Local municipality productive efficiency and its determinants in South Africa

References

• Afonso, A & Fernandes, S, 2008. Assessing and explaining the relative efficiency of local government. The Journal of Socio-Economics 37, 1946–79. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2007.03.007
   Google Scholar
• Athanassopoulos, A & Triantis, K, 1998. Assessing aggregate cost efficiency and the related policy implications for Greek local municipalities. INFOR 36(3), 66–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bahl, R & Martinez-Vazquez, J, 2006. Sequencing fiscal decentralization. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3914, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, R & Smoke, P, 2003. Restructuring Local Government Finance in Developing Countries: Lessons from South Africa. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
   Google Scholar
• Balaguer-Coll, M, Prior-Jimenez, D & Vela-Bargues, J, 2002. Efficiency and Quality in Local Government Management. The Case of Spanish Local Authorities. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, R, 2001. Subnational Revenues: Realities and Prospects. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P, Calitz, E & Steenekamp, T, 2009. Public Economics. 4th edn. Oxford University Press Southern Africa, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Boetti, L, Piacenza, M & Turati, G, 2010. Decentralization and local governments’ performance: How does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? Paper presented at the 66th Congress of the International Institute of Public Finance (IIPF), 23–26 August 2010, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Boex, J, Martinez-Vazquez, J & Timofeev, A, 2004. Subnational Government Structure and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations: An Overlooked Dimension of Decentralization. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• CoGTA (Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs), 2009. State of local government in South Africa, overview report. Working documents, Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• De Borger, B & Kerstens, K, 1996. Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: A comparative analysis of FDH, DEA, and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics 26, 145–70. doi: 10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, M, 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A (General) 120(3), 253–90. doi: 10.2307/2343100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial and Fiscal Commission, 2011. Submission for the 2012/13 Division of Revenue. Financial and Fiscal Commission (FCC): For an Equitable Sharing of National Revenue. FFC, Johannesburg, Midrand.
   Google Scholar
• Kokkinou, A, 2009. Stochastic Frontier Analysis: Empirical Evidence on Greek Productivity. University of Glasgow, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Loikkanen, H & Susiluoto, I, 2005. Cost efficiency of Finnish municipalities in basic service provision 1994–2002. Paper prepared for the 45st Congress of the European Regional Science Association in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 23–7 August.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vazquez, J, 1998. The Assignment of Expenditure Responsibilities. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• McLure, CE, 2007. The Tax Assignment Problem: Conceptual and Administrative Considerations in Achieving Subnational Fiscal Autonomy. Hoover Institution, Institute for Policy Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Murillo-Zamorano, LR, 2004. Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys 18(1), 33–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Treasury, 2003/04–2009/10. Local Government Budgets and Expenditure Review. Intergovernmental Fiscal Reviews (IGFR), Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• PREM Notes, 2001. Decentralization and Governance: Does Decentralization Improve Public Service Delivery? World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management (PREM) Network, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R, 2003. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: A Tool for Performance Measurement. Sage Publications, New Delhi.
   Google Scholar
• Siavelis, PM, 2009. Elite-mass congruence, partidocracia and the quality of Chilean democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America 1(3), 3–31.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P, 2000. Fiscal Decentralization in East and Southern Africa: A Selective Review of Experience and Thoughts on Moving Forward. Conference on Fiscal Decentralization. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P, 2001. Fiscal Decentralization in Developing Countries: A Review of Current Concepts and Practice. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development (UNRISD), Geneva.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C, 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5), 416–24. doi: 10.1086/257839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP, 2005. Fiscal Decentralization in Transition Economies: Case Studies from the Balkans and Caucasus. United Nations Development Programme, Regional Centre, Bratislava, Slovakia.
   Google Scholar
• UNDP, 2010. Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), Country Report 2010. South Africa. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), Pretoria, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Eeckaut, P, Tulkens, H & Jamar, M, 1993. Cost efficiency in Belgian municipalities. In Fried, H.O., Schmidt, S.S., & Lovell, C.A.K. (Eds.), The Measurement of Productive Efficiency: Techniques and Applications. Oxford University Press, New York, 300–34.
   Google Scholar