Advanced search
Publication Cover
Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science Volume 69, 2023 - Issue 12
Submit an article Journal homepage
107
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Control of soil variability in data analysis from camelina and crambe field breeding experiments with check plots

Dariusz Załuskia University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Olsztyn, PolandView further author information
,
Urszula Bronowicka-Mielniczukb Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandView further author information
,
Jacek Mielniczukb Department of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, PolandCorrespondence[email protected]
View further author information
,
Michał Krzyżaniaka University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Olsztyn, PolandView further author information
&
Mariusz J. Stolarskia University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Department of Genetics, Plant Breeding and Bioresource Engineering, Olsztyn, PolandView further author information
Pages 2314-2324 | Received 23 Jun 2022, Accepted 22 Nov 2022, Published online: 29 Nov 2022

References

  • Berti M, Gesch R, Eynck C, Anderson J, Cermak S. 2016. Camelina uses, genetics, genomics, production, and management. Ind Crops Prod. 94:690–710. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.09.034
  • Chandra S. 1994. Efficiency of check-plot designs in unreplicated field trials. Theor Appl Genet. 88(5):618–620. doi:10.1007/BF01240927.
  • Clarke GPY, Stefanova KT. 2011. Optimal design for early-generation plant-breeding trials with unreplicated or partially replicated test lines. Aust N Z J Stat. 53(4):461–480. doi:10.1111/j.1467-842X.2011.00642.x.
  • Cressie N. 1985. Fitting variogram models by weighted least squares. J Int Assoc Math Geol. 17(5):563–586. doi:10.1007/BF01032109.
  • Gräler B, Pebesma E, Heuvelink G. 2016. Spatio-temporal interpolation using gstat. R J. 8(1):204–218. https://journal.r-project.org/archive/2016/RJ-2016-014/index.html.
  • Heil K, Schmidhalter U. 2017. Improved evaluation of field experiments by accounting for inherent soil variability. Eur J Agron. 89:1–15. doi:10.1016/J.EJA.2017.05.004
  • Isaaks EH, Srivastava RM. 1989. Applied geostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Krzyżaniak M, Stolarski MJ, Tworkowski J, Puttick D, Eynck C, Załuski D, Kwiatkowski J. 2019. Yield and seed composition of 10 spring camelina genotypes cultivated in the temperate climate of Central Europe. Ind Crops Prod. 138:111443. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.06.006
  • Kwiatkowski J, Krzyżaniak M, Załuski D, Stolarski MJ, Tworkowski J. 2020. The physical properties of fruits and the physiological quality of seeds of selected crambe genotypes. Ind Crops Prod. 145. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111977
  • Lawes RA, Bramley RGV. 2012. A simple method for the analysis of on-farm strip trials. Agron J. 104(2):371. doi:10.2134/agronj2011.0155.
  • Martin RJ, Eccleston JA, Chauhan N, Chan BSP. 2006. Some results on the design of field experiments for comparing unreplicated treatments. J Agric Biol Environ Stat. 11(4):394–410. doi:10.1198/108571106X154489.
  • Müller BU, Schützenmeister A, Piepho H-P. 2010. Arrangement of check plots in augmented block designs when spatial analysis is used. Plant Breed. 129(6):581–589. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0523.2010.01803.x.
  • Pebesma EJ. 2004. Multivariable geostatistics in S: the gstat package. Comput Geosci. 30(7):683–691. doi:10.1016/J.CAGEO.2004.03.012.
  • R Core Team. 2019. A language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing [Internet]. [accessed 2022 March 25]. https://www.R-project.org.
  • Ribeiro PJJ, Diggle PJ 2016. geoR: analysis of geostatistical data [Internet]. [accessed 2022 March 25]. https://cran.r-project.org/package=geoR.
  • Rosielle AA. 1980. Comparison of lattice designs, check plots, and moving means in wheat breeding trials. Euphytica. 29(1):129–133. doi:10.1007/BF00037258.
  • Sokólski MM, Załuski D, Jankowski KJ. 2020. Crambe: seed yield and quality in response to nitrogen and sulfur-a case study in Northeastern Poland. Agronomy. 10(9):1436. doi:10.3390/AGRONOMY10091436.
  • Storck L, Filho AC, Lemes C, Dalló C, Duarte T, Sassi LH. 2015. Geostatistical approach for testing wheat lines using a non-replicated design. Aust J Crop Sci. 9(5):424–430.
  • TIBCO Software Inc. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 13 [Internet]. (accessed on 2022 March 25). http://www.statsoft.pl
  • Webster R, Oliver M. 2007. Geostatistics for environmental scientists. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.