Transactions as a Traceable Unit for Process Trace and Reuse in Case Tools

REFERENCES

• M Dowson, Software Process Themes and Issues, IEEE int conf, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh B & Edwards M, Issues in the Development of a Requirements Traceability Model, IEEE Symp Requirement Engineering, San DEigo, Ca, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Humphrey WS, Managing the Software Process, Addison-Wesley, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Paulk Marek C, et al. The Capability Maturity Model: Guidelines for Improving the Software Process, Published by Pearson Education Asia, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian R & Vasant D, Supporting Systems Development by Capturing Deliberations During Software Engineering, IEEE, TSE 18, 6, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• B Curtis, M Kellner & J Over, A Field Study of the Software Design Process for Large Systems, Com ACM, vol 31, no 11, 1988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady Booch, James Rambaugh & Ivar Jacobson, The Unified Modelling Language User Guide, Published by Addison Wesley, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Factors Influencing Requirements Traceability Practice, Communication of ACM, vol 41, no 12, December 1998, pp 37–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C Rolland & N Prakash, Guiding the Requirements Engineering Process, IEEE Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• M Jarke, K Pohl, C Rolland & J R Schmitt, Experience—Based Method Evaluation and Improvement: A Process Modeling Approach, Int IFIP WG8. I Conference in CRIS series: Method and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, North Holland (Pub), 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Grosz G, MENTOR: A Step Forward in Guidance for Information System Development in Proceedings of fifth workshop on Next Generation of CASE tools, May 1994, Netherlands, pp 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Ralf Domges & Klaus Paul, Adapting Traceability Environments to Project Specific Needs, Communication of ACM, vol 41, no 12, December 1998, pp 54–62.
   Google Scholar
• Pihheiro F & Goguren J, An Object Oriented Tool for Tracing Requirements, IEEE software, March 1996, pp 52–64.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl K, Domges R & Jarke M, Towards Method Driven Trace Capture, In proceedings of the 9th international conference on Advanced Information Systems Engg (Barcelona, June 1997), pp 103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N, A Process View of Methodologies, Proc 6th Int Conf on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAISE), Sprg. Vg, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N, Domain Based Abstraction for Method Modeling, Engineering of Information Systems, vol 4, no 6, 1996, pp 745–767.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N, Towards Formal definition of methods, Requirements Engineering (1997), vol 2, pp 23–50.
   Google Scholar
• F Harmeen, S Brinkkemper & Oei H, Situational Method Engineering for Information System Projects, Proc of the IFIP WG8.1 Working Conference CRIS'94 (eds T.W. Olle and A A Verrijn-Stuart), North Holland Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 169–194, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N & Sabharwal S, Building CASE Tools for Methods Represented as Abstract Data Types, Proceedings of the third International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems, London 1996, Springer, pp 357–369.
   Google Scholar
• P S Chen, The Entity-Relationship Model: Towards an Unified View of Data, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, vol 1, no 1, March 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Sabharwal S, A Technique For Building CASE Tools for Integrated Method, in National Conference on Object Oriented technology NCOOT97, India, D Janakiram (eds.) pp 115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Harmsen F, et al, Situational Method Engineering for Informational System Project Approaches, in Method and Associated Tools for the Information Systems Life Cycle, Stuart and Olle (eds.), North Holland, pp 169–194,1995.
   Google Scholar
• Gray J N, Notes on Database Operating Systems, in Operating Systems: An Advanced Course (eds R Bayer, R M Graham & G Seegmuller), Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• G Junkermann, B Peuschel, W Schafer & S Wolf, MERLIN: Supporting Cooperation in Software Development through a Knowledge-Based Environment, in Software Process Modelling and Technology, (A Finkelstein, J Kramer, B Nuseibeh (eds)), John Wiley (pub), 1994, pp 103–129.
   Google Scholar
• Moss JEB, Nested Transactions: An Approach to Reliable Distributed Computing, PhD Thesis, Laboratory for Computer Science, MIT, April 1981 (available as Technical Report No. MIT/LCS/TR-260.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N & Gupta D, An Architecture for a CAME Tool, Proceedings of the 8th European—Japanese Conference on Information Modeling and Knowledge Bases, May 26–29, 1998, Finlad, pp 147–166.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N & Sibal R, Modelling Method Heuristics for Better Quality Products, Published in Proceedings of Conference on Advance Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE*99, Heidelberg (Germany), June 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Rolland C, Souveyet C & Moreno M, An Approach for Defining Ways of Working, Information Systems, 20, 4, pp 337–359, 1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramesh B, Stubbs C, Powers T & Edwards M, Implementing Requirements Traceability: A CASE study, Annals of software Engg 3, 1997, pp 397–415.
   Google Scholar
• Ramesh B & Jarke M, Towards Reference Models for Requirements Traceability, Technical Report Georgia State University, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Smolander K, Lyytinen K, Tahavanainen V P & Marttiin P, MetaEdit—A Flexible Graphical Environment For Methodology Modelling, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, Berlin, Germany: Springer—Verlag, 1991, pp 168–193.
   Google Scholar
• Smolander K, OPRR: A Model for Modelling Systems Development Methods, in Next Generation of CASE Tools, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Motoshi Saeki, Kazuhisa Iguchi, Kuo Wen Yin & Masanori Shinora, A Metamodel for Representing Software Specification and Design Methods, Information Systems Development Process, N Prakash, C Rolland & B Pernici (Editors), North Holland, pp 149–166, 1993:
   Google Scholar
• Bergsten P, Bubenko J, Dahl R, Gustafsson M & Johansson, L A, RAMATIC—A CASE Shell for Implementation of Specific CASE Tools”, TEMPORA T6.1 report SISU, Stockholm, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• S Brinkkemper, Formalisation of Information Systems Modeling, PhD thesis, University of Nijmegen, Thesis Publishers, Amsterdam, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• J A Bubenko Jr & B Wangler, Objectives Driven Capture of Business Rules and Information Systems Requirements, IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• M Dowson, Iteration in the Software Process, Proc 9th Int Conf on Software Engineering, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• M Dowson & C Fernstrom, Towards Requirements for Enactment Mechanisms, Proceedings of the European workshop on Software Process Technology, 1994, pp 90–106.
   Google Scholar
• P H Feiler & W S Humphrey, Software Process Development and Enactment: Concepts and Definitions, Proc 2nd hit Conf on “Software Process”, 1993, pp 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta D & Prakash N, Engineering Method From Their Requirement, Requirements Engineering Journal, 6, 3, 2001, pp 133–160.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash N & Sibal R, Computer Assisted Quality Engineering: A CASE for Building Quality Product, Proceedings of the first international workshop on the many facets of Process Engineering, 22–23 Sep 1997, Tunisia, pp 25–35.
   Google Scholar
• Huang R, Making Active CASE Tools—Towards the Next Generation CASE tools, Software Engineering Notes, vol 23. no 1, January 1998, pp 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly S, Lyytinen K, MetaEdit+: A Fully Configurable Multi user and Multi Tool CASE and CAME Environment, Advanced Information Systems Engineering, (Constantopoulos, Mylopoulos J & Vassiliou Y (eds)) 1–21, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Noureddine Belkhutir, Jacky E & Walcelio M, ADELETEMPO: An Environment to support Process Modelling and Enaction, in Software Process Modelling and Technology, (A Finkelstein, J Kramer, B Nuseibeh (eds)), John Wiley (pub), 1994, pp 187–222.
   Google Scholar