Are discourse-initial action-guiding verbless speech acts elliptical?

References

• Akmajian, Adrian. 1970. Aspects of the Grammar of Focus in English. MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, Henning. 2001. “Markedness and the Theory of Linguistic Change.” In Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress, edited by Henning Andersen, 21–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, Lloyd. 1968. “The Rhetorical Situation.” Philosophy & Rhetoric 1 (1): 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bondarenko, Antonina. 2019. “A Corpus-Based Contrastive Study of Verbless Sentences: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives.” Studia Neophilologica 91 (2): 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2019.1616221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchmann, Simon. 2018. “Utterances as Tool-Mediated Specifications of Affordances: Ecological Pragmatics.” Psychology of Language & Communication 22 (1): 124–163. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2018-0006.
   Google Scholar
• Borchmann, Simon. 2019. “The Spectator Bias in the Linguistic Descriptions of Information Structure.” Language Sciences 76: 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borchmann, Simon. 2024. “A Little Less Conversation - On the Completeness of Discourse-Initial Action-Guiding Subsententials.” Language Sciences 103: 101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2024.101628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühler, Karl. (1934) 1965. Sprachtheorie, die Darstellung der Sprache. Stuttgart: Gustav Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Carston, Robyn. 2002. Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Tanya Karoli. 2007. “Hyperparadigmer - en undersøgelse af paradigmatiske samspil i danske modussystemet”. PhD diss., Roskilde University.
   Google Scholar
• Cornish, Francis. 1999. Anaphora, Discourse and Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craenenbroeck, Jeroen, and Temmerman Tanja. 2018. “Ellipsis in Natural Language: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, edited by Tanja Temmerman and Jeroen van Craenenbroeck, 1–18. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eikmeyer, Hans-Jürgen. 1985. “Ellipsen und Analysestrategien in inkrementellen Sprachverarbeitungsmodellen.” In Ellipsen und fragmentarische Ausdrücke, Band 2, edited by Reinhard Meyer-Hermann and Hanne Rieser, 1–25. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Fiehler, Reinhard. 1993. “Spezifika der Kommunikation in Kooperationen.” In Fachtextpragmatik, edited by Hartmut Schröder, 343–359. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Formaldientsordnung A2.221001280.1F. Gültig ab 01.01.2015. Bundeswehr. Amt für Heeresentwicklung.
   Google Scholar
• Garcia-Marchena, Oscar. 2017. “The Structure of Spanish Verbless Clauses.” EpiC Series in Language and Linguistics 2: 335–345. https://easychair.org/publications/paper/k6q.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, Laurence. 2013. “Introduction.” In Brevity, edited by Laurence Goldstein, 1–17. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gregoromichelaki, Eleni, Cann Ronnie, and Ruth Kempson. 2013. “On Coordination in Dialogue: Sub-Sentential Talk and its Implications.” In Brevity, edited by Laurence Goldstein, 53–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H.P. 1975. “Logic and Conversation.” In Syntax and Semantics, 3: Speech Acts, edited by Peter Cole and Jerry L. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Seminar Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det danske sprog. Det Danske Sprog- og. Litteraturselskab: Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, Peter. 1996. Functional Semantics: A Theory of Meaning, Structure and Tense in English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Harder, Peter. 2010. Meaning in Mind and Society. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Heine, Bernd. 2023. The Grammar of Interactives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heltoft, Lars. 2015. “Talesprogets grammatikaliserede enheder.” Ny forskning i grammatik 22: 93–112. https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v23i22.23487.
   Google Scholar
• Heltoft, Lars. 2021. “From Indexical to Symbolic Case in Danish - A Content Analysis.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia [ Online]. 53 (2): 160–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/03740463.2021.1955474.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, F. R. 1979. The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, Bert H., and Ruben M. Baron. 1992. “Values as Constraints on Affordances: Perceiving and Acting Properly.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (3): 263–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodges, Bert H., and Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi. 2022. “Ecological Values Theory: Beyond Conformity, Goal-Seeking, and Rule-Following in Action and Interaction.” Review of General Psychology 26 (1): 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211048174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins, Edwin.1995. Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, Wolfgang. 1985. “Ellipse, Fokusgliederung und thematischer Stand.” In Ellipsen und fragmentarische Ausdrücke, Band 1, edited by Reinhard Meyer-Hermann and Hanne Rieser, 1–24. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
   Google Scholar
• Knoblauch, Hubert. 2005. “Focused Ethnography.” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6 (2). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-6.3.20.
   Google Scholar
• Levinson, Stephen C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically. Information Age Publishing, Incorporated. ProQuest Ebook Central.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics. Vol. 1–2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinowski, Bronislaw. (1923) 1946. “The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages.” In The Meaning Of Meaning: A Study of the Influence of Language Upon Thought and of the Science of Symbolism, edited by C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards, 296–336. 8th ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2004. “Fragments and Ellipsis.” Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6): 661–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2006. “Small Structures: A Sententialist Perspective.” In The Syntax of Nonsentenials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles, and Ellen Barton, 73–91. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2010. “Three Types of Ellipsis.” In Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity, edited by Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic, and Neftali Villanueva, 141–194. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227772.
   Google Scholar
• Merchant, Jason. 2018. “Ellipsis: A Survey of Analytical Approaches.” In The Oxford Handbook of Ellipsis, edited by Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmerman, 19–45. Oxford Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198712398.013.2.
   Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, Line. 2005. Copular Clauses. Specification, Predication and Equation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Schank, Roger, and Robert Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. (1969) 1996. Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Searle, John. (1979) 1996. Expression and Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, Robert J. 2006a. “Neither Fragments nor Ellipsis.” In The Syntax of Nonsentenials: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, edited by Ljiljana Progovac, Kate Paesani, Eugenia Casielles, and Ellen Barton, 93–116. Amsterdam, NE: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Stainton, Robert J. 2006b. Words and Thoughts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strawson, Peter Frederick. 1974. Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, Michael. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weir, Andrew. 2020. “Antecedentless Fragments: A Middle Road Between Sententialism and Nonsententialism.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 52 (2): 151–179.
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, Lennart. 2018. “Direktive dynamisk lokative sætningsemner. Opbygning, betydning og modificering.” Journal of Language Works 3 (2): 75–91.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Robert F. 2006. “Using Cognitive Ethnography to Study Instruction.” In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 838–844. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1953) 2009. Philosophical Investigations. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. ProQuest Ebook Central.
   Google Scholar