Time and temporality in organisations: The case of Eskom

References

• Andrews, M, Pritchett, L & Woolcock, M, 2017. Building state capability: evidence, analysis, action. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, M, 2006. A handbook of Human Resource Management. 10th edn. Kogan Page, London & Philadelphia.
   Google Scholar
• Bénit-Gbaffou, C, 2018. Beyond the policy-implementation Gap: How the city of Johannesburg manufactured the ungovernability of Street trading. The Journal of Development Studies 54(12), 2149–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bierschenk, T & Olivier de Sardan, J-P, (Eds.). 2007. States at work: dynamics of African bureaucracies. Brill, Leiden.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, P, 2000. Elite transition: from apartheid to neoliberalism in South Africa. Pluto Press, London and Sterling, Virginia & University of Natal Press, Pietermaritzburg.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, P, 2004. The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I & Lipietz, B, 2012. Transforming South Africa’s Racial Bureaucracy: New Public Management and public sector reform in contemporary South Africa. Wits Institute for Social and Economic Research, Johannesburg. https://wiser.wits.ac.za/content/transforming-south-africa’s-racial-bureaucracy-new-public-management-and-public-sector Accessed 12 April 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I, 2011. Transcending bureaucracy: state transformation in the age of the manager. Transformation: Critical Perspectives on Southern Africa 77, 31–51.
   Google Scholar
• Chipkin, I & Swilling, M, 2018. Shadow state: The politics of state capture. Wits University Press, Johannesburg.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, K, Jolly, S, Van Der Staaij, S & Van Stolk, C, 2018. Understanding the drivers of organisational capacity. The Rand and Saatchi Institute, Santa Monica, California & Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, M, 2007. Planet of slums. Verso, London.
   Google Scholar
• De Montmollin, M & Tombelaine, V, 1975. Taylorism and anti-Taylorism. International Studies of Management & Organization 5(3), 4–15.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, P, 2001. The essential Drucker. Management challenges in the 21st century. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, P & Rauch, JE, 1999. Bureaucracy and growth: A cross-national analysis of the effects of “Weberian” state structures on economic growth. American Sociological Review 64(5), 748–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskom, 2021. Loadshedding root cause analysis, Report 240, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A, 2012. Red tape: bureaucracy, structural violence, and poverty in India. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Graduate School of Development Policy and Practice, 2013. Why the lights went out. Reform in the South African Energy Sector, a report produced by the Public Affairs Research Institute (PARI) for the University of Cape Town.
   Google Scholar
• Holston, J, 2009. Insurgent citizenship: disjuncture between democracy and modernity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, B, Cameron, R, Hoadley, U & Naidoo, V, 2016. The politics and governance of basic education. A tale of two South African provinces. ESID Working Paper No. 67. Manchester, UK: The University of Manchester. www.effective-states.org Accessed 12 May 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Lipietz, B, 2004. ‘Muddling-through’: Urban regeneration in Johannesburg’s inner city. Paper presented to the N-AERUS annual conference. Barcelona. Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Littler, CR, 1978. Understanding taylorism. The British Journal of Sociology 29(2), 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Marais, H, 2001. South Africa: Limits to change. The political economy of transition. Zed Books, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, BG, 1988. Introduction. In C Campbell & B Guy Peters (Eds.), Organizing governance, governing organisations, 3–18. Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, BG, 1997. Shouldn’t row, can’t steer: what’s a government to do? Public Policy and Administration 12(2), 51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, ME, 1980. Competitive strategy. techniques for analysing industries and competitors. The Free Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Pressman, JL & Wildavsky, A, 1984. Implementation. How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland; Or, why it's amazing that federal programs work at all, this being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as told by two sympathetic observers who seek to build morals on a foundation. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D, 2004. Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. KSG Faculty Research Working Papers Series.
   Google Scholar
• Schwella, E, 2013. Bad public leadership in South Africa: the Jackie Selebi case. Scientia Militaria. South African Journal of Military Studies 41(1), 65–90.
   Google Scholar
• Skocpol, T, 1985. Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In P Evans, D Rueschemeyer & T Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in, 3–38. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Tsutsui, MW, 1998. Manufacturing ideology: Scientific management in twentieth century Japan. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
   Google Scholar
• Von Holdt, K, 2013. South Africa: The transition to violent democracy. Review of African Political Economy 40, 589–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yiftachel, O, 2009. Critical theory and ‘grey space’. Mobilization of the Colonized. City 13, 240–56.
   Google Scholar