Physical recovery of an Oxisol under an integrated crop-livestock system in southern Brazil

References

• Ambus JV, Reichert JM, Gubiani PI, Carvalho PCF. 2018. Changes in composition and functional soil properties in long-term no-till integrated crop-livestock system. Geoderma. 330:232–243. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.06.005.
   Google Scholar
• Baptistella JLC, Andrade SAL, Favarin JL, Mazzafera P. 2020. Urochloa in Tropical Agroecosystems. Frontiers (Boulder). 4:1–17. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.00119.
   Google Scholar
• Barthram GT. 1985. Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. In: Alcok MM, editor. The Hill farming research organization Biennial report 1984/1985. 1st ed. Penicuik: HFRO; p. 29–30.
   Google Scholar
• Baumhardt RL, Johnson GL, Schwartz RC, Brauer DK. 2018. Grazing and Tillage effects on soil properties, rain infiltration, and sediment transport during fallow. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 81:1548–1556. doi:10.2136/sssaj2017.04.0133.
   Google Scholar
• Bieluczyk W, Picollo CM, Pereira GM, Moraes MT, Soltangheisi A, Bernardi ACC, Pezzopane JRM, Oliveira PPA, Moreira MZ, Camargo PB, et al. 2020. Integrated farming systems influence soil organic matter dynamics in southeastern Brazil. Geoderma. 371:114368. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114368.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R. 2010. Principles of soil conservation and management. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco-Canqui H, Wortmann CS. 2020. Does occasional tillage undo the ecosystem services gained with no-till? A review. Soil Tillage Res. 198:104534. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonetti JA, Anghinoni I, Moraes MT, Fink JR. 2017. Resilience of soils with different texture, mineralogy and organic matter under long-term conservation systems. Soil Tillage Res. 174:104–112. doi:10.1016/j.still.2017.06.008.
   Google Scholar
• Cecagno D, Costa SEVGA, Anghinoni I, Kunrath TR, Martins AP, Reichert JM, Gubiani PI, Balerini F, Fink JR, Carvalho PCF. 2016. Least limiting water range and soybean yield in system under different grazing different grazing intensities. Soil Tillage Res. 156: 54–62. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.10.005.
   Google Scholar
• Colombi T, Torres LC, Walter A, Keller T. 2018. Feedbacks between soil penetration resistance, root architecture and water uptake limit water accessibility and crop growth – a vicious circle. Sci Total Environ. 626:1026–1035. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correa J, Postma JA, Watt M, Wojciechowski T. 2019. Soil compaction and the architectural plasticity of root systems. J Exp Bot. 70:6019–6034. doi:10.1093/jxb/erz383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane JH, Hopmans JW. 2002. Water retention and storage. In: Dane JH, Topp GC, editors. Methods of soil analysis. part 4. Physical methods, SSSA book ser. 5.4. Madison (WI): Soil Science Society of America; p. 671–720. doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c24.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson RE, Sutherland PL. 1986. Porosity. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. SSSA book Ser. 5.1. SSSA. Madison (WI): ASA; p. 443–461. doi:10.2136/sssabookser5.1.2ed.c18.
   Google Scholar
• Diel J, Vogel HJ, Schlüter S. 2019. Impact of wetting and drying cycles on soil structure dynamics. Geoderma. 345:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.03.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory AS, Watts CW, Griffiths BS, Hallett PD, Kuan HL, Whitmore AP. 2009. The effect of long-term soil management on the physical and biological resilience of a range of arable and grassland soils in England. Geoderma. 153:172–185. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregory AS, Watts CW, Whalley WR, Kuan HL, Griffith BS, Hallett PD, Whitmore AP. 2007. Physical resilience of soil to field compaction and the interactions with plant growth and microbial community structure. Eur J Soil Sci. 58:1221–1232. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00956.x.
   Google Scholar
• Herrick JE, Wander MM. 1998. Relationships between soil organic carbon and soil quality cropped and rangeland soil: the importance of distribution, composition, and soil biological activity. In: Lal R, Kimble JM, Follett RF, and Stewart BA, editors. Soil processes and the carbon cycle 404–425. New York: CRC Press .
   Google Scholar
• Horn R, Fleige H. 2003. A method for assessing the impact of load on mechanical stability and on physical properties of soils. Soil Tillage Res. 73:89–99. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00102-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller T, Sandin M, Colombi T, Horn R, Or D. 2019. Historical increase in agricultural machinery weights enhanced soil stress levels and adversely affected soil functioning. Soil Tillage Res. 194:104293. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.104293.
   Google Scholar
• Koppe E, Rupollo CZ, de Queiroz R, Puschmann DU, Peth S, Reinert D. 2021. Physical recovery of an oxisol subjected to four intensities of dairy cattle grazing. Soil Tillage Res. 206:104813. doi:10.1016/j.still.2020.104813.
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2015. Restoring soil quality to mitigate soil degradation. Sustainability. 7:5875–5895. doi:10.3390/su7055875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroca JVS, Souza JMA, Pires GC, Pires GJC, Pacheco LP, Da Silva FD, Wruck FJ, Carneiro MAC, Silva LS, Souza ED. 2018. Soil quality and soybean productivity in crop-livestock integrated system in no-tillage. Pesqui Agropecuária Bras. 53:1248–1258. doi:10.1590/s0100-204x2018001100007.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig M, Wilmes P, Schrader S. 2018. Measuring soil sustainability via soil resilience. Sci Total Environ. 626:1484–1493. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martins AP, Denardin LGO, Tiecher T, Borin JBM, Schaidhauer W, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF, Kumar S. 2020. Nine-year impact of grazing management on soil acidity and aluminum speciation and fractionation in a long-term no-till integrated crop-livestock system in the subtropics. Geoderma. 359:113986. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.113986.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirzavand J, Moradi-Talebbeigi R. 2021. Relationships between field management, soil compaction, and crop productivity. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 67:675–686. doi:10.1080/03650340.2020.1749267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Chakraborty D, Bandyopadhyay K, Aggarwal P, Rana DS. 2020. A global analysis of the impact of zero‐tillage on soil physical condition, organic carbon content, and plant root response. L Degrad Dev. 31:557–567. doi:10.1002/ldr.3470.
   Google Scholar
• Moraes MT, Debiasi H, Carlesso R, Franchini JC, Silva VR, Luz FB. 2016. Soil physical quality on tillage and cropping systems after two decades in the subtropical region of Brazil. Soil Tillage Res. 155:351–362. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunes PAA, Bredemeier C, Bremm C, Caetano LAM, Almeida GM, Souza Filho W, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF. 2019. Grazing intensity determines pasture spatial heterogeneity and productivity in an integrated crop-livestock system. Grassl Sci. 65:49–59. doi:10.1111/grs.12209.
   Google Scholar
• Nunes PAA, Laca EA, Carvalho PCF, Li M, Souza Filho W, Kunrath TR, Martins AP, Gaudin A. 2021. Livestock integration into soybean systems improves long-term system stability and profits without compromising crop yields. Sci Rep. 11:1–14. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81270-z.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson CA, Bell LW, de Carvalho PCF, Gaudin ACM. 2020. Resilience of an integrated crop–livestock system to climate change: a simulation analysis of cover crop grazing in Southern Brazil. Front Sustain Food Syst. 4:1–18. doi:10.3389/fsufs.2020.604099.
   Google Scholar
• Rakkar MK, Blanco-Canqui H. 2018. Grazing of crop residues: impacts on soils and crop production. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 258:71–90. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2017.11.018.
   Google Scholar
• Reichert JM, Mentges MI, Rodrigues MF, Cavalli JP, Awe GO, Mentges LR. 2018. Compressibility and elasticity of subtropical no-till soils varying in granulometry organic matter, bulk density and moisture. Catena. 165:345–357. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2018.02.014.
   Google Scholar
• Sattolo TMS, Pereira LM, Otto R, Francisco E, Duarte AP, Kappes C, Prochnow LI, Cherubin MR. 2021. Effects of land use, tillage management, and crop diversification on soil physical quality in Cerrado agricultural systems. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 85:1799–1813. doi:10.1002/saj2.20306.
   Google Scholar
• Schjønning P, Lamandé M, Crétin V, Nielsen JA. 2017. Upper subsoil pore characteristics and functions as affected by field traffic and freeze–thaw and dry–wet treatments. Soil Res. 55:234–244. doi:10.1071/SR16149.
   Google Scholar
• Seybold CA, Herrick JE, Brejda JJ. 1999. Soil resilience: a fundamental component of soil quality. Soil Sci. 164:224–234. doi:10.1097/00010694-199904000-00002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva FD, Nunes PAA, Bredemeier C, Cadenazzi M, Amaral LP, Pfeifer FM, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF. 2020. Spatiotemporal distribution of cattle dung patches in a subtropical soybean-beef system under different grazing intensities in winter. Agronomy. 10:1–15. doi:10.3390/agronomy10091423.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Keys to soil taxonomy. 12th ed. Washington (DC): USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
   Google Scholar
• Souza ED, Costa SEVGA, Anghinoni I, Carvalho PCF, Oliveira EVF, Martins AP, Cao E, Andrighetti M. 2010. Soil aggregation in a crop-livestock integration system under no-tillage. Rev Bras Ciência Do Solo. 34:1365–1374. doi:10.1590/S0100-06832010000400033.
   Google Scholar
• Vale P, Gibbs H, Vale R, Christie M, Florence E, Munger J, Sabaini D. 2019. The expansion of intensive beef farming to the Brazilian Amazon. Glob Environ Chang. 57:101922. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar