Finite State Machine-Based Load Scheduling Algorithm for Smart Home Energy Management

References

• I. Khan, “Energy-saving behaviour as a demand-side management strategy in the developing world: the case of Bangladesh,” Int. J. Energy Environ. Eng., Vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 493–510, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s40095-019-0302-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Palensky, and D. Dietrich, “Demand side management: demand response, intelligent energy systems, and smart loads,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., Vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TII.2011.2158841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. Chen, X. Xiao, and C. Luo, “New technologies of active distribution network in smart grid,” ICEIEC 2013 – Proc. 2013 IEEE 4th Int. Conf. Electron. Inf. Emerg. Commun, no. 51277067, pp. 177–180, 2013. doi: 10.1109/ICEIEC.2013.6835481.
   Google Scholar
• Z. Xu, Y. Gao, M. Hussain, and P. Cheng, “Demand side management for smart grid based on smart home appliances with renewable energy sources and an energy storage system,” Math. Probl. Eng., Vol. 2020, pp. 14–22, 2020. doi: 10.1155/2020/9545439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.-H. Ng, N. G. B. Sheblt, and S. M. S, “Direct load control – a profit-based load management using linear programming,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 688–694, 1998. doi: 10.1109/59.667401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. F. C. Schweppe, B. Daryanian, and R. D. Tabors, “Algorithms for a spot price responding residential load controller,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 507–516, 1989. doi: 10.1109/59.193823.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Z. L. Mohammad Shahidehpour, and H. Yamin. Market operations in electric power systems: forecasting, scheduling, and risk management, vol. 40, no. 03. Wiley Interscience, 2002. DOI:10.5860/choice.40-1574.
   Google Scholar
• Z. N. Popovic, and D. S. Popovic, “Direct load control as a market-based program in deregulated power industries,” 2003 IEEE Bol. PowerTech – Conf. Proc, Vol. 3, no. April, pp. 4–7, 2003. doi: 10.1109/PTC.2003.1304491.
   Google Scholar
• B. Durga Hari Kiran, and M. Sailaja Kumari, “A hybrid game theoretic approach to generator bidding in energy and ancillary service markets,” Int. J. Renew. Energy Res., Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 68–79, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• M. Nasouri Gilvaei, and A. Baghramian, “A two-stage stochastic framework for an electricity retailer considering demand response and uncertainties using a hybrid clustering technique,” Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Electr. Eng., Vol. 43, pp. 541–558, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s40998-018-0150-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Logenthiran, D. Srinivasan, and T. Z. Shun, “Multi-agent system for demand side management in smart grid,” Proc. Int. Conf. Power Electron. Drive Syst., Vol. 0954, no. December, pp. 424–429, 2011. doi: 10.1109/PEDS.2011.6147283.
   Google Scholar
• B. Saravanan, “DSM in an area consisting of residential, commercial and industrial load in smart grid,” Front. Energy, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 211–216, 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11708-015-0351-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Z. S. Thillainathan Logenthiran, D. Srinivasan, and T. Z. Shun, “Demand side management in smart grid using heuristic optimization,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, Vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1244–1252, 2012. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2012.2195686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V. M. Niharika, “Day-ahead demand side management using symbiotic organisms search algorithm,” IIET Gener. Transm. Distrib., Vol. 12, no. 14, pp. 3487–3494, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TIA.2015.2413960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Zhejing Bao, Q. Zhou, Z. Yang, Q. Yang, and T. W. Lizhong Xu, and T. Wu, “A multi time-scale and multi energy-type coordinated microgrid scheduling solution – part I: model and methodology,” IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2257–2266, 2015. doi: 10.1109/TPWRS.2014.2367127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Wahid, and D. H. Kim, “An efficient approach for energy consumption optimization and management in residential building using artificial bee colony and fuzzy logic,” Math. Probl. Eng., Vol. 2016, pp. 1–13, 2016. doi: 10.1155/2016/9104735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Jian Chen, W. Zhang, J. Li, W. Zhang, Y. Liu, I. Bo Zhao, and Y. Zhang, “Optimal sizing for grid-tied microgrids with consideration of joint optimization of planning and operation,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 237–248, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2724583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Li, D. Xu, Z. Zhou, and W.-J. Lee, and B. Zhao, “Stochastic optimal operation of microgrid based on chaotic binary particle swarm optimization,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, Vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2016. doi: 10.1109/TSG.2015.2431072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Ebrahimi, M. Abedini, and M. M. Rezaei, “Optimal scheduling of distributed generations in microgrids for reducing system peak load based on load shifting,” Sustain. Energy Grids Netw., Vol. 23, pp. 100368, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.segan.2020.100368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G. A. Vouros, V. P. Kofinasa, and A. I. Dounisb, “Fuzzy Q-learning for multi-agent decentralized energy management in microgrids,” Appl. Energy, Vol. 219, no. December 2017, pp. 53–67, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.017.
   Google Scholar
• K. Wang, H. Li, S. Maharjan, Y. Zhang, and S. Guo, “Green energy scheduling for demand side management in the smart grid,” IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw., Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 596–611, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TGCN.2018.2797533.
   Google Scholar
• I. Dan Li, H. Sun, I. Wei-Yu Chiu, and H. Vincent, “Multiobjective optimization for demand side management program in smart grid,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., Vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1482–1490, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TII.2017.2776104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U. Asgher, M. B. Rasheed, and M. Awais, “Demand response benefits for load management through heuristic algorithm in smart grid,” RAEE 2018 Int. Symp. Recent Adv. Electr. Eng., 1–6, 2018. doi: 10.1109/RAEE.2018.8706886.
   Google Scholar
• C. Krause, et al., “Implementing a multi-level finite state machine with MATLAB simulink and stateflow in the environment of high-integrity aircraft controller software,” Proc. – 2018 4th Int. Conf. Control. Autom. Robot. ICCAR 2018, 147–151, 2018.
   Google Scholar