Straw, biochar, and nanocarbon altered the enzymatic reaction kinetics and thermodynamic process of catalase in the black soil under continuous warming

References

• Aacharya R, Chhipa H. 2020. Nanocarbon fertilizers: implications of carbon nanomaterials in sustainable agriculture production. Carbon Nanomater Agri-Food And Environ Appl. 2020:297–321.
   Google Scholar
• Akhtar K, Wang W, Ren G, Khan A, Feng Y, Yang G. 2018. Changes in soil enzymes, soil properties, and maize crop productivity under wheat straw mulching in Guanzhong, China. Soil Till Res. 182:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2018.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar K, Wang W, Ren G, Khan A, Feng Y, Yang G, Wang H. 2019. Integrated use of straw mulch with nitrogen fertilizer improves soil functionality and soybean production. Environ Int. 132:105092. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez G, Shahzad T, Andanson L, Bahn M, Wallenstein MD, Fontaine S. 2018. Catalytic power of enzymes decreases with temperature: new insights for understanding soil C cycling and microbial ecology under warming. Glob Chang Biol. 24(9):4238–4250. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao SD. 2008. Soil analysis in agricultural chemistry. Beijing (China): Agric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burns RG, DeForest JL, Marxsen J, Sinsabaugh RL, Stromberger ME, Wallenstein MD, Weintraub MN, Zoppini A. 2013. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biol Biochem. 58:216–234. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen C, Yuan CP, Xu ZB, Chen DQ, Liu JY. 2019. Comparison of the effects of different maize straw returning methods on saline soil improvement//E3S web of conferences. EDP Sci. 131:01089. doi: 10.1051/e3sconf/201913101089.
   Google Scholar
• Chen LM, Sun SL, Yao B, Peng YT, Gao CF, Qin T, Zhou YY, Sun CR, Quan W. 2022. Effects of straw return and straw biochar on soil properties and crop growth: a review. Front Plant Sci. 13:986763. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.986763.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen ST, Wu J. 2019. The sensitivity of soil microbial respiration declined due to crop straw addition but did not depend on the type of crop straw. Environ Sci Pollut R. 26(29):30167–30176. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06185-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal RC. 1985. Distribution, salinity, kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of urease activity in a vertisol profile. Soil Res. 23(1):49–60. doi: 10.1071/SR9850049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Carmen Cuevas-Díaz M, Martínez-Toledo Á, Guzmán-López O, Torres-López CP, Hermida-Mendoza LJ, Hermida-Mendoza LJ. 2017. Catalase and phosphatase activities during hydrocarbon removal from oil-Contaminated soil Amended with Agro-Industrial by-products and macronutrients. Water Air Soil Pollut. 228(4):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s11270-017-3336-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du ZL, Zhao JK, Wang YD, Zhang QZ. 2017. Biochar addition drives soil aggregation and carbon sequestration in aggregate fractions from an intensive agricultural system. J Soils Sediments. 17:581–589. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1349-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan SY. 1986. Soil enzymes and their research methods. Beijing: China Agr Press.
   Google Scholar
• Helland A, Wick P, Koehler A, Schmid K, Som C. 2007. Reviewing the environmental and human health knowledge base of carbon nanotubes. Environ Health Persp. 115(8):1125–1131. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu L, Li S, Li K, Huang H, Wan W, Huang Q, Li Q, Li Y, Deng H, He T. 2020. Effects of two types of straw biochar on the mineralization of soil organic carbon in farmland. Sustainability. 12(24):10586. doi: 10.3390/su122410586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang R, Gao M, Wan Y-L, Tian D, Tao R, Wang F-L. 2016. Effects of straw in combination with reducing fertilization rate on soil nutrients and enzyme activity in the paddy-vegetable rotation soils. Environ Sci. 37:4446–4456.
   Google Scholar
• Ji BY, Hu H, Zhao YL, Mu XY, Liu K, Li CH. 2014. Effects of deep tillage and straw returning on soil microorganism and enzyme activities. Sci World J. 2014:51493. doi: 10.1155/2014/451493.
   Google Scholar
• Jin LX, Son Y, DeForest JL, Kang YJ, Kim W, Chung H. 2014. Single-walled carbon nanotubes alter soil microbial community composition. Sci Total Environ. 466:533–538. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin ZQ, Shah T, Zhang L, Liu HY, Peng S, Nie LX. 2020. Effect of straw returning on soil organic carbon in rice–wheat rotation system: a review. Food Energy Secur. 9(2):e200. doi: 10.1002/fes3.200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuwon J, Anderson AJ. 1990. Catalase and superoxide dismutase of root-colonizing saprophytic fluorescent pseudomonads. Appl Environ Microb. 56(11):3576–3582. doi: 10.1128/aem.56.11.3576-3582.1990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khadem A, Raiesi F. 2019. Response of soil alkaline phosphatase to biochar amendments: changes in kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics. Geoderma. 337:44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch O, Tscherko D, Kandeler E. 2007. Temperature sensitivity of microbial respiration, nitrogen mineralization, and potential soil enzyme activities in organic alpine soils. Global Biogeochem Cy. 21(4):GB4017. doi: 10.1029/2007GB002983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kou TJ, Lam SK, Chen DL, Yu WW. 2018. Soil urease and catalase responses to ozone pollution are affected by the ozone sensitivity of wheat cultivars. J Agron Crop Sci. 204(4):424–428. doi: 10.1111/jac.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laghari M, Naidu R, Xiao B, Hu Z, Mirjat MS, Hu M, Kandhro MN, Chen Z, Guo D, Jogi Q. 2016. Recent developments in biochar as an effective tool for agricultural soil management: a review. J Sci Food Agr. 96(15):4840–4849. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.7753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li YD, Sun L. 2019. Effects of nanocarbon mixing with nitrogen fertilizer on soil microbial community structure and nutr. Chin Rice. 25:70–73+79.
   Google Scholar
• Liang TB, Yin QS, hYl Z, Xie JP, Wang BL, Cai XJ, Guo GW, Wang JW. 2014. Effects of nanocarbon application on nitrogen absorption and utilization of flue-cured tobacco. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 34:1429–1435.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YZ, Wang Z, Zheng KL, Cheng JM. 2022. Properties of modified nano black carbon and its Effects on soil enzyme activities. Mater Sci Forum. 1060:169–176. doi: 10.4028/p-p6558e.
   Google Scholar
• Luo H, Feng CC, Zhao JY, Yue ZH. 2020. Kinetic and thermodynamic properties of polyphenol oxidase in petroleum contaminated soil. Res Environ Sci. 33:2621–2628.
   Google Scholar
• Lv YJ, Yu HY, Yao FY, Cao YJ, Wei WW, Wang LC, Wang YJ. 2016. Effects of soil straw return and nitrogen on spring maize yield, greenhouse gas emission and soil enzyme activity in black soils. Chin J Eco-Agr. 24:1456–1463.
   Google Scholar
• Ma LJ, Kong FX, Lv XB, Wang Z, Zhou ZG, Meng YL. 2021. Responses of greenhouse gas emissions to different straw management methods with the same amount of carbon input in cotton field. Soil Till Res. 213:105126. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2021.105126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohamed I, Bassouny MA, Abbas MH, Ming Z, Cougui C, Fahad S, Saud S, Khattak JZK, Ali S, Salem HM. 2021. Rice straw application with different water regimes stimulate enzymes activity and improve aggregates and their organic carbon contents in a paddy soil. Chemosphere. 274:129971. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129971.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nannipieri P, Gianfreda L, Huang PM, Senesi N, Buffle J. 1998. Kinetics of enzyme reactions in soil environments. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Paz-Ferreiro J, Fu S, Méndez A, Gascó G. 2015. Biochar modifies the thermodynamic parameters of soil enzyme activity in a tropical soil. J Soils Sediments. 15(3):578–583. doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-1029-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel P, Ma Z, Chang SX. 2020. Biochar increases soil microbial biomass with changes in extra- and intracellular enzyme activities: a global meta-analysis. Biochar. 2(1):65–79. doi: 10.1007/s42773-020-00039-1.
   Google Scholar
• Razavi BS, Liu S, Kuzyakov Y. 2017. Hot experience for cold-adapted microorganisms: temperature sensitivity of soil enzymes. Soil Biol Biochem. 105:236–243. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Kábana R, Truelove B. 1982. Effects of crop rotation and fertilization on catalase activity in a soil of the southeastern United States. Plant Soil. 69(1):97–104. doi: 10.1007/BF02185708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serban A, Nissenbaum A. 1986. Humic acid association with peroxidase and catalase. Soil Biol Biochem. 18(1):41–44. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(86)90101-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siedt M, Schäffer A, Smith KE, Nabel M, Roß-Nickoll M, van Dongen JT. 2021. Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Sci Total Environ. 751:141607. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinsabaugh RL, Belnap J, Findlay SG, Shah J, Warnock DD, Kuehn KA, Kuske CR, Litvak ME, Martinez NG, Moorhead DL. 2014. Extracellular enzyme kinetics scale with resource availability. Biogeochemistry. 121(2):287–304. doi: 10.1007/s10533-014-0030-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonkar SK, Sarkar S. 2019. Prospects of nanocarbons in agriculture. Nanocarbon Compos. 2019:287–326.
   Google Scholar
• Stpniewska Z, Wolińska A, Ziomek J. 2009. Response of soil catalase activity to chromium contamination. J Environ Sci. 21(8):1142–1147. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(08)62394-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su X, Guo YL, Lu M, Feng CC, Yue ZH. 2020. Effects of three kinds of carbon addition on community structure diversity of CO2-assimilating bacterial in degraded farmland soil. Acta Sci Circ. 40:234–241.
   Google Scholar
• Tang HM, Xiao XP, Li C, Cheng KK, Shi LH, Pan XC, Li WY, Wen L, Wang K. 2021. Impacts of short-term tillage and crop residue incorporation managements on soil microbial community in a double-cropping rice field. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 67(4):1–10. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2020.1787387.
   Google Scholar
• Teng Q, Zhang D, Niu X, Jiang CL. 2018. Influences of application of slow-release nano-fertilizer on green pepper growth, soil nutrients and enzyme activity. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Env Sci. 208:012014. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012014.
   Google Scholar
• Wallenstein M, Allison SD, Ernakovich J, Steinweg JM, Sinsabaugh R. 2010. Controls on the temperature sensitivity of soil enzymes: a key driver of in situ enzyme activity rates. Soil Enzymol. 22:245–258.
   Google Scholar
• Weigand S, Auerswald K, Beck T. 1995. Microbial biomass in agricultural topsoils after 6 years of bare fallow. Boil Fert Soils. 19(2–3):129–134. doi: 10.1007/BF00336148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu ZF, Tang Z, Wan C, Xiong P, Cao G, Liu Q. 2010. Effects of simulated warming on soil enzyme activities in two subalpine coniferous forests in west Sichuan. Chin J Appl Ecol. 21:2727–2733.
   Google Scholar
• Yakushev AV, Kuznetsova IN, Blagodatskaya EV, Blagodatsky SA. 2014. Temperature dependence of the activity of polyphenol peroxidases and polyphenol oxidases in modern and buried soils. Eurasian Soil Sc. 47(5):459–465. doi: 10.1134/S1064229314050263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu ZQ, Ren FP. 2014. Material properties in advances in organic fertilizer. Appl Mech Mater. 730:235–240. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.730.235.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan W, Yue ZH, Guo YL, Zhao JY, Guo YX, Li JW. 2021. Effects of carbons addition on soil carbon transformation and productivity of crop. Environ Sci Technol. 44:87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang M, Cheng G, Feng H, Sun B, Zhao Y, Chen H, Chen J, Dyck M, Wang X, Zhang J, et al. 2017. Effects of straw and biochar amendments on aggregate stability, soil organic carbon, and enzyme activities in the Loess Plateau, China. Environ Sci Pollut R. 24(11):10108–10120. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8505-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang YL, Chen LJ, Sun CX, Li DP, Duan ZH. 2010. Kinetic and thermodynamic properties of hydrolases in Northeastern China soils affected by temperature. Agrochimica. 54:232–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J, Zhang J, Gao L, Wang R, Gao J, Dai Y, Li W, Shen G, Kong F, Zhang J. 2021. Effect of straw biochar amendment on tobacco growth, soil properties, and rhizosphere bacterial communities. Sci Rep. 11(1):1–14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00168-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu ME. 2011. Soil enzyme kinetics and thermodynamics. Beijing: Sci Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu ME, Bai HY, Dai W. 1989. Kinetic and thermodynamic characteristics of several soil catalase in Shaanxi. Acta Univ Septentrionali Occident Argic. 17:20–26.
   Google Scholar