Soil quality assessment based on machine learning approach for cultivated lands in semi-humid environmental condition part of Black Sea region

References

• Akıncı H, Özalp AY, Turgut B. 2013. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Comput Electron Agric. 97:71–82. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2013.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alaboz P, Dengiz O. 2023. The least limiting water range to estimate soil water content using random forest integrated with GIS and geostatistical approaches. JAS. 29(4). doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1137917.
   Google Scholar
• Alaboz P, Dengiz O, Demir S. 2021. Barley yield estimation performed by ANN integrated with the soil quality index modified by biogas waste application. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture. 108(3). doi:10.13080/z-a.2021.108.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annabi M, Houot S, Francou C, Poitrenaud M, Bissonnais YL. 2007. Soil aggregate stability improvement with urban composts of different maturities. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 71(2):413–423. doi:10.2136/sssaj2006.0161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armenise E, Redmile-Gordon M, Stellacci A, Ciccarese A and Rubino P. 2013. Developing a soil quality index to compare soil fitness for agricultural use under different managements in the Mediterranean environment. Soil Tillage Res. 130:91–98. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2013.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi Nalivan O, Mousavi Tayebi SA, Mehrabi M, Ghasemieh H, Scaioni M. 2022. A hybrid intelligent model for spatial analysis of groundwater potential around Urmia Lake, Iran. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess. 37(5):1–18. doi:10.1007/s00477-022-02368-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakhshandehmehr L, Soltani S, Sepehr A. 2009. Application of MEDALUS method for desertification mapping in SEJZI plain. Geophy Res Abstr. 11:EGU2009-1263–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bhavya R, Sivaraj K, Elango L. 2023. Ant colony based artificial neural network for predicting spatial and temporal variation in groundwater quality. Water (Switzerland). 15(12):2222. doi:10.3390/w15122222.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgili AV, Küçük Ç, Van Es HM. 2017. Assessment of the quality of the Harran plain soils under long-term cultivation. EMAS. 189(9):1–15. doi:10.1007/s10661-017-6177-y.
   Google Scholar
• Blake GRHartge KH. 1986. Bulk density. In: Klute A, editors. Methods of soil analysis: part 1 physical and mineralogical methods. 1 st ed. America: SSSA Book Series; p. 363–375.
   Google Scholar
• Bölük E. 2016. According to Erinç climate classification Turkish climate, ministry of forestry and water management general directorate of meteorology. Ankara: General Directorate of Meteorology.
   Google Scholar
• Bouyoucos GJ. 1951. A recalibration of the hydrometer method for making mechanical analysis of soils 1. Agron J. 43(9):434–438. doi:10.2134/agronj1951.00021962004300090005x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demattê JAM, Safanelli JL, Poppiel RR, Rizzo R, Silvero NEQ, Mendes WDS, Lisboa CDS, Dotto AC, Salazar DFU, Mello FADO, et al. 2020. Bare Earth’s surface spectra as a proxy for soil resource monitoring. Sci Rep. 10(1):4461. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61408-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengiz O, Ormanciı İF, Özkan B. 2022. Determination of agricultural suitability classes using multi-criteria decision analysis and linear combination technique. A case study; Ankara-Gölbaşi special environmental protection area and its near vicinity. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 10(1):44–57. doi:10.33409/tbbbd.1083452.
   Google Scholar
• Dengiz O, Sarıoğlu FE. 2013. Parametric approach with linear combination technique in land evaluation studies. JAS. 19(2013):101–112.
   Google Scholar
• Dike HU, Zhou Y, Deveerasetty KK, Wu Q 2018. Unsupervised learning based on artificial neural network: a review. In 2018 IEEE Int Conf on CBS. 322–327. doi: 10.1109/cbs.2018.8612259.
   Google Scholar
• Esfandiarpour-Boroujeni I, Shamsabadi MS, Shirani H, Mosleh Z, Bodaghabadi MB, Salehi MH. 2020. Comparison of error and uncertainty of decision tree and learning vector quantization models for predicting soil classes in areas with low altitude variations. Catena. 191:104581. doi:10.1016/j.catena.2020.104581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewelling T, Peech M. 1960. Chemical soil test. United States: Cornell University, Agr Expt Sta Bull. p. 960.
   Google Scholar
• Hassler SC, Baysal-Gurel F. 2019. Unmanned aircraft system (UAS) technology and applications in agriculture. Agronomy. 9(10):618. doi:10.3390/agronomy9100618.
   Google Scholar
• Hazelton P, Murphy B. 2016. Interpreting soil test results: what do all the numbers mean? 1 st ed. Australia: CSIRO Publ; p. 100–150.
   Google Scholar
• Heuvelink GBM, Webster R. 2001. Modelling soil variation: past, present, and future. Geoderma. 100:269–301. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(01)00025-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaiswal A, Babu AR, Zadeh MZ, Banerjee D, Makedon F. 2020. A survey on contrastive self-supervised learning. Technologies. 9(1):2. doi:10.3390/technologies9010002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian J, Du X, Reiter MS, Stewart RD. 2020. A meta-analysis of global cropland soil carbon changes due to cover cropping. Soil Biol Biochem. 143:107735. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jung J, Maeda M, Chang A, Bhandari M, Ashapure A, Landivar-Bowles J. 2021. The potential of remote sensing and artificial intelligence as tools to improve the resilience of agriculture production systems. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 70:15–22. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2020.09.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacar B, Katkat V. 2009. Plant Nutrition. Ankara: Nobel publications; p. 659.
   Google Scholar
• Karahan G, Erşahin S, Öztürk HS. 2014. Field capacity dynamics affected by soil properties. JAFAG. 30(1):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Karaman MR, Brohi AR, Müftüoğlu NM, Öztaş T, Zengin M. 2007. Sustainable soil fertility. Turkey: Koyulhisar Agriculture Culture Publisher; p. 20–50.
   Google Scholar
• Karlen, D.L, Stott, D.E 1994 A framework for evaluating physical and chemical indicators of soil quality. Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment, 35 53–72
   Google Scholar
• Kaya NS, Özkan B, Dengiz O, Turan İD. 2022. Digital mapping and spatial variability of soil quality index for desertification in the Akarçay basin under the semi-arid terrestrial ecosystem using neutrosophic fuzzy-AHP approach. Nat Hazard. 112(3):1–32. doi:10.1007/s11069-022-05258-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayhan G, İ̇şeri İ. 2022. Counter propagation network based extreme learning machine. Neural Process Lett 1-16. 55(1):857–872. doi:10.1007/s11063-022-11021-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarzi A, Del Árbol MÁS, Kaya F, Gyasi‐Agyei Y, Rodrigo‐Comino J. 2022. Digital mapping of soil texture classes for efficient land management in the piedmont plain of Iran. Soil Use And Manag. 38(4):1705–1735. doi:10.1111/sum.12833.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian A. 2012. Mapping of spatial distribution of soil salinity and alkalinity in a semi-arid region. Ann Wars Agric Univ Land Reclam. 44(1):3–14. doi:10.2478/v10060-011-0057-x.
   Google Scholar
• Kimetu JM, Lehmann J, Ngoze SO, Mugendi DN, Kinyangi JM, Riha S, Pell AN, Recha JW, Pell AN. 2008. Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems. 11(5):726–739. doi:10.1007/s10021-008-9154-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopittke PM, Menzies NW, Wang P, McKenna BA, Lombi E. 2019. Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environ Int. 132:105078. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le HA, Nguyen TA, Nguyen DD, Prakash I. 2020. Prediction of soil unconfined compressive strength using artificial neural network model. Vietnam J Earth Sci. 42(3):255–264. doi:10.15625/0866-7187/42/3/15342.
   Google Scholar
• Liakos KG, Busato P, Moshou D, Pearson S, Bochtis D. 2018. Machine learning in agriculture: a review. Sensors. 18(8):2674. doi:10.3390/s18082674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li KQ, Kang Q, Nie JY, Huang XW. 2022. Artificial neural network for predicting the thermal conductivity of soils based on a systematic database. Geothermics. 103:102416. doi:10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li KQ, Liu Y, Kang Q. 2022. Estimating the thermal conductivity of soils using six machine learning algorithms. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf. 136:106139. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2022.106139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LJ. 1992. Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning and teaching. Mach Learn. 8(3–4):293–321. doi:10.1007/BF00992699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay WL, Norvell WA. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. S Soil Sci Soc Am J. 42(3):421–428. doi:10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li KQ, Yin ZY, Liu Y. 2023. A hybrid SVR-BO model for predicting the soil thermal conductivity with uncertainty. Can Geotech J. doi: 10.1139/cgj-2023-0105.
   Google Scholar
• Li KQ, Yin ZY, Zhang N, Liu Y. 2023. A data-driven method to model stress-strain behaviour of frozen soil considering uncertainty. Cold Reg Sci Technol. 103906:103906. doi:10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.103906.
   Google Scholar
• Lwin CS, Seo BH, Kim HU, Owens G, Kim KR. 2018. Application of soil amendments to contaminated soils for heavy metal immobilization and improved soil quality—A critical review. Soil Sci Plant Nutr. 64(2):156–167. doi:10.1080/00380768.2018.1440938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone BP, Minasny B, McBratney AB. 2017. Using R for digital soil mapping. Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-44327-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabi M. 2021. Landslide susceptibility zonation using statistical and machine learning approaches in Northern Lecco, Italy. Natur Hazards. 1–37. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-771789/v1.
   Google Scholar
• Moayedi H, Mehrabi M, Bui DT, Pradhan B, Foong LK. 2020. Fuzzy-metaheuristic ensembles for spatial assessment of forest fire susceptibility. J Environ Manage. 260:109867. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson DW, Sommers LE. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: AL P, Miller R Keeney D, editors. Method of soil analysis, part 2. Madison, Wisc: ASA; p. 539–579. doi: 10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum M, Spiess K, Baltensweiler A, Grob U, Keller A, Greiner L, Schaepman ME, Papritz A. 2018. Evaluation of digital soil mapping approaches with large sets of environmental covariates. SOIL. 4(1):1–22. doi:10.5194/soil-4-1-2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odabas MS, Ergun E, Oner F. 2013. Artificial neural network approach for the predicition of the corn (Zea mays L.) leaf area. BJAS. 19(4):766–769.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Vol. 939, Washington D.C., USA: U.S Dept of Agric Cric.
   Google Scholar
• Öztürk S, Beker Y, Sarı M, Pehlivan L. 2021. Estimation of ground types in different districts of Gümüşhane province based on the ambient vibrations H/V measurements. Sigma J Eng Nat Sci. 39(4):374–391.
   Google Scholar
• Pacci S, Dengiz O, Saygın F, Alaboz P. 2022. Soil quality assessment of paddy cultivation lands in the bafra plain based on the SMAF model. Turk J Agric Res. 9(2):164–174. doi:10.19159/tutad.1067105.
   Google Scholar
• Palmer J, Thorburn PJ, Biggs JS, Dominati EJ, Probert ME, EA M, WJ P, Dodd M, Snow V, Larsen JR, et al. 2017. Nitrogen cycling from increased soil organic carbon contributes both positively and negatively to ecosystem services in wheat agro-ecosystems. Front Plant Sci. 8:731. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.00731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao J, Li F, Han H, Li W. 2016. Constructive algorithm for fully connected cascade feedforward neural networks. Neurocomputing. 182:154–164. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramamoorthy D. 2015. Assessment of heavy metal pollution and its impacts on soil physical, chemical properties and β-glucosidase activities in agricultural lands, Puducherry region. 1. India department of Science. Technol Environ, Gov Puducherry.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos FT, Dores EFDC, Weber OLDS, Beber DC, Campelo JH Jr, Maia JCDS. 2018. Soil organic matter doubles the cation exchange capacity of tropical soil under no‐till farming in Brazil. J Sci Food Agric. 98(9):3595–3602. doi:10.1002/jsfa.8881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rolda´n A, Salinas-Garcı´a J, Alguacil M, Dı´az E, Caravaca F. 2005. Soil enzyme activities suggest advantages of conservation tillage practices in sorghum cultivation under subtropical conditions. Geoderma. 129(3–4):178–185. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.12.042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol. 15(3):234–328. doi:10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1990. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res. 48(1):9–26. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2000. The fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic Hierarchy process. Vol. VI. RWS Publications, Pitsburg; p. 478. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-9799-9_2
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. IJSSci. 1(1):83–98. doi:10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty TL, Vargas LG. 2001. Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic Hierarchy process. Kluwer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1665-1.
   Google Scholar
• Şenol H, Alaboz P, Demir S, Dengiz O. 2020. Computational intelligence applied to soil quality index using GIS and geostatistical approaches in semiarid ecosystem. Arab J Geosci. 13(23):1–20. doi:10.1007/s12517-020-06214-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaddad SM. 2018. Geostatistics and proximal soil sensing for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability Agric Environ In Egypt: Part I: Soil-Water-Food Nexus. 255–271. doi: 10.1007/698_2018_244.
   Google Scholar
• Sharififar A, Sarmadian F, Minasny B. 2019. Mapping imbalanced soil classes using Markov chain random fields models treated with data resampling technique. Comput Electron Agric. 159:110–118. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2019.03.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sha T, Zhang W, Shen T, Li Z, Mei T. 2021. Deep person generation: a survey from the perspective of face, pose and cloth synthesis. New York City: ACM Computing Surveys.
   Google Scholar
• Shen C. 2018. A transdisciplinary review of deep learning research and its relevance for water resources scientists. Water Resour Res. 54(11):8558–8593. doi:10.1029/2018wr022643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha NK, Chopra UK, Singh AK. 2014. Cropping system effects on soil quality for three agro-ecosystems in India. Exp Agri. 50(3):321–342. doi:10.1017/s001447971300046x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soil Pollution Control Regulation. 2005. https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2005/05/20050531-6.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Soil Survey Staff. 1993. Soil Survey Manual, USDA., handbook no: 18. Washington D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Taş N, Okumuş E, Öner Ş, Köksal C, İ̇cat MY, Tanış S. 2003. Gümüşhane provincial environmental status report. Gümüşhane governorship provincial directorate of environment and forestry, Gümüşhane. Türkiye. 2003:179.
   Google Scholar
• USDA. 2022. Soil health. United States department of agriculture. Natural Resources Conservation Service. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/nd/soils/health/.
   Google Scholar
• van Es HM, Karlen DL. 2019. Reanalysis validates soil health indicator sensitivity and correlation with long‐term crop yields. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 83(3):721–732. doi:10.2136/sssaj2018.09.0338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Leeuwen JP, Creamer RE, Cluzeau D, Debeljak M, Gatti F, Henriksen CB, Kuzmanovski V, Mentas C, Peres G, Picaud C, et al. 2019. Modeling of soil functions for assessing soil quality: Soil biodiversity and habitat provisioning. Front Environ Sci. 7:113. doi:10.3389/fenvs.2019.00113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wambeke AR. 2000. The Newhall simulation model for estimating soil moisture and temperature regimes. Department of crop and soil sciences. Ithaca, NY. USA: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Wadoux AMJC, Minasny B, McBratney AB. 2020. Machine learning for digital soil mapping: applications, challenges and suggested solutions. Earth Sci Revi. 210:103359. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Williams JR, Gassman PW, Baffaut C, Izaurralde RC, Jeong J, Kiniry JR. 2012. EPIC and APEX: model use, calibration, and validation. Trans ASABE. 55(4):1447–1462. doi:10.13031/2013.42253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WRB. 2014. World reference Base for soil resources. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil Resources Reports: 106, Food And Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Rome. 203.
   Google Scholar
• Wu X, Różycki P, Wilamowski BM. 2014. A hybrid constructive algorithm for single-layer feedforward networks learning. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 26(8):1659–1668. doi:10.1109/tnnls.2014.2350957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wymore, AW. 1993. An introduction to the Mathematical Theory of Discrete Systems and to the Tricotyledon Theory of System Design. In: Boca R, Arbor A, editors. Model-based systems engineering. London-Tokyo: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yerli C, Çakmakci T, Sahin U, Tüfenkçi Ş. 2020. The effects of heavy metals on soil, Plant, water and human health. Türk Doğa ve Fen Dergisi. 9(Özel Sayı):103–114. doi:10.46810/tdfd.718449.
   Google Scholar
• Yeşilsoy MŞ, Aydın M. 1993. Soil physics. Turkey: Çukurova University, Faculty of Agriculture Textbook; p. 20–50.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang G, Bai J, Xi M, Zhao Q, Lu Q, Jia J. 2016. Soil quality assessment of coastal wetlands in the yellow river delta of China based on the minimum data set. Ecol Indic. 66:458–466. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.01.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Xue S, Liu GB, Song ZL. 2011. A comparison of soil qualities of different revegetation types in the Loess Plateau, China. Plant Soil. 347(1–2):163–178. doi:10.1007/s11104-011-0836-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou ZH. 2018. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning. Natl Sci Rev. 5(1):44–53. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar