Biofuels technology development in Southern Africa

References

• Amigun, B, Musango, JK & Stafford, W, 2011. Biofuels and sustainability in Africa. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15(2), 1360–72. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baltic Biogas Bus, 2009. Biogas: The natural choice for city buses. www.rdsd.lv/uploads/media/551a5ad84b3fe.pdf Accessed 15 December 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, D, 2010. Engineering organisms for industrial fuel production. Bioengineered Bugs 1(5), 303–8. doi: 10.4161/bbug.1.5.12941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blanchard, R, Richardson, D, O’Farrel, P & von Maltitz, G, 2011. Biofuels and biodiversity in South Africa. South African Journal of Science 107(5–6), 19–26. doi:http://doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i5/6.186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakauya, E, Beyene, G & Chikwamba, RK, 2009. Food production needs fuel too: Perspectives on the impact of biofuels in Southern Africa. South African Journal of Science 105(5–6), 174–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, S, Anderson-Teixeira, KJ & DeLucia, E, 2009. Life-cycle analysis and the ecology of biofuels. Trends in Plant Science 14(3), 140–6. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.12.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, S, van de Ven, G, van Ittersum, M. & Giller, K, 2010. Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques. Biomass and Bioenergy 34, 588–601. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department Environmental Affairs, 2013. Overview of biogas potential in South Africa. Author: Munganga. G, GreenCape-Waste Economy Sector Manager. http://www.energy.gov.za/files/biogas/presentations/2013-NBC/2013-Overview-of-biogas-market-in-South-Africa.pdf Accessed 26 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Department Environmental Affairs, 2015. Biogas report: Facilitation of large-scale uptake of alternative transport fuels in South Africa- the case for biogas. https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/reports/bioagas_report.pdf Accessed 22 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Energy, 2012. Energy statistics. www.energy.gov.za/files/energyStats_frame.html Accessed 17 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• EBTP, 2016. Biomass to liquids BtL. www.biofuelstp.eu/btl.html Accessed 16 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• ESI Africa, 2013. ‘Biogas – South Africa’s great untapped potential’ June 2016. ESI Africa: Africa’s power journal. https://www.esi-africa.com/biogas-south-africas-great-untapped-potential/ Accessed 26 March 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Efroymson, RA, Dale, VH, Kline KL, McBride, AC, Bielicki, JC, Smith, RL, Parish, ES, Schweizer PE, Shaw DM, 2012. Environmental indicators of biofuel sustainability: What about context? Environmental Management 51(2), 291–306. doi: 10.1007/s00267-012-9907-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ensyn, 2016, 13 July. Ensyn, Arbec and Rémabec Begin Construction of the Cote Nord Biocrude production facility in Quebec. http://advancedbiofuelsassociation.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Ensyn-CN-Release-2016.7.13-As-Issued.pdf Accessed 23 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• ExxonMobil, 2017. Advanced biofuels. http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/energy/research-and-development/advanced-biofuels/advanced-biofuels-overview Accessed 9 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Feygin, M & Satkin, R, 2004. The oil reserves-to-production ratio and its proper interpretation. Natural Resources Research 13, 57–60. doi: 10.1023/B:NARR.0000023308.84994.7f
   Google Scholar
• Fisher Jr, C, Paik, S & Schriver, W, 1986. Power plant economy of scale and cost trends: Further analyses and review of empirical studies. Ornl U S. Atomic Energy Commission 857685, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Frischnecht, R, Steiner, R, Braunschweig, A, Norbert, E & Gabi, H, 2006. Swiss ecological scarcity method: The New version. ESU-services GmbH, Zurich.
   Google Scholar
• Fundira, T & Henley, G, 2017. Biofuels in Southern Africa: Political economy, trade, and policy environment. WIDER Working Paper Series 048, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
   Google Scholar
• Gasparatos, A, Lee, L, von Maltitz, G, Mathai, M, de Oliveira, JP & Willis, K, 2012. Biofuels in Africa: Impacts on ecosystem services, biodiversity and human well-being. UNU-IAS Policy Report. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, Yokohama.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbens-Leens, P, Hoekstra, A & van der Meer, T, 2009. The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of Bio-energy in energy supply. Ecological Economics 68, 1052–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan, G, Cristina Negri, M, Wang, M, Wu, M & Snyder, SL, 2009. Biofuels, land, and water: A systems approach to sustainability. Environmental Science & Technology 43, 6094–100. doi: 10.1021/es900801u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P, Sae-wang, V, Kanbua, P & Laoonual, Y, 2010. Impact of water contents blended with Ethanol on SI engine performance and emissions. The First TSME International Conference on Mechanical Engineering, TSME-ICOME, 20–22 October, Ubon Ratchathani, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, T & Berenbaum, M, 2013. Moth diversity in three biofuel crops and native prairie in Illinois. Insect Science 20(3), 407–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7917.2012.01530.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, W, 2006. Quantifying global exergy resources. Energy 31(12), 1685–702. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAASTD, 2009. Agriculture at a crossroad: Global report. Island Press, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2008. From 1st to 2nd generation biofuel technologies. IEA, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2011a. Technology roadmap: Biofuels for transport. IEA, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2011b. Technology roadmap: Electric and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. IEA, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2014. International energy statistics. www.eia.gov/beta/international/data/browser/#/?vs=INTL.44–1-AFRC-QBTU.Aandvo=0andv=Handstart=1980andend=2014 Accessed 16 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• IEA, 2016. Global EV outlook: Beyond one million electric cars. International Energy Agency, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ineos, 2013. First facility in the world using new advanced bioenergy technology to convert waste to renewable fuel and electricity. www.ineos.com/news/ineos-group/ineos-bio-produces-cellulosic-ethanol-at-commercial-scale Accessed 21 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC, 1997. The regional impacts of climate change: An assessment of vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA, 2013. Production of liquid biofuels: Technology brief. IRENA, Masdar City.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA, 2016a. Boosting biofuels: Sustainable paths to greater energy security. IRENA, Masdar City.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA, 2016b. Innovation outlook: Advanced liquid biofuels. IRENA, Masdar City.
   Google Scholar
• ISO, 2006. ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management – LCA – Principles and framework. www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=37456 Accessed 17 January 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, FX, 2017. Biofuels, bioenergy and the bioeconomy in north and south. Industrial Biotechnology Dec 1;13(6), 289–91. doi: 10.1089/ind.2017.29106.fxj
   Google Scholar
• Kilian, A, 2016. Novo energy launches CNG dispensing facility. Engineering News, 28 October.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, K, Dale, V, Lee, R & Leiby, P, 2009. In defense of biofuels, done right. Issues in Science and Technology 25(3), 75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, KL, Msangi, S, Dale, VH, Woods, J, Souza, GM, Osseweijer, P, Clancy, JS, Hilbert, JA, Johnson, FX, McDonnell, PC & Mugera, HK, 2017. Reconciling food security and bioenergy: Priorities for action. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 9(3), 557–76. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12366
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal, M, Silva Walter, A & Seabra, J, 2013. Sugarcane as an energy source. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery 3(1), 17–26. doi: 10.1007/s13399-012-0055-1
   Google Scholar
• Leboreiro, J & Hilaly, A, 2011. Biomass transportation model and optimum plant size for the production of ethanol. Bioresource Technology 102(3), 2712–23. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malça, J & Freire, F, 2006. Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and Bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation. Energy 31, 3362–80. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIlveen-Wright, D, Williams, B & McMullan, J, 2001. A re-appraisal of wood-fired combustion. Bioresource Technology 76, 183–90. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00129-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NASA, 2017. Technology readiness level definitions. www.nasa.gov/pdf/458490main_TRL_Definitions.pdf Accessed 2 February 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, M & Prince, RH, 1995. A simple rule for bioenergy conversion plant size optimisation: Bioethanol from sugar cane and sweet sorghum. Biomass and Bioenergy 10(5–6), 361–65. doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00003-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte, M, 2007. Commercial biodiesel production in South Africa: A preliminary economic feasibility study. MSc thesis. University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
   Google Scholar
• Overend, R, 1982. The average haul distance and transportation work factors for biomass delivered to a central plant. Biomass 2, 75–9. doi: 10.1016/0144-4565(82)90008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlack, R & Turhollow, A, 2003. Feedstock cost analysis of Corn Stover residues for further processing. Energy 28, 1395–403. doi: 10.1016/S0360-5442(03)00123-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phalan, B, Mertzky, M, Butchart, S, Donald, P, Scharlemann, J & Stattersfield, AB, 2013. Crop expansion and conservation priorities in tropical countries. PLoS ONE 81, e51759. doi:http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0051759.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, GP, Dale, VH, Doering, OC, Hamburg, SP, Melillo, JM, Wander, M, Parton, WJ, Adler, PR, Barney, JN, Cruse, RM, Duke, CS, Fearnside, PM, Follett, RF, Gibbs, HK, Goldemberg, J, Mladenoff, DJ, Ojima, D, Palmer, MW, Sharpley, A, Wallace, L, Weathers, KC, Wiens, JA & Wilhelm, WW, 2008. Agriculture: Sustainable biofuels Redux. Science 322(5898), 49–50. doi: 10.1126/science.1161525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeu-Dalmau, C, Gasparatos, A, von Maltitz, G, Graham, A, Almagro-Garcia, J, Wilebore, B & Willis, KJ, 2016. Impacts of land use change due to biofuel crops on climate regulation services: Five case studies in Malawi, Mozambique and Swaziland. Biomass and Bioenergy 111. doi:http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.05.011.
   Google Scholar
• Rulli, M, Bellomi, D, Cazolli, A, de Carolis, G & D’Odorico, P, 2016. The water–land–food nexus of first-generation biofuels. Scientific Reports 6. doi:10.1038/sre2521p2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford, W, Lotter, A, Brent, A & von Maltitz, G, 2017. Biofuels technology: A look forward. UNU-WIDER. Working Paper No: 2017/87. https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2017-87.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Scharleman, J & Laurence, W, 2008. How green are biofuels? Science 319(5859), 43–44. doi: 10.1126/science.1153103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert, R, Schellnhuber, H, Buchmann, N, Epiney, A, Grießhammer, R, Kulessa, M, et al. 2008. Future bioenergy and sustainable land use: Flagship report. German Advisory Council on Global Change, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Searcy, E & Flynn, P, 2009. The impact of biomass availability and processing cost on optimum size and processing technology selection. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 154, 92–107. doi: 10.1007/s12010-008-8407-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilman, D, Socolow, R, Foley, JA, Hill, J, Larson, E, Lynd, L, Pacala, S, Reilly, J, Searchinger, T, Somerville, C, Williams, R, 2009. Beneficial biofuels—The food, energy, and environment Trilemma. Science 325(5938), 270–1. doi: 10.1126/science.1177970
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transport Research Centre, 2008. Biofuels: Linking support to performance. OECD, Danvers.
   Google Scholar
• von Maltitz, G, Nickless, A & Blanchard, R, 2010. Maintaining biodiversity during biofuel development. In Amezaga, JM, von Maltitz, G & Boyes, S (Eds.), Assessing the sustainability of bioenergy projects in developing countries: A framework for policy evaluation. Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, 81–118.
   Google Scholar
• von Maltitz, G & Stafford, W, 2011. Assessing opportunities and constraints for biofuel development in sub-Saharan Africa. CIFOR. Working Paper 58. Bogor, Indonesia. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/WPapers/WP58CIFOR.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Maltitz, M & van der Merwe, M, 2017. Land and agronomic potential for biofuel production in Southern Africa. WIDER Working Paper 2017/85. Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.
   Google Scholar
• World Energy Outlook, 2012. World energy outlook. www.worldenergyoutlook.org/media/weowebsite/2012/WEO_2012_Water_Excerpt.pdf Accessed 2 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Worldwatch Institute, 2006. Biofuels for transportation: Global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy in the 21st century. Worldwatch Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, M & Brown, R, 2007. Establishing the optimal sizes of different kinds of biorefineries. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 1, 191–200. doi: 10.1002/bbb.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar