A corpus-based analysis of Post-Auxiliary Ellipsis voice mismatches in Late Modern English

References

• Bos, Johan, and Jennifer Spenader. 2011. “An Annotated Corpus for the Analysis of VP Ellipsis.” Language Resources and Evaluation 45 (4): 463–494. doi:10.1007/s10579-011-9142-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, Katy. 2002. Parallelism and Prosody in the Processing of Ellipsis Sentences. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dalrymple, Mary, Stuart M. Shieber, and Fernando C. N. Pereira. 1991. “Ellipsis and Higher-Order Unification.” Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 399–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandón-Chapela, Evelyn. 2016. “A Corpus-Based Analysis of Post-Auxiliary Ellipsis in Modern English: Methodological and Theoretical Issues.” PhD dissertation, University of Vigo.
   Google Scholar
• Gandón-Chapela, Evelyn. 2020. On Invisible Language in Modern English: A Corpus-based Approach to Ellipsis. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Gengel, Kirsten. 2007. “Focus and Ellipsis. A Generative Analysis of Pseudogapping and Other Elliptical Structures.” PhD dissertation, University of Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Gengel, Kirsten. 2013. Pseudogapping and Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Daniel. 1993. “Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Form, Meaning, and Processing.” PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Hardt, Daniel, and Owen Rambow. 2001. “Generation of VP Ellipsis: A Corpus-Based Approach.” In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Toulouse, France, 9–11 July 2001, 290–297. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeksema, Jack. 2006. “Pseudogapping: Its Syntactic Analysis and Cumulative Effects on Acceptability.” Research on Language and Computation 4: 335–352. doi:10.1007/s11168-006-9023-x.
   Google Scholar
• Kehler, Andrew. 2000. “Coherence and the Resolution of Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 533–575. doi:10.1023/A:1005677819813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehler, Andrew. 2002. Coherence, Reference and the Theory of Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kertz, Laura. 2008. “Focus Structure and Acceptability in Verb Phrase Ellipsis.” In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Natasha Abner and Jason Bishop, 283–291. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Kertz, Laura. 2013. “Verb Phrase Ellipsis: The View from Information Structure.” Language 89: 390–428. doi:10.1353/lan.2013.0051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroch, Anthony, Beatrice Santorini, and Ariel Diertani. 2010. “Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English.” Accessed March 2016. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/hist-corpora/PPCMBE-RELEASE-1/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Nancy S. 1978. “Some Identity-of-sense Deletions Puzzle Me. Do They You?” In Papers from the 14th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CLS), edited by Donka Farkas, Wesley Jacobsen, and Karol Todrys, 229–240. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, Chicago Linguistic Society.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, Nancy S. 1986. Main Verb Ellipsis in Spoken English. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2008. “An Asymmetry in Voice Mismatches in VP-Ellipsis and Pseudogapping.” Linguistic Inquiry 39 (1): 169–179. doi:10.1162/ling.2008.39.1.169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2013. “Voice and Ellipsis.” Linguistic Inquiry 44 (1): 77–108. doi:10.1162/LING_a_00120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Philip. 2011. “The Choice between Verbal Anaphors in Discourse.” In Anaphora Processing And Applications: 8th Discourse Anaphora And Anaphor Resolution Colloquium (Daarc 2011), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, edited by Iris Hendrickx, Sobha Lalitha Devi, António Branco, and Ruslan Mitkov, 82–95. Vol. 7099. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Philip. 2014. “A Corpus Study of Pseudogapping and Its Theoretical Consequences.” In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 10, edited by Christopher Piñón, 73–90. http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr/eiss10/.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Philip, and Geoffrey K. Pullum. 2014. “Exophoric VP Ellipsis.” In The Core and the Periphery: Data-driven Perspectives on Syntax Inspired by Ivan A. Sag, edited by Philip Hofmeister and Elisabeth Norcliffe, 5–32. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sag, Ivan A. 1976. “Deletion and Logical Form.” PhD dissertation, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Sharifzadeh, Saghie. 2012. “Recherches Sur Do, Lexique Et Grammaire.” PhD dissertation, University of Paris-Sorbonne.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Anthony. 1993. English Auxiliaries: Structure and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar