Social networks of knowledge production in Brazilian psychology: comparing sub-areas

References

• Andrade, M. T. T., Braga, P., Carneiro, T. K. G., Ribeiro, N. M., Moret, M. A., & Pereira, H. B. B. (2014). Contextualized analysis of social networks: Collaboration in scientific communities. Social Networking, 3, 71–79. doi: 10.4236/sn.2014.32009
   Google Scholar
• Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate? Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239. doi: 10.1002/asi.20684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blickle, G., Schneider, P. B., Liu, Y., & Ferris, G. R. (2011). A predictive investigation of reputation as mediator of the political-skill/career-success relationship. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(12), 3026–3048. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00862.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2002). Netdraw software for network visualization. Lexington, KY: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bulgacov, S., & Verdu, F. C. (2001). Redes de pesquisadores da área de administração: Um estudo exploratório [Social networks of researchers in business management: An exploratory study]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, Special issue, 5, 163–182. doi: 10.1590/S1415-65552001000500009
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (2015). Reinforced structural holes. Social Networks, 43, 149–161. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2015.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Z. J., Zhang, X., & Vogel, D. (2011). Exploring the underlying processes between conflict and knowledge sharing: A work-engagement perspective. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(5), 1005–1033. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00745.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico. (2012). Produtividade em pesquisa - PQ [Productivity in research – RP]. Brasília: C.N.Pq., Ministry of Science and Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2007). Relatório da avaliação trienal de 2007 - resultados finais [Report of the triennial evaluation of 2007 – final results]. Brasília: C.A.P.E.S., Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2010). Plano nacional de pós-graduação - PNPG 2011-2020 [Brazilian Plan of Post-graduation – 2011-2020]. Brasília: C.A.P.E.S./Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2016). Avaliação trienal de 2016 – Documento de área: Psicologia [Triennial evaluation of 2016 – Document of area: Psychology]. Brasília: C.A.P.E.S., Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior. (2017). GEOC.A.P.E.S. - Sistema de Informações Georreferenciadas. Retrieved from http://geocapes.capes.gov.br/geocapes2/
   Google Scholar
• Corradi, A. A., & Neiva, E. R. (2008, October). As redes sociais de pesquisadores como mecanismo para desenvolvimento da ciência psicológica [Social networks of researchers as a mechanism to develop the psychological science]. Research report presented at the XXXVIII Annual Meeting of Psychology, Uberlândia, Brazil, Uberlândia: Sociedade Brasileira de Psicologia.
   Google Scholar
• Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities (1st ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cross, R., and Prusak, L. 2002. The people who make organizations go - or stop. Harvard Business Review, 6, 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• DiCrecchio, N. C. (2016). An examination of research collaboration in psychometrics utilizing social network analysis methods (Doctoral Dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Dolnicar, S., & Leisch, F. (2012). One legacy of Mazanec: Binary questions are a simple, stable and valid measure of evaluative beliefs. International Journal of Culture, Tourism and Hospitality Research, 6(4), 316–325. doi: 10.1108/17506181211265059
   Google Scholar
• Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence (1st ed.). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Gallegos, M., Berra, M., Benito, E., & López López, W. (2014). Las nuevas dinámicas del conocimiento científico y su impacto en la psicología Latinoamericana [The new dynamics of scientific knowledge and their impacts on the Latin American psychology]. Psicoperspectivas, 13(3), 106–117. Retrieved from http://www.psicoperspectivas.cl doi: 10.5027/psicoperspectivas-Vol13-Issue3-fulltext-377
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, J., & Laudel, G. (2016). Governing science. European Journal of Sociology, 57, 117–168. doi: 10.1017/S0003975616000047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, B., & Miller, J. (1970). Networks of informal communication among scientifically productive scientists. In C. E. Nelson & D. D. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (1st ed., pp. 125–140). Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hagstrom, W. O. (1965). The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved from http://www.faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/
   Google Scholar
• Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• I.B.M. (2011). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J., & Matell, M. S. (1971). The three-point Likert scales are good enough. Journal of Marketing Research, 8(4), 495–500. doi: 10.2307/3150242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jovanovic, G. (2010). Historizing epistemology in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44(4), 310–328. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9132-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1–18. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khun, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1982). Network analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Krantz, D. L. (1972). Schools and systems: The mutual isolation of operant and non-operant psychology as a case study. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 8(1), 86–102. doi: 10.1002/1520-6696(197201)8:1<86::AID-JHBS2300080104>3.0.CO;2-B
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maggioni, M. A., & Uberti, T. E. (2009). Knowledge networks across Europe: Which distance matters? The Annals of Regional Science, 43, 691–720. doi: 10.1007/s00168-008-0254-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melo, D., & Serva, M. (2014). A agenda do professor-pesquisador em Administração: Uma análise baseada na sociologia da ciência [The agenda of the professor-researcher in Administration: an analysis based on sociology of scientific knowledge]. Cadernos EBAPE, 12(3), 619–632.
   Google Scholar
• Merluzzi, J., & Burt, R. S. (2013). How many names are enough? Identifying network effects with the least set of listed contacts. Social Networks, 35, 331–337. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2013.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moody, J. (2004). The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review, 69, 213–238. doi: 10.1177/000312240406900204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neiva, E., & Corradi, A. A. (2008, May). A pesquisa de redes sociais de pesquisadores no Brasil: Primeiros resultados [Research on social networks of researchers in Brazil: Initial results]. Research report presented at XII Symposium of Research and Scientific Interchange, Natal, Brazil. Natal: Associação Nacional de Pesquisa e Pós-graduação em Psicologia.
   Google Scholar
• Neiva, E., Fussi, C. C., & Corradi, A. A. (2016). Relações entre produtividade acadêmica e redes sociais entre pesquisadores da Ciência Psicológica [Relationship between academic productivity and social networks of Psychology researchers]. Estudos de Psicologia (Campinas), 33(1), 83–94. doi: 10.1590/1982-02752016000100009
   Google Scholar
• Newman, M. E. J. (2004). Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 5200–5205. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307545100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partha, D., & David, P. A. (1994). Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487–521. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(94)01002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Población, D. A., & Noronha, D. P. (2002). Produção das literaturas “branca” e “cinzenta” pelos docentes/doutores dos programas de pós-graduação em ciência da informação no Brasil [Production of the ‘white’ and ‘grey’ literatures by scholars in post-graduation programs in information science in Brazil]. Ciência da Informação, 31(2), 98–106.
   Google Scholar
• Rossoni, L., & Graeml, A. (2009). A influência da imersão institucional e regional na cooperação entre pesquisadores no Brasil [The influence of institutional and regional immersion on cooperation between researchers in Brazil]. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales, 16(9), 228–249.
   Google Scholar
• Rossoni, L., & Guarido-Filho, E. R. (2009). Cooperação entre programas de pós-graduação em administração no Brasil: Evidências estruturais em quatro áreas temáticas [Scientific cooperation among graduate programs in the field of business in Brazil: Structural evidence in four thematic areas]. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13(3), 366–390. doi: 10.1590/S1415-65552009000300003
   Google Scholar
• Schmaus, W. (2014). The concept of social location in the sociology of knowledge. Trad. A. B. Massella. Tempo Social, 26(2), 39–56. doi: 10.1590/S0103-20702014000200003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotti, C. M., & Luna, I. V. (2014). La resistencia al programa fuerte en la sociología del conocimiento: la asepsia científica y la amenaza del relativismo [Resistance to the Strong Program in the Sociology of Knowledge: Scientific Asepsis and the Threat of Relativism]. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales, 59(221), 77–97. doi: 10.1016/S0185-1918(14)70816-5
   Google Scholar
• Sousa-Lima, M., Michel, J. W., & Caetano, A. (2013). Clarifying the importance of trust in organizations as a component of effective work relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(2), 418–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2013.01012.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, O. H., & Tourinho, E. Z. (2007). Área de avaliação: Psicologia [Area of evaluation: Psychology]. Retrieved from http://www.capes.gov.br/component/content/article/44-avaliacao/4681-psicologia
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto, O. H., Tourinho, E. Z., Bastos, A. V. B., & Menandro, P. R. M. (2012). Produção científica e “produtivismo”: há alguma luz no final do túnel? [Scientific publishing and “academic productivism”: is there any light at end of the tunnel?]. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, 9(18), 727–750.
   Google Scholar