Determinants of bryophyte species composition and diversity on the Great Alvar of Öland, Sweden

References

• Anderson, D.S., Davis, R.B. & Janssens, J.A. 1995. Relationships of bryophytes and lichens to environmental gradients in Maine peatlands. Vegetatio, 120: 147–59. doi: 10.1007/BF00034344
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, H.F., Britton, A.J., van der Wal, R. & Woodin, S.J. 2012. Grazing exclusion and phosphorus addition as potential local management options for the restoration of alpine moss-sedge heath. Biological Conservation, 153: 17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arroniz-Crespo, M., Leake, J.R., Horton, P. & Phoenix, G.K. 2008. Bryophyte physiological responses to, and recovery from, long-term nitrogen deposition and phosphorus fertilisation in acidic grassland. New Phytologist, 180: 864–74. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02617.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ArtDatabanken. 2015. Red-listed species in Sweden 2015. Uppsala: ArtDatabanken SLU.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.P., Baaker, E.S., Rosén, E., Verweij, G.L. & Bekker, R.M. 1996. Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dry alvar grassland to Juniperus shrubland. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7: 165–76. doi: 10.2307/3236316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.P., Rosén, E., Ozinga, W.A., Bretfeld, M., Feldt T. & Stahl, J. 2012. Long-term effects of scrub clearance and litter removal on the re-establishment of dry alvar grassland species. Annales Botanici Fennici, 49: 21–30. doi: 10.5735/085.049.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, J.P., Hoffmann, F., Ozinga, W.E. & Rosén, E. 2014. Shading results in depletion of the soil seed bank. Nordic Journal of Botany, 32: 674–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00288.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, J.W. 1995. Numerical analysis of bryophyte-environment relationships in a lowland English flora. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica, 40: 471–90.
   Google Scholar
• Belcher, J.W., Keddy, P.A. & Catling, P.M. 1992. Alvar vegetation in Canada: a multivariate description at two scales. Canadian Journal of Botany, 70: 1279–91. doi: 10.1139/b92-161
   Google Scholar
• Bergqvist, S. & Blomgren, E. 1998. Sotenäsets mossor. Lund: Förf. förlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bolker, B.M., Brooks, M.E., Clark, C.J., Geange, S.W., Poulsen, J.R., Stevens, M.H.H. & White, J-S.S. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 24: 127–35. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, P. 2009. Composition, phytogeography, and relict status of the vascular flora of alvars and cliff tops southwest of Great Slave Lake, northwest territories, Canada. Rhodora, 111: 189–208. doi: 10.3119/08-33.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, P.M. & Brownell, V.R. 1995. A review of the alvars of the Great Lakes region: distribution, floristic composition, biogeography and protection. Canadian Field-Naturalist, 109: 143–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, T.H. & Zackrisson, O. 2007. Enhanced soil fertility under Juniperus communis in arctic ecosystems. Plant and Soil, 294: 147–55. doi: 10.1007/s11104-007-9242-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, S. & Löbel, J. 2006. The basiphilous dry grasslands of shallow, skeletal soils (Alysso-Sedetalia) on the island of Öland (Sweden), in the context of North and Central Europe. Phytocoenologia, 36: 343–91. doi: 10.1127/0340-269X/2006/0036-0343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson, O. 1996. Regional dynamics of plants: a review of evidence for remnant, source-sink and matapopulations. Oikos, 77: 248–58. doi: 10.2307/3546063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glime, J.M. 2006. Bryophyte ecology. Vol. 1 Physiological ecology. E-book published at http://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/ (date accessed 27 July 2017).
   Google Scholar
• González-Mancebo, J.M., Losada-Lima, A. & Llorente, J.P. 2004. Forest floor bryophytes of laurel forest in Gomera (Canary Islands): life strategies and influence of the tree species. Lindbergia, 29: 5–16.
   Google Scholar
• Göransson, H., Edwards, P.J., Perreijn, K., Smittenberg, R.H. & Venterink, H.O. 2014. Rocks create nitrogen hotspots and N:P heterogeneity by funnelling rain. Biogeochemistry, 121: 329–38. doi: 10.1007/s10533-014-0031-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, C., Wynn, J.M. & Woodin, S.J. 2001. Impacts of increased nitrogen supply on high Arctic heath: the importance of bryophytes and phosphorus availability. New Phytologist, 149: 461–71. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00053.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallingbäck, T., Hedenäs, L. & Weibull, H. 2006. A new checklist of Swedish bryophytes. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 100: 96–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hallingbäck, T., Carlsson, P., Johansson, P., Kristensson, G. & Sjögård, P. 2008. Göteborgstraktens Mossor. Uppsala: Mossornas Vänner.
   Google Scholar
• Hammer, Ø., Harper, D.A.T. & Ryan, P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Paleontologia Electronica, 4: 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs, L. 2014a. Southern Scandinavian lowland populations of Rhytidium rugosum Hedw. Kindb. Bryophyta, Rhytidiaceae differ significantly from those in the mountains. Journal of Bryology, 36(1): 1–14. doi: 10.1179/1743282013Y.0000000080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs, L. 2014b. Tortella rigens, Bryophyta, Pottiaceae: relationships, regional variation, and conservation aspects. Plant Systematics and Evolution. DOI: 10.1007/S00606-014-1159-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, M. & McCarthy, J. 2006. Association of soil-test phosphorus with phosphorus fractions and adsorption characteristics. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 75: 79–90. doi: 10.1007/s10705-006-9013-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hydbom, S., Ödman, A.M., Olsson, P.A. & Cronberg, N. 2012. The effects of pH and disturbance on the bryophyte flora in calcareous sandy grasslands. Nordic Journal of Botany, 30: 446–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2012.01463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ikenberry, G.J. 1936. The relation of hydrogen-ion concentration to the growth and distribution of mosses. American Journal of Botany, 23: 1–15. doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1936.tb08984.x
   Google Scholar
• Ingerpuu, N. & Sarv M. 2015. Effect of grazing on plant diversity of coastal meadows in Estonia. Annales Botanici Fennici, 52: 84–92. doi: 10.5735/085.052.0210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüriado, I., Leppik, E., Lohmus, P., Randlane, T. & Liira, J. 2015. Epiphytic lichens on Juniperus communis – an unexplored component of biodiversity in threatened alvar grasslands. Nordic Journal of Botany, 33: 128–39. doi: 10.1111/njb.00650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karttunen, K. & Toivonen, H. 1995. Ecology of aquatic bryophyte assemblages in 54 small Finnish lakes, and their changes in 30 years. Annales Botanici Fennici, 32: 75–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasari, L., Gaxol, A., Kalwij, J.M. & Helm, A. 2013. Low shrub cover in alvar grasslands increases small-scale diversity by promoting the occurrence of generalist species. Tuexenia, 3: 293–308.
   Google Scholar
• Kiviniemi, K. & Eriksson, O. 2002. Size-related deterioration of semi-natural grassland fragments in Sweden. Diversity and Distributions, 8: 21–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1366-9516.2001.00125.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Königsson, L-K. 1968. The holocene history of the Great Alvar of Öland. Acta Phygogeographica Suecica, 55: 1–172.
   Google Scholar
• Krahulec, F., Rosén, E. & van Der Maarel, E. 1986. Preliminary classification and ecology of dry grassland communities on Ölands Stora Alvar, Sweden. Nordic Journal of Botany, 6: 797–809. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1986.tb00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lammerts, E.J., Pegtel, D.M., Grootjans, A.P. & van der Veen, A. 1999. Nutrient limitation and vegetation changes in a coastal dune slack. Journal of Vegetation Science, 10: 111–22. doi: 10.2307/3237166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leishman, M.R. & Wild, C. 2001. Vegetation abundance and diversity in relation to soil nutrients and soil water content in Vestfold Hills, East Antarctica. Antarctic Science, 13: 126–34. doi: 10.1017/S0954102001000207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppik, E., Jueriado, I., Suija, A. & Liira, J. 2015. Functional ecology of rare and common epigeic lichens in alvar grasslands. Fungal Ecology, 13: 66–76. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2014.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Y. & Vitt, D.H. 1994. The dynamics of moss establishment: temporal responses to nutrient gradients. Bryologist, 97: 357–64. doi: 10.2307/3243900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindo, Z., Nilsson, M-C. & Gundale, M.J. 2013. Bryophyte-cyanobacteria associations as regulators of the northern latitude carbon balance in response to global change. Global Change Biology, 19: 2022–35. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löbel, S. & Dengler, J. 2007. Dry grassland communities on southern Öland: phytosociology, ecology, and diversity. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica, 88: 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Löbel, S., Dengler, J. & Hobohm, C. 2006. Species richness of vascular plants, bryophytes and lichenes in dry grasslands: the effects of environment, landscape structure and competition. Folia Geobotanica, 41: 377–93. doi: 10.1007/BF02806555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luczaj, L. & Sadowska, B. 1997. Edge effects in different groups of organisms: vascular plant, bryophyte and fungi species richness across a forest–grassland border. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 32: 343–53. doi: 10.1007/BF02821940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malombe, I., Matheka, K.M., Pócs, T & Patiño, J. 2016. Edge effect on epiphyllous bryophytes in Taita Hills fragmented afromontane forests. Journal of Bryology, 38(1): 33–46. doi: 10.1179/1743282015Y.0000000015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettrop, I.S., Cussell, C., Koijman, A.M. & Lamers, L.P.M. 2015. Short-term summer inundation as a measure to counteract acidification in rich fens. PLoS ONE 10:e0144006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moeslund, J.E., Arge, L., Bocher, P.K., Dalgaard, T. & Svenning, J-C. 2013. Topography as a driver of local terrestrial vascular plant diversity patterns. Nordic Journal of Botany, 31: 129–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00082.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niinemets, U. & Kull, K. 2005. Co-limitation of plant primary productivity by nitrogen and phosphorus in a species-rich wooded meadow on calcareous soils. Acta Oecologica, 28: 345–56. doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2005.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F.G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P.R., O’Hara, R.B., Simpson, G.L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M.H.H., Wagner, H. 2016. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.3-5. Available at: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan
   Google Scholar
• Pharo, E.J., Kirkpatrick, J.M., Gilfedder, L., Mendel, L. & Turner, P.A.M. 2005. Predicting bryophyte diversity in grassland and eucalypt-dominated remnants in subhumid Tasmania. Journal of Biogeography, 32: 2015–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01366.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, C.D., Hill, M.O., Porley, R.D. & Bosanquet, S.D.S. 2010. Survey of the bryophytes of arable land in Britain and Ireland 1: a classification of arable field assemblages. Journal of Bryology, 32(1): 61–79.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Available at: http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Reitalu, T., Helm, A., Pärtel, M., Bengtsson, K., Gerhold, P., Rosén, E., Takkis, K., Znamenskiy, S. & Prentice, H.C. 2014. Determinants of fine-scale plant diversity in dry calcareous grasslands within the Baltic Sea region. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 182: 59–68. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, E. 2006. Alvar vegetation of Öland – changes, monitoring and restoration. Biological Environment, 106B: 387–99.
   Google Scholar
• Sand-Jensen, K. & Hammer, K.J. 2012. Moss cushions facilitate water and nutrient supply for plant species on bare limestone pavements. Oecologia, 170: 305–12. doi: 10.1007/s00442-012-2314-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, R.J. & Stark, L.R. 2014. Habitat vs. dispersal constraints on bryophyte diversity in the Mojave Desert, USA. Journal of Arid Environments 102: 76–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2013.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparrius, L.B., Kooijman, A.M. & Sevink, J. 2013. Response of inland dune vegetation to increased nitrogen and phosphorus levels. Applied Vegetation Science, 16: 40–50. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-109X.2012.01206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterner, R. 1938. Flora der Insel Öland. Die Areale der Gefässpflanzen Ölands nebst Bemerkungen zu ihrer Oekologie und Soziologie. Uppsala: Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 9.
   Google Scholar
• Stuvier, B.M., Wardle, D.A., Gundale, M.J. & Nilsson, M.-C. 2014. The impact of moss species and biomass on the growth of Pinus sylvestris tree seedlings at different precipitation frequencies. Forests, 5: 1931–51. doi: 10.3390/f5081931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, S-Q., Wu, Y-H., Wang, G-X., Zhou, J., Yu, D., Bing, H-J. & Luo, J. 2013. Bryophyte species richness and composition along an altitudinal gradient in Gongga Mountain, China. PLoS ONE, 8: e58131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0058131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish LifeWatch Analysis Portal, available at: www.analysisportal.se (date accessed: 3 June 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Takala, T., Tahvanainen, T. & Kouki, J. 2014. Grazing promotes bryophyte species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Annales Botanici Fennici, 51: 148–60. doi: 10.5735/085.053.0102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tälle, M., Fogelfors, H., Westerberg, L. & Milberg, P. 2015. The conservation benefit of mowing vs grazing for management of species-rich grasslands: a multi-site, multi-year field experiment. Nordic Journal of Botany, 33: 761–8. doi: 10.1111/njb.00966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Braak, C.J.F. & Šmilauer, P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Wageningen: Biometris.
   Google Scholar
• Tremp, H., Kampmann, D. & Schulz, R. 2012. Factors shaping submerged bryophyte communities: a conceptual model for small mountain streams in Germany. Limnologica – Ecology and Management of Inland Waters, 42: 242–50. doi: 10.1016/j.limno.2012.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, G. & Olsson, T. 2001. Concentrations of 60 elements in the soil solution as related to the soil acidity. European Journal of Soil Science, 52: 151–65. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2001.t01-1-00360.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, G., Tyler, C. & Tyler, T. 1995. Importance of soluble phosphate to bryophyte establishment and growth on a limestone soil. Lindbergia, 20: 91–3.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. 2005. The bryophyte flora of Scanian sand-steppe vegetation and its relation to soil pH and phosphate availability. Lindbergia, 30: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. & Olsson, T. 2016. Substrate pH ranges of south Swedish bryophytes—identifying critical pH values and richness patterns. Flora—Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 223: 74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2016.05.006
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T., Cronberg, N., Kristensson, G., Nilsson, N.-O., Olsson, K.-A., Rosengren, F. & Rydlöv, J. 2014. Summary of the six first years of the ongoing survey of the bryophyte flora of the province of Skåne, southern-most Sweden. Botaniska Notiser, 147(2): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• van der Maarel, E. & Sykes, M.T. 1993. Small-scale plant species turnover in a limestone grassland: the carousel model and some comments on the niche concept. Journal of Vegetation Science, 4: 179–88. doi: 10.2307/3236103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, R. & Crawley, M.J. 2010. Contrasting patterns in bryophyte and vascular plant species richness in relation to elevation, biomass and Soay sheep on St Kilda, Scotland. Plant Ecology and Diversity, 3: 77–85. doi: 10.1080/17550874.2010.492403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, R., Johnston, A.E., Crawley, M.J. & Edwards, G.R. 2000. Bryophyte biomass and species richness on the Park Grass Experiment, Rothamsted, UK. Plant Ecology, 151: 129–41. doi: 10.1023/A:1026533418357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, R., Eskelinen, A. & Harrison, S. 2015. Bryophyte diversity in Californian grasslands in relation to substrate quality, exotic vascular plants and disturbance. Biodiversity and Conservation, 24: 103–16. doi: 10.1007/s10531-014-0793-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldheim, S. 1947. Kleinmoosgesellschaften und Bodenverhältnisse in Schonen. Botaniska Notiser Supplement, 1: 1–203.
   Google Scholar
• Widén, B. 1988. Partitioning of variation in pubescence of a dwarf shrub Helianthemum oelandicum. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica, 76: 135–56.
   Google Scholar
• Zamfir, M., Dai, X. & van der Maarel, E. 1999. Bryophytes, lichens and phanerogams in an alvar grassland: relationships at different scales and contributions to plant community pattern. Ecography, 22: 40–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.1999.tb00453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobel, M. & Kont, A. 1992. Formation and succession of alvar communities in the Baltic land uplift area. Nordic Journal of Botany, 12: 249–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.1992.tb01302.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar