Halo It’s Meat! the Effect of the Vegetarian Label on Calorie Perception and Food Choices

References

• Besson, T., F. Lalot, N. Bochard, V. Flaudias, and O. Zerhouni. 2019. The calories underestimation of “organic” food: Exploring the impact of implicit evaluations. Appetite 137:134–44. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.02.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandon, P., and B. Wansink. 2007. The biasing health halos of fast-food restaurant health claims: Lower calorie estimates and higher side-dish consumption intentions. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (3):301–14. doi:10.1086/519499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A. 2011. The Dieter’s Paradox. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21 (2):178–83. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernev, A., and P. Chandon. 2010. Calorie estimation biases in consumer choice. (4):104–21.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, D. M., E. L. Glaeser, and J. M. Shapiro. 2003. Why have americans become more obese? Journal OfEconomic Perspectives 17 (3):93–118. doi:10.2139/ssrn.373121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, B., B. R. L. Duff, Z. Wang, and T. B. White. 2016. Putting the organic label in context: Examining the interactions between the organic label, product type, and retail outlet. Food Quality and Preference 49:140–50. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.11.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes, C., T. G. Smith, J. Jewell, J. Wardle, R. A. Hammond, S. Friel, … J. Kain. 2015. Smart food policies for obesity prevention. The Lancet 385 (9985):2410–21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61745-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IARC-OMS. (2018). Red Meat and Processed Meat. Iarc Monographs(Vol. 114). Retrieved from http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol114/mono114.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kantar Worldpanel. 2016. Le « flexitarisme », une tendance en vogue. Accessed https://www.kantarworldpanel.com/fr/A-la-une/flexitariens-nl48#downloadThankyou
   Google Scholar
• Khan, U., and R. Dhar. 2006. Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research 43 (2):259–66. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.2.259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, W., J. chen, M. Shimizu, K. M. Kniffin, and B. Wansink. 2013. You taste what you see: Do organic labels bias taste perceptions? Food Quality and Preference 29 (1):33–39. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.01.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, M. E., and C. S. Slotterback. 2001. Gender differences in perceptions of the healthiness of foods. Psychology & Health 16 (1):57–65. doi:10.1080/08870440108405489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, M. E., and C. S. Slotterback. 2005. Too good to be true: Dose insensitivity and stereotypical thinking of foods’ capacity to promote weight gain. Food Quality and Preference 16 (8):675–81. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prada, M., C. Godinho, D. L. Rodrigues, C. Lopes, and M. V. Garrido. 2019. The impact of a gluten-free claim on the perceived healthfulness, calories, level of processing and expected taste of food products. Food Quality and Preference 73:284–87. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2018.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prada, M., D. Rodrigues, and M. V. Garrido. 2016. Deliberate choices or strong motives: Exploring the mechanisms underlying the bias of organic claims on leniency judgments. Appetite 103:8–16. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, A. M., and S. A. Jebb. 2003. Fast foods, energy density and obesity: A possible mechanistic link. Obesity Reviews 4 (4):187–94. doi:10.1046/j.1467-789X.2003.00117.x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raghunathan, R., R. W. Naylor, and W. D. Hoyer. 2006. The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. Journal of Marketing 70 (4):170–84. doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.4.170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., M. Ashmore, and M. Markwith. 1996. Lay American conceptions of nutrition : Dose insensitivity, categorical thinking, contagion, and the monotonic mind we propose that two simplifying approaches to nutritional. Health Psychology 15 (6):438–47. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.15.6.438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruby, M. B. 2012. Vegetarianism. A blossoming field of study. Appetite 58 (1):141–50. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.09.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt, J. P., D. Muller, and N. Schwarz. 2012. The “Fair Trade” Effect: Health halos from social ethics claims. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3 (5):581–89. doi:10.1177/1948550611431643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuldt, J. P., and N. Schwarz. 2010. The “organic” path to obesity? Organic claims influence calorie judgments and exercise recommendations. Judgment and Decision Making, Read 5 (3):144–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sörqvist, P., A. Haga, L. Langeborg, M. Holmgren, M. Wallinder, A. Nöstl, P. B. Seager, and J. E. Marsh. 2015b. The green halo: Mechanisms and limits of the eco-label effect. Food Quality and Preference 43:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorndike, E. L. 1920. A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology 4 (1):25–29. doi:10.1037/h0071663.
   Google Scholar
• Wansink, B., and P. Chandon. 2006. No Can “Low-Fat” Nutrition Labels Lead to Obesity? Journal of Marketing Research 43 (4):605–17. doi:10.1509/jmkr.43.4.605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar