The effect of a superabsorbent as a soil amendment on seed yield and chemical composition of two soybean genotypes

References

• Akhter J, Mahmood K, Malik KA, Mardan A, Ahmad M, Iqbal MM. 2004. Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ. 50(10):463–469. doi:10.17221/4059-PSE.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angra S, Kaur S, Singh K, Pathania D, Kaur N, Sharma S, Nayyar H. 2010. Water-deficit stress during seed filling in contrasting soybean genotypes. Association of stress sensitivity with profiles of osmolytes and antioxidants. Int J Agric Res. 5(6):328–345. doi:10.3923/ijar.2010.328.345.
   Google Scholar
• Baptista A, Pinho O, Pinto E, Casal S, Mota C, Ferreira IM. 2017. Characterization of protein and fat composition of seeds from common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) and bambara groundnuts (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) from Mozambique. JFood Meas Charact. 11(2):442–450. doi:10.1007/s11694-016-9412-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellaloui N, Mengistu A, Kassem MA. 2013. Effects of genetics and environment on fatty acid stability in soybean seed. Food Nutr Sci. 4:165–175.
   Google Scholar
• Brzóska F, Śliwa J. 2016. Non-GM soybean – production and possible use in animal feeding in Poland Part I. Soy in the fodder balance and its cultivation in Poland. Wiad Zootech. 54(4):98–110.
   Google Scholar
• Buezo J, Á S, Moran JF, Soba D, Aranjuelo I, Esteban R. 2019. Drought tolerance response of high‐yielding soybean varieties to mild drought: physiological and photochemical adjustments. Physiol Plant. 166(1):88–104. doi:10.1111/ppl.12864.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujak K, Frant M. 2009. Influence of mixtures of herbicide on yielding and weed infestation of five cultivars of soybean. Acta Agrophys. 13(3):601–613.
   Google Scholar
• Câmara GMS, Sediyama T, Dourado-Neto D, Bernardes MS. 1997. Influence of photoperiod and air temperature on the growth, flowering and maturation of soybean (Glycine Max (L.) Merrill). Sci Agric. 54:149–154. doi:10.1590/S0103-90161997000300017
   Google Scholar
• Carrera C, Martínez MJ, Dardanelli J, Balzarini M. 2009. Water deficit effect on the relationship between temperature during the seed fill period and soybean seed oil and protein concentrations. Crop Sci. 49(3):990–998. doi:10.2135/cropsci2008.06.0361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung J, Babka HL, Graef GL, Staswick PE, Lee DJ, Cregan PB, Shoemaker RC, Specht JE. 2003. The seed protein, oil, and yield QTL on soybean linkage group I. Crop Sci. 43(3):1053–1067. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.1053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czopek K, Staniak M. 2018. Influence of water deficiency in soil on morphological features, size and quality of soybean seed yield (Glycine max). In: Merr L, editor. Poznań: Nauki przyrodnicze, Wyd. Młodzi Naukowcy; p. 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Desclaux D, Huynh TT, Roumet P. 2000. Identification of soybean plant characteristics that indicate the timing of drought stress. Crop Sci. 40(3):716–722. doi:10.2135/cropsci2000.403716x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz KJ, Zörb C, Geilfus CM. 2021. Drought and crop yield. Plant Biol. 23(6):881–893. doi:10.1111/plb.13304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreesen FE, De Boeck HJ, Janssens IA, Nijs I. 2012. Summer heat and drought extremes trigger unexpected changes in productivity of a temperate annual/biannual plant community. Environ Exp Bot. 79:21–30. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubey A, Kumar A, Abd-Allah EF, Hashem A, Khan ML. 2019. Growing more with less: breeding and developing drought resilient soybean to improve food security. Ecol Indic. 105:425–437. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshafie HS, Camele I. 2021. Applications of absorbent polymers for sustainable plant protection and crop yield. Sustainability. 13(6):3253. doi:10.3390/su13063253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faligowska A, Szukała J. 2011. Influence of irrigation, soil tillage systems and polymer on yielding and sowing value of pea. Frag Agron. 28(1):15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Faligowska A, Szukała J. 2014. The effect of organic polymer on the yield components and the yield of soybean seeds. Nauka Przyr Tech. 8(1):9.
   Google Scholar
• Farjam S, Kenarsari MJ, Rokhzadi A, Yousefi B. 2014. Effects of inter-row spacing and superabsorbent polymer application on yield and productivity of rainfed chickpea. J Biodivers Environ Sci. 5(3):316–320.
   Google Scholar
• Fazeli F, Ghorbanli M, Niknam V. 2007. Effect of drought on biomass, protein content, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant enzymes in two sesame cultivars. Bio. Plant. 51(1):98–103. doi:10.1007/s10535-007-0020-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fidelis R, Sousa da Silva G, Rauber WA, Urzêdo Rodrigues L, Nascimento VL, Siebeneichler SC. 2020. Biochemical quality of cowpea beans grown under water-deficit maintained with hydrogel. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas. 37(1):38–50. doi:10.22267/rcia.203701.123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florek J. 2017. Potential utilization of legumes in feed production in Poland. Rocz Nauk SERiA. 19(4):40–45.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M, Brandon DL. 2001. Nutritional and health benefits of soy proteins. J Agric Food Chem. 49(3):1069–1086. doi:10.1021/jf0009246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gacek ES. 2012. Postęp biologiczny w hodowli roślin strączkowych. Wrocław: Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu; p. 9–19, W: Rośliny strączkowe w rolnictwie integrowanym, A. Kotecki (red.).
   Google Scholar
• Ghanbari AA, Shakiba MR, Toorchi M, Choukan R. 2013. Nitrogen changes in the leaves and accumulation of some minerals in the seeds of red, white and chitti beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) under water deficit conditions. Aus J Crop Sci. 7:706–712.
   Google Scholar
• Grabiński J, Wyzińska M. 2018. The effect of superabsorbent polymer application on yielding of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Res Rural Dev. 2:55–61.
   Google Scholar
• Guilherme MR, Aouada FA, Fajardo AR, Martins AF, Paulino AT, Davi MFT, Rubira AF, Muniz EC. 2015. Superabsorbent hydrogels based on polysaccharides for application in agriculture as soil conditioner and nutrient carrier: a review. Eur Polym J. 72:65–385. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyõri Z, Nemeskéri E, Szilágyi S. 1998. Legumes grown under nonirrigated conditions. J Agric Food Chem. 46(8):3087–3091. doi:10.1021/jf980060c.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanczakowska E, Księżak J. 2012. Domestic sources of plant protein feeds as replacements of GM soybean meal in pig nutrition. Rocz Nauk Zootech. 39(2):171–187.
   Google Scholar
• Hou X, Li R, He W, Dai X, Ma K, Liang Y. 2018. Superabsorbent polymers influence soil physical properties and increase potato tuber yield in a dry-farming region. J Soils Sediment. 18(3):816–826. doi:10.1007/s11368-017-1818-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUSS Working Group WRB. 2014. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015. In International Soil Classification System for Naming Soils and Creating Legends for Soil Maps; World Soil Resources Reports No. 106; FAO: Rome (Italy), 201.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson KW, Chen G. 1996. Atomic absorption, atomic emission, and flame emission spectrometry. Anal Chem. 68(12):231–256. doi:10.1021/a1960012l.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaleel CA, Gopi R, Panneerselvam R. 2008. Growth and photosynthetic pigments responses of two varieties of Catharanthus roseus to triadimefon treatment. C R Biol. 331(4):272–277. doi:10.1016/j.crvi.2008.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jańczak-Pieniążek M, Buczek J, Bobrecka-Jamro D, Szpunar-Krok E, Tobiasz-Salach R, Jarecki W. 2021. Morphophysiology, productivity and quality of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) cv. Merlin in response to row spacing and seeding systems. Agronomy. 11(2):403. doi:10.3390/agronomy11020403.
   Google Scholar
• Jerzak MA, Śmiglak-Krajewska M. 2020. Globalization of the market for vegetable protein feed and its impact on sustainable agricultural development and food security in EU countries illustrated by the example of Poland. Sustainability. 12(3):888. doi:10.3390/su12030888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones DB. 1941. Factors for Converting Percentages of Nitrogen in Foods and Feed into Percentages of Proteins; Circular, 1941, No. 183 (Original Version, 1931). Washington (DC, USA): United States Department of Agriculture; p. 1931.
   Google Scholar
• Kalhapure A, Kumar R, Singh VP, Pandey DS. 2016. Hydrogels: a boon for increasing agricultural productivity in water-stressed environment. Curr Sci. 111(11):1773–1779. doi:10.18520/cs/v111/i11/1773-1779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun M, Sarkar S, Era FM, Mominul Islam AKM, Anwar M, Fahad S, Datta R, Islam AKM. 2021. Drought Stress in Grain Legumes: effects. Tolerance Mechanisms and Management. Agronomy. 11(12):2374. doi:10.3390/agronomy11122374.
   Google Scholar
• Kjeldahl JA. 1883. New Method for the Determination of Nitrogen in Organic Matter. Z Anal Chem. 22(1):366–382. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01338151 .
   Google Scholar
• Kotecki A, editor. 2020. Plant Cultivation. Wrocław (Poland): Uniwersytet Przyrodniczy we Wrocławiu. p. 161–206.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar V, Rani A, Solanki S, Hussain SM. 2006. Influence of growing environment on the biochemical composition and physical characteristics of soybean seed. J Food Compos Anal. 19188–19195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XB, Herbert SJ, Jin J, Zhang QY, Wang GH. 2004. Responses of photosynthetic rates and yield/quality of main crops to irrigation and manure application in the black soil area of Northeast China. Plant Soil. 261(1/2):55–60. doi:10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035553.53865.ec.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magyar-Tábori K, Mendler-Drienyovszki N, Dobránszki J. 2011. Models and tools for studying drought stress responses in peas. OMICS. Int J Integr Biol. 15(12):829–838. doi:10.1089/omi.2011.0090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandić V, Krnjaja V, Tomić Z, Bijelić Z, Simić A, Đorđević S, Stanojković A, Gogić M 2015. Effect of water stress on soybean production. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress New Perspectives and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Production, Belgrade, 405–414.
   Google Scholar
• Mertz-Henning LM, Ferreira LC, Henning FA, Mandarino JM, Santos ED, Oliveira MC, Neumaier N. 2018. Effect of water deficit-induced at vegetative and reproductive stages on protein and oil content in soybean grains. J Agron. 8(1):3. doi:10.3390/agronomy8010003.
   Google Scholar
• Michałek S, Borowski E. 2006. Yielding, oil, fatty acids and protein content in the seeds of Polish soybean cultivars under drought conditions. Acta Agrophys. 8(2):459–471.
   Google Scholar
• Narjary B, Aggarwal P, Kumar S, Meena MD. 2015. Significance of hydrogel and its application in agriculture. Indian Council Agric Res. 62:15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeskéri E. 1997. The nutritive quality of legume foodstuffs produced under dry growing conditions. Acta Agron Hung. 45:17–22.
   Google Scholar
• Nemeskéri E. 2001. Water deficiency resistance study on soya and bean cultivars. Acta Agron Hung. 49(1):83–93. doi:10.1556/AAgr.49.2001.1.10.
   Google Scholar
• Nogala-Kałucka M , editor. 2016. Analiza Żywności. In: Wybrane Metody Oznaczeń Jakościowych i Ilościowych Składników Żywności. Poland: UP Poznan; p. 165.
   Google Scholar
• Norodinvand FA, Dehkordi DK, Egdernezhad A. 2019. Evaluation of the superabsorbent effect on the yield and some growth factors of Pisum sativum L. under drought stress conditions. Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric. 10(2):106–114. doi:10.2174/2212798410666180924142716.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panasiewicz K, Faligowska A, Szymanska G, Szukala J, Koziara W, Ratajczak K. 2019. The effects of using a hydrogel in the cultivation of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Biul IHAR. 285:235–236.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo A, Pereira LS. 2006. Drought concepts and characterization. Water Int. 31(1):37–49. doi:10.1080/02508060608691913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroza-Sandoval A, Yáñez-Chávez LG, Sánchez-Cohen I, Samaniego-Gaxiola JA, Trejo-Calzada R. 2017. Hydrogel, biocompost and its effect on photosynthetic activity and production of forage maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Acta Agron. 66(1):63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Pouresmaeil P, Habibi D, Boojar MMA. 2012. Yield and yield component quality of red bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars in response to water stress and super absorbent polymer application. Ann Biol Res. 3(12):5701–5704.
   Google Scholar
• Radomski C. 1973. Agrometeorologia. Warszawa: PWN Warszawa.
   Google Scholar
• Rahbarian R, Khavari-Nejad R, Ganjeali A, Bagheri A, Najafi F. 2011. Drought stress effects on photosynthesis, chlorophyll fluorescence and water relations in tolerant and susceptible chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot. 53(1):47–56. doi:10.2478/v10182-011-0007-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Román-Paoli E, Sotomayor-Ramírez D. 2004. Soil conditioner efficacy on Lajas Valley sweet corn production. J Agric Univ. 88(3/4):97–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotundo JL, Westgate ME. 2009. Meta-analysis of environmental effects on soybean seed composition. Field Crops Res. 110(2):147–156. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2008.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan Q, Geetha KN, Hashimi R, Atif R, Habimana S. 2020. Growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) as influenced by organic manures and superabsorbent polymers. J Exp Agric Int. 42(6):77–85. doi:10.9734/jeai/2020/v42i630541.
   Google Scholar
• Sannino A, Demitri C, Madaghiele M. 2009. Biodegradable cellulose-based hydrogels: design and applications. Materials. 2:353–373. doi:10.3390/ma2020353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartore L, Vox G, Schettini E. 2013. Preparation and performance of novel biodegradable polymeric materials based on hydrolyzed proteins for agricultural application. J Polym Environ. 21(3):718–725. doi:10.1007/s10924-013-0574-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satriani A, Catalano M, Scalcione E. 2018. The role of superabsorbent hydrogel in bean crop cultivation under deficit irrigation conditions: a case study in Southern Italy. Agric Water Manag. 195:114–119. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2017.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shankarappa SK, Muniyandi SJ, Chandrasheka AB, Singh AK, Nagabhushanaradhya P, Shivashankar B, El-Ansary DO, Wani SH, Elansary HO. 2020. Standardizing the hydrogel application rates and foliar nutrition for enhancing yield of lentil (Lens culinaris). Processes. 8(4):420. doi:10.3390/pr8040420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shooshtarian S, Abedi-Kupai J, Tehranifar A. 2012. Evaluation of application of superabsorbent polymers in green space of arid and semi-arid regions with emphasis on Iran. Int J For Soil Eros. 2:24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Sionit N, Kramer PJ. 1977. Effect of water stress during different stages of growth of soybean. J Agron. 69(2):274–278. doi:10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900020018x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skowera B. 2014. Changes in hydrothermal conditions in the Polish area (1971-2010). Frag Agron. 31(2):74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder LR. 1980. Continuous-flow analysis: present and future. Anal Chim Acta. 114:3–18. doi:10.1016/S0003-2670(01)84276-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soxhlet F. 1879. The weight analytic determination of milk fat. Polytech J. 232:461–465.
   Google Scholar
• SOYSTATS 2020. Available online: http://soystats.com/ (accessed on 20.12.2021)
   Google Scholar
• Staniak M, Czopek K, Stępień-Warda A, Kocira A, Przybyś M. 2021. Cold stress during flowering alters plant structure, yield and seed quality of different soybean genotypes. Agronomy. 11(10):2059. doi:10.3390/agronomy11102059.
   Google Scholar
• Swann AL. 2018. Plants and drought in a changing climate. Curr Clim Change Rep. 4(2):192–201. doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0097-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szpunar-Krok E, Wondołowska-Grabowska A, Bobrecka-Jamro D, Jańczak-Pieniążek M, Kotecki A, Kozak M. 2021. Effect of nitrogen fertilisation and inoculation with bradyrhizobium japonicum on the fatty acid profile of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) seeds. Agronomy. 11(5):941. doi:10.3390/agronomy11050941.
   Google Scholar
• Ullah F, Othman MBH, Javed F, Ahmad Z, Akil HMD. 2015. Classification, processing and application of hydrogels. A reviewMat Sci Eng. 57:414–433. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yáñez-Chávez LG, Pedroza-Sandoval A, Sánchez-Cohen I, Samaniego-Gaxiola JA. 2014. Assessment of the impact of compost and hydrogel as soil moisture retainers on the growth and development of forage maize (Zea mays L.). J Agric Environ Sci. 3(4):93–106.
   Google Scholar
• Yang W, Guo S, Li P, Song R, Yu J. 2019. Foliar antitranspirant and soil superabsorbent hydrogel affect photosynthetic gas exchange and water use efficiency of maize grown under low rainfall conditions. J Sci Food Agric. 99(1):350–359. doi:10.1002/jsfa.9195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef S, Riad G, El-Azm NAI A, Ahmed E. 2018. Amending sandy soil with biochar or/and superabsorbent polymer mitigates the adverse effects of drought stress on green pea. Egyptian J Hort. 45(1):169–183. doi:10.21608/ejoh.2018.3860.1067.
   Google Scholar