253
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The impact of subjective social status, inequality perceptions, and inequality tolerance on demand for redistribution. The case of a highly unequal society

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 125-148 | Received 04 Sep 2021, Accepted 11 Sep 2022, Published online: 12 Oct 2022

References

  • Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
  • Agresti, A. (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, No. 653. Wiley. doi: 10.1002/0471249688
  • Ahrens, L. (2019). Theorizing the impact of fairness perceptions on the demand for redistribution. Political Research Exchange, 1(1), 1–17. doi:10.1080/2474736X.2019.1617639
  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2009). Preferences for redistribution (National Bureau of Economic Research working paper no. 14825).
  • Alesina, A., & Giuliano, P. (2011). Preferences for redistribution. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. O. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1A, pp. 93–131). North-Holland Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53187-2.00004-8
  • Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2005). Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5–6), 897–931. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.05.009
  • Ardanaz, M. (2009). Preferences for redistribution in the land of inequalities. New York, NY: Columbia University. Mimeographed document.
  • Arfan, M., & Sherwani, R. (2017). Ordinal logit and multilevel ordinal logit models: An application on wealth index MICS-survey data. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operation Research, 13(1), 211–226. doi:10.18187/pjsor.v13i1.1801
  • Ari, E., & Yildiz, Z. (2014). Parallel lines assumption in ordinal logistic regression and analysis approaches. International Interdisciplinary Journal of Scientific Research, 1(3), 8–23.
  • Bénabou, R., & Ok, E. (2001). Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: The POUM hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 447–487. doi:10.1162/00335530151144078
  • Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., Lundberg, K. B., Kay, A. C., & Payne, B. K. (2015). Subjective social status shapes political preferences. Psychological Science, 26(1), 15–26. doi:10.1177/0956797614553947
  • Burger, R., Steenekamp, C., Van der Berg, S., & Zoch, A. (2015). The emergent middle-class in contemporary South Africa: Examining and comparing rival approaches. Development Southern Africa, 32(1), 25–40. doi:10.1080/0376835X.2014.975336
  • Bussolo, M., Ferrer‐I‐Carbonell, A., Giolbas, A., & Torre, I. (2021). I perceived therefore I demand: The formation of inequality perceptions and demand for redistribution. The Review of Income and Wealth, 67(4), 835–871. doi:10.1111/roiw.12497
  • Cantril, H. (1965). The pattern of human concerns. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  • Chen, Y., & Fan, X. (2015). Discordance between subjective and objective social status in contemporary China. The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 2(1), 1–20. doi:10.1186/s40711-015-0017-7
  • Choi, G. (2019). Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. European Journal of Political Economy, 58(2019), 220–244. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.12.004
  • Choi, G. (2021). Individuals’ socio-economic position, inequality perceptions, and redistributive preferences in OECD countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 19(2), 239–264. doi:10.1007/s10888-020-09471-6
  • Corneo, G., & Grüner, H. P. (2002). Individual preferences for political redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1), 83–107. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00172-9
  • Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., & Tetaz, M. (2013). Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 98(2013), 100–112. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2012.10.009
  • Duman, A. (2013). Beliefs, volatility and redistributive preferences across developing countries. The Developing Economies, 51(2), 203–218. doi:10.1111/deve.12011
  • Duman, A. (2019). Subjective social class and individual preferences for redistribution: Cross-country empirical analysis. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(2), 173–189. doi:10.1108/IJSE-06-2019-0377
  • Evans, M. D. R., & Kelley, J. (2004). Subjective social location: Data from 21 nations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 16(1), 3–38. doi:10.1093/ijpor/16.1.3
  • Fatke, M. (2018). Inequality perceptions, preferences conducive to redistribution, and the conditioning role of social position. Societies, 8(4), 99. doi:10.3390/soc8040099
  • Georgiadis, A., & Manning, A. (2012). Spend it like Beckham? Inequality and redistribution in the UK, 1983–2004. Public Choice, 151(3–4), 537–563. doi:10.1007/s11127-010-9758-7
  • Gimpelson, V., & Treisman, D. (2018). Misperceiving inequality. Economics & Politics, 30(1), 27–54. doi:10.1111/ecpo.12103
  • Goldman, N., Cornman, J. C., & Chang, M. C. (2006). Measuring subjective social status: a case study of older Taiwanese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 21(1–2), 71–89. doi:10.1007/s10823-006-9020-4
  • Goodman, E., Adler, N. E., Kawachi, I., Frazier, A. L., Huang, B., & Colditz, G. A. (2001). Adolescents’ perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics, 108(2), E31. doi:10.1542/peds.108.2.e31
  • Greene, W. H. (1991). Econometric analysis. Collier Macmillan. ISBN 10: 0023463902.
  • Gründler, K., & Köllner, S. (2017). Determinants of governmental redistribution: income distribution, development levels, and the role of perceptions. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(4), 930–962. doi:10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.007
  • Guillaud, E. (2013). Preferences for redistribution: An empirical analysis over 33 countries. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 57–78. doi:10.1007/s10888-011-9205-0
  • Human Sciences Research Council (2009). South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) 2009: Questionnaire 1 – All provinces (SASAS 2009 Q1. Version 1.0) [Data set]. Human Sciences Research Council. http://dx.doi.org/10.14749/1400837015
  • Karadja, M., Mollerstrom, J., & Seim, D. (2017). Richer (and Holier) Than Thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 99(2), 201–212. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00623
  • Kelley, J., & Zagorski, K. (2004). Economic change and the legitimation of economic inequality: the transformation from socialism to the free market in central-eastern Europe. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 22, 319–364. doi:10.1016/S0276-5624(04)22011-X
  • Kenworthy, L., & McCall, L. (2007). Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 35–68. doi:10.1093/ser/mwm006
  • Kim, H., & Lee, Y. (2018). Socio-economic status, perceived inequality of opportunity, and attitudes towards redistribution. The Social Science Journal, 55(3), 300–312. doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2018.01.008
  • Knell, M., & Stix, H. (2020). Perceptions of inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101927. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101927
  • Kuhn, A. (2011). In the eye of the beholder: Subjective inequality measures and individual assessment of market justice. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(4), 625–641. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.06.002
  • Kuhn, A. (2015). The subversive nature of inequality: subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality (IZA Discussion Paper No. 9406). Institute for the Study of Labor. https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp9406.html
  • Kuhn, A. (2019). The subversive nature of inequality: Subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. European Journal of Political Economy, 59(2019), 331–344. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2019.04.004
  • Leibbrandt, M., Wegner, E., & Finn, A. (2011). The policies for reducing income inequality and poverty in South Africa (SALDRU Working Paper No. 64). SALDRU, University of Cape Town. http://hdl.handle.net/11090/79
  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Sage Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/regression-models-for-categorical-and-limited-dependent-variables/book6071
  • Mahmood, T., Yu, X., & Klasen, S. (2019). Do the poor really feel poor? Comparing objective poverty with subjective poverty in Pakistan. Social Indicators Research, 142(2), 543–580. doi:10.1007/s11205-018-1921-4
  • McCarty, N., & Pontusson, J. (2009). The political economy of inequality and redistribution. In W. Salverda, B. Nolan, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of economic inequality (pp. 665–692). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199606061.013.0026
  • Meltzer, A. H., & Richard, S. F. (1981). A rational theory of the size of government. Journal of Political Economy, 89(5), 914–927. doi:10.1086/261013
  • Merrino, S. (2020). Measuring labour earnings inequality in post-apartheid South Africa (WIDER Working Paper No. 2020/32). UNU-WIDER. https://www.wider.unu.edu/publication/measuring-labour-earnings-inequality-post-apartheid-south-africa
  • Mosimann, N., & Pontusson, J. (2014). Bounded communities of solidarity: Union membership and support for redistribution in contemporary Europe (Working Paper). University of Geneva.
  • Must, E. (2016). When and how does inequality cause conflict? Group dynamics, perceptions and natural resources [Unpublished doctoral thesis]. The London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).
  • Niehues, J. (2014). Subjective perceptions of inequality and redistributive preferences: An international comparison (Discussion paper). Cologne Institute for Economic Research.
  • Nqwane, S., Bila, S., Kirsten, F., & Arogundade, S. (2021). Perceived and tolerated inequality in South Africa. The Journal of Developing Areas, 55(3), 79–93. doi:10.1353/jda.2021.0053
  • Olivera, J. (2015). Preferences for redistribution in Europe. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 4(1). doi:10.1186/s40174-015-0037-y
  • Ostrove, J. M., Adler, N. E., Kuppermann, M., & Washington, A. E. (2000). Objective and subjective assessments of socioeconomic status and their relationship to self-rated health in an ethnically diverse sample of pregnant women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 613–618. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.613
  • Pellicer, M., Piraino, P., & Wegner, E. (2019). Perceptions of inevitability and demand for redistribution: Evidence from a survey experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 159(2019), 274–288. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2017.12.013
  • Piketty, T. (1995). Social mobility and redistributive politics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110 (3), 551–584. doi:10.2307/2946692
  • Posel, D. R., & Casale, D. M. (2011). Relative standing and subjective well-being in South Africa: The role of perceptions, expectations and income mobility. Social Indicators Research, 104 (2), 195–223. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9740-2
  • Roberts, B. J. (2014). Your place or mine? Beliefs about inequality and redress preferences in South Africa. Social Indicators Research, 118(3), 1167–1190. doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0458-9
  • Schmidt-Catran, A. W. (2016). Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Economic Review, 14(1), 119–140. doi:10.1093/ser/mwu030
  • Schröder, M. (2017). Is income inequality related to tolerance for inequality? Social Justice Research, 30(1), 23–47. doi:10.1007/s11211-016-0276-8
  • Singh-Manoux, A., Adler, N. E., & Marmot, M. G. (2003). Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. Social Science & Medicine, 56(6), 1321–1333. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00131-4
  • Sosnaud, B., Brady, D., & Frenk, S. M. (2013). Class in name only: Subjective class identity, objective class position, and vote choice in American Presidential Elections. Social Problems, 60(1), 81–99. http://www.tinyurl.com/yy9oxpqk
  • Tay, T. C. (2013). Tolerance for income inequality and redistributive preferences: Cross-nation and multilevel perspectives [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California.
  • Wegner, E., & Pellicer, M. (2011). Demand for redistribution in South Africa. Paper Prepared for the Special IARIW-SSA Conference on Measuring National Income, Wealth, Poverty, and Inequality in African Countries Cape Town, South Africa.
  • Williams, R. A., & Quiroz, C. (2019). Ordinal regression models. In P. Atkinson, S. Delamont, A. Cernat, J. W. Sakshaug, & R. A. Williams (Eds.), SAGE Research Methods Foundations. https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036885901
  • Willis, G. B., Rodrıguez-Bailon, R., Lopez-Rodrıguez, L., & Garcıa-Sanchez, E. (2015). Legitimacy moderates the relation between perceived and ideal economic inequalities. Social Justice Research, 28(4), 493–508. doi:10.1007/s11211-015-0253-7
  • Wittenberg, M. (2017). Wages and wage inequality in South Africa 1994–2011: Part 2 – Inequality measurement and trends. South African Journal of Economics, 85(2), 298–318. doi:10.1111/saje.12147
  • World Bank (2018). Overcoming poverty and inequality in South Africa, an assessment of drivers, constraints and opportunities. World Bank Group. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/530481521735906534/Overcoming-Poverty-and-Inequality-in-South-Africa-An-Assessment-of-Drivers-Constraints-and
  • Yamamura, E. (2016). Social conflict and redistributive preferences among rich and poor: Testing the hypothesis of Acemoglu and Robinson. Journal of Applied Economics, 19(1), 41–63. doi:10.1016/S1514-0326(16)30002-2

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.