RETRACTED ARTICLE: Combination Weighting Method of Engineering Disciplines Evaluation Index Based on Soft Computing

References

• X. L. Li, “Change and enlightenment of subject evaluation index of ministry of education,” Univ. Educ., Vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1–3, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• C. Sun, “The realistic situation and orientation of discipline construction of nationalities colleges and universities under the background of “double tops” construction-based on the fourth round of discipline evaluation of ministry of education,” Res. Ethn. Educ., Vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 116–124, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• L. H. Jiang, J. P. Huang, H. J. Chen, and D. C. Zhou, “An international comparative study on the practice and influence of disciplinary evaluation system,” Degrees Grad. Educ., Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 72–77, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ujalambkar, and G. Chowdhary, “Allocation of channels over optical burst switching (OBS) networks in smart cities using integrated statistical techniques,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag .2021. DOI:10.1007/s13198-021-01435-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Khadka, “Teachers’ questioning: A survey of nepali schools,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Manag, Vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 333–340, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• S. Pradhan, G. Patel, and P. Priya, “Measuring customer lifetime value: application of analytic hierarchy process in determining relative weights of ‘lrfm’,” Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process, Vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 526–547, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• B. Meng, and G. Chi, “New combined weighting model based on maximizing the difference in evaluation results and Its application,” Math. Probl. Eng., Vol. 2015. Article ID 239634, pp. 9, 2015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. M. Li, M. Lu, X. Shu, K. Xu, and S. F. Pan, “Application of Combination Weighting Method in Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation on Water-saving Irrigation District,” Henan Sci., Vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 70–77, 2019..
   Google Scholar
• S. Qu, Y. Zheng, H. Yan, W. Deng, T. Liu, “Operational effectiveness evaluation of antimissile early warning based on combination weighted TOPSIS,” J. Phys: Conf. Ser., Vol. 1927, no. 1, pp. 12007, 2021. DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1927/1/012007
   Google Scholar
• F. Ding, Y. Men, J. S. Wang, H. Zuo, and B. Yao, “Construction and application of discipline evaluation index system in tertiary general hospital,” China Health Qual. Manag., Vol. 26, no. 04, pp. 41–44, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• H. Guan, F. Yang, and Q. Wang, “Study on evaluation index system of rubber materials for sealing,” Mater. Des., Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2404–2412, 2011. DOI:10.1016/j.matdes.2010.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. J. Klinke, “A multiscale systems perspective on cancer, immunotherapy, and interleukin-12,” Mol. Cancer, Vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 242, 2010. DOI:10.1186/1476-4598-9-242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• K. Boudt, M. W. Raza, and M. Wauters, “Evaluating the shariah-compliance of equity portfolios: The weighting method matters,” Int. Rev. Financial Anal., Vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 406–417, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• R. S. Qiu, J. F. Pan, J. Zhao, and X. D. Hui, “Efficiency evaluation algorithm of ELINT system based on combinatorial weighting,” Mod. Rad., Vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 13–18, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• L. F. Bertolucci, “Muscle repositioning: combining subjective and objective feedbacks in the teaching and practice of a reflex-based myofascial release technique,” Int. J. Ther. Massage. Bodywork., Vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 26–35, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• X. Liu, J. N. Li, C. X. Wang, J. W. Shi, Y. H. Li, X. Y. Cao, and J. Yu, “Feasibility analysis of the application of combination weighting method to the construction of disciplinary evaluation model in public hospitals,” Chin. Hosp. Manag., Vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 12–14, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cao, L. Yang, S. Guo, X. Xiao, W. G. Yu, and R. Jia, “Research on comprehensive benefit evaluation method of “coal to electricity” project based on combination weighting method,” Energy and Energy Conservation, Vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 66–70, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kaur, and S. Kadam, “Discovery of resources over cloud using MADM approaches,” Int. J. Eng. Model., Vol. 32, no. 2-4 Regular Issue, pp. 83–92, 2019. DOI:10.31534/engmod.2019.2-4.ri.02m.
   Google Scholar
• M. Kaur, and S. S. Kadam, “Discovery of resources using MADM approaches for parallel and distributed computing,” Engg Sc. Tech., Int. J, Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1013–1024, 2017. DOI:10.1016/j.jestch.2017.04.00.
   Google Scholar
• X. M. Yin, H. Y. Wang, J. Ding, H. Zhu, and X. G. Tan, “Evaluation method of distribution gridplanning based on maximum deviation and coefficient entropy,” Electr. Power Eng. Technol., Vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 51–59, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• L. Smolinsky, and A. J. Lercher, “Co-author weighting in bibliometric methodology and subfields of a scientific discipline,” J. Data Inf. Sci, Vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 84–96, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Y. Chang, C. Liu, M. Liu, W. Liu, Z. Liu, H. Zhang, and Y. Zheng, “Differentiation degree combination weighting method for investment decision-making risk assessment in power grid construction projects,” Glob. Energy Interconnect., Vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 466–478, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• I. A. Siradjuddin, R. P. Bahruddin, and M. K. Sophan, “Combination of term weighting and integrated color intensity co-occurrence matrix for two-level image retrieval on social media data,” Procedia. Comput. Sci., Vol. 157, pp. 329–336, 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2019.08.174
   Google Scholar
• B. Stensaker, “Balancing excellence and diversity in higher education? The role of the Chinese first-level discipline evaluation scheme,” Policy Rev. High. Educ., Vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 208–230, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• W. Zhang, and M. Kaur, “A novel QACS automatic extraction algorithm for extracting information in blockchain-based systems,” IETE. J. Res. 2022. DOI: 10.1080/03772063.2022.2030252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar