Cryptic speciation revealed in Scandinavian Racomitrium lanuginosum (Hedw.) Brid. (Grimmiaceae)

References

• Bednarek-Ochyra H. 1995. Rodzaj Racomitrium (Musci, Grimmiaceae) w Polsce: taksonomia, ekologia i fitogeografia. Fragmenta Floristica et Geobotanica. Series Polonica. 2:3–307. Plolish.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek-Ochyra H. 2006. A taxonomic monograph of the moss genus Codriophorus P. Beauv. (Grimmiaceae). Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bednarek-Ochyra H, Ochyra R. 2003. Racomitrium patagonicum, a new moss species from southern South America. Journal of Bryology. 25:181–187. doi: 10.1179/037366803235001661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek-Ochyra H, Ochyra R. 2010. Bucklandiella allanfifei (Grimmiaceae), a new moss species from New Zealand, with a note on South American B. striatipila. Journal of Bryology. 32:245–255. doi: 10.1179/037366810X12814321877381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednarek-Ochyra H, Ochyra R. 2011. Bucklandiella angustissima sp. nov. (Grimmiaceae), a new Austral Amphipacific species with the smallest capsules and the shortest setae in the genus. Cryptogamie, Bryologie. 32:13–27. doi: 10.7872/cryb.v32.iss1.2011.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I. 2006. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 22:148–155. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology. 9:1657–1659. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feliner GN, Rosselló JA. 2007. Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 44:911–919. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.01.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez CC, Shevock JR, Glazer AN, Thompson JD. 2006. Cryptic species within the cosmopolitan desiccation-tolerant moss Grimmia laevigata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103:637–642. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510267103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisvoll AA. 1982. Revision of Svalbard bryophytes. II. The genus Racomitrium. Lindbergia. 9:41–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisvoll AA. 1983. A taxonomic revision of the Racomitrium canescens group (Bryophyta, Grimmiales). Gunneria. 41:1–181.
   Google Scholar
• Frisvoll AA. 1988. A taxonomic revision of the Racomitrium heterostichum group (Bryophyta, Grimmiales) in N. and C. America, N. Africa, Europe and Asia. Gunneria. 59:1–289.
   Google Scholar
• Goloboff P, Farris J, Nixon K. 2003. Tree analysis using new technology; [accessed 2017 May 3]. https://www.lillo.org.ar/phylogeny/tnt/.
   Google Scholar
• Harris ESJ. 2008. Paraphyly and multiple causes of phylogenetic incongruence in the moss genus Plagiomnium (Mniaceae). Taxon. 57:417–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L, Eldenäs P. 2007. Cryptic speciation, habitat differentiation, and geography in Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Calliergonaceae, Bryophyta). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 268:131–145. doi: 10.1007/s00606-007-0529-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L, Heinrichs J, Gallego MT. 2019. The Scandinavian Syntrichia ruralis complex (Musci, Pottiaceae): a chaos of diversification. Plant Systematics and Evolution. 305:639–661. doi: 10.1007/s00606-019-01596-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 1989. The genera Scorpidium and Hamatocaulis, gen. nov., in northern Europe. Lindbergia. 15:8–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2009. Relationships among Arctic and non-Arctic haplotypes of the moss species Scorpidium cossonii and Scorpidium scorpioides (Calliergonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 277:217–231. doi: 10.1007/s00606-008-0131-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2012. Global phylogeography in Sanionia uncinata (Amblystegiaceae, Bryophyta). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 168:19–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2011.01189.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2015. Molecular and morphological incongruence among the genera around Sarmentypnum (Bryophyta: Calliergonaceae). Nova Hedwigia. 100:279–292. doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2014/0226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2017a. Scandinavian Oncophorus (Bryopsida, Oncophoraceae): species, cryptic species, and intraspecific variation. European Journal of Taxonomy. 315:1–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2017b. Three molecular markers suggest different relationships among three Drepanocladus species (Bryophyta: Amblystegiaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution. 303:521–529. doi: 10.1007/s00606-017-1389-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2018a. Conservation status of the two cryptic species of Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Bryophyta) in Sweden. Journal of Bryology. 40:307–315. doi: 10.1080/03736687.2018.1513712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2018b. Oncophorus demetrii, a fifth Scandinavian species of Oncophorus (Musci) possible to recognize by morphology. Lindbergia. 41: linbg.01098 (1–9). doi: 10.25227/linbg.01098
   Google Scholar
• Hedenäs L. 2019. On the frequency of northern and mountain genetic variants of widespread species: essential biodiversity information in a warmer world. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 191:440–474. doi: 10.1093/botlinnean/boz061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedwig J. 1801. Species muscorum frondosorum. Lipsiae: Joannis Ambrosii Barthii.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Maqueda R, Quandt D, Muñoz J. 2008. Testing reticulation and adaptive convergence in the Grimmiaceae (Bryophyta). Taxon. 57:500–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 23:254–267. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msj030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jörger KM, Schrödl M. 2013. How to describe a cryptic species? Practical challenges of molecular taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology. 10(59):1–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Košnar J, Herbstová M, Kolář F, Koutecký P, Kučera J. 2012. A case of intragenomic ITS variation in bryophytes: assessment of gene flow and role of plyploidy in the origin of European taxa of the Tortula muralis (Musci: Pottiaceae) complex. Taxon. 61:709–720. doi: 10.1002/tax.614001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larraín J, Quandt D, Stech M, Muñoz J. 2013. Lumping or splitting? The case of Racomitrium (Bryophytina: Grimmiaceae). Taxon. 62:1117–1132. doi: 10.12705/626.45
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manukjanová A, Košnar J, Kucera J. 2018. Microsatellite primers for the cryptic species of the moss Hamatocaulis vernicosus and methods for their quick barcoding. Journal of Bryology. 40:302–305. doi: 10.1080/03736687.2018.1450199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manukjanová A, Koutecký P, Štechová T, Kučera J. 2019a. Insights into the distribution patterns, habitat and morphologic differentiation of cryptic species of the moss Hamatocaulis vernicosus in the Czech Republic. Herzogia. 32:183–199. doi: 10.13158/heia.32.1.2019.183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manukjanová A, Štechová T, Kučera J. 2019b. Expressed sex ratio in populations of the moss Hamatocaulis vernicosus (Mitt.) Hedenäs (Scorpidiaceae) in the Czech Republic with consideration of its cryptic species. Cryptogamie, Bryologie. 40:41–58. doi: 10.5252/cryptogamie-bryologie2019v40a6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel SF, Shaw AJ. 2003. Phylogeographic structure and cryptic speciation in the trans-Antarctic moss Pyrrhobryum mnioides. Evolution. 57:205–215. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00256.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyholm E. 1998. Illustrated flora of Nordic mosses. Fasc. 4. Aulacomniaceae – Meesiaceae – Catoscopiaceae – Bartramiaceae – Timmiaceae – Encalyptaceae – Grimmiaceae – Ptychomitriaceae – Hedwigiaceae – Orthotrichaceae. Copenhagen and Lund: Nordic Bryological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ochyra R, Zarnowiec J, Bednarek-Ochyra H. 2003. Census catalogue of Polish mosses. Biodiversity of Poland. 3:1–372.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Ponce de León G, Nadler SA. 2010. What we don't recognize can hurt us: a plea for awareness about cryptic species. Journal of Parasitology. 96:453–464. doi: 10.1645/GE-2260.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson AO, Palmer JD. 2007. Horizontal gene transfer in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany. 58:1–9. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl148
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawicki J, Szczecińska M, Bednarek-Ochyra H, Ochyra R. 2015. Mitochondrial phylogenomics supports splitting the traditionally conceived genus Racomitrium (Bryophyta: Grimmiavceae). Nova Hedwigia. 100:293–317. doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, Allen BH. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships, morphological incongruence, and geographic speciation in the Fontinalaceae (Bryophyta). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 16:225–237. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw AJ, McDaniel SF, Werner O, Ros RM. 2002. New frontiers in bryology and lichenology. Phylogeography and phylodemography. The Bryologist. 105:373–383. doi: 10.1639/0007-2745(2002)105[0373:PAP]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons MP, Ochoterena H. 2000. Gaps as characters in sequence-based phylogenetic analyses. Systematic Biology. 49:369–381. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/49.2.369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stech M, Veldman S, Larraín J, Muñoz J, Quandt D, Hassel K, Kruijer H. 2013. Molecular species delimitation in the Racomitrium canescens complex (Grimmiaceae) and implications for DNA barcoding of species complexes in mosses. PLoS ONE. 8(1):e53134. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struck TH, Feder JL, Bendiksby M, Birkeland S, Cerca J, Gusarov VI, Kistenich S, Larsson K-H, Hsiang Liow L, Nowak MD, et al. 2018. Finding evolutionary processes hidden in cryptic species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 33:153–163. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2017.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twyford AD, Ennos RA. 2012. Next-generation hybridization and introgression. Heredity. 108:179–189. doi: 10.1038/hdy.2011.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitt DH, Marsh C. 1988. Population variation and phytogeography of Racomitrium lanuginosum and R. pruinosum. Nova Hedwigia. Beiheft. 90:235–260.
   Google Scholar
• Wendel JF, Doyle JJ. 1998. Phylogenetic incongruence: window into genome history and molecular evolution. In: Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Doyle JJ, editor. Molecular systematics of plants II. DNA sequencing. New York: Chapman and Hall; p. 265–296.
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt R, Lane DM, Stoneburner A. 1982. The misuse of mixed collections in bryophyte taxonomy. Taxon. 31:698–704. doi: 10.2307/1219687
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar