Repossession through sharing of and access to seeds: different cases and practices

References

• Aistara, G.A., 2011. Seeds of kin, kin of seeds: the commodification of organic seeds and social relations in Costa Rica and Latvia. Ethnography, 12 (4), 490–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almekinders, C., Louwaars, N., and De Bruijn, G., 1994. Local seed systems and their importance for an improved seed supply in developing countries. Euphytica, 78 (3), 207–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assadi, M., 2002. Globalisation and the state: interrogating the farmers’ movement in India. Journal of social and economic development, 4 (1), 42–54.
   Google Scholar
• Boettiger, S., and Wright, B.D., 2006. Open source in biotechnology: open questions innovations case discussion: CAMBIA-BiOS. Innovations: technology, governance, globalization 1 (4): 45–57.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1985. The social space and the genesis of groups. Theory and society, 14 (6), 723–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 1989. Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory, 7 (1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, J., 2008. The public domain: enclosing the commons of the mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, H., 2009. Breaking new ground in food regime theory: corporate environmentalism, ecological feedbacks and the ‘food from somewhere’ regime? Agriculture and human values, 26 (4), 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, K.J. and Brush, S.B., 2010. Geographic influences on maize seed exchange in the Bajío, Mexico. The professional geographer, 62 (3), 305–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christinck, A., 2002. This seed is like ourselves. A case study from rajasthan, India, on the social aspects of biodiversity and farmers’ management of pearl millet seed. Weikersheim, Germany: Margraf Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, B. and York, R., 2005. Carbon metabolism: global capitalism, climate change, and the biospheric rift. Theory and society, 34 (4), 391–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clausen, R. and Clark, B., 2005. The metabolic rift and marine ecology an analysis of the ocean crisis within capitalist production. Organization & environment, 18 (4), 422–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coomes, O.T., 2010. Of stakes, stems, and cuttings: the importance of local seed systems in traditional Amazonian societies. The professional geographer, 62 (3), 323–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, S., 2012. Rice in Odisha. IRRI Technical Bulletin No.16. Los Banos, Philipines: International Rice Research Institute, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Deibel, E., 2013. Open variety rights: rethinking the commodification of plants. Journal of agrarian change, 13 (2), 282–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demeulenaere, E., 2014. A political ontology of seeds: the transformative frictions of a farmers’ movement in Europe. Focaal, 2014 (69), 45–61.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A., 1998. Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, conservation, and the political ecology of social movements. Journal of political ecology, 5 (1), 53–82.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, D., 2003. Spatialities of transnational resistance to globalization: the maps of grievance of the inter-continental caravan. Transactions of the institute of British geographers, 28 (4), 404–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J.B., 1999. Marx’s theory of metabolic rift: classical foundations for environmental sociology. American journal of sociology, 105 (2), 366–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gadgil, M. and Guha, R., 1994. Ecological conflicts and the environmental movement in India. Development and change, 25, 101–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J., 2006. Finding the spaces for change: a power analysis. IDS bulletin, 37 (6), 23–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graddy, T.G., 2013. Regarding biocultural heritage: in situ political ecology of agricultural biodiversity in the Peruvian Andes. Agriculture and human values, 30 (4), 587–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, D. 2013. Encroached commons: politics of seeds. In: Commners And The Changing Commons: Livelihoods, Environmental Security, And Shared Knowledge, The Fourteenth Biennial Conference Of The International Association For The Study Of The Commons, Mt. Fuji, Japan, 3-5 June, Digital Library of The Commons. https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/8904/GUPTA_1138.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C., 2003. When nature goes public: the making and unmaking of bioprospecting in Mexico. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R.J. 2005. Miracle seeds, suicide seeds, and the poor. In: R. Ray and M.F. Katzenstein (eds.) Social movements in India: poverty, power, and politics. Lanham, Boulder, New York, Tornoto, Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 203–232.
   Google Scholar
• Hope, J., 2008. Biobazaar: the open source revolution and biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jardhari, V., 1998. Involving farmers in the on farm conservation of crop genetic resources: a history of save the seeds’ movement in Garhwal, Indian Himalayas. In: T. Partap and B. Sthapit (eds.) Managing agrobiodiversity: farmers’ changing perspectives and institutional responses in the HKH region. Kathmandu, Nepal: ICIMOD, 351–353.
   Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J., 2010. Impeding dispossession, enabling repossession: biological open source and the recovery of seed sovereignty. Journal of agrarian change, 10 (3), 367–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloppenburg, J., 2014. Re-purposing the master’s tools: the open source seed initiative and the struggle for seed sovereignty. The journal of peasant studies, 41 (6), 1225–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., 1994. Reviving diversity in India’s agriculture. Seedling, 14, 1–4. https://www.grain.org/article/entries/514-reviving-diversity-in-india-s-agriculture [Accessed 14th January 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Kumbamu, A., 2009. Subaltern strategies and autonomous community building: a critical analysis of the network organization of sustainable agriculture initiatives in Andhra Pradesh. Community development journal, 44, 336–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, T., 1999. General public license for plant germplasm: A proposal by Tom michaels. Paper presented at the bean improvement cooperative conference, Calgary, Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, J.W., 2000. Environmental crises and the metabolic rift in world-historical perspective. Organization & environment, 13 (2), 123–157.
   Google Scholar
• Oakley, E. and Momsen, J.H., 2007. Women and seed management: a study of two villages in Bangladesh. Singapore journal of tropical geography, 28 (1), 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patnaik, A. 2016. Seeds as biosocial commons: an analysis of various practices in India. Wageningen: Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Pautasso, M., et al., 2013. Seed exchange networks for agrobiodiversity conservation. A review. Agronomy for sustainable development, 33 (1), 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploeg, J., 2010. The peasantries of the twenty-first century: the commoditisation debate revisited. The journal of peasant studies, 37 (1), 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanna, A. & Smale, M., 2004. Rights and access to plant genetic resources under India’s New Law. Development policy review, 22 (4), 423–442.
   Google Scholar
• Ruivenkamp, G., 2015. Seeds: from commodities towards commons. In Possession of A. Patnaik, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Salleh, A., 2010. From metabolic rift to “metabolic value”: reflections on environmental sociology and the alternative globalization movement. Organization & environment, 23 (2), 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiva, V., 1988. Staying alive: women, ecology and development. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V., 1991. The violence of green revolution: third world agriculture, ecology and politics. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V., 2005. Earth democracy: justice, sustainability and peace. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. and Jafri, A.H., 2003. Failure of the GMOs in India. Research foundation for science, technology and ecology report. Available from: http://www.mindfully.org/GE/2003/India-GMO-Failure-Shiva31may03.htm [Accessed 15 Feb 2012].
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V., et al., 2000. Seeds of suicide: the ecological and human costs of globalisation of agriculture. Delhi: Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, V., 1998. Traditional biodiversity management strategies in the mountains: farmers’ experimentation in Garhwal Himalaya’. In: Mountain ecosystems: a scenario of unsustainability. New Delhi: Indus, 25–66.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, R.B., 2000. Environmental consequences of agricultural development: a case study from the Green revolution state of Haryana, India. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 82 (1), 97–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaminathan, M.S., 1996. Sustainable agriculture: towards an evergreen revolution. Delhi: Konark Publishers PVT. Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Visvanathan, S. and Parmar, C., 2002. A biotechnology story: notes from India. Economic and political weekly, 37 (27), 2714–2724.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, H., 2009. Reworking the metabolic rift: La Vía campesina, agrarian citizenship, and food sovereignty. The journal of peasant studies, 36 (4), 805–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R.K., 2013. Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations. Evaluation, 19 (3), 321–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, K.S., 1996. Changing fortunes: biodiversity and peasant livelihood in the Peruvian Andes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar