The importance of diurnal variation of photosynthesis vs. light curves to estimates of integral primary production

References

• Allen, H. L., 1973: Production and utilization of dissolved inorganic carbon during in situ phytoplankton photosynthesis mesaurements. — Int. Rev. ges. Hydrobiol. 58 (6), 843–849.
   Google Scholar
• Fee, E. J., 1973: Modelling primary production in water bodies: a numerical approach that allows vertical homogeneities.— J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30, 1469–1473.
   Google Scholar
• Fee, E. J., 1973 a: A digital computer program for calculating integral phytoplankton production in vertically stratified waterbodies. — Fish. Res. Bd. Canada Tech. Rept. 376, 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Fee, E. J., 1973 b: A numerical model for determining integral primary production and its application to Lake Michigan. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30, 1447–1468.
   Google Scholar
• Gächteb, R., 1972: Die Bestimmung der Tagesraten der planktischen Primärproduktion-Modelle und In-situ-Messungen. — Schweiz. Z. Hydrol. 34, 211–244.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, C. R., 1961: The measurement of primary productivity and limiting factors in freshwater with carbon-14. — Proc. Conference on Primary Productivity Measurement, Marine and Freshwater, 103–115. Ed. M. Doty. U. S. Atomic Energy Commission, Div. of Techn. Information. TID-7633.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, V. K., 1962: On the afternoon depression. — Int. Counc. Expl. Sea. Plankton Committee. 129.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, L. W. & Haxo, F. T., 1957: Diumal variation in the photosynthesis of natural phytoplankton populations in artificial light. — In: Physical, chemical, and biological observations obtained on expedition Scope in the eastern tropical Pacific, November–December, 1956, ed. by R. W. Holmes. Univ. of Calif. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 147 pp. (mimeo.).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, W. E. & Vallentyne, J. R., 1971: Rationale, background, and development of experimental lake studies in northwestern Ontario. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 28, 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• McAllister, C. D., 1963: Measurement of diurnal variation in productivity at ocean station “P”. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 8, 289–292.
   Google Scholar
• Ostle, B., 1963: Statistics in Research. — The Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa. 2nd. ed. XV + 585 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W., 1966: A liquid scintillation method for measuring carbon-14 uptake in photosynthesis. — Nature 211, 844–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W. & Fee, E. J., 1973: Diurnal variation of dissolved inorganic carbon and its use in estimating primary production and CO2 invasion in lake 227. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30, 1501–1510.
   Google Scholar
• Schindler, D. W., Schmidt, R. V. & Reid, R. A.: Acidification and bubbling as an alternative to filtration in determining phytoplankton production by the UC method. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 29, 1627–1631.
   Google Scholar
• Shearer, J. A. & Fee, E. J., 1974: Phytoplankton primary production in the Experimental Lakes Area using in incubator technique, 1973 data. — Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, Tech. Rept. (in prep.).
   Google Scholar
• Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G., 1967: Statistical methods. 6th ed. — The Iowa State University Press, Ames, xiv + 593 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, M. P., 1973: A syringe gas-stripping procedure for gas diromatographic determination of dissolved inorganic and organic carbon in fresh water and carbonates in sediments. — J. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada 30, 1441–1445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, J. D. H., 1960: Measuring the production of marine phytoplankton. — Fish. Res. Bd. Canada, Bull. 122.
   Google Scholar
• Stross, R. G., Chisholm, S. W. & Downing, T. A., 1973: Causes of diurnal rhythms in photosynthetic rates of phytoplankton. — Biol. Bull. 145, 200–209.
   Google Scholar
• Verduin, J., 1957: Daytime variations in phytoplankton photosynthesis. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 2, 333–336.
   Google Scholar
• Yentsch, C. S. & Ryther, J. H., 1957: Short-term variations in phytoplankton chlorophyll and their significance. — Limnol. Oceanogr. 2, 140–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar