Rule, pattern, and meaning in the second-language teaching of grammar

References

• Achard, Michele. 2010. “Fields and Settings: French il and ça Impersonals in Copular Complement Constructions.” Cognitive Linguistics 21 (3): 443–500. doi:10.1515/COGL.2010.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar, Betty Schrampfer. 2003. Fundamentals of English Grammar. 3rd ed. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Beckner, Clay, and Joan Bybee. 2009. “A Usage-Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis.” In Language as a Complex Adaptive System, edited by Nick C. Ellis and Diane Larsen-Freeman, 27–46., Language Learning 59, Suppl. 1.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00534.x.
   Google Scholar
• Boers, Frank, June Eyckmans, and Hélène Stengers. 2006. “Motivating Multiword Units: Rationale, Mnemonic Benefits, and Cognitive Style Variables.” EUROSLA Yearbook 6: 169–190. doi:10.1075/eurosla.6.11boe.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Jeremy K., and Adele E. Goldberg. 2009. “Input Effects Within a Constructionist Framework.” The Modern Language Journal 93 (3): 418–429. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00899.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye, Kasper, and Peter Harder. 2012. “A Usage-Based Theory of Grammatical Status and Grammaticalization.” Language 88 (1): 1–44. doi:10.1353/lan.2012.0020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan. 2001. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, Marianne. 2002. “Why It Makes Sense to Teach Grammar in Context and Through Discourse.” In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, edited by Eli Hinkel and Sandra Fotos, 119–133. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Contini-Morava, Ellen. 2011. “And Now for Something Completely Different: Reid on English Verb Number.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (4): 1147–1162, (Topic/Comment Special: Phi-feature Inflection and Agreement).10.1007/s11049-011-9152-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crystal, David. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. New York: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Joseph. 2002. “Rethinking the Place of Statistics in Columbia School Analysis.” In Signal, Meaning, and Message: Perspectives on Sign-Based Linguistics, edited by Wallis Reid, Ricardo Otheguy, and Nancy Stern, 65–90. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Joseph. 2004. “Revisiting the Gap Between Meaning and Message.” In Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, edited by Ellen Contini-Morava, Robert S. Kirsner, and Betsy Rodríguez-Bachiller, 155–174. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, Joseph. 2009. “Rule and Meaning in the Teaching of Grammar.” Language and Linguistics Compass 3 (1): 199–221. doi:10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00119.x.
   Google Scholar
• de Bot, Kees, Marjolijn Verspoor, and Wander Lowie. 2005. “Dynamic Systems Theory and Applied Linguistics: The Ultimate “so what”?.” International Journal of Applied Linguistics 15 (1): 116–118. doi:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2005.0083b.x.
   Google Scholar
• De Knop, Sabine, and Julien Perrez. 2014. “Conceptual Metaphors as a Tool for the Efficient Teaching of Dutch and German Posture Verbs.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 12 (1): 1–29. doi:10.1075/rcl.12.1.01kno.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeKeyser, Robert M. 1998. “Beyond Focus on Form: Cognitive Perspectives on Learning and Practicing Second Language Grammar.” In Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition, edited by Catherine Doughty and Jessica Williams, 42–63. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William. 1969. “The System of Relevance of the Homeric Verb.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 12 (1): 45–68. doi:10.1080/03740463.1969.10415425.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William. 2012a. “The Nature of Linguistic Meaning.” In Language: Communication and Human Behavior. The Linguistic Essays of William Diver, edited by Alan Huffman and Joseph Davis, 47–63. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004208582.i-566.15 Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William. 2012b. “Theory.” In Language: Communication and Human Behavior. The Linguistic Essays of William Diver, edited by Alan Huffman and Joseph Davis, 445–519. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004208582.i-566.90 Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, William, Joseph Davis, and Wallis Reid. 2012. “Traditional Grammar and Its Legacy in Twentieth-Century Linguistics.” In Language: Communication and Human Behavior. The Linguistic Essays of William Diver, edited by Alan Huffman and Joseph Davis, 371–443. doi:10.1163/ej.9789004208582.i-566.82 Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Doughty, Catherine, and Jessica Williams. 1998. Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Rod. 2002. “The Place of Grammar Instruction in the Second/Foreign Language Curriculum.” In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, edited by Eli Hinkel and Sandra Fotos, 17–34. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C. 2004. “The Processes of Second Language Acquisition.” In Form-meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, edited by Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, and Susanne Rott, 49–76. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C., and Teresa Cadierno. 2009. “Constructing a Second Language: Introduction to the Special Section.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 111–139. doi:10.1075/arcl.7.05ell.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick, and Laura Collins. 2009. “Input and Second Language Acquisition: The Roles of Frequency, Form, and Function Introduction to the Special Issue.” The Modern Language Journal 93 (3): 329–335. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00893.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C., and Fernando Ferreira-Junior. 2009a. “Construction Learning as a Function of Frequency, Frequency Distribution, and Function.” The Modern Language Journal 93 (3): 370–385. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00896.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C., and Fernando Ferreira-Junior. 2009b. “Constructions and Their Acquisition: Islands and the Distinctiveness of their Occupancy.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 7: 187–220.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, Nick C., and Diane Larsen-Freeman, eds. 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System. Language Learning 59, Suppl. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Beckner Clay, et al. (The Five Graces Group). 2009. “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” In Language as a Complex Adaptive System, edited by Nick C. Ellis and Diane Larsen-Freeman, 1–26., Language Learning 59, Suppl. 1.10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x.
   Google Scholar
• Eskildsen, Søren W. 2009. “Constructing Another Language – Usage-Based Linguistics in Second Language Acquisition.” Applied Linguistics 30 (3): 335–357. doi:10.1093/applin/amn037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkel, Eli, and Sandra Fotos, eds. 2002. New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, Paul J. 1987. “Emergent Grammar.” In Proceedings of the 13th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, edited by J. Aske, N. Beery, L. Michaelis, and H. Filip, 139–157. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, Alan. 1997. The Categories of Grammar: French lui and le. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, Alan. 2001. “The Linguistics of William Diver and the Columbia School.” Word 52 (1): 29–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huffman, Alan. 2002. “Cognitive and Semiotic Modes of Explanation in Functional Grammar.” In Signal, Meaning, and Message: Perspectives on Sign-Based Linguistics, edited by Wallis Reid, Ricardo Otheguy, and Nancy Stern, 311–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Huffman, Alan. 2012. “Introduction: The Enduring Legacy of William Diver.” In Language: Communication and Human Behavior. The Linguistic Essays of William Diver, edited by Alan Huffman and Joseph Davis, 1–20. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsner, Robert S. 2004. “Introduction: On Paradigms, Analyses, and Dialogue.” In Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, edited by Ellen Contini-Morava, Robert S. Kirsner, and Betsy Rodriguez-Bachiller, 1–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Klein-Andreu, Flora. 1983. “Grammar in Style: Spanish Adjective Placement.” In Discourse Perspectives on Syntax, edited by Flora Klein-Andreu, 143–179. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, Stephen, and Tracy Terrell. 1983. The Natural Approach: Language Acquisition in the Classroom. Oxford: Pergamon.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 2004. “Form, Meaning, and Behavior: The Cognitive Grammar Analysis of Double Subject Constructions.” In Cognitive and Communicative Approaches to Linguistic Analysis, edited by Ellen Contini-Morava, Robert S. Kirsner, and Betsy Rodriguez-Bachiller, 21–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Lantolf, James P. 2009. “Knowledge of Language in Foreign Language Teacher Education.” The Modern Language Journal 93 (2): 270–274. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00860_4.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2002. “The Grammar of Choice.” In New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms, edited by Eli Hinkel and Sandra Fotos, 103–118. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2003. Teaching Language: From Grammar to Grammaring. Boston, MA: Thomson-Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen-Freeman, Diane. 2004. “Reflections on Form-Meaning Connection Research in Second Language Acquisition.” In Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, edited by Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, and Susanne Rott, 237–244. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Dilin. 2010. “Going Beyond Patterns: Involving Cognitive Analysis in the Learning of Collocations.” TESOL Quarterly 44 (1): 4–30. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.214046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, Michael. 1991. “Focus on Form: A Design Feature in Language Teaching Methodology.” In Foreign Language Research in Cross-Cultural Perspective, edited by Kees DeBot, Ralph Ginsberg, and Claire Kramsch, 39–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Nassaji, Hossein, and Sandra Fotos. 2011. Teaching Grammar in Second Language Classrooms: Integrating Form-Focused Instruction in Communicative Context. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeier, Susanne, and Michael Achard. 2000. “Cognitive Linguistics: Special Issue on Language Acquisition.” Cognitive Linguistics 11 (1–2): 1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, John M., and Lourdes Ortega. 2000. “Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-Analysis.” Language Learning 50 (3): 417–528. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pütz, Martin, Justyna A. Robinson, and Monika Reif. 2012. “The Emergence of Cognitive Sociolinguistics: An Introduction.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10 (2): 241–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, Wallis. 1991. Verb and Noun Number in English: A Functional Explanation. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Wallis. 2011. “The Communicative Function of English Verb Number.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29 (4): 1087–1146, (Topic/Comment Special: Phi-feature Inflection and Agreement).10.1007/s11049-011-9154-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, Jack C., and Theodore S. Rodgers. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, Peter. 2011. “Task-Based Language Learning: A Review of Issues.” Language Learning 61 (Suppl. 1): 1–36. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2011.00641.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, Peter, and Nick C. Ellis, eds. 2008. Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Richard. 1990. “The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning.” Applied Linguistics 11 (2): 129–158. doi:10.1093/applin/11.2.129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spada, Nina, and Patsy Lightbown. 2008. “Form-Focused Instruction: Isolated or Integrated?” TESOL Quarterly 42: 181–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Susan, Jihye Lee, and Kyungja Ahn. 2006. “Applying Conceptual Grammar to Advanced-Level Language Teaching: The Case of Two Completive Constructions in Korean.” Modern Language Journal 90 (2): 185–209. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2006.00392.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell, Tracy David. 1991. “The Role of Grammar Instruction in a Communicative Approach.” Modern Language Journal 75 (1): 52–63. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb01083.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanPatten, Bill, Jessica Williams, and Susanne Rott. 2004. “Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition.” In Form-Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition, edited by Bill VanPatten, Jessica Williams, and Susanne Rott, 1–26. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, Crayton Phillip. 2011. “A Corpus-Based Study of the Linguistic Features and Processes Which Influence the Way Collocations Are Formed: Some Implications for the Learning of Collocations.” TESOL Quarterly 45 (2): 291–312. doi:10.5054/tq.2011.247710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuldashev, Aziz, Julieta Fernandez, and Steven L. Thorne. 2013. “Second Language Learners' Contiguous and Discontiguous Multi-Word Unit Use Over Time.” The Modern Language Journal 97 (S1): 31–45. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar