Wh-questions with conjunction in Greek: ellipsis as an epiphenomenon of multidominance

References

• Aelbrecht, Loebke. 2010. The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Agüero-Bautista, Calixto. 2001. “Cyclicity and the Scope of wh-phrases.” PhD Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• An, Duk-Ho. 2006. “Asymmetric T-to-C Movement in ATB Constructions: A PF Deletion Analysis.” In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIV, edited by Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente, and Erik Schoorlemmer, 1–19. http://www.sole.leidenuniv.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 1994. “Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek.” PhD Thesis, University of Salzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Asarina, Alevtina. 2011. “Case in Uyghur and Beyond.” PhD Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Bachrach, Asaf, and Roni Katzir. 2009. “Right-node Raising and Delayed Spell-out.” In InterPhases: Phase-theoretic Investigations of Linguistic Interfaces, edited by Kleanthes K. Grohmann, 283–316. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bánréti, Zoltán. 1992. “A mellérendelés.” [Coordination]. In Strukturális Magyar Nyelvtan, I. Mondattan [Structural Hungarian Grammar, I. Syntax], edited by Ferenc Kiefer, 715–796. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorkman, Bronwyn M. 2013. “The Syntax of Syncretism.” In NELS 40: Proceedings of the Fortieth Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, edited by Seda Kan, Claire Moore-Cantwell, and Robert Staubs, 71–84. Amherst, Mass.:GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Blümel, Andreas. 2017. Symmetry, Shared Labels and Movement in Syntax. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, E. Wayles. 1972. “Conjoined Question Words and a Limitation on English Surface Structures.” Linguistic Inquiry 3: 223–226.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1993. “A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory.” In The View from Building 20, edited by Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 1–52. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 1995. “Bare Phrase Structure.” In Government and Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program: Principles and Parameters in Syntactic Theory, edited by Gert Webelhuth, 383–439. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2000. “Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.” In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, edited by Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka, 89–155. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, Noam. 2013. “Problems of Projection.” Lingua 130: 33–49. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung, Sandra, William A. Ladusaw, and James McCloskey. 1995. “Sluicing and Logical Form.” Natural Language Semantics 3 (3): 239–282. doi:10.1007/BF01248819.
   Google Scholar
• Citko, Barbara. 2000. “Parallel Merge and the Syntax of Free Relatives.” PhD Thesis, Stony Brook University.
   Google Scholar
• Citko, Barbara. 2005. “On the Nature of Merge: External Merge, Internal Merge, and Parallel Merge.” Linguistic Inquiry 36 (4): 475–496. doi:10.1162/002438905774464331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Citko, Barbara. 2011. Symmetry in Syntax: Merge, Move and Labels. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Mark. 2005. “Merge: Properties and Boundary Conditions.” Linguistics in the Netherlands 22: 219–230.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Mark. 2009. “On Multidominance and Linearization.” Biolinguistics 3: 344–403.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, Mark. 2013. “Multidominance and Locality.” Lingua 134: 149–169. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Español-Echevarría, Manuel, and Angeliki Ralli. 2000. “Case Mismatches in Greek: Evidence for the Autonomy of Morphology.” Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47 (1/4): 179–203. doi:10.1023/A:1014014631732.
   Google Scholar
• Fiengo, Robert, and Robert May. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gengel, Kirsten. 2013. Pseudogapping and Ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, Leland M. 1980. “Analogical Generalization in Natural Language Syntax.” PhD Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Giannakidou, Anastasia, and Jason Merchant. 1998. “Reverse Sluicing in English and Greek.” The Linguistic Review 15 (2–3): 233–256. doi:10.1515/tlir.1998.15.2-3.233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gračanin-Yüksek, Martina. 2007. “About Sharing.” PhD Thesis, MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz, Patrick. 2015. “Movement and Agreement in Right Node Raising Constructions.” Syntax 18 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1111/synt.12024.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Seungwan. 2008a. “Ellipsis, Right Node Raising, and Across-the-board Constructions.” PhD Thesis, Boston University.
   Google Scholar
• Ha, Seungwan. 2008b. “On Ellipsis Features and Right Node Raising.” In Proceedings of ConSOLE XV, edited by Sylvia Blaho, Camelia Constantinescu, and Erik Schoorlemmer, 67–90. http://www.sole.leidenuniv.nl.
   Google Scholar
• Haider, Hubert. 1988. “Matching Projections.” In Constituent Structure: Papers from the 1987 GLOW Conference, edited by Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, and Giuliana Giusti, 101–123. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Hiraiwa, Ken. 2001. “Multiple Agree and the Defective Intervention Constraint in Japanese.” MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 67–80.
   Google Scholar
• Hornstein, Norbert. 2009. A Theory of Syntax. Minimal Operations and Universal Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Kyle. 2007. “LCA + Alignment = RNR.” Talk presented at the Workshop on Coordination, Subordination and Ellipsis. Tübingen: University of Tübingen.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai, Hironobu. 2004. “Two Notes on ATB Movement.” Language and Linguistics 5: 167–188.
   Google Scholar
• Kasai, Hironobu. 2007. “Multiple dominance in syntax.” PhD Thesis, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Kliashchuk, Mikalai. 2007. “La syntaxe des mots-QU coordonnés en russe.” In Proceedings of the 2007 Αnnual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, edited by Milica Radišić, 1–15. Saskatoon: University of Saskatchewan.
   Google Scholar
• Kotzoglou, George. 2005. “Wh-extraction and locality in Greek.” PhD Thesis, University of Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. “On Pronominalization and the Chain of Command.” In Modern Studies in English: Readings in Transformational Grammar, edited by David A. Reibel and Sanford A. Schane, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lipták, Anikó. 2003. “Conjoined Questions in Hungarian.” In Multiple Wh-fronting, edited by Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Grohmann, 141–160. Philadelphia, Pa.: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2000. “Islands and LF-movement in Greek Sluicing.” Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 41–64.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2004. “Fragments and Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6): 661–738. doi:10.1007/s10988-005-7378-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn, Alan. 1999. “On the Identity Requirement of ATB Extraction.” Natural Language Semantics 7 (4): 421–425. doi:10.1023/A:1008377429394.
   Google Scholar
• Salzmann, Martin. 2012a. “A Derivational Ellipsis Approach to ATB-movement.” The Linguistic Review 29 (3): 397–438. doi:10.1515/tlr-2012-0015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzmann, Martin. 2012b. “Deriving Reconstruction Asymmetries in ATB-movement by Means of Asymmetric Extraction + Ellipsis.” In Comparative Germanic Syntax: The State of the Art, edited by Peter Ackema, Rhona Alcorn, Caroline Heycock, Dany Jaspers, Jeroen Van Craenenbroeck, and Guido Vanden Wyngaerd, 353–385. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Salzmann, Martin. 2013. “Deriving Reconstruction Asymmetries in ATB by Means of Ellipsis.” In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, edited by Yelena Fainleib, Nicholas LaCara, and Yangsook Park, 179–192. Vol. 1. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, Tatiana V. 2012. “Whoever Doesn’t HOP Must be Superior: The Russian Left-Periphery and the Emergence of Superiority.” PhD Thesis, Stony Brook University.
   Google Scholar
• Sinopoulou, Ourania. 2011. “Wh&wh-questions in Greek: Monoclausal or Biclausal?” Linguistic Analysis 37: 189–229.
   Google Scholar
• Sinopoulou, Ourania. 2019a. “Δομές πολλαπλής κυριαρχίας: η σύνταξη των ερωτηματικών προτάσεων της Ελληνικής.” [Multidominance structures: the syntax of interrogative sentences in Greek]. PhD Thesis, University of Athens. http://thesis.ekt.gr/thesisBookReader/id/45405.
   Google Scholar
• Sinopoulou, Ourania. 2019b. “What Can Wh-questions in Greek Tell Us about Multidominance?” Paper presented at the 14th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Patras: University of Patras, September 5–8, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Tai, James Hau-Y. 1969. “Coordination Reduction.” PhD Thesis, Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Te Velde, John R. 2005. Deriving Coordinate Symmetries: A Phase-based Approach Integrating Select, Merge, Copy and Match. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewicz, Barbara M. 2011a. “Against Spurious Coordination in Multiple Wh-questions.” In Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer, and Βarbara Tomaszewicz, 186–195. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaszewicz, Barbara M. 2011b. “Wh&wh: Syntactic and Semantic Arguments for Clausal Coordination.” In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 19, edited by John Frederick Bailyn, Ewan Dunbar, Yakov Kronrod, and Chris LaTerza, 131–145. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Michigan Slavic Publications.
   Google Scholar
• van Oirsouw, Robert R. 1987. The Syntax of Coordination. London: Croom Helm.
   Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2000. “Free Relatives inside Out: Transparent Free Relatives as Grafts.” In PASE Papers in Language Studies – Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English, edited by B. Rozwadowska, 223–233. Wrocław: University of Wrocław.
   Google Scholar
• van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2006. “Free Relatives.” In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, edited by M. Everaert and Henk van Riemsdijk, 318–332. London: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, Neal. 2005. Category Neutrality: A Type-logical Investigation. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, Chris. 1994. “Coordination, ATB and Ellipsis.” Groninger Arbeiten zur germanistischen Linguistik 37: 291–331.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, Chris. 1997. “Some Properties of Ellipsis in Coordination.” In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation, edited by Artemis Alexiadou and Tracy A. Hall, 59–107. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, Chris. 1999. “Right Node Raising and the LCA.” In Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, edited by S. Bird, A. Carnie, J. D. Haugen, and P. Norquest, 586–598. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilder, Chris. 2008. “Shared Constituents and Linearization.” In Topics in Ellipsis, edited by K. Johnson, 229–258. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Edwin. 1978. “Across-the-board Rule Application.” Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoerner, Cyril Edward III. 1995. “Coordination: The Syntax of &P.” PhD Thesis, University of California, Irvine.
   Google Scholar