Changes in salinity, aggregates and physicomechanical quality induced by biochar application to coastal soil

References

• Abel S, Peters A, Trinks S, Schonsky H, Facklam M, Wessolek G. 2013. Impact of biochar and hydrochar addition on water retention and water repellency of sandy soil. Geoderma. 202–203:183–191. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali S, Rizwan M, Qayyum MF, Ok YS, Ibrahim M, Riaz M, Arif MS, Hafeez F, Al-Wabel MI, Shahzad AN. 2017. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: a critical review. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 24(14):12700–12712. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-8904-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amini S, Ghadiri H, Chen CR, Marschner P. 2016. Salt-affected soils, reclamation, carbon dynamics, and biochar: a review. J Soils Sediments. 16(3):939–953. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1293-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao SD. 2000. Soil and agricultural analysis (In Chinese). Beijing (China): China Agricultural Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brady NC, Weil RR. 2008. The nature and properties of soils. 14th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer CE, Chuang VJ, Masiello CA, Gonnermann H, Gao XD, Dugan B, Driver LE, Panzacchi P, Zygourakis K, Davies CA. 2014. New approaches to measuring biochar density and porosity. Biomass Bioenergy. 66:176–185. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrell LD, Zehetner F, Rampazzo N, Wimmer B, Soja G. 2016. Long-term effects of biochar on soil physical properties. Geoderma. 282:96–102. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.07.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantrell KB, Hunt PG, Uchimiya M, Novak JM, Ro KS. 2012. Impact of pyrolysis temperature and manure source on physicochemical characteristics of biochar. Bioresour Technol. 107:419–428. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaganti VN, Crohn DM. 2015a. Evaluating the relative contribution of physiochemical and biological factors in ameliorating a saline–sodic soil amended with composts and biochar and leached with reclaimed water. Geoderma. 259–260:45–55. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaganti VN, Crohn DM, Šimůnek J. 2015b. Leaching and reclamation of a biochar and compost amended saline-sodic soil with moderate SAR reclaimed water. Agric Water Manag. 158:255–265. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.05.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KY, Zwieten LV, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. 2007. Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Soil Res. 45:629–634.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Kang Y, Wan S, Chu L, Li X. 2015. Chinese rose (Rosa chinensis) cultivation in Bohai Bay, China, using an improved drip irrigation method to reclaim heavy coastal saline soils. Agric Water Manag. 158:99–111. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2015.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghafoor A, Gill MA, Hassan A, Murtaza G, Qadir M. 2001. Gypsum: an economical amendment for amelioration of saline-sodic waters and soils and for improving crop yields. Int J Agric Biol. 9:266–275.
   Google Scholar
• Gray M, Johnson MG, Dragila MI, Kleber M. 2014. Water uptake in biochars: the roles of porosity and hydrophobicity. Biomass Bioenergy. 61:196–205. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammer EC, Forstreuter M, Rillig MC, Kohler J. 2015. Biochar increases arbuscular mycorrhizal plant growth enhancement and ameliorates salinity stress. Appl. Soil Ecol 96:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D. 2014. Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil. 376(347–361). doi:10.1007/s11104-013-1980-x.
   Google Scholar
• Hemmat A, Aghilinategh N, Rezainejad Y, Sadeghi M. 2010. Long-term impacts of municipal solid waste compost, sewage sludge and farmyard manure application on organic carbon, bulk density and consistency limits of a calcareous soil in central Iran. Soil Till Res. 108:43–50. doi:10.1016/j.still.2010.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herath HMSK, Camps-Arbestain M, Hedley M. 2013. Effect of biochar on soil physical properties in two contrasting soils: an Alfisol and an Andisol. Geoderma. 209:188–197. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang M, Zhang Z, Zhu C, Zhai Y, Lu P. 2019. Effect of biochar on sweet corn and soil salinity under conjunctive irrigation with brackish water in coastal saline soil. Sci Hortic. 250:405–413. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jien SH, Wang CS. 2013. Effects of biochar on soil properties and erosion potential in a highly weathered soil. Catena. 110:225–233. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.06.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jimenez-Cordero D, Heras F, Alonso-Morales N, Gilarranz MA, Rodriguez JJ. 2013. Porous structure and morphology of granular chars from flash and conventional pyrolysis of grape seeds. Biomass Bioenergy. 54:123–132. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones K, Ramakrishnan G, Uchimiya M, Orlov A. 2015. New applications of X-ray tomography in pyrolysis of biomass: biochar Imaging. Energ Fuel. 29:1628–1634. doi:10.1021/ef5027604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemper WD, Rosenau RC. 1986. Aggregate stability and size distribution. In: Klute A, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods. Madison (WI (USA)): ASA & SSSA; p. 425–444.
   Google Scholar
• Kinney TJ, Masiello CA, Dugan B, Hockaday WC, Dean MR, Zygourakis K, Barnes RT. 2012. Hydrologic properties of biochars produced at different temperatures. Biomass Bioenergy. 41:34–43. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R, Shukla MK. 2004. Principles of soil physics. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Lashari MS, Liu YM, Li LQ, Pan WN, Fu JY, Pan GX, Zheng JF, Zheng JW, Zhang XH, Yu XY. 2013. Effects of amendment of biochar-manure compost in conjunction with pyroligneous solution on soil quality and wheat yield of a salt-stressed cropland from Central China Great Plain. Field Crop Res. 144:113–118. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2012.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Kuzyakov Y, Pan GX, Ok YS. 2015. Biochars and the plant-soil interface. Plant Soil. 395:1–5. doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2658-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D. 2011. Biochar effects on soil biota - A review. Soil Biol Biochem. 43:1812–1836. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long XH, Liu LP, Shao TY, Shao HB, Liu ZP. 2016. Developing and sustainably utilize the coastal mudflat areas in China. Sci Total Environ. 569:1077–1086. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.170
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SG, Sun FF, Zong YT. 2014. Effect of rice husk biochar and coal fly ash on some physical properties of expansive clayey soil (Vertisol). Catena. 114:37–44. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2013.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu SG, Zong YT. 2018. Pore structure and environmental serves of biochars derived from different feedstocks and pyrolysis conditions. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:30401–30409. doi:10.1007/s11356-018-3018-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukome FND, Zhang XM, Silva LCR, Six J, Parikh SJ. 2013. Use of chemical and physical characteristics to investigate trends in biochar feedstocks. J Agric Food Chem. 61:2196–2204. doi:10.1021/jf3049142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muyen Z, Wrigley RJ. 2016. Reclamation of sodic soils with organic amendments: a review. Imp. J Interdiscip. Res 2:317–324.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page AL, Klute A, editors. Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chemical and microbiological methods, agronomy monograph (Vol. 9). Madison: ASA and SSSA; p. 539–579.
   Google Scholar
• Obia A, Mulder J, Martinsen V, Cornelissen G, Borresen T. 2016. In situ effects of biochar on aggregation, water retention and porosity in light-textured tropical soils. Soil Till Res. 155:35–44. doi:10.1016/j.still.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oo AN, Iwai CB, Saenjan P. 2015. Soil Properties and Maize Growth in Saline and Nonsaline Soils Using Cassava-Industrial Waste Compost and Vermicompost with or without Earthworms. L Degrad Dev. 26:300–310. doi:10.1002/ldr.2208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oster JD, Shainberg I, Abrol IP. 1999. Reclamation of salt affected soils. In: Skaggs RW, van Schilfgaarde J, editors. Agricultural Drainage. Madison (WI, USA): ASA–CSSA–SSSA; p. 659–691. doi:10.2134/agronmonogr38.c19
   Google Scholar
• Öz H. 2018. A new approach to soil solarization: addition of biochar to the effect of soil temperature and quality and yield parameters of lettuce (Lactuca Saliva L. Duna). Sci Hortic 228:153–161. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2017.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy P, Olsson KA. 1991. Sodicity and soil structure. Soil Res. 29:935–952. doi:10.1071/sr9910935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rengasamy P, Sumner M. 1998. Processes Involved in Sodic Behavior. New York (USA): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saifullah Dahlawi S, Naeem A, Rengel Z, Naidu R. 2018. Biochar application for the remediation of salt-affected soils: challenges and opportunities. Sci Total Environ. 625:320–335. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schafer WM, Singer MJ. 1976. A new method of measuring shrink-swell potential using soil pastes. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 40:805–806. doi:10.2136/sssaj1976.03615995004000050050x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava PK, Gupta M, Shikha SN, Tewari SK. 2016. Amelioration of Sodic Soil for Wheat Cultivation Using Bioaugmented Organic Soil Amendment. L Degrad Dev. 27:1245–1254. doi:10.1002/ldr.2292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Standard of the People’s Republic of China (SSPRC). 1999. Standard for soil test method (GB/T50123-1999). Beijing (China):People’s Republic of China Ministry of construction.
