Bioethanol potential of switchgrass cultivars for rainfed and irrigated conditions in marginal lands

References

• Aimar D, Calafat M, Andrade AM, Carassay L, Bouteau F, Abdala G, Molas ML. 2014. Drought effects on the early development stages of Panicum virgatum L.: cultivar differences. Biomass Bioenergy. 66:49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcura M. 2011. The relationships of some traits in Turkish winter bread wheat landraces. Turkish J Agric For. 35(2):115–125. doi: 10.3906/tar-0908-301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexopoulou E, Zanetti F, Papazoglou EG, Iordanoglou K, Monti A. 2020. Long-term productivity of thirteen lowland and upland switchgrass ecotypes in the Mediterranean region. Agronomy. 10(7):923. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10070923.
   Google Scholar
• Allison GG, Morris C, Lister SJ, Barraclough T, Yates N, Shield I, Donnison IS. 2012. Effect of nitrogen fertiliser application on cell wall composition in switchgrass and reed canary grass. Biomass Bioenergy. 40:19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ameen A, Tang C, Liu J, Han L, Xie GH. 2019. Switchgrass as forage and biofuel feedstock: effect of nitrogen fertilization rate on the quality of biomass harvested in late summer and early fall. Field Crops Res. 235:154–162. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.03.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinsakir K, Buyuktas D, Dinç N, Erdurmus C, Bayram E, Yegin AB. 2021. Yield and bioethanol productivity of sorghum under surface and subsurface drip irrigation. Agric Water Manage. 243:106452. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari HS, Saha MC, Fasoula VA, Bouton JH. 2011. Estimation of ggenetic parameters for biomass yield in lowland switchgrass (Panicum virgatumL.). Crop Sci. 51(4):1525–1533. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2010.10.0588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhandari HS, Walker DW, Bouton JH, Saha MC. 2014. Effects of ecotypes and morphotypes in feedstock composition of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.). Gcb Bioenergy. 6(1):26–34. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12053.
   Google Scholar
• Casler MD, Boe AR. 2003. Cultivar× environment interactions in switchgrass. Crop Sci. 43(6):2226–2233. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2003.2226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casler MD, Vogel KP. 2014. Selection for biomass yield in upland, lowland, and hybrid switchgrass. Crop Sci. 54(2):626–636. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.04.0239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassida KA, Muir JP, Hussey MA, Read JC, Venuto BC, Ocumpaugh WR. 2005. Biofuel component concentrations and yields of switchgrass in south Central U.S. Environments. Crop Sci. 45(2):682–692. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celiktas N, Unal MU, Can E, Atıs I, Yavuz T, Eren O, Sener A. 2017. World bioenergy model type switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) determination of bioethanol production capacity, selection and seed production of genotypes in the mediterranean and continental climate zones of Turkey. Tübítak. TOVAG- 113O009. Result report. Link. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/proje/TVRjMk1EUTA/dunya-biyoenerji-model-turu-dalli-dari-panicum-virgatum-l-genotiplerinin-ulkemiz-akdeniz-ve-karasal-iklim-kusaklarinda-biyoetanol-uretim-kapasitelerinin-belirlenmesi-seleksiyonu-ve-tohumluk-uretimi.
   Google Scholar
• da Silva TM, de Oliveira AB, de Moura JG, da Trindade Lessa BF, de Oliveira LSB. 2019. Potential of sweet sorghum juice as a source of ethanol for semi-arid regions: cultivars and spacing arrangement effects. Sugar Tech. 21:145–152. doi: 10.1007/s12355-018-0637-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dien BS, Jung HJ, Vogel KP, Casler MD, Lamb JF, Iten L, Mitchell RB, Sarath G. 2006. Chemical composition and response to dilute-acid pretreatment and enzymatic saccharification of alfalfa, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass. Biomass Bioenergy. 30(10):880–891. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duygu MB, Kirmencioglu B, Aras M. 2017. Essential tools to establish a comprehensive drought management plan-Konya basin case study. Turk J Water Sci Manage. 1(1):54–70. doi: 10.31807/tjwsm.297087.
