What could improve or hinder the implementation of spatial planning towards environmental justice?

References

• Barthwal, CP & Sah, BL, 2008. Role of governmental agencies in policy implementation. The Indian Journal of Political Science 69(3), 457–72.
   Google Scholar
• Benton, JE, 2013. Local government collaboration: Considerations, issues, and prospects. State & Local Government Review 45(4), 220–3.
   Google Scholar
• Byambadorj, T, Amati, M & Ruming, KJ, 2011. Twenty-first century nomadic city: Ger districts and barriers to the implementation of the Ulaanbaatar city master plan. Asian Pacific Viewpoint 52(2), 165–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y, 2013. Collaborative planning in the network: Consensus seeking in urban planning issues on the Internet-the case of China. Planning Theory 12(4), 351–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chirisa, I, 2014. Linking time use to implementation of spatial plans: What explains the dysfunctional urban landscapes in Zimbabwe? Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning 5(1), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, BP, 2013. Reform on the frontline: Reflections on the implementing spatial planning in England, 2004-2008. Planning Practice & Research 28(4), 361–83.
   Google Scholar
• Cloke, P & Little, J, 1986. The implementation of rural policies: A survey of county planning authorities. The Town Planning Review 57(3), 265–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C, 2008. Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge. Transport Policy 15, 104–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deLeon, P & deLeon, L, 2002. What ever happened to policy implementation? An alternative approach. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 12, 467–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du Plessis, DJ, 2014. A critical reflection on urban spatial planning practices and outcomes in post-apartheid South Africa. Urban Forum 25, 69–88.
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, A, 2010. Centenary paper: European spatial planning: Past, present and future. The Town Planning Review 81(1), 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Fredericks, SE, 2011. Monitoring environmental justice. Environmental Justice 4(1), 63–9.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, JL, 2009. Theory and practice in planning the suburbs: Challenges to implementing new urbanism, smart growth, and sustainability principles. Planning Theory & Practice 10(1), 11–33.
   Google Scholar
• Görgens, T & Denoon-Stevens, S, 2013. Towards facilitative and pro-poor land-use management in South African urban areas: Learning from international experience. Urban Forum 24(1), 85–103.
   Google Scholar
• Halla, F, 2002. Preparation and implementation of a general planning scheme in Tanzania: Kahama strategic urban development planning framework. Habitat International 26, 281–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann, R, Lincoln, G & Musvoto, G, 2018. The underbelly of the Berea: Challenges to orthodox planning for the creation of sustainable suburban neighbourhoods in South Africa. Town and Regional Planning 72, 13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P, 1992. Planning through debate: The communicative turn in planning theory. The Town Planning Review 63(2), 143–62.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P, 2003. Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory 2(2), 101–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, AT, Cowling, RM, Boshoff, AF, Wilson, SL & Pierce, SM, 2011. Walking in STEP: Lesson for linking spatial prioritisations to implementation strategies. Biological Conservation 144(1), 202–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konukiewitz, M, 1983. Can regional planning work: Experiences from a research project on the implementation of spatial policies in the Federal Republic of Germany. Policy and Politics 11(1), 87–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, TM & Newig, J, 2014. From planning to implementation: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. The Policy Studies Journal 42(3), 416–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leopold, A, 1949. A sand county almanac: With essays on conservation from rand river. Ballantine Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Mark, S, 2003. Monitoring and evaluation in municipal planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 69(4), 430–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matland, RE, 1995. Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(2), 145–74.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila, H, 2016. Can collaborative planning o beyond locally focused notions of the “public interest”? The potential of Habermas’ concept of “generalizable interest” in plurality and trans-scalar planning discourses. Planning Theory 15(4), 344–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menzel, DC, 1987. An interorganizational approach to policy implementation. Public Administration Quarterly 11(1), 3–16.
   Google Scholar
• Mischen, PA & Sinclair, TAP, 2007. Making implementation more democratic through action implementation research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(1), 145–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Planning Commission. 2011. National development plan: Vision for 2030. Government Printer, Pretoria.
   Google Scholar
• Ntiwane, BC, 2012. A critical analysis of the incorporation of environmental issues into land use and planning instruments of selected municipalities of the Ehlanzeni District Municipality. M. thesis, University of North West, Potchefstroom.
   Google Scholar
• Ntiwane, B & Coetzee, J, 2018. Environmental justice in the context of planning. Town and Regional Planning 72, 84–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Jr, LJ & Montjoy, RS, 1984. Interorganizational policy implementation: A theoretical perspective. Public Administration Review 44(6), 491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Toole, Jr., LJ, 1993. Interorganizational policy studies: Lessons drawn from implementation research. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3(2), 232–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H & Treib, O, 2007. Implementing public policy. In F Fischer, GJ Miller & MS Sidney (Eds.), Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics and methods. Tailor & Franci Group, New York, pp. 89–107.
   Google Scholar
• Ratulangi, M, Akib, H & Jasruddin, L, 2015. Implementation of spatial planning policy in Tomohon of Indonesia. International Journal of Academic Research 7(1), 207–11.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, HWJ & Webber, MM, 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Science 4, 155–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy, P, 2015. Collaborative planning-a neoliberal strategy? A study of Atlanta Beltline. Cities 43, 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schermerhorn, Jr., JR, 1975. Determinants of interorganizational cooperation. The Academy of Management Journal 18(4), 846–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoeman, C, 2015. The alignment between spatial planning, transportation planning and environmental management within the new spatial systems in South Africa. Town and Regional Planning 67, 42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soja, EW, 2009. The city and spatial justice. Paper prepared for presentation at the conference Spatial Justice, Nanterre, Paris, March 12–14, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• South Africa. 2019. Towards a 25 year review: 1994–2019. https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/attachments/80582_towards25yearreview_.pdf Accessed 9 November 2019.
   Google Scholar