Epistemic feelings and the making of the statement as a meaningful linguistic structure. Revisiting Heinrich Gomperz’s psychoaffective model of semantics and semiotics and its significance today

References

• Arango-Muñoz, Santiago, and Kourken Michaelian. 2014. “Epistemic Feelings, Epistemic Emotions: Review and Introduction to the Focus Section.” Philosophical Inquiries 2 (1): 97–122.
   Google Scholar
• Avenarius, Richard. 1888-1890. Kritik derreinen Erfahrung, 2 vol. Leipzig: Reisland.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, Lawrence W. 1999. “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4): 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale, chapitre IV : “Nature du signe linguistique”, 49–55. Paris: Gallimard (first published 1939 in Acta Linguistica 1: 23-29).
   Google Scholar
• Borghi, Anna M., Chiara Fini, and Luca Tummolini. 2021. “Abstract Concepts and Metacognition: Searching for Meaning in Self and Others.” In Handbook of Embodied Psychology: Thinking, Feeling, and Acting, edited by Michel D. Robinson and Laura E. Thomas, 197–220. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78471-3_9.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, Georg, Ulvi Doğuoğlu, and Dominique Kuenzle, eds. 2008. Epistemology and Emotion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Candiotto, Laura, ed. 2019a. The Value of Emotions for Knowledge. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15667-1.
   Google Scholar
• Candiotto, Laura. 2019b. “From Philosophy of Emotion to Epistemology: Some Questions About the Epistemic Relevance of Emotions.” In The Value of Emotions for Knowledge, edited by Laura Candiotto, 3–24. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15667-1_1.
   Google Scholar
• Candiotto, Laura. 2020. “Epistemic Emotions and the Value of Truth.” Acta Analytica 35 (4): 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12136-019-00416-x.
   Google Scholar
• Cigana, Lorenzo. 2023. “Assent, Sentiment and Linguistic Feeling in Jac. van Ginneken’s Psycholinguistics.” In Emotions, Metacognition, and the Intuition of Language Normativity: Theoretical, Epistemological, and Historical Perspectives on Linguistic Feeling, edited by David Romand and Michel Le Du. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17913-6_3.
   Google Scholar
• Clausner, Timothy C., and William Croft. 1999. “Domains and Images Schemas.” Cognitive Linguistics 10 (1): 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1999.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dukes, Daniel, K. Abrams, R. Adolphs, M E. Ahmed, A. Beatty, K C. Berridge, S. Broomhall, et al. 2021. “The Rise of Affectivism.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (7): 816–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01130-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdmann, Karl Otto. 1900. Die Bedeutung des Wortes. Leipzig, Germany: Avenarius.
   Google Scholar
• Foolen, Ad. 2012. “The Relevance of Emotion for Language and Linguistics.” In Moving Ourselves, Moving Others. Motion and Emotion in Intersubjectivity, Consciousness and Language, edited by Ad Foolen, Ulrike M. Lüdtke, Timothy P. Racine, and Jordan Zlatev, 349–368. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.6.13foo.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, Raymond W. 2005. “The Psychological Status of Image Schemas.” In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 29), edited by Beate Hampe, 113–135. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.2.113.
   Google Scholar
• Gomperz, Heinrich. 1905. Weltanschauungslehre. Ein Versuch die Hauptprobleme der allgemeinen theoretischen Philosophie geschichtlich zu entwickeln und sachlich zu bearbeiten, Band 1: Methodologie. Jena/Leipzig: Diederichs.
   Google Scholar
• Gomperz, Heinrich. 1908. Weltanschauungslehre. Ein Versuch die Hauptprobleme der allgemeinen theoretischen Philosophie geschichtlich zu entwickeln und sachlich zu bearbeiten, Band 2: Noologie, Erste Hälfte: Einleitung und Semasiologie. Jena/Leipzig: Diederichs.
   Google Scholar
• Gomperz, Heinrich. 1943. “Autobiographical Remarks.” The Personalist 24 (3): 254–270.
   Google Scholar
• Hacohen, Malachi Haim. 2000. Karl Popper. The Formative Years: Politics and Philosophy in Interwar Vienna. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haimovici, Sabrina. 2018. “The Modal-Amodal Distinction in the Debate on Conceptual Format.” Philosophies 3 (2): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007.
   Google Scholar
• Hampe, Beate, ed. 2005a. From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. (Cognitive Linguistics Research 29). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.
   Google Scholar
• Hampe, Beate. 2005b. “Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics: Introduction.” In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 29), edited by Beate Hampe, 1–12. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.0.1.
   Google Scholar
• Henckmann, Wolfhart. 1988. “Bewußtsein und Realität bei Külpe und Gomperz: Zwei Alternativen in der philosophischen Grundlegung der Semasiologie.” Zeitschrift für Semiotik 10 (4): 377–397.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Mark. 2005. “The Philosophical Significance of Images Schemas.” In From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics (Cognitive Linguistics Research 29), edited by Beate Hampe, 15–33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.1.15.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer, Markus, and Friedemann Pulvermüller. 2012. “Conceptual Representations in Mind and Brain: Theoretical Developments, Current Evidence and Future Directions.” Cortex 48 (7): 805–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesow, Karl-Friedrich. 1990. “Das sprachphilosophische Werk von Heinrich Gomperz.” Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Philosophie 15: 19–42. https://doi.org/10.5771/0340-7969-1990-2-19.
   Google Scholar
• Kornblith, Hilary, ed. 2001. Epistemology: Internalism and Externalism. Malden, MA/ Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, Theodor. 1893. Grundzüge der Logik. Hamburg/Leipzig: Voss.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, Theodor. 1902. Vom Fühlen, Wollen und Denken. Eine psychologische Skizze (Schriften der Gesellschaft für psychologische Forschung, Helft 13-14). Leipzig: Barth.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, Theodor. 1903a. Ästhetik, Psychologie des Schönen und der Kunst. Erster Teil: Grundlegung der Ästhetik. Leipzig: Voss.
   Google Scholar
• Lipps, Theodor. 1903b. Leitfaden der Psychologie. Leipzig: Engelmann.
   Google Scholar
• Lüdtke, Ulrike M., ed. 2015. Emotion in Language. Theory – Research – Application. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.10.
   Google Scholar
• Nerlich, Brigitte. 1992. Semantics Theories in Europe, 1830-1930. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.59.
   Google Scholar
• Riemer, Nick. 2016. “Internalist Semantics: Meaning, Conceptualization and Expression.” In The Routledge Handbook of Semantics, edited by Nick Riemer, 30–47. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2015. “Theodor Waitz’s Theory of Feelings and the Rise of Affective Sciences in the mid-19th Century.” History of Psychology 18 (4): 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039797.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2016. “La théorie herbartienne de la représentation (Vorstellung): une dialectique de l’acte et du contenu.” Studia Philosophica 75: 175–188. https://doi.org/10.24894/StPh-fr.2016.75012.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2019a. “Mach’s ‘Sensation,’ Gomperz’s ‘Feeling,’ and the Positivist Debate About the Nature of the Elementary Constituents of Experience. A Comparative Study in an Epistemological and Psychological Context.” In Ernst Mach – Life, Work, and Influence (Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol. 22), edited by Friedrich Stadler, 91–107. Vienna: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04378-0_6.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2019b. “More on Formal Feeling/form-Feeling in Language Sciences. Heinrich Gomperz’s Concept of ‘Formal Logical feeling’ (Logisches Formalgefühl) Revisited.” Histoire Epistémologie Langage 41 (1): 131–157. https://doi.org/10.1051/hel/2019001.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2021. “Psychologie affective allemande et sciences du langage au début du XXe siècle. Le concept de sentiment dans la ‘linguistique psychologique’ de Jac. Van Ginneken.” Histoire Épistémologie Langage 43 (2): 57–82. https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.994.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2022a. “La ‘sémasiologie’ de Heinrich Gomperz. Un modèle psychoaffectif de la signification et du signe linguistiques.” Histoire Épistémologie Langage 44 (1): 155–180. https://doi.org/10.4000/hel.2544.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. 2022b. “Wundt, Titchener et la réception américaine de la théorie tridimensionnelle du sentiment à la fin du XIXe et au début du XXe siècle.” Revue germanique internationale 35 (35): 129–146. https://doi.org/10.4000/rgi.2910.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. In pressa. “Sentiments épistémiques et épistémologie affective chez Theodor Lipps. Une réévaluation critique de la première édition de Vom Fühlen, Wollen und Denken (1902)”. In Theodor Lipps (1851-1914). Psychologie, Philosophie, Esthétique/ Psychology, Philosophy, Aesthetics, edited by David Romand and Serge Tchougounnikov. Lausanne-Genève: SDVIG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. In pressb. “Empathy in Theodor Lipps’s Theory and Aesthetics of Language”. In Theodor Lipps (1851-1914). Psychologie, Philosophie, Esthétique/ Psychology, Philosophy, Aesthetics, edited by David Romand and Serge Tchougounnikov. Lausanne-Genève: SDVIG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Romand, David. Forthcoming. “The Psychological Origins of the Concept of Defamiliarization. Theoretical Studies on Familiarity, Unfamiliarity, Strangeness, and Cognate Feelings from Waitz to Lipps (1849-1909).” In A Hundred Year Of Ostranenie, edited by Alexandra Berlina and Holt Meyer. Lausanne/Genève: SDVIG Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rysiew, Patrick. 2021. “Naturalism in Epistemology.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), edited by Edward N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/epistemology-naturalized/.
   Google Scholar
• Schiewer, Gesine Lenore, Jeanette Altarriba, and Bee Chin Ng, eds. 2022–2023. Language and Emotion: An International Handbook (Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft/Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science [HSK], 46/1, 46/2, 46/3), 3 vol. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110795486.
   Google Scholar
• Scorolli, Claudia, and Anna Borghi. 2008. “Language and Embodiment.” Anthropology and Philosophy 9 (1–2): 7–23.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Martin. 1991. “Heinrich Gomperz (1873-1942), Philosophie und Semiotik.” In Philosophie und Semiotik, edited by Ludwig Nagl, Elisabeth List, Jeff Bernard, and Gloria Withalm, 101–124. Vienna: ÖGS/ISSS.
   Google Scholar
• Seiler, Martin, and Friedrich Stadler, eds. 1994. Henrich Gomperz, Karl Popper und die österreichische Philosophie. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Talmy, Leonard. 1988. “Force Dynamics in Language and Cognition.” Cognitive Science 12 (1): 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1201_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Ginneken, Jac[ques]. 1907. Principes de linguistique psychologique. Essai de synthèse. Amsterdam/Paris/Leipzig: van der Vecht/Rivière/Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, Phillip, and Robert Thorstad. 2017. “Force Dynamics.” In The Oxford Handbook of Causal Reasoning, 147–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.13.
   Google Scholar
• Wundt, Wilhelm. 1900. Völkerpsychologie. Eine Untersuchung der Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache, Mythus und Sitte, Band 1: Die Sprache. Vol. 2. Leipzig: Kröner.
   Google Scholar