   Google Scholar
• Suliman W, Harsh JB, Abu-Lail NI, Fortuna AM, Dallmeyer I, GarciaPerez M. 2016. Influence of feedstock source and pyrolysis temperature on biochar bulk and surface properties. Biomass Bioenergy. 84:37–48. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.11.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun FF, Lu SG. 2014. Biochars improve aggregate stability, water retention, and pore- space properties of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 177:26–33. doi:10.1002/jpln.201200639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang JW, Zhang SD, Zhang XT, Chen JH, He XY, Zhang QZ. 2020. Effects of pyrolysis temperature on soil -plant -microbe responses to Solidago canadensis L. -derived biochar in coastal saline -alkali soil. Sci Total Environ. 731. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanure MMC, da Costa LM, Huiz HA, Fernandes RBA, Cecon PR, Pereira JD, da Luz JMR. 2019. Soil water retention, physiological characteristics, and growth of maize plants in response to biochar application to soil. Soil Till Res. 192:164–173. doi:10.1016/j.still.2019.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas GW. 1982. Exchangeable cation. In: Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, editors. Methods of soil analysis: part 2. Chemical and microbiological methods, vol 9, Agronomy Monograph. Madison: ASA and SSSA; p. 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Hu Y, Zhao X, Wang S, Xing G. 2013. Comparisons of biochar properties from wood material and crop residues at different temperatures and residence times. Energy Fuel. 27:5890–5899. doi:10.1021/ef400972z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao Q, Zhu LX, Shen YF, Li SQ. 2016. Sensitivity of soil water retention and availability to biochar addition in rainfed semi-arid farmland during a three-year field experiment. Field Crop Res. 196:284–293. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2016.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaduvanshi NPS, Swarup A. 2005. Effect of continuous use of sodic irrigation water with and without gypsum, farmyard manure, pressmud and fertilizer on soil properties and yields of rice and wheat in a long term experiment. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. 73:111–118. doi:10.1007/s10705-005-3361-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CD, Lu SG. 2021. Effects of five different biochars on aggregation, water retention and mechanical properties of paddy soil: a field experiment of three-season crops. Soil Till Res. 205. doi:10.1016/j.still.2020.104798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ying YQ, Lu SG, Shi HX, Shi YZ, Shi YN, Rao WJ, Liu CS, Liu YR. 2021. Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) steel slag ameliorates salinity, sodicity, and adverse physical properties of saline-sodic soil of middle Yellow River, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 28:36765–36774. doi:10.1007/s11356-021-13338-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang GL, Gong ZT. 2012. Soil survey laboratory methods (in Chinese). Science Press. Beijing, 58–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang JN, Zhou S, Sun HF, Lu F, He PJ. 2019. Three-year rice grain yield responses to coastal mudflat soil properties amended with straw biochar. J Environ Manag. 239:23–29. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Wang X, Luo X, Wang Z, Xing B. 2018. Biochar-induced negative carbon mineralization priming effects in a coastal wetland soil: roles of soil aggregation and microbial modulation. Sci Total Environ. 610–611:951–960. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Huang N, Xue S, Hartley W, Li Y, Zou Q. 2016. Effects of binding materials on microaggregate size distribution in bauxite residues. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 23:23867–23875. doi:10.1007/s11356-016-7626-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Yang JS, Yao RJ, Wang XP, Xie WP, Zhu W, Liu XY, Cao YF, Tao JY. 2020. Interactive effects of soil amendments (biochar and gypsum) and salinity on ammonia volatilization in coastal saline soil. Catena. 190. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong YT, Chen DP, Lu SG. 2014. Impact of biochars on swell-shrinkage behavior, mechanical strength, and surface cracking of clayey soil. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci. 177:920–926. doi:10.1002/jpln.201300596
   Google Scholar
• Zong YT, Wang YF, Sheng Y, Wu CF, Lu SG. 2018. Ameliorating soil acidity and physical properties of two contrasting texture Ultisols with wastewater sludge biochar. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 25:25726–25733. doi:10.1007/s11356-017-9509-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zong YT, Xiao Q, Lu SG. 2016. Acidity, water retention, and mechanical physical quality of a strongly acidic Ultisol amended with biochars derived from different feedstocks. J Soils Sediments. 16:177–190. doi:10.1007/s11368-015-1187-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar