Introduction to the special issue on variation in auxiliary selection

References

• Alexiadou, Artemis. 2015. “On the Irrealis Effect on Auxiliary Selection.” In Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, edited by Rolf Kailuweit and Malte Rosemeyer, 123–144. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• van der Auwera, Johan. 1998. “Conclusion.” In Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe, edited by Johan van der Auwera, 813–836. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110802610
   Google Scholar
• Beliën, Maaike. 2017. “Auxiliary Choice with Particle Verbs of Motion in Dutch.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 212–231.
   Google Scholar
• D’Alessandro, Roberta, and Ian Roberts. 2010. “Past Participle Agreement in Abruzzese: Split Auxiliary Selection and the Null-subject Parameter.” Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28 (1): 41–72.10.1007/s11049-009-9085-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. 2013. “Sources of Auxiliation in the Perfects of Europe.” Studies in Language 37 (3): 599–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drinka, Bridget. 2017. Language Contact in Europe: The Periphrastic Perfect Through History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781139027694
   Google Scholar
• Fløgstad, Guro. 2017. “Revisiting Perfect/Preterit Instability Across Romance: On Functional Motivations for Diverging Paths.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Gillmann, Melitta. 2015. “Auxiliary Selection in Closely Related Languages: The Case of German and Dutch.” In Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, edited by Rolf Kailuweit and Malte Rosemeyer, 333–358. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Gillmann, Melitta. 2016. Perfektkonstruktionen mit haben und sein. Eine Korpusuntersuchung im Althochdeutschen, Altsächsischen und Neuhochdeutschen [Constructions of Perfect with ‘haben’ and ‘sein’. A Corpus Investigation of Old High German, Old Saxon and New High German] (Studia Linguistica Germanica 128). Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110492170
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over Det Danske Sprog [Grammar of the Danish Language]. København: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.
   Google Scholar
• Heltoft, Lars. 2017. “The Regrammation of Paradigms: The Development of Auxiliaries in Danish.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 255–285.
   Google Scholar
• Heycock, Caroline, and Hjalmar Petersen. 2017. “The Have/Be Alternation in Contemporary Faroese.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 143–158.
   Google Scholar
• Kailuweit, Rolf, and Malte Rosemeyer, eds. 2015. Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Laanemets, Anu. 2017. “The Choice of the Perfect Auxiliary in Contemporary Spoken Danish.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 232–254.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change. Volume 1: Internal Factors. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, Ida. 2015. “The Have/Be Alternation in Scandinavian – Perfects, Resultatives and Unaccusative Structure.” In Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, edited by Rolf Kailuweit and Malte Rosemeyer, 145–182. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Legendre, Geraldine. 2007. “Optimizing Auxiliary Selection in Romance.” In Split Auxiliary Systems. A Typological Perspective, edited by Rául Aranovich, 145–180. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/tsl
   Google Scholar
• Legendre, Geraldine. 2010. “A Formal Typology of Person-based Auxiliary Selection in Italo-romance.” In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, edited by Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway, and Ian Roberts, 186–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Thomas. 2007. “Auxiliary Selection.” Language and Linguistics Compass 1 (6): 674–708.10.1111/lnco.2007.1.issue-6
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Thomas. 2015. Preverbal ge- in Old and Middle English. http://www.zas.gwz-berlin.de/fileadmin/mitarbeiter/mcfadden/ge_writeup.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Thomas. 2017. “On the Disappearance of the Be Perfect in Late Modern English.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Thomas, and Artemis Alexiadou. 2006. “Auxiliary Selection and Counterfactuality in the History of English and Germanic.” In Comparative Studies in Germanic Syntax: From Afrikaans to Zurich German, edited by Jutta Hartmann and László Molnárfi, 237–262. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/la
   Google Scholar
• McFadden, Thomas, and Artemis Alexiadou. 2010. “Perfects, Resultatives, and Auxiliaries in Earlier English.” Linguistic Inquiry 41: 389–425.10.1162/LING_a_00002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen, Peter Juul. 2017. “The Function of Supine Auxiliaries in Swedish and Danish: Morphology and Syntax in Argument Assignment.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 176–194.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Hermann. 1905. “Die Umschreibung des Perfektums im Deutschen mit haben und sein.” [The German Perfects formed with ‘haben’ and ‘sein’.] Abhandlungen der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Philologische und Historische Klasse 22: 159–210.
   Google Scholar
• Perlmutter, David. 1978. “Impersonal Passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis.” Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 4, edited by Jeri J. Jaeger, et al., 157–189. doi:10.3765/bls.v4i0.2198.
   Google Scholar
• Sorace, Antonella. 2000. “Gradients in Auxiliary Selection with Intransitive Verbs.” Language 76 (4): 859–890.10.2307/417202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorace, Antonella. 2004. “Gradience at the Lexicon-syntax Interface: Evidence for Auxiliary Selection and Implications for Unaccusativity.” In The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface, edited by Artemis Alexiadou, Elena Anagnostopoulou, and Martin Everaert, 243–268. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199257652.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Sorace, Antonella. 2015. “The Cognitive Complexity of Auxiliary Selection: From Processing to Grammaticality Judgements.” In Auxiliary Selection Revisited: Gradience and Gradualness, edited by Rolf Kailuweit and Malte Rosemeyer, 23–42. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2017. “Developing a New Perfect: The Rise of the Icelandic vera búinn að-perfect.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 49 (2): 118–142.
   Google Scholar