An Efficient FNN Model with Chaotic Oppositional Based SCA to Solve Classification Problem

References

• D. Svozil, V. Kvasnicka and J. Pospichal, “Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks,” Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst., Vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 43–62, 1997.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ivakhnenko, G. Ivakhnenko and J. Muller, “Self-organization of neural networks with active neurons,” Pattern Recogn. Image Anal., Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 185–196, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• N. Nariman-Zadeh, A. Darvizeh, M. Darvizeh and H. Gharababaei, “Modelling of explosive cutting process of plates using gmdh-type neural network and singular value decomposition,” J. Mater. Process. Technol., Vol. 128, no. 1–3, pp. 80–7, 2002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sahlol, A. M. Hemdan and A. E. Hassanien, “Prediction of antioxidant status in fish farmed on selenium nanoparticles using neural network regression algorithm,” in Inter. Conf. on Advanced Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Springer, 2016, pp. 353–64.
   Google Scholar
• P. Sathya and R. Kayalvizhi, “Optimum multilevel image thresholding based on tsallis entropy method with bacterial foraging algorithm,” Int. J. Computer Sci. Issues (IJCSI), Vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 336–41, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• M.-H. Horng, “Multilevel minimum cross entropy threshold selection based on the honey bee mating optimization,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 4580–92, 2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Chen, B. Tang, T. Song and L. Li, “Multi-fault diagnosis study on roller bearing based on multi-kernel support vector machine with chaotic particle swarm optimization,” Measurement, Vol. 47, pp. 576–90, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. A. R. Hosseinabadi, J. Vahidi, B. Saemi, A. K. Sangaiah and M. Elhoseny, “Extended genetic algorithm for solving open-shop scheduling problem,” Soft. Comput., Vol. 23, no. 13, pp. 5099–116, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L. Wang, Y. Zeng and T. Chen, “Back propagation neural network with adaptive differential evolution algorithm for time series forecasting,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 855–63, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N. Leema, H. K. Nehemiah and A. Kannan, “Neural network classifier optimization using differential evolution with global information and back propagation algorithm for clinical datasets,” Appl. Soft. Comput., Vol. 49, pp. 834–44, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “How important is a transfer function in discrete heuristic algorithms,” Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 625–40, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. Montana and L. Davis, “Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms,” IJCAI, Vol. 89, pp. 762–7, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• J.-T. Tsai, J.-H. Chou and T.-K. Liu, “Tuning the structure and parameters of a neural network by using hybrid taguchi-genetic algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, Vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• F. Ahmadizar, K. Soltanian, F. AkhlaghianTab and I. Tsoulos, “Artificial neural network development by means of a novel combination of grammatical evolution and genetic algorithm,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., Vol. 39, pp. 1–13, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Faris, I. Aljarah and J. Alqatawna, “Optimizing feedforward neural networks using krill herd algorithm for e-mail spam detection,” in 2015 IEEE Jordan Conference on Applied Electrical Engineering and Computing Technologies (AEECT), IEEE, 2015, pp. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• J. Kennedy and R. Eberhart, “Particle swarm optimization,” in Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks, vol. 4, IEEE, 1995, pp. 1942–48.
   Google Scholar
• C. Wang, Z. Shi and F. Wu, “An improved particle swarm optimization-based feed-forward neural network combined with rfid sensors to indoor localization,” Information, Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• K. Taheri, M. Hasanipanah, S. B. Golzar and M. Z. A. Majid, “A hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm-artificial neural network for forecasting the blast-produced ground vibration,” Eng. Comput., Vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 689–700, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. N. Ghaleini, M. Koopialipoor, M. Momenzadeh, M. E. Sarafraz, E. T. Mohamad and B. Gordan, “A combination of artificial bee colony and neural network for approximating the safety factor of retaining walls,” Eng. Comput., Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 647–58, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Socha and C. Blum, “An ant colony optimization algorithm for continuous optimization: application to feed-forward neural network training,” Neural Comput. Appl., Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 235–47, 2007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-P. Liu, M.-G. Wu and J.-X. Qian, “Evolving neural networks using the hybrid of ant colony optimization and bp algorithms,” in International Symposium on Neural Networks, Springer, 2006, pp. 714–22.
   Google Scholar
• L. Zhang and H. Li, “A mixed-coding adaptive differential evolution for optimising the architecture and parameters of feedforward neural networks,” Int. J. Sensor Netw., Vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 262–74, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Faramarzi, M. Heidarinejad, S. Mirjalili and A. H. Gandomi, “Marine predators algorithm: A nature-inspired metaheuristic,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 152, pp. 113377, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Nguyen, G. Nguyen and B. M. Nguyen, “Eo-cnn: an enhanced cnn model trained by equilibrium optimization for traffic transportation prediction,” Procedia. Comput. Sci., Vol. 176, pp. 800–9, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• S. Gupta, K. Deep and S. Mirjalili, “An efficient equilibrium optimizer with mutation strategy for numerical optimization,” Appl. Soft. Comput., Vol. 96, pp. 106542, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Połap and M. Woźniak, “Red fox optimization algorithm,” Expert. Syst. Appl., Vol. 166, pp. 114107, 2021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Pierezan, L. dos Santos Coelho, V. C. Mariani, E. H. de Vasconcelos Segundo and D. Prayogo, “Chaotic coyote algorithm applied to truss optimization problems,” Comput. Struct., Vol. 242, pp. 106353, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• G. Dhiman, D. Oliva, A. Kaur, K. K. Singh, S. Vimal, A. Sharma and K. Cengiz, “Bepo: A novel binary emperor penguin optimizer for automatic feature selection,” Knowl. Based. Syst., Vol. 211, pp. 106560, 2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-x. Shen et al., “Longitudinal radiomics algorithm of posttreatment computed tomography images for early detecting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation,” Transl. Oncol., Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 100866, 2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Khishe, M. Mosavi and M. Kaveh, “Improved migration models of biogeography-based optimization for sonar dataset classification by using neural network,” Applied Acoustics, Vol. 118, pp. 15–29, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. T. Pham, M. D. Nguyen, K.-T. T. Bui, I. Prakash, K. Chapi and D. T. Bui, “A novel artificial intelligence approach based on multi-layer perceptron neural network and biogeography-based optimization for predicting coefficient of consolidation of soil,” Catena, Vol. 173, pp. 302–11, 2019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Raju, V. M. Rao and B. P. Rao, “Grey wolf optimization-based artificial neural network for classification of kidney images,” Journal of Circuits, Systems and Computers, Vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 1–21, 2018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Ye, L. Yan, W. Cai and S. Pan, “Credit card fraud detection based on whale algorithm optimized bp neural network,” in 2018 13th International Conf. on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), IEEE, 2018, pp. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• S. Mirjalili, “Sca: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems,” Knowl. Based. Syst., Vol. 96, pp. 120–33, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. Sindhu, R. Ngadiran, Y. M. Yacob, N. A. H. Zahri and M. Hariharan, “Sine–cosine algorithm for feature selection with elitism strategy and new updating mechanism,” Neural Comput. Appl., Vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 2947–58, 2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Mudhsh, S. Xiong, M. A. El Aziz, A. E. Hassanien and P. Duan, “Hybrid swarm optimization for document image binarization based on otsu function,” CASA2017, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• S. Kaur and S. Prashar, “A novel sine cosine algorithm for the solution of unit commitment problem,” Int. J. Sci., Eng. Technol. Res., Vol. 5, pp. 3298–310, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• O. E. Turgut, “Hybrid chaotic quantum behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm for thermal design of plate fin heat exchangers,” Appl. Math. Model., Vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 50–69, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. K. Bharti and P. K. Singh, “Chaotic gradient artificial bee colony for text clustering,” Soft. Comput., Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1113–26, 2016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Zhang, S. Lin and W. Qiu, “A modified chaotic differential evolution algorithm for short-term optimal hydrothermal scheduling,” Int. J. Electrical Power Energy Syst., Vol. 65, pp. 159–68, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. R. Tizhoosh, “Opposition-based reinforcement learning,” J. Adv. Comput. Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 578–85, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• S. Saremi, S. Mirjalili and A. Lewis, “Biogeography-based optimisation with chaos,” Neural Comput. Appl., Vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1077–97, 2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar