Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Entomophagy: A Survey and Experiment in Australia and the Netherlands

REFERENCES

• Aiking, H. 2011. Future protein supply. Trends in Food Science and Technology 22:112–120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazaux, G., D. van Gijseghem, and L. Bas. 2010. Alternative sources of protein for human consumption: An exploration [In Dutch.] Brussels: Department of Agriculture and Fisheries, Monitoring and Studies Division.
   Google Scholar
• Coakes, S. J. 2005. SPSS: Analysis without anguish. Version 12.0 for Windows. Milton, Australia: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• DeFoliart, G.R. 1999. Insects as food: Why the Western Attitude is Important. Annual Review of Entomology 44:21–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, J. 2012. A study of European consumers’ quality perception and acceptance on insect food. Masters thesis, Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Durst, P. B., D. V. Johnson, R. N. Leslie, and K. Shono. 2010. Forest insects as food: Humans bite back. Workshop on Asia-Pacific resources and their potential for development. Chiang Mai, Thailand: UNFAO.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, R. 1991. The mid-point on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin 2:66–70
   Google Scholar
• Gahukar, R. T. 2011. Entomophagy and human food security. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 31 (3): 129–144
   Google Scholar
• Heckathorn, D. D. 2002. Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems 49 (1): 11–34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoek, A. C. 2010. Will novel protein foods beat meat? Consumer acceptance of meat substitutes: A multidisciplinary research approach. PhD diss., Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, S. 2004. Likert scales: how to ab(use) them. Medical Education, 38 (12): 1217–1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobb, A. 2005. Consumer trust, risk and food safety: A review. Food Economics – Acta Agriculture Scandinavia, Section C, 2 (1): 3–12
   Google Scholar
• Looy, H., and J. R. Wood. 2010. Attitudes toward invertebrates: Are education “bug banquets” effective? The journal of environmental education, 37 (2): 37–48
   Google Scholar
• Looy, H., F. V.Dunkel, and R. W. Wood. 2013. How then shall we eat? Insect-eating attitudes and sustainable foodways. Agriculture and Human Values, DOI 10.1007/s10460-013-9450-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, G. 2010. Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Science Education, 15 (5): 625–632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumpold, B. A., and O. K. Schlüter. 2013. Potential and challenges of insects as an innovative source for food and feed production. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies, 17:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. 2007. Consumer attitudes to food innovation and technology. In: Understanding consumers of food products, ed. L. Frewer and H. van Trijp, 236–253. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC
   Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M. 2008. Factors influencing public acceptance of innovative food technologies and products. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 19:603–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, M., M. E. Cousin, H. Kastenholz, and A. Wiek. 2007. Public acceptance of nano-technology foods and food packaging: The influence of affect and trust. Appetite, 49:459–466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Synodinos, N. E. 2003. The “art” of questionnaire construction: some important considerations for manufacturing studies. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 14 (3): 221–237
   Google Scholar
• UNFAO. 2009. How to feed the world in 2050. Accessed March 21, 2012 via: http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_the_World_in_2050.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Huis, A., J. van Itterbeeck, H. Klunder, E. Mertens, A. Halloran, G. Muir, and P. Vantomme. 2013. Edible insects: Future prospects for food and feed security. FAO Forestry Paper. Rome: UNFAO.
   Google Scholar
• van Itterbeeck, J. 2008. Entomophagy and the West: Barriers and possibilities, ecological advantages and ethical desirability. Master Thesis, Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Verkerk, M. C., J. Tramper, J. C. M. van Trijp, and D. E. Martens. 2007. Insect cells for human food. Biotechnology Advances 25:198–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen, A. L. 2009. Edible insects: Traditional knowledge or Western phobia? Entomological Research 39:289–298
   Google Scholar
• Yen, A. L. 2010. Edible insects and other invertebrates in Australia: Future prospects. In Forest insects as food: Humans bite back. Proceedings of a workshop on Asia-Pacific resources and their potential for development, ed. P. B. Durst, D. V. Johnson, R. N. Leslie, and K. Shono, 65–84. Bangkok, Thailand: FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.
   Google Scholar