   Google Scholar
• Elis S, Ozyazici MA. 2019. Determination of the silage quality characteristics of different switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars. Appl Ecol Env Res. 17(6):6. doi: 10.15666/aeer/1706_1575515773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falasca S, Pitta-Alvarez S, Del Fresno CM. 2017. Possibilities for growing switch-grass (Panicum virgatum) as second generation energy crop in dry-subhumid, semiarid and arid regions of the Argentina. J Cent Eur Agric. 18(1):95–116. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/18.1.1870.
   Google Scholar
• Fan P, Hao M, Ding F, Jiang D, Dong D. 2020. Quantifying global potential marginal land resources for switchgrass. Energies. 13(23):6197. doi: 10.3390/en13236197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geren H, Kavut YT, Topcu GD. 2016. A preliminary study on the biomass yield and some agronomical characteristics of different switch grass genotypes grown under bornova ecological conditions, 2. Nat Biofuels Symp, 27-30 September 2016, Samsun/Turkey. 1:286–292.
   Google Scholar
• Goff BM, Moore KJ, Fales SL, Heaton EA. 2010. Double-cropping sorghum for biomass. J Agron. 102(6):1586–1592. doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonulal E, Soylu S, Sahin M. 2021. Effects of different water stress levels on biomass yield and agronomic traits of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) varieties under semi-arid conditions. Turkish J Field Crop. 26(1):25–34. doi: 10.17557/tjfc.758010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta A, Verma JP. 2015. Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 41:550–567. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guretzky JA, Biermacher JT, Cook BJ, Kering MK, Mosali J. 2011. Switchgrass for forage and bioenergy: harvest and nitrogen rate effects on biomass yields and nutrient composition. Plant Soil. 339(1–2):69–81. doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0376-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen K, Mathiesen BV, Skov IR. 2019. Full energy system transition towards 100% renewable energy in Germany in 2050. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 102:1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homyak PM, Sickman JO, Miller AE, Melack JM, Meixner T, Schimel JP. 2014. Assessing nitrogen-saturation in a seasonally dry chaparral watershed: limitations of traditional indicators of N-saturation. Ecosystems. 17(7):1286–1305. doi: 10.1007/s10021-014-9792-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: Synthesis report (SYR) of the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan M, Kale H, Kardes YM, Karaman K, Kahraman K, Yılmaz MF, Temizgül R, Akar T. 2020. Characterization of local sorghum (sorghum bicolor L.) population grains in terms of nutritional properties and evaluation by GT biplot approach. Starch Stärke. 72(3–4):1900232. doi: 10.1002/star.201900232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar R, Pareek NK, Kumar U, Javed T, Al-Huqail AA, Rathore VS, Kalaji HM, Choudhary A, Nanda G, Ali HM. 2022. Coupling effects of nitrogen and irrigation levels on growth attributes, nitrogen use efficiency, and economics of cotton. Front Plant Sci. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.890181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemus R, Brummer EC, Moore KJ, Molstad NE, Burras CL, Barker MF. 2002. Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. Biomass Bioenergy. 23(6):433–442. doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00073-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewandowski I, Kicherer A. 1997. Combustion quality of biomass: practical relevance and experiments to modify the biomass quality of miscanthus x giganteus. Eur J Agron. 6(3–4):163–177. doi: 10.1016/S1161-0301(96)02044-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Li M, Pu Y, Ragauskas AJ, Klett AS, Thies M, Zheng Y. 2018. Inhibitory effects of lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis: the role of lignin chemistry and molecular weight. Renew Energ. 123:664–674. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.02.079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lionello P, Scarascia L. 2018. The relation between climate change in the Mediterranean region and global warming. Reg Environ Chan. 18(5):1481–1493. doi: 10.1007/s10113-018-1290-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XJA, Fike JH, Galbraith JM, Fike WB. 2014. Switchgrass response to cutting frequency and biosolids amendment: biomass yield, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol yield. Bioenerg Res. 7(4):1191–1200. doi: 10.1007/s12155-014-9454-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu XJA, Fike JH, Galbraıth JM, Fike WB, Parrish DJ, Evanylo GK, Strahm BD. 2015. Effects of harvest frequency and biosolids application on switchgrass yield, feedstock quality, and theoretical ethanol yield. Gcb Bioenergy. 7(1):112–121. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12124.
   Google Scholar
• Masse D, Gilbert Y, Savoie P, Bélanger G, Parent G, Babineau D. 2011. Methane yield from switchgrass and reed canarygrass grown in Eastern Canada. Bioresour Technol. 102(22):10286–10292. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA. 2005. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy. 28(6):515–535. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehmood MA, Ibrahim M, Rashid U, Nawaz M, Ali S, Hussain A, Gull M. 2017. Biomass production for bioenergy using marginal lands. Sustain Prod Consum. 9:3–21. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2016.08.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti A, Virgilio ND, Venturi G. 2008. Mineral composition and ash content of six major energy crops. Biomass Bioenergy. 32(3):216–222. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasso NND, Lasorella MV, Roncucci N, Bonari E. 2015. Soil texture and crop management affect switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) productivity in the Mediterranean. Ind Crops Prod. 65:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozenen-Kavlak M, Cabuk SN. 2023. Spatial cost analysis for switchgrass cultivation: case of Eskisehir. Biomass Bioenergy. 174:106827. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2023.106827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozturk MZ, Cetinkaya G, Aydin S. 2017. Climate types of Turkey according to köppen-geiger climate classification. J Geography – Coğrafya Dergisi. 35:17–27. doi: 10.26650/JGEOG295515.
   Google Scholar
• Parrish DJ, Fike JH. 2005. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 24(5–6):423–459. doi: 10.1080/07352680500316433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popova Z, Kercheva M. 2004. Integrated strategies for maize irrigation and fertilization under water scarcity and environmental pressure in Bulgaria. Irrig Drain. 53(1):105–113. doi: 10.1002/ird.104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price DL, Casler MD. 2014. Divergent selection for secondary traits in upland tetraploid switchgrass and effects on sward biomass yield. Bioenerg Res. 7(1):329–337. doi: 10.1007/s12155-013-9374-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulighe G, Bonati G, Colangeli M, Morese MM, Traverso L, Lupia F, Khawaja C, Janssen R, Fava F. 2019. Ongoing and emerging issues for sustainable bioenergy production on marginal lands in the Mediterranean regions. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 103:58–70. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.12.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2013. Structural changes and reforms on Turkish Agriculture 2003-2013. Turkish. [accessed 2023 Jan 11]. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/ENG/changes_reforms.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sadiqa A, Gulagi A, Breyer C. 2018. Energy transition roadmap towards 100% renewable energy and role of storage technologies for Pakistan by 2050. Energy. 147:518–533. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson MA, Read JC, Reed RL. 1999. Harvest management of switchgrass for biomass feedstock and forage production. J Agron. 91(1):5–10. doi: 10.2134/agronj1999.00021962009100010002x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saris F, Gedik F. 2021. Meteorological drought analysis in konya closed basin. J Geoghraphy - Coğrafya Dergisi. 42:295–308.
   Google Scholar
• Schmer MR, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Dien BS, Jung HG, Casler MD. 2012. Temporal and spatial variation in switchgrass biomass composition and theoretical ethanol yield. J Agron. 104(1):54–64. doi: 10.2134/agronj2011.0195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seepaul R, Macoon B, Reddy KR, Evans WB. 2014. Harvest frequency and nitrogen effects on yield, chemical characteristics, and nutrient removal of switchgrass. J Agron. 106(5):1805–1816. doi: 10.2134/agronj14.0129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma N, Piscioneri I, Pignatelli V. 2003. An evaluation of biomass yield stability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars. Energy Convers Manage. 44(18):2953–2958. doi: 10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00049-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soldatos P. 2015. Economic aspects of bioenergy production from perennial grasses in marginal lands of South Europe. BioEnergy Res. 8(4):1562–1573. doi: 10.1007/s12155-015-9678-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soylu S, Sade B, Öğüt H, Akinerdem F, Babaoğlu M, Ada R, Eryılmaz T, Öztürk Ö, Oğuz H 2010. Investigation of the possibilities of growing switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) as an alternative biofuel and silage crop for Turkey. TÜBİTAK, TOVAG-107O161. Result report. Turkish. https://app.trdizin.gov.tr/proje/TVRFd016UTA/turkiye-icin-alternatif-bir-biyoyakit-ve-silaj-bitkisi-olarak-dalli-darinin-pancium-virgatum-l-yetistirilebilme-olanaklarinin-arastirilmasi.
   Google Scholar
• Stroup JA, Sanderson MA, Muir JP, McFarland MJ, Reed RL. 2003. Comparison of growth and performance in upland and lowland switchgrass types to water and nitrogen stress. Bioresour Technol. 86(1):65–72. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(02)00102-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CC, Han LP L-P, Xie HG. 2020. Response of switchgrass grown for forage and bioethanol to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium on semiarid marginal land. Agrony. 10(8):1147 2–114713. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10081147.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M, Tornqvist CE, Zhao X, Doerge RW, Casler MD, Jiang Y. 2019. Identification of quantitative trait loci for plant height, crown diameter, and plant biomass in a pseudo-F2 population of switchgrass. BioEnergy Res. 12(2):267–274. doi: 10.1007/s12155-019-09978-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. 1991. Symposium: carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci. 74(10):3583–3597. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varvel GE, Vogel KP, Mitchell RB, Follett RF, Kimble JM. 2008. Comparison of corn and switchgrass on marginal soils for bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy. 32(1):18–21. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP, Brejda JJ, Walters DT, Buxton DR 2002. Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management. Agron J. 94(3):413–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel KP, Dien BS, Jung HG, Casler MD, Masterson SD, Mitchell RB. 2011. Quantifying actual and theoretical ethanol yields for switchgrass strains using NIRS analyses. BioEnergy Res. 4(2):96–110. doi: 10.1007/s12155-010-9104-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wicke B, Smeets E, Watson H, Faaij A. 2011. The current bioenergy production potential of semi-arid and arid regions in sub-Saharan Africa. Biomass Bioenergy. 35(7):2773–2786. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson DM, Dalluge DL, Rover M, Heaton EA, Brown RC. 2013. Crop management impacts biofuel quality: influence of switchgrass harvest time on yield, nitrogen and ash of fast pyrolysis products. BioEnergy Res. 6(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s12155-012-9240-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan W, Tinker NA. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci. 86(3):623–645. doi: 10.4141/P05-169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yilmaz E, Cicek I. 2018. Detailed köppen-geiger climate regions of Turkey. J Hum Sci. 15(1):225–242. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v15i1.5040.
   Google Scholar
• Yilmaz G, Colak MA, Ozgencil İK, Metin M, Korkmaz M, Ertuğrul S, Jeppesen E, Bucak T, Tavşanoğlu ÜN, Özkan K, Akyürek Z. 2021. Decadal changes in size, salinity, waterbirds, and fish in lakes of the Konya closed basin, Turkey, associated with climate change and increasing water abstraction for agriculture. Inland Waters. 11(4):538–555. doi: 10.1080/20442041.2021.1924034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Y, Fan X, Hou X, Wu J, Wang T. 2014. Effect of different levels of nitrogen deficiency on switchgrass seedling growth. Crop J. 2(4):223–234. doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.04.005.
   Google Scholar