Social impact assessment: practitioner perspectives of the neglected status in South African SIA

References

• Arce-Gomez, A., Donovan, J. D., & Bedggood, R. E. (2015). Social impact assessments: Developing a consolidated conceptual framework. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50, 85–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, J., Runhaar, H. A. C., Fischer, T. B., Jha-Thakur, U., Van Laerhoven, F., Driessen, P. P. J., & Onyango, V. (2012). The effectiveness of EIA as an instrument for environmental governance: Reflecting on 25 years of EIA practice in the Netherlands and the UK. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 14(4), 1–40.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., & Lombard, A. (2018). Can social impact assessment contribute to social development outcomes in an emerging economy? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 36, 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., Retief, F. P., & King, N. D. (2018). The social dimensions of environmental management. In N. D. King, H. A. Strydom, & F. P. Retief (Eds.), Environmental management (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I., Woodborne, S., Perold, J., Bron, A., & Aucamp, S.-M. (2011). Looking beyond impact assessment to social sustainability. In F. Vanclay & A. M. Esteves (Eds.), New directions in social impact assessment: Conceptual and methodological advances. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Aucamp, I. C. 2015. Social impact assessment as a tool for social development in South Africa: An exploratory study. Pretoria (SA): University of Pretoria. (Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree Doctor Philosophiae — Social Work and Criminology).
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. J. (1997). Environmental and social impact assessment: An introduction (pp. 226–250). London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Barrow, C. J. (2010). How is environmental conflict addressed by SIA? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(5), 293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. California State University, Long Beach: Pearson, pp. 195–207. Available: http://www.digilib.bc.edu/reserves/sc210/piat/sc21007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bezuidenhout, H. 2009. An improved social impact evaluation framework for the completion of SIA section during the environmental impact assessment process for residential developments in South Africa. Pretoria: University of Pretoria. (Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the degree Master of Arts — Environment and Society).
   Google Scholar
• Bice, S. (2017). Corporate social responsibility as institution: A social mechanisms framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 17–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., Fischer, T. B., & Fothergill, J. (2016). Progressing quality control in environmental impact assessment beyond legislative compliance: An evaluation of the IEMA EIA quality mark certification scheme. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 63(2016), 160–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A., Retief, F., Cave, B., Fundingsland, M., Duinker, P. N., Verheem, R., & Brown, A. L. (2018, October). A contribution to the conceptualisation of quality in impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 68(2018), 49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, A. J., Morrison-Saunders, A. N., & Pope, J. (2012). Sustainability assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 53–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowd, R., Quinn, N. W., & Kotze, D. C. (2015). Toward an analytical framework for understanding complex social-ecological systems when conducting environmental impact assessments in South Africa. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdge, R. J. (2002). Why is social impact assessment the orphan of the assessment process? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(1), 3–9.
   Google Scholar
• Burdge, R. J. (2003). Benefiting from the practice of social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(3), 225–229.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., Gwilliam, R., Morgan, R., Cobb, D., & Bond, A. (2004). The interminable issue of effectiveness: Substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22, 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., Richardson, T., Hilding-Rydevik, T., & Emmelin, L. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30(6), 371–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chadwick, A. (2002). Socio-economic impacts: Are they still the poor relations in UK environmental statements? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(1), 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Chanchitpricha, C., & Bond, A. (2013). Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43(2013), 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• De Vos, A. A., Strydom, H., Fouché, C. B., & Delport, C. S. L. (2011). Research at grass roots. For the social sciences and human service professions (4th ed.). Pretoria: Van Schaik Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Du Pisani, J. A., & Sandham, L. A. (2006). Assessing the performance of SIA in the EIA context: A case study of South Africa. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(8), 707–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finsterbusch, K. (1995). In praise of SIA- A personal review of the field of social impact assessment: feasibility, justification, history, methods, issues. Impact Assessment, 13(3), 229–252.
   Google Scholar
• Glasson, J., & Heaney, D. (1993). Socio-economic impacts: The poor relations in british environmental impact statements. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 36(3), 335–343.
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, L. 2012. The significance and status of Social Impact Assessment (SIA) in a South African Context. Potchefstroom: North-West University. (Dissertation presented in fulfilment of the degree Master of Science — Geography and Environmental Management).
   Google Scholar
• Hildebrandt, L., & Sandham, L. A. (2014). Social impact assessment: The lesser sibling in the South African EIA process? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 48(2014), 20–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). 1999. Principles of environmental impact assessment best practice. ( Available: http://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf).
   Google Scholar
• IAIA (International Association for Impact Assessment). (2003). International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 21(1), 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., & Wood, C. (2007). Environmental impact assessment: Retrospect and prospect. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 27(4), 287–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• João, E., Vanclay, F., & Den Broeder, L. (2011). Emphasising enhancement in all forms of impact assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 29(3), 170–180.
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, M., Retief, F. P., & Albert, R. (2018). Integrated environmental assessment and management. In N. D. King, H. A. Strydom, & F. P. Retief (Eds.), Environmental management (3rd ed.). Cape Town: Juta.
   Google Scholar
• Le Compte, M. D. (2000). Analyzing qualitative data. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 146–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockie, S. (2001). SIA in review: Setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 19(4), 277–287.
   Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. J., & Dziedzic, M. (2018). Evaluating EIA systems’ effectiveness: A state of the art. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 68(2018), 29-37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyhne, I., Cashmore, M., Runhaar, H., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2016). Quality control for environmental policy appraisal tools: An empirical investigation of relations between quality, quality control and effectiveness. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(1), 121–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Momtaz, S. (2005). Institutionalizing social impact assessment in Bangladesh resource management: Limitations and opportunities. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(2005), 33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, R. K., Hart, A., Freeman, C., Coutts, B., Colwill, D., & Hughes, A. (2012). Practitioners, professional cultures and perceptions of impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 32(2012), 11–24.
   Google Scholar
• Rozema, J. G., & Bond, A. J. (2015). Framing effectiveness in impact assessment: Discourse accommodation in controversial infrastructure development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50(2015), 66–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, B. (1996). International study of the effectiveness of environmental assessment, final report. Ottawa: Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sandham, L. A., Siphugu, M. V., & Tshivhandekano, T. R. (2005). Aspects of environmental impact assessment (EIA) practice in the Limpopo Province - South Africa. African Journal of Environmental Assessment and Management, 10, 50–65.
   Google Scholar
• South Africa. (1989). Environment conservation act, no. 73 of 1989. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• South Africa. (1998). National environmental management act, no. 107 of 1998. Cape Town: Government Gazette.
   Google Scholar
• Suopajärvi, L. (2013). Social impact assessment in mining projects in Northern Finland: Comparing practice to theory. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 42(2013), 25–30.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2004). International principles for social impact assessment. In R. J. Burdge (Ed.), The concepts, process and methods of social impact assessment: rabel, j. burdge and colleagues (pp. 273–281). Wisconsin: Social Ecology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2006). Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 26(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2014a). Introduction. In F. Vanclay (Ed.), Developments in social impact assessment. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. (2014b). Integration and focus from the perspective of social impact assessment: A response to Morrison-Saunders et al. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 32(1), 11–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wende, W. (2002). Evaluation of the effectiveness and quality of environmental impact assessment in the Federal Republic of Germany. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 20(2), 93–99.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, C. H. M., & Chung, H. W. (2015). Roles of social impact assessment practitioners. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 50(2015), 124–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and Methods. In Applied social research methods series (Vol. 5, 3rd). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar