Household recycling and Millennials: A case study of the city of Johannesburg, South Africa

References

• Al-Khatib, IA, Monou, M, Abu Zahara, ASF, Shaleen, HQ & Kassinos, D, 2010. Solid waste characterization, quantification and management practices in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management 91(5), 1131–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, MW & Spialek, L, 2018. Young millennials, environmental orientation, food company sustainability, and green word-of-mouth recommendations. Journal of Food Products Marketing 24(7), 803–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banga, M, 2011. Household knowledge, attitudes and practices in solid waste segregation and recycling: The case of urban Kampala. Zambia Social Science Journal 2(1), 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Bedard, SAN & Tolmie, CR, 2018. Millennials’ green consumption behaviour: Exploring the role of social media. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25, 1388–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blettler, MC, Abrial, E, Khan, FR, Sivri, N & Espinola, LA, 2018. Freshwater plastic pollution: recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps. Water Research 143, 416–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolaane, B, 2006. Constraints to promoting people centred approaches in recycling. Habitat International 30(4), 731–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosman, C, Alberts, R & Roos, C. 2018. Integrated waste management. In King, ND, Strydom, HA & Retief, FP. (Eds.), Environmental management in South Africa. 3rd ed., 1055–1097. Juta, Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Cervantes, DET, Martínez, AL, Hernández, MC & García de Cortázar, AL, 2018. Using indicators as a tool to evaluate municipal solid waste management: A critical review. Waste Management 80, 51-63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae, Y & An, Y, 2018. Current research trends on plastic pollution and ecological impacts on the soil ecosystem: A review. Environmental Pollution 240, 387–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CoJ (City of Johannesburg), 2012. Sustainable human settlement urbanization plan. Available from: https://www.joburg.org.za/work_/SpatialFrameworks.pdf Accessed 24 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• CoJ (City of Johannesburg), 2019. City of Johannesburg Annual Report 2017/18. Available from: https://www.joburg.org.za/documents_/Documents/Annual%20Reports/20172018/CoJ%20Annual%20Report%202017-18%20_4%20March%202019.pdf Accessed 24 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• CoJ (City of Johannesburg), 2020. City of Johannesburg Integrated Annual Report 2018/19. Available from: https://www.joburg.org.za/documents_/Documents/Annual%20Reports/20182019%20Annual%20Report/2018-19%20City%20of%20Johannesburg%20Annual%20Report%20.pdf Accessed 27 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M, Kądziela, T & Hanley, N, 2014. We want to sort! Assessing households’ preference for sorting waste. Resource and Energy Economics 36(1), 290–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DEA (Department of Environmental Affairs), 2011. National Waste Management Strategy. Available from: https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/nationalwaste_management_strategy.pdf. Accessed 4 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Do Paço, A, Alves, H, Shiel, C & Filho, WL, 2013. A multi-country level analysis of the environmental attitudes and behaviours among young consumers. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 56(10), 1532–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filho, WL, Brandli, L, Moora, H, Kruopienè, J & Stenmarck, A, 2016. Benchmarking approaches and methods in the field of urban waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 112(5), 4377–86.
   Google Scholar
• Ganak, J, Chen, Y, Liang, D & Ch, T, 2018. Key factors influencing consumer intent to recycling denim apparel: A study of U.S. millennials. International Textile and Apparel Association (ITAA) Annual Conference Proceedings, Cleveland, Ohio, 5–9 November 2018. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3235&context=itaa_proceedings.pdf Accessed 28 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gillham, PF, 2008. Participation in the environmental movement: Analysis of the European Union. International Sociology 23(1), 67–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, SG, Raimi, KT, Wilson, R & Árvai, J, 2019. Will millennials save the world? The effect of age and generational differences on environmental concern. Journal of Environmental Management 242, 394–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, L, 2013. Millennials are greener! Really? Shelton Group – Eco Study, Knoxville. Available from: http://sheltongrp.com/millennials-are-greener-really/ Accessed 27 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter, LM, Hatch, A & Johnson, A, 2004. Cross-national gender variation in environmental behaviours. Social Science Quarterly 85(2), 677–94.
   Google Scholar
• Ittiravivongs, A, 2012. Household waste recycling behaviour in Thailand: The role of responsibility. International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, 28, 21-26. LACSIT Press, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, RR, Martinez, SA, Palmer, K & Poodolsky, MJ, 2003. The determinants of household recycling: A material specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(2), 294–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JGEEC (Jeffares and Green Engineering and Environmental Consulting), 2013. The Waste Minimization Strategy for Pikitup. Available from: [email protected].
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, HF, 1970. A second generation little jiffy. Psychomentrika 35, 401–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knickmeyer, D, 2020. Social factors influencing household waste separation: A literature review on good practices to improve the recycling performance of urban areas. Journal of Cleaner Production 245, 118605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komane, KA, 2014. Waste reclaimers and South African environmental law. Doctoral Thesis. Northwest University, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, A, 2019. Exploring young adults’ e-waste recycling behaviour using an extended theory of planned behaviour model: A cross-cultural study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 141, 378–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latif, SA, Omar, MS, Bidin, YH & Awang, Z, 2013. Analyzing the effect of situational factor on recycling behaviour in determining the quality of life. Journal of Asian Behavioural Studies 3(8), 37-46.
   Google Scholar
• Loueiro, SMC & Kaufmann, HR, 2016. Committing millennials toward recycling and environmental preservation. Journal of Promotion Management 22(2), 224–37.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, RE & Farahbakhsh, K, 2013. Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Management 33(4), 988–1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavropoulus, A, 2009. Recycling behaviour: The present focus brain and a framework to understand personal differences in recycling. Proceedings of ISWA World Conference, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie-Mohr, D & Schultz, P, 2014. Choosing effective behavior change tools. Social Marketing Quarterly 20, 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Meneses, GD & Palacio, AB, 2005. Recycling behaviour: A multidimensional approach. Environment and Behavior 37(6), 837–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miafodzyeva, S, Brandt, N & Andersson, M, 2013. Recycling behaviour of householders living in multicultural urban area: A case study of Järva, Stockholm, Sweden. Waste Management and Research 31(5), 447–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miliute-Plepiene, J, Hage, O, Plepys, A & Reipas, A, 2016. What motivates households recycling behaviour in recycling schemes of different maturity? Lessons from Lithuania and Sweden. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 113, 40–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielson, 2018. Was 2018 the year of the influential sustainable consumer? Available from: https://www.nielsen.com/us/en/insights/article/2018/was-2018-the-year-of-the-influential-sustainable-consumer.pdf Accessed 28 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, K, 2018. Fusion’s Project Earth is creating eco-docs tailored for millennials. Sierra. Available from: https://www.sierraclub.org/sierra/2018-2-march-april/mixed-media/fusions-project-earth-creating-eco-docs-tailored-for.pdf Accessed 30 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Owusu, V, Adjei-Addo, E & Sundber, C, 2013. Do economic incentives affect attitudes to solid waste source separation? Evidence from Ghana. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 78, 115–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyekale, AS, 2015. Factors explaining households’ cash payment for solid waste disposal and recycling behaviors in South Africa. Sustainability 7(12), 15882–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oztekin, C, Teksöz, G, Pamuk, S, Sahin, E & Kilic, DS, 2017. Gender perspective on the factors predicting recycling behavior: Implications from the theory of planned behavior. Waste Management 62, 290–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikitup, 2016. Pikitup Johannesburg SOC Limited 2016/2017 midyear performance report. Available from: http://www.pikitup.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/2016-2017-Mid-year-Performance-Report-December-2016.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Pikitup, 2019. Pikitup Johannesburg SOC Limited 2017/2018 integrated report. Available from: http://www.pikitup.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Annual-Report.pdf. Accessed 1 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• RSA (Republic of South Africa), 2008. National Environmental Management: Waste Act (Act No. 59 of 2008). Government Gazette. (Vol. 525, No. 32000).
   Google Scholar
• Poole, CJM & Basu, S, 2017. Systematic review: Occupational illness in the waste and recycling sector. Occupational Medicine 67(8), 626–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousta, K, Ordoñez, I, Bolton, K & Dahlén, L, 2017. Support for designing waste sorting systems: A mini review. Waste Management & Research 35, 1099–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schenck, CJ, Blaauw, PF, Viljoen, JMM & Swart, EC, 2019. Exploring the potential health risks faced by waste pickers on landfills in South Africa: A socio-ecological perspective. Sustainability 16, 2059.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman, T & Schmidt, J, 2016. An explorative study on household recycling behaviour in the City of Johannesburg. Proceedings of the Centenary Conference of the Society of South African Geographers, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 25–28 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman, T, 2018. Trolley pushers in the City of Johannesburg. Proceedings of the Centenary Conference of the Society of South African Geographers, Stellenbosch, South Africa, 25–28 September 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Sidique, SF, Joshi, SV & Lupi, F, 2010. Factors influencing the rate of recycling: An analysis of Minnesota counties. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54(4), 242–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• StatsSA (Statistics South Africa), 2018. Only 10% of waste recycled in South Africa. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=11527 Accessed 10 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• StatsSA (Statistics South Africa), 2019. Mid-year population estimates 2019. Available from: http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/P0302/P03022019.pdf Accessed 10 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Strydom, WF, 2018. Barriers to household waste recycling: Empirical evidence from South Africa. Recycling 3(41), 2–23.
   Google Scholar
• Suttibak, S & Nitivattananon, V, 2008. Assessment of factors influencing the performance of solid waste recycling programs. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 53, 45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vicente, P & Reis, E, 2008. Factors influencing households’ participation in recycling. Waste Management and Research 26, 140–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willman, KW, 2015. Information sharing and curbside recycling: A pilot study to evaluate the value of door-to-door distribution of informational literature. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 104, 162–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, DC, Velis, CA & Rodic, L, 2013. Integrated sustainable waste management in developing countries. Waste and Resource Management 166(2), 52–68.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, L, Ling, M, Lu, Y & Shen, M, 2017. Understanding household waste separation behaviour: Testing the roles of moral, past experience, and perceived policy effectiveness within the theory of planned behaviour. Sustainability 9(4), 625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zen, IS, Noor, ZZ & Yusuf, RO, 2014. The profiles of household solid waste recyclers and non-recyclers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Habitat International 42, 83–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar