The opening of dialog and meaning: a pragmatic perspective on intersubjective rationality in the potential initial prodromal stage and early stages of schizophrenia

References

• Arminen, Ilkka. 2000. “On the Context Sensitivity of Institutional Interaction.” Discourse and Society 11 (4): 435–458.10.1177/0957926500011004001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. 1962. How to do Things with Words. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bornedal, Peter. 1990. Rekonstruktioner. At tænke hinsides Derrida [Reconstructions. To Think Beyond Derrida]. København: Museum Tusculanums Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tanya. 2007. Hyperparadigmer. En undersøgelse af paradigmatiske samspil i danske modussystemer [Hyper Paradigms. An Examination of Paradigmatic Interactions in Danish Modal Systems]. Roskilde: Institut for Kultur og Identitet. Roskilde Universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, Klaus. 1959. Den begyndende skizofreni. Forsøg på en gestaltanalyse af psykosen. København: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Edelsgaard Andersen, John. 1980. “‘Hvad hedder egentlig Berufsverbot på russisk?’ Om almene forudsætninger i samtalen [What is ‘Berufzverbot’ Actually Called in Russian? On Common Prerequisites in Conversation].” In Hvad går vi ud fra? Om forudsætninger i sprog og handling [What is our Point of Departure? On Prerequisites in Language and Action], edited by Peter Harder and Arne Poulsen, 59–77. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Edelsgaard Andersen, John. 1986. “Adverbialer – sprogvidenskabens stedbørn [Adverbials - The Stepchildren in Language Science].” In Festschrift Oskar Bandle, edited by Hans Peter Naumann, Magnus von Platen, and Stefan Sonderegger, 45–54. Basel and Frankfurt a. M.: Helbing und Lichtenhain.
   Google Scholar
• Endicott, Jean, Robert L. Spitzer, Joseph L. Fleiss, and Jacob Cohen. 1976. “The Global Assessment Scale.” Archives of General Psychiatry 33: 766–771.10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, Thomas. 2015. “The intersubjectivity of delusions.” World Psychiatry 14 (2): 178–179.10.1002/wps.v14.2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Bennison. 1977. “From Discourse to Dialog.” Journal of Pragmatics 1: 283–297.10.1016/0378-2166(77)90039-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grice, Paul H. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics 3, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1981. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. Handlingsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung [The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society]. Band 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen.1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. 1991. “Comments on John Searle: ‘Meaning, Communication, and Representation’.” In John Searle and His Critics, edited by Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick, 17–29. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog [Grammar of Danish]. Vols. 1–3. København: Det danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.
   Google Scholar
• Krylova, Elvira. 2008. “Epistemisk polyfoni på dansk [Epistemic Polyphony in Danish].” In Sproglig polyfoni: Tekster om Bachtin og ScaPoLine [Language Polyphony: Texts on Bakhtin and ScaPoLine], edited by Rita Therkelsen, Nina Møller Andersen, and Henning Nølke, 181–203. Århus: Århus universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 1992. “Activity Types and Language.” In Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting, edited by Paul Drew and John Heritage, 66–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Måseide, Per. 1981. “Sincerity may Frighten the Patient: Medical Dilemmas in Patient Care.” Journal of Pragmatics 5 (2–3): 145–167.10.1016/0378-2166(81)90003-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, Mercer. 1969. Frog – Where Are You?. New York: Dial Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGlashan, Thomas H., Tandy J. Miller, Scott W. Woods, Ralph E. Hoffman, and Larry Davidson. 2001. “A Scale for the Assessment of Prodromal Symptoms and States.” In Early Intervention in Psychotic Disorders, edited by Tandy J. Miller, Sarnoff A. Mednick, Thomas H. McGlashan, Jan Libiger and Jan O. Johannessen, 135–149. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-010-0892-1
   Google Scholar
• Møller Nielsen, Niels. 2005. “Counter Argument – In Defence of Common Sense.” PhD thesis, Roskilde University, Roskilde.
   Google Scholar
• Møller Nielsen, Niels. 2010. Argumenter i kontekst. Introduktion til pragmatisk-argumentationsanalyse [Arguments in Context. Introduction to Pragmatic Text Analysis]. København: Samfundslitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Mortensen, Janus. 2012. “Epistemisk positionering i dansk talesprog [Epistemic Stance Marking in Spoken Danish].” NyS – Nydanske Sprogstudier 42: 62–91.
   Google Scholar
• Onions, Charles T., ed. 1974. The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, Charlotte. 2011. “Attitude i sproget ved tidlige skizofrene tilstande. Empirisk undersøgelse af sprogbrugen hos prodromale, førstegangsindlagte og yngre patienter med flere indlæggelser [Attitude in Language in Early Stages of Schizophrenia. An Empirical Investigation of the Language Use of Prodromal, First-Admitted Patients, and Younger Patients with Several Admissions].” PhD thesis, Institute for Culture and Identity. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Bent. 2003. “The Unconscious” The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review 26: 31–40.10.1080/01062301.2003.10592905
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, Bent, and Harly Sonne. 1986. The Language of Psychosis. New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sbisà, Marina. 2006. “Two Concepts of Rationality in Grice’s Theory of Implicature.” In Rationality of Belief and Action, edited by Elvio Baccarini and Snjezana Prijié-Samarzija, 233–247. Rijeka: University of Rijeka.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. 1991. “Response: Meaning, Intentionality and Speech Acts.” In John Searle and His Critics, edited by Ernest Lepore and Robert Van Gulick, 81–102. Cambridge: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Skafte Jensen, Eva. 2000. Danske sætningsadverbialer og topologi i diakron belysning [Danish Sentence Adverbials and Topology in a Diachronic Light]. PhD thesis, Copenhagen University.
   Google Scholar
• Sonne, Harly, and Bent Rosembaum. 1981. “Psychosis, Psychiatry and the Science of Text.” Journal of Pragmatics 5: 205–221.10.1016/0378-2166(81)90006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therkelsen, Rita. 2008. “Epistemiske sætningsadverbialer i interrogativer [Epistemic Sentence Adverbials in Interrogatives].” In Ny forskning i grammatik [New research in grammar], edited by Carl Bache, Alexandra Holsting, Henrik Høeg Müller, and Nina Nørgaard, 177–191. Odense: Syddansk Universitet, Institut for Sprog og Kommunikation.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, Stephen E. (1958) 2003. The Uses of Argument. Updated edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840005
   Google Scholar
• White, Peter. 2000. “Dialogue and Inter-subjectivity: Reinterpreting the Semantics of Modality and Hedging.” In Working with Dialog, edited by Malcolm Coulthard, Janet Cotterill, and Francis Rock, 67–80. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• White, Peter. 2003. “Beyond Modality and Hedging: A Dialogic View of the Language of Intersubjective Stance.” Text 23 (2): 259–284.
   Google Scholar
• WHO. 1994. ICD-10. Psykiske lidelser og adfærdsmæssige forstyrrelser. Klassifikation og diagnostiske kriterier [The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders. Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines]. Revised edition 2003. København: Munksgaard.
   Google Scholar
• Widell, Peter, Ib Ulbæk, and Niels Møller Nielsen. 2006. “Pragmatik.” [ Pragmatics.] NyS – Nydanske Sprogstudier [NyS - Studies in Modern Danish] 34–35: 131–181.
   Google Scholar