An evidential perfect in Wangerooge Frisian

References

• Linguistic Sources
   Google Scholar
• EhV= Ehrentraut, H. G. and Arjen P. Versloot. 1996. ”Mittheilungen aus der Sprache der Wangeroger”: De neilittenskip fan H.G. Ehrentraut oangeande it Eastfryske dialekt fan it eilân Wangereach út it argyf fan it Mariengymnasium yn Jever. Ljouwert/Leeuwarden: Fryske Akademy.
   Google Scholar
• FA1 = Ehrentraut, H. G. 1849. “Mittheilungen aus der Sprache der Wangeroger.” Friesisches Archiv 1: 3–109, 338–416.
   Google Scholar
• FA2 = Ehrentraut, H. G. 1854. “Mittheilungen aus der Sprache der Wangeroger.” Friesisches Archiv 2: 1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Littmann, Enno. 1922. Friesische Erzählungen aus Alt-Wangerooge: Letzte Klänge einer verschollenen Sprache. Oldenburg: Littmann.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Martin, transl. 1744. Biblia, das ist: Die ganze Heilige Schrift Alten und Neuen Testaments. Lemgo: Meyer.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Martin, transl. 1788. Biblia, das ist: Die ganze Heilige Schrift Alten und Neuen Testaments. Basel: Im-Hof und Sohn.
   Google Scholar
• Luther, Martin, transl. 1842. Biblia. Das ist: die ganze Heilige Schrift. Leipzig: Mayer und Wigand.
   Google Scholar
• Grimm, Jacob, and Wilhelm Grimm, eds. 1812. Kinder- und Haus-Märchen. Vol. 1. Berlin: Realschulbuchhandlung.
   Google Scholar
• Siebs, Theodor. 1923. “Vom aussterbenden Friesisch der Insel Wangeroog.” Zeitschrift für Deutsche Mundarten 18: 237–225. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40498287.
   Google Scholar
• Winkler, Johan, ed. 1874. Algemeen Nederduitsch en Friesch Dialecticon. Vol. 1. Groningen: Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Wisser, Wilhelm. 1914. Plattdeutsche Volksmärchen: Ausgabe für Erwachsene. Jena: Diederichs.
   Google Scholar
• Secondary References
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, Alexandra. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199263882.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, Alexandra, ed. 2018. The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Aikhenvald, Alexandra, and R. M. W. Dixon, eds. 2003. Studies in Evidentiality. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, J. 1903. “Zur Syntax der gesprochenen Sprache.” Jahrbuch des Vereins für niederdeutsche Sprachforschung 29: 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Boas, Franz. 1947. Kwakiutl Grammar with a Glossary of the Suffixes. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, n.s., 37. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, Temmo. 2012. “Wangeroogische i-Verben: Betrachtungen zum Verbsystem des ausgestorbenen ostfriesischen Dialekts der Insel Wangerooge.” Us Wurk 61: 125–141. https://ugp.rug.nl/uswurk/article/view/28516/25897.
   Google Scholar
• Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning: A Crosslinguistic and Functional-Cognitive Study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110219036.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan L. 1985. Morphology: A Study of the Relation between Meaning and Form. Typological Studies in Language 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chafe, Wallace, and Johanna Nichols, eds. 1986. Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology. Advances in Discourse Processes 20. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, Ferdinand. 1999. “Evidentiality and Epistemic Modality: Setting Boundaries.” Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• Elsness, Johan. 2000. “A Contrastive Look at the Present Perfect/Preterite Opposition in English and Norwegian.” Languages in Contrast 3 (1): 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.3.1.03els.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, Hanna. 2018. Präteritumschwund im Deutschen: Dokumentation und Erklärung eines Verdrängungsprozesses. Studia Linguistica Germanica 132. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110563818.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, Victor A. 2018. “Where do Evidentials Come from?” In The Oxford Handbook of Evidentiality, edited by Alexandra Aikhenvald, 124–147. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198759515.013.6.
   Google Scholar
• Greed, Teija. 2018. “From Perfect to Narrative Tense: The Development of an Evidential Meaning Examined Generally and in the Even Language.” Studies in Language 42 (4): 923–966. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.18031.gre.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen, Sune. 2023a. “Komplementsætninger med V2-ledstilling i wangeroogefrisisk.” Ny forskning i grammatik 30 (30): 40–56. https://doi.org/10.7146/nfg.v1i30.137952.
   Google Scholar
• Gregersen, Sune. 2023b. “A Syntactic Sketch of Wangerooge Frisian.” Unpublished working paper. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7775493.
   Google Scholar
• Haarmann, Harald. 1970. Die indirekte Erlebnisform als grammatische Kategorie: Eine eurasische Isoglosse. Veröffentlichungen der Societas Uralo-Altaica 2. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.
   Google Scholar
• Halpern, A. M. 1946. “Yuma.” In Linguistic Structures of Native America. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology 6, edited by Cornelius Osgood, 249–288. New York: Viking Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, Erik, and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog. Vol. 3. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab.
   Google Scholar
• Harnisch, Rüdiger. 1997. “Ein mitteldeutsches Tempusparadigma in textökonomischer Sicht.” In Vergleichende germanische Philologie und Skandinavistik: Festschrift für Otmar Werner, edited by Thomas Birkmann, Heinz Klingenberg, Damaris Nübling, and Elke Ronneberger-Sibold, 111–128. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110931259-009.
   Google Scholar
• Haugen, Einar. 1972. “The Inferential Perfect in Scandinavian: A Problem of Contrastive Linguistics.” Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 17 (2–3): 132–139. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100007076.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, Kees, and Marize Mattos Dall’aglio Hattnher. 2015. “Four Types of Evidentiality in the Native Languages of Brazil.” Linguistics 53 (3): 479–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2015-0010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Jarich. 1998. “R-ynfoeging yn it Wangereagersk.” Us Wurk 47: 25–48. https://ugp.rug.nl/uswurk/article/view/27884/25283.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Jarich. 2008. “Suppleesje by tiidwurden yn it Eastfrysk: Sealtersk sjo - saach - blouked, Wangereagersk sjoo - blauket - blauket (‘sjen’).” Us Wurk 57: 120–140. https://ugp.rug.nl/uswurk/article/view/27358/24784.
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, Jarich. 2023. “From Naming Verb to Copula: The Case of Wangerooge Frisian Heit.” Journal of Germanic Linguistics 35 (2): 97–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1470542722000113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huesken, Nicole. 2001. “Mirrorsentences: Repetition of Inflected Verb and Subject in Spoken Dutch.” MA thesis, Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, William H. 1986. “The Heterogeneity of Evidentials in Makah.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, edited by Wallace L. Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 3–28. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. [1957] 1971. “Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb.” In Selected Writings, Vol. 2: Word and Language, 130–137. The Hague: Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110873269.130.
   Google Scholar
• Johanson, Lars, and Bo Utas, eds. 2000. Evidentials: Turkic, Iranian and Neighbouring Languages. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 24. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110805284.
   Google Scholar
• Kehayov, Petar. 2008. “An Areal-Typological Perspective to Evidentiality: The Cases of the Balkan and Baltic Linguistic Areas.” PhD diss., Tartu University. http://hdl.handle.net/10062/6524.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmann, Paul. 1891. “Der Umfang des friesischen Sprachgebietes im Großherzogtum Oldenburg.” Zeitschrift für Volkskunde 1: 377–401.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, Jouko. 2000. “The Perfect – Aspectual, Temporal and Evidential.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20.6, edited by Östen Dahl, 365–383. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.3.365.
   Google Scholar
• McLendon, Sally. 2003. “Evidentials in Eastern Pomo with a Comparative Survey of the Category in Other Pomoan Languages.” In Studies in Evidentiality, edited by Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and R. M. W. Dixon, 101–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.54.08mcl.
   Google Scholar
• Mithun, Marianne. 2020. “Context and Consciousness: Documenting Evidentials.” Folia Linguistica 54 (2): 317–342. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mortelmans, Tanja. 2000. “On the ‘Evidential’ Nature of the ‘Epistemic’ Use of the German Modals Müssen and Sollen.” Belgian Journal of Linguistics 14: 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1075/bjl.14.08mor.
   Google Scholar
• Mussaeus, J. 1829. Versuch einer plattdeutschen Sprachlehre mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der mecklenburgischen Mundart. Neu-Strelitz: Dämmler.
   Google Scholar
• Oswalt, Robert. 1986. “The Evidential System of Kashaya.” In Evidentiality: The Linguistic Coding of Epistemology, edited by Wallace Chafe and Johanna Nichols, 29–45. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Plungian, Vladimir. 2010. “Types of Verbal Evidentiality Marking: An Overview.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49, edited by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 15–58. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.15.
   Google Scholar
• Reershemius, Gertrud. 2004. Niederdeutsch in Ostfriesland: Zwischen Sprachkontakt, Sprachveränderung und Sprachwechsel. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik Beiheft 119. Stuttgart: Steiner.
   Google Scholar
• Saltveit, Laurits. 1983. “Syntax.” In Handbuch zur niederdeutschen Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft, edited by Gerhard Cordes and Dieter Möhn, 279–333. Berlin: Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, Albert. 1967. “Syntactische implicaties van de zgn. herhalingsconstructie (dat is een gek geval is dat).” Handelingen van het Vlaams Filologencongres 26: 30–47.
   Google Scholar
• Schwitalla, Johannes. 2003. Gesprochenes Deutsch: Eine Einführung. Grundlagen der Germanistik 33. 2nd ed. Berlin: Schmidt.
   Google Scholar
• Siebs, Theodor. 1931. “Die Friesen und ihre Sprache.” In Die Friesen, edited by Conrad Borchling and Rudolf Muuß, 56–76. Breslau: Hirt.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, Patrick V. 2008. “A Note on the Development of Old Wangeroogic *e and *o in Open Syllables.” Us Wurk 57: 176–194. https://ugp.rug.nl/uswurk/article/view/27361/24787.
   Google Scholar
• Teleman, Ulf, Staffan Hellberg, and Erik Andersson. 1999. Svenska Akademiens grammatik, vol. 4: Satser och meningar. Stockholm: Svenska Akademien.
   Google Scholar
• Thieroff, Rolf. 2000. “On the Areal Distribution of Tense-Aspect Categories in Europe.” In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20.6, edited by Östen Dahl, 265–308. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.1.265.
   Google Scholar
• van der Auwera, Johan, and Vladimir A. Plungian. 1998. “Modality’s semantic map.” Linguistic Typology 2 (1): 79–124. https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1998.2.1.79.
   Google Scholar
• Versloot, Arjen. 1996. “Konsonantengeminaten in der Sprache der Wangerooger: eine Einmaligkeit unter den westgermanischen Sprachen.” NOWELE: North-Western European Language Evolution 28–29: 241–250. https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.28-29.17ver.
   Google Scholar
• Versloot, Arjen. 2001a. “Ältere ostfriesische Sprache und Literatur.” In Handbuch des Friesischen, edited by Horst Haider Munske, 741–744. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946925.741.
   Google Scholar
• Versloot, Arjen. 2001b. “Das Wangeroogische.” In Handbuch des Friesischen, edited by Horst Haider Munske, 423–429. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946925.423.
   Google Scholar
• Versloot, Arjen. 2001c. “Grundzüge ostfriesischer Sprachgeschichte.” In Handbuch des Friesischen, edited by Horst Haider Munske, 734–740. Tübingen: Niemeyer. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110946925.734.
   Google Scholar
• Versloot, Arjen. 2002. “Die wangeroogischen Diminutivendungen -uuk und -iik.” Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 56 (1): 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1163/18756719-056-01-90000016.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn. 2010. “Hearsay in European Languages: Toward an Integrative Account of Grammatical and Lexical Marking.” In Linguistic Realization of Evidentiality in European Languages. Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 49, edited by Gabriele Diewald and Elena Smirnova, 59–129. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110223972.59.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn. 2022. “Conclusions and Outlook.” In Evidential Marking in European Languages: Toward a Unitary Comparative Account, edited by Björn Wiemer and Juana I. Marín-Arrese, 631–714. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726077-015.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn, and Juana I. Marín-Arrese, eds. 2022a. Evidential Marking in European Languages: Toward a Unitary Comparative Account. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726077.
   Google Scholar
• Wiemer, Björn, and Juana I. Marín-Arrese. 2022b. “Introduction.” In Evidential Marking in European Languages: Toward a Unitary Comparative Account, edited by Björn Wiemer and Juana I. Marín-Arrese, 3–53. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110726077-001.
   Google Scholar
• Willett, Thomas. 1988. “A Cross-Linguistic Survey of the Grammaticization of Evidentiality.” Studies in Language 12 (1): 51–97. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.12.1.04wil.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiwel, H. G. 1901. Synspunkter for dansk sproglære. Copenhagen: Det Nordiske Forlag.
   Google Scholar