467
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Assessing the relationship between digital divide and citizens’ political participation in Africa

ORCID Icon, , , , , & show all

References

  • Adegbola, O & Gearhart, S, 2019. Examining the relationship between media Use and political engagement: A comparative study among the United States, Kenya, and Nigeria. International Journal of Communication 13, 1231–51.
  • Alonso, GR & Lippez–De Castro, S, 2016. Technology helps, people make: A Smart City Governance Framework Grounded In Deliberative Democracy, in R Gil–Garcia, TA Pardo & T Nam (Eds.) Smarter as the New Urban Agenda: A Comprehensive View of the 21st Century City. Springer, Stockholm.
  • Andrianaivo, M & Kpodar, K, 2012. Mobile phones, financial inclusion, and growth. Review of Economics and Institutions 3(2), 1–30. doi:10.5202/rei.v3i2.75
  • Beam, M, Hutchens, M & Hmielowski, J, 2016. Clicking vs. sharing: The relationship between online news behaviors and political knowledge. Computers in Human Behavior 59, 215–20. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.013
  • Bode, L, 2012. Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking and political behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 9(4), 352–69.
  • Bomah, KB, 2014. Digital divide: effects on education development in Africa. Conference: LYIT Dept. of Computing: Technical Writing Presentation At: Letterkenny Institute of Technology, Ireland, Dec 16, pp. 1–21.
  • Bonfadelli, H, 2002. The internet and knowledge gaps: A theoretical and empirical investigation. European Journal of Communication 17(1), 65–84.
  • Bruce, D & MacInnis, M, n.d. Wealth, age, and education play key role in internet use. The New Rural Economy Project. https://www.concordia.ca/content/dam/artsci/sociology-anthropology/nre/docs/insites-flyers/InSites_09_-_David_Bruce_3_-_VERSION_3.pdf.
  • Budge, I, 1996. The New challenge of direct democracy. Polity Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Buer, TF, 2012. Achieving the millennium development goal 3: the role of the church in empowerment of women: a case study of the Anglican Diocese of Kumasi. Unpublished masters thesis, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology.
  • Carrizales, T, 2009. The internet citizenry: access and participation. Public Administration Review 69(2), 350–3.
  • Chen, C, Liu, C, Hui, BPH & Chung, M, 2020. Does education background affect digital equal opportunity and the political participation of sustainable digital citizens? A Taiwan case. Sustainability 12, 1359–1376.
  • Choi, M, 2016. A concept analysis of digital citizenship for democratic citizenship education in the internet Age. Theory & Research in Social Education 44(4), 565–607.
  • Cullen, R, 2001. Addressing the digital divide. Online Information Review 25(5), 311–20. doi:10.1108/14684520110410517
  • Dencik, L & Cable, J, 2017. The advent of surveillance realism: public opinion and activist responses to the snowden leaks. International Journal of Communication 11, 763–81.
  • Economist, 2007. Mobile banking: a bank in every pocket. Retrieved from Economist: www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id = 10133998.
  • Fanta, AB, Mutsonziwa, K, Goosen, R, Emanuel, M & Kettles, N, 2016. The role of mobile money in financial inclusion in the SADC region. FinMark trust policy research paper No. 03/2016.
  • Feeney, P, 1998. Accountable Aid: local participation in major projects. Oxfam, Oxford.
  • Festenstein, M, 1997. The ties of communication: Dewey on ideal and political democracy. History of Political Thought 18(1), 104–124.
  • Gainous, J, Marlowe, AD & Wagner, KM, 2013. Traditional cleavages or a New world: does online social networking bridge the political participation divide? International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 26, 145–58. doi:10.1007/s10767-013-9130-2
  • Gil de Zúñiga, H, Molyneaux, L & Zheng, P, 2014. Social media, political expression, and political participation: panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication 64, 612–34. doi:10.1111/jcom.12103
  • Goldberg, AC, 2014. The impact of religion on voting behaviour – A multilevel approach for Switzerland. Swiss Political Science Review 20(2), 305–29. doi:10.1111/spsr.12068
  • GSMA, 2018. The mobile economy: Sub-saharan Africa. GSM Association, London. https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/sub-saharan-africa/ Accessed 9 October 2018
  • GSMA, 2020. The mobile economy 2020. GSM Association, London. https://www.gsma.com/mobileeconomy/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/GSMA_MobileEconomy2020_Global.pdf Accessed 13 February 2021
  • GSMA Intelligence, 2015. The mobile economy: Sub-saharan Africa 2015. GSM Association, London.
  • Hargittai, E, 2002. The second-level divide: differences in people’s online skills. First Monday 7(4), 1–14. http://firstmonday.org/article/view/942/864. Accessed 17 May 2016.
  • Hargittai, E & Shaw, A, 2013. Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcast & Electronic Media 57, 115–34. doi:10.1080/08838151.2013.787079
  • Hoffmann, CP & Lutz, C, 2019. Digital divides in political participation: The mediating role of social media self-efficacy and privacy concerns. Policy & Internet 13(1), 6–29. doi:10.1002/poi3.225
  • Hong, YA, Zhou, Z, Fang, Y & Shi, L, 2017. The digital divide and health disparities in China: evidence from a national survey and policy implications. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(9), 1–13. doi:10.2196/jmir.7786
  • Hübler, M & Hartje, R, 2016. Are smart phones smart for economic development? Economics Letters 141, 130–3.
  • ITU, 2010. ICT facts and figures: The world in 2010. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
  • ITU, 2020. Measuring digital development: facts and figures 2020. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva.
  • Jørring, L, António, V & Pablo, P-C, 2019. Mapping a changing field. A literature review on digital citizenship. Digital Culture and Society 4(2), 11–37.
  • Kalebe-Nyamongo, C & Marquette, H, 2014. Elites and coalitions elite attitudes towards cash transfers and the poor in Malawi, Development leadership programme research paper 30, Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
  • Kanyam, DA, Kostandini, G & Ferreira, S, 2017. The mobile phone revolution: have mobile phones and the internet reduced corruption in Sub-saharan Africa? World Development 99, 271–84. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.05.022
  • Keegan Eamon, M, 2004. Digital divide in computer access and use between poor and non-poor youth. J. Soc. & Soc. Welfare 31, 1–23.
  • Kenny, R, Park, C, Van Neste- Kenny, J, Burton, P, Park, C & Qayyum, A, 2012. Using self- efficacy to assess the readiness of nursing educators and students for mobile learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 13(3), 277–96.
  • Kim, H & Joshanloo, M, 2020. Internet access and voicing opinions: The moderating roles of Age and the national economy. Social Indicators Research 150, 121–41.
  • Kumar, R, 2014. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners . 4th edn. SAGE, London.
  • Lee, J, 2010. 10 year retrospect on stage models of e-government: A qualitative meta synthesis. Government Information Quarterly 27, 220–30.
  • Majeed, MT, 2020. Do digital governments foster economic growth in the developing world? An empirical analysis. NETNOMICS: Economic Research and Electronic Networking 21, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11066-020-09138-4
  • Manzuoli, CH, Sánchez, AV & Bedoya, ED, 2019. Digital citizenship: A theoretical review of the concept and trends. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 18(2), 10–8.
  • Min, S-J, 2010. From the digital divide to the democratic divide: internet skills, political interest, and the second-level digital divide in political internet use. Journal of Information, Technology, and Politics 7, 22–35. doi:10.1080/19331680903109402
  • Mossberger, K, 2008. Toward digital citizenship. addressing inequality in the information age. In A Chadwick & PN Howard (Eds.), Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 173–85). Routledge, Hoboken.
  • Mossberger, K & Mcneal, RS, 2007. Digital citizenship: The internet, society, and participation. MIT Press.
  • Norris, P, 2001. The digital divide: civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • OECD, 2001. Understanding the digital divide. OECD, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/sti/1888451.pdf
  • Perloff, RM, 2013. The dynamics of political communication: media and politics in a digital age. Routledge, London.
  • Pors, AS, 2015. Becoming digital ‒ passages to service in the digitized bureaucracy. Journal of Organizational Ethnography 4(2), 177–92.
  • Rashid, AT, 2016. Digital inclusion and social inequality: gender differences in ICT access and Use in five developing countries. Gender, Technology and Development 20(3), 306–32. doi:10.1177/0971852416660651
  • Resnick, D & Casale, D, 2011. The political participation of Africa’s youth: Turnout, partisanship, and protest. UNU-WIDER working paper No. 2011/56.
  • Ruiz-Rodríguez, F, Lucendo-Monedero, AL & González-Relaño, R, 2018. Measurement and characterisation of the digital divide of spanish regions at enterprise level. A comparative analysis with the European context. Telecommunications Policy 42(3), 187–211. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2017.11.007
  • Schlozman, K, Verba, S & Brady, H, 2010. Weapon of the strong? participatory inequality and the internet. Perspectives on Politics 8(2), 487–509.
  • Shulman, SW, Shelley, MC & Thrane, L, 2004. Digital citizenship: parameters of the digital divide. Social Science Computer Review 22(2), 256–69.
  • Smith, RM, 1997. Civic ideals: conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S history. Yale University, New Haven.
  • Statacorp, 2020. Stata. https://www.stata.com/.
  • UNDP, 2012. Enhancing youth political participation throughout the electoral cycle. UNDP, New York.
  • UNDP & UNDESA, n.d. Youth, political participation and decision making. UNDP & UNDESA, New York. https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/documents/youth/fact-sheets/youth-political-participation.pdf
  • van Deursen, AJAM & van Dijk, JAGM, 2019. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media and Society 21(2)v 354–75.
  • van Dijk, JAGM, 2005. The deepening divide. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Vecchione, M & Caprara, GV, 2009. Personality determinants of political participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences 46(4), 487–92. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.11.021
  • Verba, S, 1967. The annals of the American academy of political and social science. Social Goals and Indicators for American Society 373(1), 53–78.
  • Verba, S, Nie, N & Kim, J-O, 1978. Participation and political equality: A seven-national comparison. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • Wilson, EJ, 2004. The information revolution and developing countries. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • Winkler, JD, Judd, CM & Kelman, HC, 1981. Determinants of political participation in a Canadian and a United States city. Political Psychology 3(3/4), 140–61. doi:10.2307/3791144
  • Wolfsfeld, G, Segev, E & Sheafer, T, 2013. Social media and the arab spring: politics comes first. The International Journal of Press/Politics 18(2), 115–37.
  • Yamamoto, M, Kushin, M & Dalisay, F, 2017. Social media and political disengagement among young adults: A moderated mediation model of cynicism, efficacy, and social media Use on apathy. Mass Communication & Society 20, 149–68. doi:10.1080/15205436.2016.1224352
  • Zaheer, L, 2016. Use of social media and political participation among university students. Pakistan Vision 17(1), 278–299.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.