Ambivalence of official statistics: some theoretical-methodological notes

References

• Agnoli, S. and Parra Saiani, P., eds., 2016. Sulle tracce di big data. Questioni di metodo e percorsi di ricerca. Monographic issue: Sociologia e ricerca sociale, 37, 109.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso, W. and Starr, P., 1987. The politics of numbers. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Antonelli, F. and Rossi, E., 2014. Homo dignus. Cittadinanza, democrazia e diritti in un mondo in trasformazione. Padova: CEDAM.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., 1977. Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., 1985. About science. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, B., Bloor, D., and Henry, J., 1996. Scientific knowledge: a sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, A., Osborne, T., and Rose, N., 1996. Foucault and political reason. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 2001. Science de la science et réflexivité. Cours du Collège de France 2000–2001. Paris: Éditions Raisons d’Agir.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., 2012. Sur l’État: Cours au Collège de France (1989–1992). Paris: Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M., 1983. The methodology of early social indicator research: William fielding Ogburn and ‘recent social trends’, 1933. Social Indicators Research, 13 (2), 109–130. doi: 10.1007/BF00344087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, G., Gordon, C., and Miller, P., eds., 1991. The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Butera, F., 2008. Il castello e la rete. Impresa, organizzazioni e professioni. Milano: Franco Angeli.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, C., 2011. Robert K. Merton: sociology of science and sociology as science. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Camic, C. and Gross, N.G., 2001. The new sociology of ideas. In: J.R. Blau, ed. The Blackwell companion to sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 236–249.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A., 1993. La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A., 2008. L’Argument statistique. Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification (tome I) et Gouverner par les nombres (tome II). Paris: Presses de l’école des Mines.
   Google Scholar
• Durkheim, É., 1897. Le Suicide. Paris: Alcan.
   Google Scholar
• Espeland, W.N. and Sauder, M., 2007. Rankings and reactivity: how public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113 (1), 1–40. doi: 10.1086/517897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner, A., 1957–1958. Cosmopolitans and locals: toward an analysis of latent social roles. Administrative Science Quartely, 1, 281–306. doi: 10.2307/2391000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 1985. Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I., 1999. The social construction of what? Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1987. Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., 1999. Pandora’s hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. and Woolgar, S., 1986. Laboratory life: the construction of scientific facts. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, P., 1961. Notes on the history of quantification in sociology. Trends, Sources and Problems. History of Science Society, 52 (2), 277–333.
   Google Scholar
• de Leonardis, O. and Neresini, F., 2015. Introduzione. Il potere dei grandi numeri. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3-4, 371–378.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1984. Soziale Systeme. Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Marlié, D., 2004. Pistes de recherche pour une sociologie des statistiques du suicide. Note sur ‘Anti- ou anté-durkheimisme. Revue européenne des sciences sociales, [En ligne], XLII-129 | 2004, mis en ligne le 01 mars 2004, consulté le 13 octobre 2016. Available from: http://ress.revues.org/417
   Google Scholar
• Mazzotti, M., 2015. Per una sociologia degli algoritmi. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3-4, 465–478.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R.K., 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Neresini, F., 2015. Quando i numeri diventano grandi: che cosa possiamo imparare dalla scienza. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 3-4, 379–404.
   Google Scholar
• Paiva Rio Camargo, A., 2009. The sociology of statistics: the possibilities of a new field of investigation. Hist. cienc. saude-Manguinhos, 16 (4), 134–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, T.M., 1995. Trust in numbers. Princenton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quetelet, A., 1835. Sur l’homme et le développement de ses facultés, ou essai de Statistique sociale, 2 voll. Paris: Bachelier.
   Google Scholar
• Rahkonen, K. and Roos, J.P., 1993. The field of intellectuals: the case of Finland. International Journal of Contemporary Sociology, 30, 178–198.
   Google Scholar
• Ringer, F., 1990. The intellectual field, intellectual history, and the sociology of knowledge. Theory and Society, 19, 209–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritzer, G., 2014. The mcdonaldization of society. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rodotà, S., 2013. Il diritto di avere diritti. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Saetnan, R.S., Lomell, H.M., and Hammer, S., 2011. The mutual construction of statistics and society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Santambrogio, A., 2008. Introduzione alla sociologia. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
   Google Scholar
• Savage, M. and Burrows, R., 2007. The coming crisis of empirical sociology. Sociology, 41 (5), 885–899. doi: 10.1177/0038038507080443
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A., 1985. Commodities and capabilities. 1st ed. New York, NY: North-Holland Sole distributors for the U.S.A. and Canada: Elsevier Science Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, E.U., 1979. Agenda-setting and mass communication theory. International Communication Gazette, 25, 96–105. doi: 10.1177/001654927902500203
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, G., 1908. Der Arme. In: Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung.
   Google Scholar
• Supiot, A., 2015. La Gouvernance par les nombres. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., 1984. Rules and implements: investment in forms. Social Science Information, 23 (1), 1–45. doi: 10.1177/053901884023001001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., 1997. Cognition et information en société, codirection avec B. Conein, Ed. de l’EHESS (Raisons Pratiques 8).
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., 2010. Autorità e poteri alla prova della critica. L’oppressione del governo orientato all’obiettivo. Rassegna Italiana di Sociologia, 4, 627–660.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. and Desrosières, A., 1988. Les catégories socioprofessionnelle. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Touraine, A., 1992. Critique de la modernité. Paris: Fayard.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M., 1922. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, M., 2006. Teorie delle comunicazione di massa. Milano: Bompiani.
   Google Scholar