Linearity and tone in the unfolding of information

References

• Auer, Peter. 1996. “On the Prosody and Syntax of Turn Continuations.” In Prosody in Conversation: Interactional Studies, edited by Elizabeth Couper Kuhlen and Margret Selting, 57–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, Peter. 2007. “Why are Increments Such Illusive Objects; An Afterthought.” Journal of Pragmatics 17 (4): 647–658. doi:10.1075/prag.17.4.03aue.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. 1961. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2016. Intonation Units Revisited: Cesuras in Talk-In-Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, Margaret. 2016. “Dynamism in Exchange Structure.” English Text Construction 9: 33–55. doi:10.1075/etc.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, Paul, and David Weenick. 2013. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer.” Computer programme Version 5.3.52.
   Google Scholar
• Boomer, Donald, and John D.M. Laver. 1968. “Slips of the Tongue.” British Journal of Disorders of Communication 3: 2–12.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brazil, David. 1995. A Grammar of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brazil, David. 1997. The Communicative Value of Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse Consciousness and Time. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Choe, Wook Kyung, and Melissa, A. Redford. 2012. “The Distribution of Speech Errors in Multi-word Prosodic Units.” Journal for the Association of Laboratory Phonology 3 (1): 5–26. doi:10.1515/lp-2012-0002.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 1986. An Introduction to English Prosody. London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Cruttenden, Alan. 1997. Intonation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal, David. 1969. Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, Anne. 2012. Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: M. I. T. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, Jürgen. 1988. Comparing Reading and Spoken Intonation. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Firbas, Jan. 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, Cecilia E., Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson. 2002. “Constituency and the Grammar of Turn Increments.” In The Language of Turn and Sequence, edited by Cecilia E. Ford, Barbara A. Fox, and Sandra A. Thompson, 14–38. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fries, Peter H. 1995. “Themes, Method of Developments and Texts.” In On Subject and Theme: A Discourse Functional Perspective, edited by Ruqaiya Hasan and Peter Fries, 317–360. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Gandour, Jack, Donald Wong, Mario Dzemidzic, Mark Lowe, Yunxia Tong, and Xiaojian Li. 2003. “A Cross‐linguistic fMRI Study of Perception of Intonation and Emotion in Chinese.” Human Brain Mapping 18 (3): 149–157. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greaves, William S. 2006. “Intonation in Systemic Functional Linguistics.” In Continuing Discourse on Language, Volume 2, edited by Ruqaiya Hasan, Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen, and Jonathan J. Webster, 979–1025. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven, Carlos. 1983. On the Grammar and Semantics of Sentence Accents. Dordrecht: Fortis.
   Google Scholar
• Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2004. The Phonology and Tone of Intonation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. 1967. Intonation and Grammar in British English. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen. 2014. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., and William S. Greaves. 2008. Intonation in the Grammar of British English. London: Equinox.
   Google Scholar
• Haselow, Alexander. 2016. “A Processual View on Grammar: Macrogrammar and the Final Field in Spoken Syntax.” Language Sciences 54: 77–101. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2015.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage, John. 2012. “The Epistemic Engine; Sequence Organization and Territories of Knowledge.” Research on Language & Social Interaction 45 (1): 30–52. doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjelmslev, Louis N. 1975. Resume of a Theory of Language. edited and translated by Francis W. Whitfield. Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, Sun-Ah, ed. 2007. Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jun, Sun-Ah, ed. 2015. Prosodic Typology II: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamio, Akio. 1994. “The Theory of Information: The Case of Japanese.” Journal of Pragmatics 21: 67–100. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(94)90047-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, William. 1972. “Rules for Ritual Insults.” In Studies in Social Interaction, edited by David Sudnow, 120–170. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, Robert D. 2008. Intonational Phonology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, John. 1970. “The Production of Speech.” In New Horizons in Linguistics, edited by John Lyons, 53–75. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Muntigl, Peter. 2009. “Knowledge Moves in Conversational Exchanges: Revisiting the Concept of Primary Vs. Secondary Knowers.” Functions of Language 16: 225–263. doi:10.1075/fol.16.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, Gerard. 2010. A Grammar of Spoken English Discourse: The Intonation of Increments. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• O’Grady, Gerard. 2016. “Given/New. What Do the Terms Refer To? A First (small) Step.” English Text Construction 9: 9–32. doi:10.1075/etc.9.1.02ogr.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Grady, William. 2005. Syntactic Carpentry: An Emergentist Approach to Syntax. Mahwah, N. J: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. “Turn Organization: One Intersection of Grammar and Interaction.” In Interaction and Grammar, edited by Elinor Ochs, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Sandra A. Thompson, 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker, Robert C. 2002. “Common Ground.” Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5–6): 701–721. doi:10.1023/A:1020867916902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tench, Paul. 1996. The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Duane, and Edward Gibson. 2004. “Making Sense of the Sense Unit Condition.” Linguistic Inquiry 35 (3): 508–517. doi:10.1162/ling.2004.35.3.508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar