting in texture and mineralogy. Geoderma. 237–238:105–116. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao P, Lu C, Yu Z. 2018. Historical nitrogen fertilizer use in agricultural ecosystems of the contiguous United States during 1850–2015: application rate, timing, and fertilizer types. Earth Syst Sci Data. 10(2):969–984. doi:10.5194/essd-10-969-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrysargyris A, Panayiotou C, Tzortzakis N. 2016. Nitrogen and phosphorus levels affected plant growth, essential oil composition and antioxidant status of lavender plant (Lavandula angustifolia Mill.). Ind Crops Prod. 83:577–586. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster DN, Gleeson DB, Solaiman ZM, Jones DL, Murphy DV. 2012. Decreased soil microbial biomass and nitrogen mineralisation with Eucalyptus biochar addition to a coarse textured soil. Plant Soil. 354(1–2):311–324. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-1067-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haung M, Shan S, Xie X, Zhou X, Zou Y, Uphoff N. 2018. Grain yield and nitrogen utilization in response to reducing nitrogen rate in hybrid rice transplanted as single seedling. Exp Agri. 55(04):637–648. doi:10.1017/S0014479718000261.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang L, Dong D, Gan X, Wei S. 2005. Photosynthesis efficiency and nitrogen distribution under different nitrogen management and relationships with physiological N-use efficiency in three rice genotypes. Plant Soil. 271(1–2):321–328. doi:10.1007/s11104-004-3116-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korai PK, Liu XXX, Bian R, Omondi MO, Nahayo A, Pan G, Pan G. 2018. Extractable pool of biochar controls on crop productivity rather than greenhouse gas emission from a rice paddy under rice-wheat rotation. Sci Rep. 8(1):802. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19331-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koyama S, Katagiri T, Minamikawa K, Kato M, Hayashi H. 2016. Effects of rice husk charcoal application on rice yield, methane emission, and soil carbon sequestration in Andosol paddy soil. JARQ. 50(4):319–327. doi:10.6090/jarq.50.319.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota—A review. Soil Biol Biochem. 43(9):1812–1836. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z, He T, Cao T, Yang T, Meng J, Chen W. 2017. Effects of biochar application on nitrogen leaching, ammonia volatilization and nitrogen use efficiency in two distinct soils. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 17(2):515–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen V, Mulder J, Shitumbanuma V, Sparrevik M, Børresen T, Cornelissen G. 2014. Farmer-led maize biochar trials: effect on crop yield and soil nutrients under conservation farming. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 177(5):681–695. doi:10.1002/jpln.201300590.
   Google Scholar
• Menz J, Range T, Trini J, Ludewig U, Neuhäuser B. 2018. Molecular basis of differential nitrogen use efficiencies and nitrogen source preferences in contrasting Arabidopsis accessions. Sci Rep. 8(1):3373. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21684-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nair A, Ngouajio M. 2012. Soil microbial biomass, functional microbial diversity, and nematode community structure as affected by cover crops and compost in an organic vegetable production system. Appl Soil Ecol. 92:45–55. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.03.008.
   Google Scholar
• Okamura M, Arai-Sanoh Y, Yoshida H, Mukouyama T, Adachi S, Yabe S, Nakagawa H, Tsutsumi K, Taniguchi Y, Kobayashi N, et al. 2018. Characterization of high-yielding rice cultivars with different grain-filling properties to clarify limiting factors for improving grain yield. Field Crop Res. 219:139–147. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo AZ, Sudo S, Akiyama H, Win KT, Shibata A, Yamamoto A, Sano T, Hirono Y. 2018. Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil. PLoS One. 13(2):e0192235. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page AL, Ed. 1992. Methods of soil analysis, part 2, chemical and microbiological properties. 2nd ed. Madison (Wisconsin USA): 6th printing. American Society of Agronomy, Inc and Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Pan J, Cui K, Wei D, Huang J, Xiang J, Nie L. 2011. Relationships of non-structural carbohydrates accumulation and translocation with yield formation in rice recombinant inbred lines under two nitrogen levels. Physiol Plant. 141(4):321–331. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01441.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratiwi EPA, Hillary AK, Fukuda T, Shinogi Y. 2016. The effects of rice husk char on ammonium, nitrate and phosphate retention and leaching in loamy soil. Geoderma 277:61–68. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat J, Saxena J, Sanwal P 2019. “Biochar: a sustainable approach for improving plant growth and soil properties,” biochar - an imperative amendment for soil and the environment [working title], 2019. View at Google Scholar [ accessed 2019 August 21]. DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.82151
   Google Scholar
• Sharma MP, Bali SV, Gupta DK. 2001. Soil fertility and productivity of rice (Oryza sativa)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system in an Inceptisol as influenced by integrated nutrient management. Indian J Agr Sci. 71:82–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbeiss S, Gleixner G, Antonietti M. 2009. Effect of biochar amendment on soil carbon balance and soil microbial activity. Soil Bio Biochem. 41(6):1301–1310. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sui YH, Gao JP, Liu CH, Zhang WZ, Lan Y, Li SH, Meng J, Xu ZJ, Tang L. 2016. Interactive effects of straw-derived biochar and N fertilization on soil C storage and rice productivity in rice paddies of Northeast China. Sci Total Environ. 544:203–210. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS. 1987. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass-C. Soil Biol Biochem. 19(6):703–707. doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Liu Y, Liu R, Zhang A, Yang S, Liu H, Zhou Y, Yang Z. 2017. Biochar amendment reduces paddy soil nitrogen leaching but increases net global warming potential in Ningxia irrigation, China. Sic Rep. 7(1):1592. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01173-w.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Win KT, Okazaki K, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Ookawa T, Yokoyama T. 2020. Short-term effects of biochar and Bacillus pumilus TUAT-1 on the growth of forage rice and its associated soil microbial community and soil properties. Biol Fert Soils. 56(4):481–497. doi:10.1007/s00374-020-01448-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Win KT, Okazaki K, Ookawa T, Yokoyama T, Ohwaki Y. 2019. Influence of rice-husk biochar and Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 on yield, biomass production, and nutrient uptake in two forage rice genotypes. PLoS One. 14(7):e0220236. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Win KT, Oo AZ, Ohkama-Ohtsu N, Tadashi Y. 2018. Bacillus pumilus strain TUAT-1 and nitrogen application in nursery phase promote growth of rice plants under field conditions. Agronomy. 8(10):216. doi:10.3390/agronomy8100216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Zhang J. 2010. Grain-filling problem in ‘super’ rice. J Exp Bot. 61(1):1–5. doi:10.1093/jxb/erp348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang QW, Yang ZL, Zhang H, Yi J. 2012. Recovery efficiency and loss of N-15-labelled urea in a rice-soil system in the upper reaches of the Yellow River basin. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 158:118–126. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou W, Lv T, Yang Z, Wang T, Fu Y, Chen Y, Hu B, Ren W. 2017. Morphophysiological mechanism of rice yield increase in response to optimized nitrogen management. Sci Rep. 7(1):17226. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17491-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar